Categories
The Editor's Desk

Letters to the editor

More free for you

Thanks for mentioning the Jefferson-Madison Regional Library in your article “Something for nothing” [January 3]. The Monticello Avenue Computer Lab is indeed a wonderful place to get free Internet access. Your readers might also like to know that Central Library has free wireless service for those patrons carrying around their laptop.

   Yes, it is true that Ninja Yoga meets in Central Library’s McIntire Meeting Room. There are also lots of other nonprofit and community organizations that meet in the library’s three meeting rooms. All meetings are free and open to the public and everyone’s invited to check them out and learn what is going on in our community.

   We also encourage everyone to use the library’s free online databases that give access to thousands of magazines and news sources. The databases are available 24 hours a day from home, work, or school. All you need to use them is a library card—and that is also free.

 

John Halliday

halliday@jmrl.org

 

The writer is director of the Jefferson-Madison Regional Library

 

Cheap attempt

How tragic that your cover article “Something for nothing” suggests that the way to do so in Charlottesville is to mooch off the rich. As a single mom, longtime C’villian and deranged bargain hunter, I eagerly opened to this article touting “frugal tips” thinking I’d find valuable advice from a trusted source. The only “value” I found was a few references to local businesses—commendable—though you sadly miss many opportunities on this front.

   Instead, you recommend stealing food and entertainment from major hotels. Never mind that hardworking people making the food in these hotels have to fight for a living wage. Why not use that energy spent “running from the guards” to work for their cause? Especially since most of them don’t have laptops, much less time to drive around looking for unsecured wi-fi like your so-called poor person does. Same goes for Darden. Maybe it’s naïve to think that a few dollars saved on pilfered coffee might trickle down to UVA’s working class, but at least it’s an example of, well, thinking. And in addition to jobs, Darden and the School of Law bring educated diversity to our community—for that priceless gift, I’m glad to let them keep their own coffee.

   Your article is directed at people who either “make minimum wage” (although, as I point out, not so useful for them), or who are “too busy writing experimental theater to go to work.” What about the huge number of us who have decent jobs, work hard and still can’t afford to live in this town? For those, I’d like to point out the many coupon books on sale from organizations such as Hospice, the Boy Scouts, etc., wherein you can find amazing deals on everything from free fancy meals to oil changes (from friendly local mechanics to boot!). Sure you have to shell out a bit (a little planning involved here—like keeping track of hotel guards’ schedules). But then you save hundreds. Best of all, you can be a cheapskate and do right in the world!

   I have long despaired in he influx of fluffy money into this town, and its effect. (How many lipstick and gelato stores does one town need in two blocks? Although we could use more family diners.) I welcome folks with less money and more good ideas (cheapskates, we call them). But the kind you describe should not be welcome in any self-respecting town.

Megan Gillespie

Charlottesville

 

 

Nothing’s wrong with “Nothing”

Erika Howsare’s article “Something for nothing: 12 ways to beat the system” was comic relief in an overpriced town. To add to Ms. Howsare’s sage advice, travel aboard the free trolley is climate controlled for year-round comfort and follows a route convenient to many of the locations mentioned in the article. Also, using a free computer in the library, you can join freecycle.org and find Charlottesville in “US Southern Groups.” This is the best local resource for all kinds of free stuff (and you can give your stuff away too). Now, does anyone know what to do about the high housing costs? 

Janette Martin

Charlottesville

 

 

Goal oriented

It is my understanding that UVA charges for admission to men’s and women’s soccer matches. There are still a large number of sports at UVA that do not charge admission. Those sports alone could make an interesting article. 

Gary Westmoreland

Schuyler

Categories
News

VIRGINIA’S NEWEST BATTLEGROUND

David Toscano is in for a change of pace. Until now, the former City mayor has mastered the art of compromise in Charlottesville, Virginia’s haven for left-leaning, latté-drinking, Volvo-driving Democratic voters. This week, however, the new 57th District delegate is one of 140 legislators in Virginia’s General Assembly. While the General Assembly is in session for two months that began on January 11, Toscano will be doing business with the state’s powerful conservative faction—a group that sees compromise as weakness and thinks Charlottesville might as well be San Francisco.

   Nowhere do the values of city voters conflict more deeply with state conservatives than in the arena of reproductive rights. As in recent years, 2006 will bring another flurry of bills [see sidebar, p. 19] that strive to limit women’s access to abortion, birth control and scientific information about sex.

   “There’s going to be a lot of them this year,” Toscano says. As a member of the courts committee, Toscano will have more influence on those bills than most freshman delegates. “You don’t want to pre-judge any bill, but my general approach is that abortion ought to be safe, legal and used rarely.” Most votes on abortion bills follow party lines, and, as Toscano says, “right now the Republicans have the numbers.”

   Meanwhile, much of the focus on reproductive rights is aimed at the Supreme Court. Currently, nominee Samuel Alito—who has a history of supporting abortion restrictions and questioning whether abortion should be legal at all—seems to be cruising through his hearings. Along with the ascension of another conservative, John Roberts, to the position of Supreme Court chief justice, the Alito hearings have prompted much speculation about whether conservatives could finally overturn the Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade that protects a woman’s right to abortion.

   Alito’s confirmation hearings currently top the headlines, even though the really important battles over reproductive freedom are being fought in statehouses like the General Assembly in Richmond. Supreme Court justices can remove federal protections for reproductive rights. If that happens, it will be up to the General Assembly to set Virginia’s policy on abortion rights.

   “There’s a lot of concern about the Supreme Court,” says Ann O’Hanlon, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia. “A lot of people put their attention on the federal stage when it comes to reproductive rights, but the real drama is happening in the states.

   “The states are the laboratories for new restrictions,” O’Hanlon says. “The Supreme Court tells the states how far they can go. It’s your home state’s laws that affect what you can and cannot do.”

   For women in Virginia, there are a lot of “cannots” in the works.

 

Sideshow Bob and Virginia’s right wing

Theoretically, the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade guarantees that a woman and her doctor have the right to make reproductive decisions without the government sticking its nose in their business. In reality, though, this year there are a raft of bills in the Virginia legislature designed to make it harder than ever to actually get an abortion.

   “There are people who think they get elected to put in those kinds of bills,” says Sen. Creigh Deeds (D-Charlottesville). “They talk about limited government, but they want to impose government on people’s lives.”

   While Republicans usually speak of their desire for “less government,” it is two delegates from the GOP who feel that women’s lives need more government. This year, two NoVA legislators—Del. Robert Marshall (R-Manassas) and Del. Scott Lingamfelter (R-Woodbridge)—introduced a total of seven anti-choice bills, with perhaps more to come as the session continues. Neither Marshall nor Lingamfelter returned calls to C-VILLE.

   Over the past decade, Marshall, a fundamentalist Catholic, has been the leading culture warrior in the General Assembly. His repeated attempts to legislate Christian morality in the face of more pressing issues never fails to draw media attention, earning Marshall the nickname “Sideshow Bob.”

   Former Charlottesville Delegate Mitch Van Yahres, a 20-year veteran of the General As-sembly, says Marshall is a “very bright guy.”

   “He gets an awful lot of attention,” says Van Yahres. “And he likes it.”

   Here’s the kind of guy Marshall is: He is a fervent pro-life activist who, according to published reports, drives a decommissioned police car because he enjoys seeing other drivers hit their brakes. He has been quoted claiming that condoms have “produced the current epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases.” He supports criminalizing homosexuality, a practice he suggests has “killed 450,000 Americans and will kill at least 1 million more in just a few years.” For a lawmaker so interested in morality, Marshall doesn’t always seem to get his facts straight.

   So far this year, Marshall has introduced four bills related to culture issues. He has two bills designed to stop unmarried women from receiving artificial insemination. He wrote two other bills that require abortion clinics to be built like hospitals and require Virginia’s abortion doctors to reside in Virginia and have admitting privileges at a Virginia hospital.

   On their face, Marshall’s abortion bills seem reasonable. According to NARAL’s O’Hanlon, however, they are designed to shut down clinics, especially in poor and rural areas. “These laws would hurt the poor, rural, minority women—the women at the bottom of the ladder—most of all,” O’Hanlon says.

   Lingamfelter “is a different character than Bob,” says Van Yahres. “He’s more positive. He’s very positive about his beliefs…. I just get a different kind of feeling from him.” This year, Lingamfelter is pushing bills that would require sex-education classes to emphasize abstinence and the “unlawfulness of sexual relations between unmarried persons.”

   Lingamfelter’s House Bill 173 would require government employees to notify a teenage girl’s parents if she received any service relating to sexually transmitted disease, pregnancy or emergency contraception—a bill that critics say would discourage young women from seeking help.

   Usually, bills like this are killed in the moderate Senate Health and Welfare Committee, if not the much more conservative House of Delegates. “They still put these bills in,” says Van Yahres. “They’re very emotional issues, they bring out a lot of people. Unfortunately, they take up a lot of time.”

 

Chipping away at Roe

In Virginia and other states, the rights enshrined in Roe are under attack. To understand what Christian fundamentalists like Marshall and Lingamfelter are up to, we have to go all the way back to Roe v. Wade.

   In that landmark decision, seven of nine justices affirmed that a citizen’s right to privacy is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy, and that the Constitution’s right to life and liberty does not include the unborn. Any law attempting to restrict abortion, the court said, would be subject to a “strict scrutiny,” in effect placing women’s reproductive choice alongside such basic American rights as freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

   Conservative backlash began immediately after the Roe decision, as right-wing politicians introduced the phrase “judicial activism” to attack what they claimed was the Supreme Court’s failure to adhere to the “original intent” of the framers. State legislatures soon began passing laws with the goal of finding exceptions to Roe, or to open up new legal areas in which abortion could be successfully restricted [see sidebar this page].

   The backlash reached its peak during the 12 years when Ronald Reagan and George Bush sat in the Oval Office. According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, every year since 1983 the U.S. Solicitor General urged the Supreme Court, on behalf of the federal government, to overturn Roe. A person’s thoughts on Roe became a “litmus test” for justices nominated by Reagan and Bush. During this 12-year period, five justices—Sandra Day O’Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter and Clarence Thomas—were appointed. Not one of these five supported the “strict scrutiny” standard of review established by Roe; and, in fact, this more conservative court significantly weakened federal protection for reproductive rights.

   This shift in the politics of the Supreme Court had its most dramatic effect in the court’s ruling on the landmark 1992 case Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In that decision, the Supreme Court abandoned the “strict scrutiny” clause of Roe and started to weigh abortion restrictions by determining whether a particular law creates an “undue burden” for a woman seeking an abortion. For example, in Casey the court declared a Pennsylvania law unconstitutional because it would have required married women to obtain their husband’s permission before receiving an abortion—that, in the court’s opinion, would have been an “undue burden.” (Then a federal judge, current nominee Alito argued that a woman should need her husband’s permission in this case.)

   This new clause raised an obvious question. What, exactly, constitutes an “undue burden”? State legislatures began testing the Supreme Court with a new series of restrictions, with Bob Marshall and his right-wing cohorts in the Virginia General Assembly concocting some of the most creative measures to keep women from exercising what is still a Constitutional right to abortion.

 

Can Republicans read tea leaves?

The 33-year argument over abortion that began with Roe v. Wade is now approaching a turning point.

   With Samuel Alito apparently cruising to confirmation, the pro-life camp is hoping for radical new restrictions on abortions in America, while Democrats hope that voters will soon get sick and tired of arguing over divisive social issues.

   That optimism seemed to be affirmed on Tuesday, January 10, when Democrat Sherry Valentine defeated Republican Michael Harrington in a special election to replace Lynchburg Delegate Preston Bryant, a Republican leaving the House after 10 years to be Tim Kaine’s secretary of natural resources. Valentine’s victory comes at the end of an election season when Democrats made several important gains in the General Assembly—arch-conservatives Dick Black and Brad Marrs lost their seats to Democrats.

   Although Democrats still face a 57-40 Republican majority in the House (Indepen-dents hold three seats), by attaining 40
seats Democrats are entitled to more
seats on House committees. “It’s a potentially very
significant change,” says Planned Parenthood Direc-tor David Nova.

   Perhaps most importantly for Democrats, Tim Kaine won the governor’s race by
a 52 percent to 46 percent margin over Republican Jerry Kilgore, an avowed anti-choice conservative. Van Yahres downplays the significance of Kaine’s victory
as an indicator of a voter backlash against the right wing, but Nova is feeling optimistic.

   “This is going to be a very interesting session to watch,” says Nova. He says that all the attention on abortion and the Supreme Court could prompt apathetic voters to wake up and vote out the right-wingers, given that most research indicates a majority of Americans support a woman’s right to choose abortion, at least in some cases.

   “It’s easy to talk about [overturning Roe] when it doesn’t look like it’s going to happen,” says Nova. “Now there’s a potential backlash. That can’t help but weigh on the mind of a legislator who might not want to take an extreme position.”

 

What’s at stake
A look at some 2006 bills that invite Virginia’s government into your bedroom—and your body

As in recent years, right-wing Republican delegates are bringing forth new attempts to restrict abortion and other reproductive rights in the Commonwealth. Below is a list of some of the anti-choice bills that had been introduced in the General Assembly at press time. As you can see, the leading anti-choice activists in the House are Republicans L. Scott Lingamfelter and Robert Marshall.—J.B.

 

House Bill 163: Family life education, parent or guardian to review materials thereof.

Chief patron: L. Scott Lingamfelter

This bill “emphasizes the right of parents and guardians to review family life curricula whether or not family life instruction is mandatory or optional. Further, this bill repeals 22.1-207.1 that requires the Board of Education to establish guidelines for family life education and prescribes certain subject matter to be taught in family life education programs.”

 

House Bill 164: Emphasis on abstinence in family life curricula.

Chief patron: L. Scott Lingamfelter

Requires that any family life education course, including a discussion of sexual intercourse, emphasize that abstinence is the “accepted norm and the only guarantee against unwanted pregnancy. The bill also requires that family life courses “emphasize honor and respect for monogamous heterosexual marriages… and the unlawfulness of sexual relations between unmarried persons.”

 

House Bill 173: Medical and health services to minors; notification to parents.

Chief patron: L. Scott Lingamfelter

Requires that any State or local government employee who provides services to a minor relating to “sexually transmitted diseases, emergency contraception, pregnancy, illegal drug use, or the contemplation of suicide” to notify the minor’s parents or legal guardians “within two business days of delivery of such services.”

 

House Bill 187: Unmarried women; prohibition on provision of certain intervening medical technology.

Chief patron: Robert G. Marshall

This bill would make it illegal for doctors or other licensed health professionals to assist an unmarried woman in any technology “that completely or partially replaces sexual intercourse as the means of contraception including, but not limited to artificial insemination, cryopreservation of gametes and embryos, invitro fertilization, embryo transfer… and low tubal ovum transfer.”

 

House Bill 412: Identification of gamete donors

Chief patron: Robert G. Marshall

Prohibits the use of unrelated anonymous donor oocyte or sperm in the performance of artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization.

 

House Bill 189: Abortion clinics; regulations and licensure

Chief patron: Robert G. Marshall

Requires all abortion clinics to be licensed and comply with the requirements currently in place for ambulatory surgery centers.

 

House Bill 237: Abortion services; requires physicians to reside and practice in State

Chief patron: Robert G. Marshall

Requires any physician performing abortions in the Commonwealth to reside and practice in Virginia and have practice privileges in a Virginia hospital.

 

Birth of a civil right
Important Supreme Court rulings on abortion

 

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)

This case didn’t deal with abortion, but it set forth a Constitutional right to privacy for married couples seeking birth control—an important precedent that upholds Roe v. Wade. Both Chief Justice John Roberts and nominee Samuel Alito affirm this decision.—J.B.

 

Roe v. Wade (1973)

This landmark 7-2 decision drew on Griswold’s right to privacy and struck down a Texas law banning all abortions except those “for the purpose of saving the life of the mother.” The ruling established that the right to privacy applies to abortion, and the decision said that the 14th Amendment’s right to life and liberty does not apply to an unborn fetus. The Roe decision divides a woman’s pregnancy into three 13-week “trimesters.” A woman need only consult her doctor for an abortion in the first trimester; states can regulate abortion in the second trimester only to ensure women’s’ health; in the third trimester, the court gave states the right to limit abortion except in cases where the woman’s health is in danger. Roe sparked fierce opposition from conservatives, who immediately began using the decision as a rallying point.

 

Webster v. Reproductive Services (1989):

In this case, the court demonstrated that Roe v. Wade was not necessarily settled law. The court voted that Missouri could ban the use of public facilities and employees for providing abortions. Three of the majority justices—Rehnquist, White and Kennedy—recommended revisiting Roe, while Justice Antonin Scalia suggested the court overturn Roe.

 

Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992):

In the most significant abortion decision since Roe v. Wade, the court ruled that states could restrict abortion services—as long as the restrictions did not place an “undue burden” on pregnant women. Since Casey, Virginia has led the way on imposing restrictions on abortions. Another interesting fact about this case—at the time, Supreme Court nominee Sam-uel Alito was a judge on the Third District Court of Appeals, which also ruled on this case. Alito wrote that a Penn-sylvania law requiring a married woman to get her husband’s permission before obtaining an abortion did not present an “undue burden,” since the law included a provision exempting women afraid they might suffer abuse.

 

Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood (2006):

The court is currently hear-ing arguments in this case, which focuses on a New Hampshire law that re-quires a doctor to notify parents before performing abortion on a minor. The law contains an exception when the life of the teen is in danger, but no exception for health. An important question in this case is whether groups like Planned Parenthood can challenge abortion restrictions before they take effect, or if challenges will have to wait until after the law has gone into effect.

 

Source: “Supreme Court’s Evolving Rulings on Abortion,” www.npr.org

Categories
News

Finding Nirvana

Dear Ace: Soon after I moved to Charlottesville in 1988 or ’89 I went to eat at an Indian restaurant on the Downtown Mall called Nirvana. I am having a debate with a friend about the location. We both remember that it was in a basement. I clearly remember it being under the Jefferson Theater. She remembers it being under Sylvia’s Pizza, where Henry’s is now. I have asked around and no one seems to remember this restaurant at all. So, we come to you for help, Ace! Where was this?—Currying Favor

Dear Currying: Tell your friend to prepare for a big ol’ crow sammich (preferably on naan bread), because you, sir, are in the right: Nirvana was indeed located at 112 E. Main St., right underneath the Jefferson Theater. As for why everyone else seems completely oblivious to the restaurant’s whereabouts, Ace has a theory: They may have intentionally tried to forget it.

   Let Ace explain. In researching your question, Ace paged through the dusty tomes in the C-VILLE archives, looking for an article he kinda sorta remembered from back in the day. Sure ’nuff, he finally found it: In the December 10-16, 1991 edition, a restaurant review with the title “Nirvana isn’t nirvana.”

   Ouch.

   And it just gets worse from there. The critic, Lisa Goff, recounted the eatery’s atmosphere as such: “The entrance to Nirvana’s basement locale is not auspicious, the trip down the dank stairs doesn’t build confidence, and the room itself gives new meaning to the business phrase ‘low overhead’: a low-slung, drop ceiling with fluorescent lighting.” How do you say “Oh, snap!” in Hindi or Punjabi?

   The critic then took issue with the appetizers “served unappetizingly in stainless steel containers.” Entrees like the Rogan Josh (“could have easily as come from Ireland as India”) didn’t fair much better in her estimation, and even the desserts she recommended were hailed as “adequate.”

   She disliked the price point, she disliked the service, she disliked pretty much everything. Finally, Nirvana was summed up thusly: “If Nirvana were to halve its prices, it might get my recommendation as a place for cheap ethnic eats for people with lots of time and who eat blindfolded.”

   Not surprisingly, Nirvana didn’t last too long after that. Since then the space has had many lives, most recently as underground art collectives like Bullseye and Cilli Original Design Gallery. Currently the spot is home to the off-kilter Better Than Television group, which holds a free pancake and disco night on Tuesdays. At least they got the price point right.

Categories
Uncategorized

News in review

Tuesday, January 3
Preservation and zoning at odds on Rugby

Tonight City Councilors discussed options for a design control district in the Rugby/Venable area. The City wants to give its Board of Architec-tural Review purview over development in the district, and to restrict demolition in the neighborhood. This move toward preservation conflicts, however, with a 2003 up-zoning of that area to encourage high-density student housing—a change intended to concentrate students there and keep them out of adjoining owner-occupied neighborhoods. Councilors Kevin Lynch and Mayor David Brown support the design control district, while Councilors Blake Caravati and Kendra Hamilton favor fewer restrictions. Councilor Rob Schilling, who didn’t weigh in on the discussion, may cast the swing vote when Council decides the issue at its next meeting, on January 17.

 

Wednesday, January 4
Kaine to party with The Beach Boys

Proving that his musical taste is sufficiently dated for political leadership, Tim Kaine announced that The Beach Boys will play at his inauguration on January 13.

 
Stoner City employees take note

You know all those jokes about how everything down at City Hall takes place in a haze of pot smoke? Well, O.K.…there are no jokes about that. And there never will be, either, now that the City has announced it will start random drug tests for police and firefighters (public works employees already get tested). Further-more, all new City employees will have to pass a drug screen before starting work. The new rules are apparently a response to the escalating disappearance of paper clips from the City’s supply closet.

 

Thursday, January 5
Charter school vote delayed

While Acting Superintendent Bobby Thompson recommended against adopting the application for a charter school, tonight the City School Board unanimously voted to table their vote for another two weeks. The charter proposal, first advanced by educators Bobbi Snow and Sandy Richardson last February, would target students who are at least two years off grade level in reading and math. The proposal calls for 60 students to be immersed in an arts-centric curriculum. Thompson’s advisory group found that while the applicants’ passion was a plus, the program’s budget and undefined curriculum were major drawbacks. By putting the vote off until its next meeting, the board gives Snow and Richardson’s group another opportunity to fine-tune their proposal.

 

Friday, January 6
RICO fugitive ends life on the lam

Today a suspect in the local racketeering case turned himself in to federal authorities in Philadelphia. Richard Knajib Johns faces life in prison if he is convicted for involvement with an alleged Charlottesville drug ring. Eleven men have already pleaded guilty to charges that include the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiza-tions (RICO) charges, originally designed to catch mobsters. Prosecutors allege Johns arranged a shipment of 20 kilograms of marijuana from Philadelphia to Charlottes-ville in 2004. In November, the federal prosecution of five others alleged to have participated in the drug ring ended in a mistrial.

 

Saturday, January 7
“Zero tolerance” sends Vick to the NFL one year early

Former Hokie QB Marcus Vick today apologized to Virginia Tech one day after being booted from the team. “I deeply regret that I allowed my competitive emotions to take control,” Vick said, referring to a Gator Bowl incident in which he stomped a Louisville defensive end after a tackle. Vick, whose brother Michael, also a quarterback, is an NFL star, had a troubled career at Tech where he was suspended in 2004 because of legal problems, including serving alcohol to underage girls. When Vick returned, he reportedly accepted the school’s “zero tolerance” policy. Following a traffic-related incident late last month, head coach Frank Beamer permanently relieved the talented troublemaker of his team duties. Vick says he will now go into the NFL draft.

 

Sunday, January 8
Gibson smacks down state Republicans

In his “Political Notebook” column in The Daily Progress today, reporter Bob Gibson takes a whack at a Republican move to change legislative rules that will allow subcommittees to kill bills without recorded votes. “Principles that the [Republi-cans] stressed while in the minority have gotten in the way of exercising power efficiently,” wrote Gibson in his column entitled “GOP elevates power over openness.” Because subcommittees often meet early in the morning or late at night, this rule change allows a few legislators to kill bills away from public debate, and effectively off the record. Conservative bloggers and other media pounced on the story after Gibson reported it in his Sunday column on December 18.

 

Monday, January 9
Caravati says au revoir to City Council

Blake Caravati announced today that he would not seek re-election to City Council in May. After eight years of uttering indecipherable folkisms from the Council dais, Caravati, 55, says “it is time to move on.” He says he will take a vacation from politics for a few months, but he expects to be involved behind the scenes for the Democrats during this spring’s Council elections. No one has announced a candidacy so far. Public office “is a big sacrifice for a private citizen,” says Caravati. However, the Francophile relishes political chess games, and says he does not rule out running for elected office again. Caravati, who owns several rental properties and runs a contracting company called Vector Construction Inc., says he would like to keep working on political issues surrounding affordable housing and felons re-entering society.

  Written by John Borgmeyer from staff and news reports

 

Special tax district for Route 29N?
Supes eye new ways to make developers pay for roads, sewers

As Albemarle County continues to wrestle with population growth and real estate development, one of the most persistent problems for the Board of Supervisors is making sure that public infrastructure keeps pace with new construction.

   New stores, businesses and homes need more than land; they also require water and sewer service, roads, sidewalks, schools, etc. In the county’s growth areas residents have complained that planners have not provided the necessary infrastructure that new residential and commercial buildings demand.

   On Wednesday, January 4, the Board of Supervisors heard a report on how the County might be able to collect a special tax from two major projects (Albemarle Place and Hollymead Town Center) to help pay for improvements to Route 29N.

   When the board approved zoning changes for the two projects in 2003, the developers agreed that upon the County’s request, the owners of nonresidential property would consent to the creation of a “community development authority.” The CDA could impose a special tax of not more than 25 cents per $100 of assessed value. (Albemarle Place and Hollymead Town Center, both desined according to the “neighborhood model,” also include residences in their plans.)

   A CDA poses several problems, though: It must consist of a single tract of land, and 51 percent of property owners must petition for the creation of the CDA. In a report to the board, County staff instead recommended creating a “service district” that would have essentially the same power as a CDA with fewer complicating factors.

   A service district between Albemarle Place and Hollymead Town Center could be a huge windfall for the County’s road improvement fund. It would contain commercial property assessed at about $72 million; that’s about $180,000 in new revenue each year under the proposed tax rate. The money could only be used for road improvements within the tax district.

   The board will continue to discuss the issue; most seemed to agree with Supervisor Ken Boyd, who said he wanted to see what a service district might cost the County in terms of legal proceedings or extra staff that might be needed to collect the money. “I don’t want to spend $100,000 to collect $130,000,” said Boyd.—John Borgmeyer

 

Warner fights for roadless protection
Local attorney disses “Bush-whacking”

On December 22, Governor Mark Warner filed a petition with the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture asking for protection of the Washington and Jefferson National Forests from mining, logging and other forms of destructive development.

   The petition is a necessary step
that each state must undertake in order
to protect the national forests from being, in the words of environmentalists,
“Bush-whacked.”

   In May 2005, President Bush finally succeeded in overturning the 2001 Road-less Area Conserva-tion Rule signed into law by Bill Clinton in the final days of his presidency. As a result, governors must now petition the Department of Agriculture for protection from logging and other destructive development within “roadless” areas of national forests in their states. Warner was the first gover–nor to do so before the November 13 deadline.

   If the petition is ac-cepted—and there is no guarantee that it will be—Virginia’s 380,000 acres of national forests could be protected from unnecessary development. But following the petition’s acceptance, the Commonwealth will still have to enter into specific rule negotiations and those could go either way.

   Public hearings around the drafting of the Conser-vation Law showed overwhelming public support in Virginia. The U.S. Forest Service estimates that de-mand for backcountry recreation will grow 170 percent by 2050. Governor-elect Tim Kaine “supports Governor Warner’s petition for roadless designation…and he will pursue the same designation,” according to his spokesperson Delacey Skinner.

   According to David Carr, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center, “Governor Warner has made a strong case, highlighting the broad public appeal of the conservation efforts and the Secretary
of Agriculture will have to take a long, hard look at
his petition.”

   In the meantime, commercial interests are free to bid on areas of the national forest for purposes of logging and other development. No such bids
have been brought forth yet in Virginia.—Dan Pabst

 

Petitioners protest county development
More rural subdivisions has Albemarle folks fretting

On Wednesday, January 4, Jeff Werner of the Piedmont Environmental Council presented the Albemarle Board of Supervisors with a petition signed by 1,000 county residents who oppose the “current rate and type of growth in Albemarle County.”

   The petition reads: “We, the undersigned citizens are concerned that the current rate and type of growth in the Albemarle-Charlottesville region is threatening our quality of life with: Increased traffic; increased taxes; loss of farmland; and the degradation of our water and air quality.”

   Werner says he and others collected the 1,000 signatures by setting up tables at six of the County’s 29 voting precincts during the recent November elections. “To eliminate any challenges that we were attempting to influence the local election, we decided to collect signatures only at the three magisterial districts without a County supervisor on the ballot,” Werner told the board.

   Werner said he assumed that the signers would be upset about re-cent commercial development on Route 29N. However, he says the people he met were most concerned not just about new big-box stores, but also about the lot-by-lot development of subdivisions in the county’s rural areas.

   Supervisors did not comment on the petition at last week’s meeting.—John Borgmeyer

 

Transportation to drive 2006 General Assembly
Voters cranky about gridlock, potholes

Creigh Deeds says his bid for attorney general, while unsuccessful, was not a total wash. During his campaign, the Democratic Bath County senator, who represents the Charlottesville area, traveled far and wide in Virginia. He says that almost everywhere people have the same complaint—all the damn traffic.

   “There are real issues in every single region,” says Deeds. Whether people are trapped in NoVA gridlock or griping about the lack of a Route 29 bypass in Char-lottesville, traffic is on voters’ minds. “It’s a real encroachment on quality of life, but we can’t look for a solution in Northern Virginia alone. It’s going to take a comprehensive solution. I think it’s going to be difficult.”

   Three men—Governor-elect Tim Kaine, a Democrat, along with Republican House Speaker William Howell and Senator John Chichester—will try to engineer a transportation solution when the General Assembly session convenes on January 11. None have said much about their ideas, except for Kaine’s campaign promises to reform local land-use policies, which he says will curb sprawl and traffic. Taxes will likely come into play, with conservatives pushing for more funds for transportation without raising new revenues. This has prompted some speculation that traffic issues could cause major gridlock in the 2006 session.

   Besides transportation, our local delegates have other things on their plates, too. Here’s what they’re up to. —John Borgmeyer

Here’s what our local legislators will be up to this year in Richmond

Rob Bell

(R-Albemarle):Rising star Bell enters his fourth session in the General Assembly. He is known for a clean-cut image, high intelligence, and for going after public enemies like drunk drivers, bullies and—this year—sex offenders. Bell is widely rumored to be grooming himself for higher office, and he is a bigger Pat Benetar fan than any other straight man in the Commonwealth.

 

David Toscano

(D-Charlottesville): As the new kid on the block, Toscano will be trying to figure out where the bathroom is. In his first session, Toscano says he wants more regulation of Virginia’s eminent domain powers in the wake of the Supreme Court’s deeply unpopular decision last year in Kelo v. New London. (Hmmm… A rookie delegate building his reputation by slaying unpopular villains? Sounds like Toscano is taking a page from Bell’s playbook.)

 

Creigh Deeds

(D-Charlottesville): After losing November’s race for attorney general by a scant 360 votes, Deeds will return to the Senate this week. A member of the Transportation Committee, he’ll spend the session up to his eyeballs in roads.

  

Watkins Abbitt

 (I-Appomattox): During last year’s session he introduced several bills regulating landfills, sewage sludge and handguns. We’re not sure what Abbitt will be up to this session—he didn’t return C-VILLE’s calls by press time.

 

Steve Landes

(R-Waynesboro): Besides transportation, Landes says that health care will be a big issue as more of Virginia’s aging Baby Boomers look for government help. “Hopefully we’ll see some proposed incentives encouraging individuals to purchase their own long-term care,” Landes says. He’ll also take a look at eminent domain laws and the rising cost of the federal No Child Left Behind program.

 

County social service costs rising
Albemarle short on dough to meet growing needs

Nearly half of all Albemarle residents who are eligible for food stamps do not get them, but County officials say they don’t have the resources to do any better.

   “We’re a little nervous about doing outreach, because of the lack of staff,” said Kathy Ralston, director of Albemarle County’s social services department.

   According to a report that Ralston delivered to the Albemarle Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, January 4, 1,235 county households get food stamps, but that represents only about 52 percent of all eligible households. County social services, however, do not have enough staff to meet rising needs.

   The department’s 2005 annual report indicates that needs for social services are climbing, including caseloads for food stamps, welfare, Medicaid, child-protective services and long-term care for the elderly.

   “A lot of that probably has to do with the economy,” says Ralston. She also cites Albemarle’s growing population of elderly and non-English speakers as reasons for rising costs. Furthermore, the increasing complexity of federal programs, especially Medicare, put even greater strain on the department, which has a budget of $11,105,786 in 2006, 6 percent of Albemarle’s total budget.—John Borgmeyer

 

City Supe search rolls on
Board hopes one of 61 applicants will say “yes” by February

Starting this week, the Charlottesville School Board will shift into high gear as the deadlines near in their search for a new superintendent to lead the division. The school system, with an annual budget of $57.5 million and enrollment of 4,166 students, has been led by Acting Superintendent Bobby Thompson since April when Dr. Scottie Griffin backed out of the job after 10 months. Griffin, who was salaried at $149,000 and left with a $290,000 severance package, was widely criticized for her imperious management style and her efforts to shift resources from classrooms to additional Central Office administrators. Addressing media in advance of last Thursday’s School Board meeting [for more on that meeting, see 7 Days, p. 17], Chair Julie Gronlund said that the Illinois search firm of Hazard, Attea, Young & Associates will pare the field of 61 applicants to five or six for the board’s consideration. When they’ve narrowed it further to the top three, the board plans to invite three community members—culled from staff and/or an advisory board and sworn to confidentiality—to join the interview process. They hope to make an offer by February, Gronlund said. Salary has not yet been set.

   Among the qualities that the board will seek, says Gronlund, is someone who will “work more with parents.”

   “We feel parental involvement is critical to students’ success,” she said.

   Gronlund wouldn’t confirm if Thompson, a veteran of Charlottesville schools and former principal of the high school, is a candidate. “And when I find out, I won’t be telling you,” she said.—Cathy Harding

 

City police arrest rapist in 21-year-old case
Suspect apparently e-mailed victim to apologize

Last week Las Vegas police arrested a 41-year-old man for a rape that allegedly took place 21 years ago in Charlottesville.

   Charlottesville police chief Tim Longo held a press conference on Fri-day, January 6, to discuss details of the arrest of William Beebe.

   Longo said that in December, a Con-necticut woman called Charlottesville police and reported that she had been raped in October 1984 at a UVA fraternity party. The alleged victim told police that Beebe had recently contacted her, apparently to make amends. When Beebe told her his whereabouts and invited additional contact, she called police to have him arrested.

   According to Longo, the victim reported that she was a 17-year-old UVA freshman attending a party at Phi Kappa Psi on Madison Lane when a 20-year-old student raped her. Police be-lieved him to be a member of the fraternity at the time. The victim says she told a dean at UVA about the incident, but Longo said police were never notified.

   UVA spokeswoman Carol Wood offered no comment, citing the on-going investigation, ex-cept to say that the victim has recently contacted UVA. “We are working with City po-lice and cooperating fully with the investigation,” says Wood.

   The suspect and the victim were strangers at the time of the alleged attack, and Longo says the attack was “not a date rape.” The victim was not hospitalized after the incident. The two had no further contact until 1986, when Beebe apparently worked delivering pizzas and brought one to the victim’s house, much to her shock.

   Then, over the past year, the suspect contacted the victim. Longo said Beebe works in real estate in Las Vegas, while the victim lives with her family and has a successful business career in Connecticut. Longo says the man’s guilty conscience “may have been what prompted” the contact. “He specifically told where he was, how to contact him, and welcomed contact,” says Longo. “This was pretty open dialogue.”

   Shortly after she learned his address, she called City police, and eventually came to Charlottes-ville for extensive interviews. Based on that in-formation, City Common-wealth’s Attorney Dave Chapman issued a warrant for Beebe’s arrest, which was carried out by Las Vegas police with help from local officers on January 4. At press time, Charlottesville and Nevada officials were working out details of the suspect’s extradition to Virginia. He has no previous criminal record.

   The Commonwealth has no statute of limitations on rape, and Beebe could face up to life in prison.—John Borgmeye

 

Landfill lawsuit back on
Federal judge reverses previous decision to dismiss case

The Ivy Landfill—also known as the “Materials Utilization Center”—closed in the late 1990s after Ivy residents filed a suit alleging the landfill was polluting the groundwater. While the residents reached a settlement agreement in 1998 with the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority and its overseers, the City and County, issues raised by the case are still being debated in court.

   On December 22, federal judge Norman Moon overturned an earlier ruling that would have thrown out a $16 million lawsuit against the RSWA, City, and County, filed by Patricia Stephens. Her husband, Wayne, was killed at the landfill in April 2003 when an oil storage tank he was cutting exploded. In the suit, Stephens—represented by ubiquitous local civil rights attorney Debbie Wyatt—alleges that First Amendment violations on the part of the City, County and RSWA in the 1998 settlement are to blame for her husband’s death.

   According to Stephens’ suit, as a condition of the 1998 settlement, plaintiffs agreed to stop “opposing the landfill” and would make no more “private or public adverse comments about the landfill.”

   According to Moon, the First Amendment is a two-way street: In having the right to speak freely, people also have the right to receive speech freely. Moreover, precedent states that the government cannot give someone benefits on the condition that that someone relinquishes his constitutional rights (e.g. the free speech rights of the plaintiffs in the 1998 case).

   The crux of Stephens’ case is a combination of these two precedents. She argues that her and her husband’s First Amendment right to know the dangers of the oil tanks was violated by the City, County and RSWA not allowing the former plaintiffs to share information they had about the dangers of the landfill. Had the former plaintiffs been at liberty to talk, Stephens alleges that the safety violations at the landfill would have been fixed before they caused her husband’s death.

   While referring to the attempt to argue that the 1998 settlement violated the rights of a third party as “truly novel,” Moon allowed that Stephens still had the right to seek damages based on “any violation of her or her husband’s right to receive speech.” No date has been set for further hearings in the suit.—Nell Boeschenstein

 

What’s coming up from UVA Press
Honest Abe joins the list of writers

Last month, the Uni-versity of Virginia Press added another impressive name to its list of authors that already includes Thomas Jefferson and James Madison: Abra-ham Lincoln. The press will be publishing a four-volume set of the 16th pres-ident’s Legal Documents and Cases, culled from a collection of 96,000 documents, in the fall of 2007.

   While the press is also working on a number of books for Jamestown’s upcoming 400th anniversary in 2007, for the more immediate future, forthcoming books for spring “continue pursuing our interests in the founding era, architectural history and the Civil War era,” according to press director Penelope Kaiserlian.

   Founded in 1963, UVA’s is the only university press in Virginia and, as Kaiserlian says, “We fill a niche.”

   For the bookworms, below is a selected preview of what the University of Virginia Press is publishing this spring.—Nell Boeschenstein

 

Realistic Visionary: A Por-trait of George Washing-ton, by Peter R. Hen-riques: A biography that “seeks to humanize the first president without diminishing him,” according to the catalogue.

 

What Time and Sadness Spared: Mother and Son Confront the Holocaust, by Roma Nutkiewicz Ben-Atar with Doron Ben-Atar: A mother who lived through the Holocaust shares her experiences with her son, a professional historian.

 

The Struggle of Democracy against Terrorism: Lessons from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Israel, by Emanueal Gross: Kaiser-lian said she is particularly excited about this book because of its in depth discussions of the Patriot Act.

 

Road Cycling in Virginia: A Guide, by Sue George: In step with the press’ penchant for regional titles, George guides bikers through the Blue Ridge.

 

UVA’s cancer treatment, by the numbers
Medical Center sees increase in seriously ill patients

In December, Governor Mark Warner proposed spending $255 million on university research, including $25 million for a new cancer center at UVA. Meanwhile, UVA tapped former Wahoo and NBC “Today” show co-host Katie Couric to help raise another $100 million for the center.

   Cancer is a growing business at UVA Medical Center. These numbers indicate that more Virginians are being treated for cancer at UVA, and that the Medical Center is, increasingly, the state leader in cancer research. The growing number of physician-initiated trials shows that UVA “is the leader, as opposed to the follower,” says Medical Center spokesman Peter Jump.—John Borgmeyer

•   Thirty-eight of 550 beds at UVA Medical Center are specifically dedicated to cancer patients (although patients with cancer and other conditions may also be elsewhere in the hospital).

•   UVA had 2,534 new cancer cases last year—a 6.1 percent increase over 2004.

•   Last year there were 3,133 cancer patients admitted to UVA, a 6.7 percent increase over 2004.

•   UVA’s share of Virginia cancer cases grew to 7 percent from 6 percent between 2001 and 2004.

•   The most common types of cancer seen at UVA: digestive (mostly colon, but also stomach and liver), lung, breast and brain/nervous system.

•   In 2005, UVA enrolled 225 patients for cancer trials to study new treatments. This represents 10 percent of all new cancer patients seen at UVA in the last year, up from 5 percent from 2001.

•   Right now UVA has 100 trials open.

•   UVA leads the state with 60 percent of cancer trials initiated by UVA physicians. This is up from 23 percent in 2001 and, according to Jump, “probably as high as any center in the U.S.”

Categories
The Editor's Desk

Mailbag

Kudos to the Breedens

  Regarding the new Fox Ridge project on Fifth Street Extended south of town [“Southern exposure,” December 6], it’s interesting how much folks have been focusing on the integrity of the Breeden family in their sale to Forest Lodge LLC.

   Without knowing much about the Breedens, their history in Charlottesville, or the personal (and I mean personal) details of the transaction, people seem to think it’s appropriate to make them out to be a guilty party in the inevitable suburban sprawl of our area.

   The Breedens have made a very positive contribution to the Charlottesville/Albe-marle area for many years, serving this com-munity in a way that many others could only aspire to. They also have been very responsible stewards of the land in question.

   To them I say: CONGRATULATIONS on your good fortune! It’s well deserved. I wish you the very best, for all you have done to make our community a better place to live.

Pete Armetta

petearmetta@yahoo.com

 

Happy holidays

  I just want to thank you for Nell Boeschenstein’s article on the Santa Project that was coordinated through the local jail [“Santa drops by the jail,” The Week, December 13]. The response we received was overwhelming and we were able to help make Christmas brighter for more than 30 children. In addition, we received more than $1,000 toward the purchase of gifts for the children and for cards that the inmates were able to send to their families.

   I hope you had a nice holiday and wish you a New Year filled with opportunities for future articles that will make a difference in the lives of others.

Holly Heilberg

Santa Project

Albemarle County

 

Grave concerns

At the risk of overstaying the 15 minutes of fame C-VILLE accorded me [“Meet the activist,” The Week, December 27], I think it important to clear up confusion one aspect of your Q&A with me may have caused.

   Immediately after quoting me about Southern Development’s “utter refusal even to acknowledge both deeded and anecdotal evidence of a 19th-century cemetery on the property,” you inserted: “[When contacted by C-VILLE, Charlie Armstrong of Southern Development said the company hired surveyors and consulted old deeds but found no evidence of a cemetery.—ed]” Consequently, readers may think there’s doubt about a cemetery having been established on the land in question. There is no doubt.

   Information regarding the May 14, 1883, deed (Albemarle County Deed Book 84, pages 194-195) by which the descendants of UVA master bricklayer and Char-lottesville builder Allen W. Hawkins (1799/1800-1855) reserved “a family graveyard” on land now embraced by Ridge Street, Cherry Avenue and Fifth Street SW has been in city files for almost 30 years as byproduct of Charlottesville’s first historic landmark survey. I found that deed and the plat to which it relates (Albemarle County Deed Book 58, page 365) independently in 2003 as part of my ongoing research into my neighborhood’s past. Subsequent research—both mine and (entirely separate from mine) that of archaeologist Ben Ford, who’s made a professional specialty of rediscovering lost cemeteries both on paper and on the ground—narrowed the probable location of the Hawkins graveyard to a parcel that Southern Devel-opment proposes altering irremediably. (Illegal bulldozing on that parcel five years ago severely complicated any on-ground search.) Since then, two individuals with deep local roots have come forward with their childhood memories of seeing gravemarkers where documents point.

   Evidence of the Hawkins family burying ground has been in the hands of both current City officials and Southern Development operatives for more than a year. I told Southern Development’s project architect about the cemetery in May 2004. The most recent addition to the growing record—a former neighbor’s personal gravestone-encounter memory from the 1940s—came out at a November 16 City Hall meeting Charlie Armstrong attended. Nevertheless, Southern Development’s response to the cemetery issue continues to be, as it has been from the beginning, relentless denial laced with elaborate scorn.

   Burial sites are big headaches for developers. They stop bulldozers. They create legal exposure. Indeed, to knowingly disturb human remains is a felony in Virginia, one charged as “Violation of Sepulchre.” The term is antique because the principle is ancient. The moral obligation to protect such sites is timeless.

Antoinette W. Roades

Charlottesville

 

Patrol those purse strings

In reference to “What’s the price of security? $4.3 million” [The Week, December 27] regarding the use of Homeland Security funds: Why did none of this money go to protecting our synagogue, a much more obvious security need than “abdominal health education.” Who made these local allocation requests and decisions? Thanks.

Mark Gruber

Charlottesville

 

Learning curve

Thank you for using the term “disabled” instead of “the handicapped” in your most recent story on Little High Street [”More twists on Little High Street,” The Week, January 3]. I really appreciate it. For extra bonus points, move up to “people living with disabilities.”

Alison Hymes

Albemarle County

 

CLARIFICATION

The December 27 article “Inside Warner’s final budget” stated that Warner proposed spending $200 million to upgrade water treatment plants in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. We meant to say wastewater treatment plants.

Categories
News

Brokeback Mountain

 Based on a short story by E. Annie Proulx (she of The Shipping News fame), screenwritten by Larry McMurtry (The Last Picture Show, Terms of Endearment, “Lonesome Dove”) and directed by Ang Lee (The Ice Storm and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon), Brokeback arrives on the big screen with the sort of pedigree that all but guarantees serious Oscar consideration.

   The laconic story concerns two ranch hands who, in 1963, take jobs tending sheep on a remote Wyoming ranch. Ennis Del Mar (Heath Ledger) is the tight-lipped type, a quiet, unsophisticated, salt-of-the-earth guy. Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal) is the more outspoken of the two, an energetic young cowboy who isn’t above riding rodeo on occasion. Ennis and Jack are hired to lead the massive flock of skinflint ranch owner Joe Aguirre (Randy Quaid) into its summer grazing pastures. One of the men is required to stay with the flock all night, protecting it from predators, while the other sets up a basecamp and corrals supplies.

   The long, lazy, lovingly photographed days of summer pass slowly into fall. One lonely, fateful, frost-bitten night, Ennis and Jake find themselves sharing a tent. In a drunken fit, Ennis and Jack end up doing what lonely cowboys have probably been doing for centuries. In the morning, Ennis stubbornly declares, “I ain’t queer.” “Neither am I,” affirms Jack. Despite such declarations, both men keep up the relationship, which becomes—by turns—ecstatic, bitter and deeply conflicted. With the coming of winter, the job up on Brokeback Mountain ends, and the two go their separate ways.

   Here begins a classic tale of repression, secrecy and unfulfilled emotion. Both Ennis and Jack try to lead what they believe are “normal” lives. Ennis gets married to a plain Jane farm girl (Michelle Williams from “Dawson’s Creek”) and fathers a couple of kids. Jack drifts down to Texas, where he hooks up with the beautiful daughter (Princess Diaries’ Anne Hathaway) of a rich farm equipment salesman. Over the years, though their paths drift apart, Ennis and Jack try to keep up their relationship in secret, taking three or four “fishing trips” a year up to Brokeback Mountain.

   As the ‘60s spin into the ‘70s, the personal lives of our protagonists slowly crumble. Ennis fills his life with a country music jukebox worth of poverty and divorce. Jack lives a life of quiet suburban boredom and lies. Although these two are clearly meant for each other, Ennis stubbornly refuses to follow Jack’s suggestion that they buy a ranch and run off together. This is, after all, the early ‘70s, and they are a couple of country boys. Open homosexuality really isn’t an option for either of them.

   Though it is, on the surface, a romance, Brokeback Mountain isn’t exactly Gone with the Wind or Casablanca. There are certain similarities with those earlier unrequited love stories, but Brokeback is more of a drama about living your life with regret. The saddest thing about this three-hanky weeper is that these two men spend an entire lifetime afraid to admit what they want. Lives are wasted, people are hurt, children are scarred, all because Ennis and Jack are scared of society and—by extension—their own feelings. “If only” is a tough phrase to have on your tombstone, and this heartbreaking story etches it deep into both of our protagonists.

   Director Ang Lee’s beauteous style mirrors the film’s melancholy message with poetic economy. The wide-open vistas of Wyoming, the cracked paint clapboards of small-town America: Lee takes them all in with a sad, windswept beauty. Only some cheap-looking makeup effects detract from the overall feel. It’s hard to follow characters through 30 years of their lives. By the end, Ledger and Gyllenhaal just look like a couple of young actors in desperate need of some moisturizer. But it’s a minor gripe for a film that so perfectly succeeds in its goals.

   I can’t guarantee that Brokeback Mountain will change hearts and minds, but I can state fairly unequivocally that it is one of the best films of 2005.

Categories
News

Something for nothing

O.K., so you’re broke. It doesn’t matter why. Maybe you make minimum wage putting those infernal plastic seals on CD cases, or maybe you’re too busy writing experimental theater pieces to go to work. What’s important is that you live in Charlottesville, one of the pricier small cities in America, and you’re tired of seeing the horse farmers and pop-music moguls have all the fun.

   Need to snag a meal? Don’t settle for Ramen and popcorn ever again. Trying to dress decently? You can do it without selling your soul to J. Crew. For every financial gate that seemingly stands between you and the good life, there’s a little golden key buried somewhere nearby. Read on, treasure hunters.

 

Grocery-getter

Of course you already realize that the bulk section of certain grocery stores is a gold mine for the unscrupulous customer who’s wicked enough to write the PLU for cheap rolled oats on her bag of $15-a-pound imported hazelnuts. And you realize that’s technically, er, stealing. But check this out: When grocery stores—I’m not saying Harris Teeter, necessarily—have stuff they can’t sell (less-than-perfect produce, expired dairy and bakery products, and so on), guess what they do with it? Yep, they THROW IT AWAY. Guess what happens next? You, smartest of shoppers, pay a visit to their dumpster and HELP YOURSELF.

   Don’t put your health in danger, of course. But remember that the sell-by date on a carton of milk is calculated to give the buyer enough time to drink that milk before it goes bad. So if it’s one day expired, you really only lose a day compared to the fool who paid for it yesterday. Fruits and veggies that the squeamish would bypass (spotted apples, cabbage wilting on the outside) can be perfectly edible with a little basic knife-work. Just remember: BYO bags!

 

Start your day off right

Looking for the most important meal of the day? Broke? All I’m saying is that certain hotels—the Hampton, the Ramada, the Fairfield—offer free continental breakfast to their guests. One hotel at the corner of 10th and W. Main streets has not only coffee, pastries and fruit, but a free Internet station in the lobby, near the crackling fireplace. The key to staying incognito here is to look like you belong—and nothing says “Back off, my company already paid for it” like one of those corporate IDs on a lanyard around your neck. A briefcase wouldn’t hurt either, and it sure will hold a lot of bagels. Hey, don’t hotels have pools too? Why, yes. Yes, they do.

 

Feel great, cheapskate

Swimming is one of the best all-around exercises there is. Throw in running from hotel guards and climbing hotel fences, and you’ve got a wicked good workout. Centrally located hotels with heated indoor pools: the Omni and the Courtyard by Marriott.

   On those days when you’re after tranquility rather than an adrenaline-laced cardio pounding, practice yoga at Union Yoga Loft or Body, Mind, Spirit—at either one, your first class is free. (Invest in a fake-nose-and-glasses disguise and become the impossible: a repeat first-time student.) Studio 206 makes all its classes free for one week each spring and fall. But the best yoga deal of all is surely Ninja Yoga: ALWAYS free. Yep, that’s right: learn downward dog for zero dollars at the Central Library Mondays at 1pm, Tuesdays at 5pm and Thursdays at 5pm. There are also classes at the Community Space, 1117 E. Market St., at 1pm on Tuesday and Wednesday. Call 960-3994 for more info.

 

Move about; don’t shell out

Talk about time travel: Remember in Back to the Future how Marty McFly gets around town by hopping on his skateboard and grabbing the back of a pickup truck? Load up Huey Lewis on your headphones, lace up your Nike high-tops, and embrace your inner 1985-era Michael J. Fox as you surf your way to work or school.

   Even if you’re a bit more risk-averse than McFly, you can still travel on the cheap. Here’s a nearly free way to get (literally) around town. Say you live in Belmont and you want to go shopping at the Dollar Place at Pantops. Ride your bike to the end of E. Market Street and jump on the paved Rivanna Trail at Riverview Park—a pleasant alternative route toward Route 250. When you’re done at Pantops, catch the Nos. 10 and 6 buses (putting your bike on the front) to Barracks Road for some quality time at Barnes & Noble, reading in comfy chairs at no charge. (Go ahead, finish the book! Do they expect you to buy it?) Then take a UVA bus to the Corner (according to University Transportation Services, you almost certainly won’t need a University ID unless you “cause a problem”) for your free counseling session at the Women’s Center, after which you can ride the trolley downtown at absolutely no charge. Get there in time for happy hour at Miller’s and you can fend off those therapy-induced revelations for only $1 a drink—and still be staggering home to Belmont by dinnertime.

 

No such thing?

Once you’ve exhausted the Christian’s Pizza/Bodo’s Bagels/Marco and Luca axis of tasty meals for under $5, you’re ready to graduate to the advanced school of cheap eats. The Darden School at UVA is known to cater numerous seminars and meetings. (All those future MBAs have to practice simultaneous schmoozing and chewing, after all.) Lucky for you, the food is conveniently laid out on tables in the hallways, rather than the classrooms. Look reasonably professional, and there’s no reason you can’t blend in and eat your fill. An anonymous reporter in ill-fitting dress pants recently enjoyed lunch and coffee in Darden’s gracious lobby, gratis. (Emboldened, the reporter then checked out the nearby School of Law, but found it much less generous, institutionally speaking.) Nearest free parking: Millmont Street, just down the hill.     CONT. P. 21

 

Food and conversation

A frugal aunt and uncle of mine, when they were young and poverty-stricken, used to make a date out of walking the mile from their house to a gas station. There they’d buy a single candy bar, then split it on the walk home. The end.

   Sweet, huh? You can be a cheap date without going to such extremes. Start your evening at the Brick Café in Scottsville, ordering a perfectly tasty and filling personal-size pizza with two toppings: an easy $4.64. Take a nice after-dinner stroll along the James River: free. Then head back to Charlottesville for the late movie at the Jefferson: $3. (Bring-your-own candy bar: 75 cents. Go on—get two, you crazy lovebirds!)

 

Get connected

Ah, wi-fi—a glorious invention and so much better than getting your hands dirty with those free-trial AOL CDs that come in the mail. If you’re not lucky enough to have a downstairs or next-door neighbor whose wireless you can tap, here’s what you do: Get in your car. Boot up your laptop. Drive around your neighborhood. Find someone with a wireless Internet connection who has failed to secure it. Park your car. E-mail your friends.

   When you get tired of people who come outside with a shotgun acting all territorial about their bandwidth, you may decide to try playing by the rules. In that case, the library is your friend. Use it. The Central Li-brary’s Monticello Avenue lab, on the mezzanine level, has enough computers so that you usually won’t have to wait; all
you need is a library card. There are also quick e-mail stations on the main level. Similarly, the Mud-house’s Downtown lo-cation offers a computer at no charge (avoid disapproving glances from baristas by springing for a day-old muffin: $1).

 

Five-spot shopper

Buying clothes, wear-ing them to parties, then returning them the next day is so time-consuming. Plus, you have to answer a bunch of redundant questions from salesclerks. (“What do you mean, ‘What’s that wine-colored stain?’”) Instead, pay a visit to the Green Olive Tree in Crozet, a secondhand shop. Toward the end of each month (call 823-4523 for exact dates), the Green Olive Tree will sell you an entire bag of clothing for only $5. It gets better: In March and August, as the seasons are changing, the $5 sale becomes a “5-4-3-2-1” sale. Each week the price of the bag goes down by a buck, until they’re practically giving the stuff away. This is the kind of deal that’s so good it makes you feel like sending a thank-you note.

 

Feed your head

Luckily, being an intellectual doesn’t have to mean shelling out for an Ivy League degree. There are lots of ways to get smarter, cheaper. Free University events include gallery talks, lectures and poetry readings; check out www.virginia.edu/ news.html for event listings on Grounds. If you’d rather curl up with a good book, “shop” at the free-book trailer in the McIntire Road Recycling Center. Looking for magazines? The Scottsville library has a giveaway box where you can snag free copies of used magazines donated by other patrons. Or visit the Northside branch during January or February, when the library purges magazine holdings and makes the throwaways available for keeps.

   If there’s something specific you want to learn, take advantage of the major university that’s right in our backyard, and audit a course. Officially, you can’t sit in on a class unless you’re a registered student. Unofficially, it’s likely you can get away with joining a UVA course without asking anyone’s permission—as long as the class size is large enough. Spring semester offerings in-clude Introductory So-ciology (class size cap-ped at a hefty 260) and History of Photog-raphy (class size 150). Just show up and look interested, and most professors will be happy to have you (that is, if they even notice you’re there). And remember, audit is Latin for “no tests or papers.”

 

Park it

So, you work Downtown, commute from
the county and can’t stomach paying for all-day parking?

   Random thoughts about the Barracks Road Shopping Center: It sure is convenient to the 250 Bypass. It sure is big. There sure are a lot of parking spots there. It sure is close to UVA and public bus stops. Those buses sure can get you into central Charlottesville.

   Fact about riding a bike from Belmont to the Downtown Mall, say, for example, because you parked at the former: It’s all downhill. Fact about downhill biking: It doesn’t get your work clothes sweaty. Fact about uphill biking: It’s a great way to blow off steam after a hard day on the job.

   Advice about those usually empty, government-only spots around Court Square: Don’t even think about it.

 

Out on the freetown

You already know about the free sports at UVA (soccer, tennis, track and field, and lots of others), the free cheese-and-mingling at McGuffey Art Center on First Fridays, and the free tastings offered by many area wineries. Check this out: Better Than Tel-evision, a community space in the basement of the Jeffer-son Theater on the Downtown Mall, is your one-stop shop for low- or no-cost entertainment. This place has free movies on Thursday nights, free pancakes and disco on Tuesday nights, a library and a ping-pong table. Now here is a crew of people who are not only fun, innovative and friendly, but have a certifiable political commitment to the cheap and the free—many are anarchists. Here’s what John Bylander, an organizer of the space, says: “We encourage people to wander around. It’s not
a store. We’re not going to ask you to buy something.” You gotta love that. Check
out the current schedule on the space’s front door.

 

Better living

If you happen to be hanging around the entrance to the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority, be sure to keep your eyes peeled. Sooner or later, someone’s bound to come along with furniture strapped to the roof of their Lexus. Everybody wins: You get a sofa, they avoid the disposal fee and one less object goes in the landfill!

   If you’d rather avoid the face-to-face method of dumpster diving, go west, young ninja! Staunton is Charlottesville’s sister city, and once a year in spring she acts like an older sister, providing us with tons of cool hand-me-downs. Need a bookshelf? An oscillating fan? A barbecue pit? Almost any other household item you can think of? Whereas Charlottesville removes residents’ large trash items individually year-round, Staunton throws what amounts to a big city- wide trash party each April: everybody throws out everything at once. So the city’s ordinary streets and sidewalks become, essentially, one giant mall where everything is free. Call 540-332-3892 for this year’s exact dates, and start making friends now with someone who owns a pickup truck.

Categories
News

Resolution revolution

As it’s only the first week of January, Turnopher, Ace’s resolve remains with him, firm as Clark Kent’s handshake. The real question is, Where will it go?

 Ace has little in common with his fellow man, but sadly one of the few qualities he shares with the average schlub is an inability to stick to his resolutions. Granted, many of them are made in a stuporous condition in the middle of the night, but Ace swears on the lives of his parents that he’s not going to call that foul-mouthed hussy again no matter how lonely he gets.

Categories
Uncategorized

News in review

Tuesday, December 27
Monticello receives TJ’s old chairs

Today Monticello announced that curators of Thomas Jefferson’s house recently received a pair of centuries-old armchairs that once belonged to Charlottesville’s favorite son. TJ bought the neoclassical curved-back chairs to furnish the townhouse he rented while living in Paris as an ambassador in the 1780s. According to the Associated Press, the chairs, along with many of Jefferson’s possessions, were auctioned off in 1827. The chairs were discovered in a Charlottesville stable in 1907; they were bought by a Baltimore family, then by Jacqueline Kennedy in 1962. She kept them in the White House and in her New York apartment until Patricia Kluge bought them at auction for $134,500 in 1996, with an agreement to keep them for 10 years before returning them to Monticello. The chairs were restored in the late ’90s, and, according to news reports, nobody has sat in them since.

 

Wednesday, December 28
Community Foundation drops a load on ’em

Today the Charlottesville Area Communi-ty Foundation announced that it will give more than $1 million to 80 local nonprofit organizations. Of the $1 million, nearly $300,000 came from the Bama Works Fund, the charitable arm of the Dave Matthews Band. The boys typically donate that amount twice each year. The band’s success has been good for the foundation—according to CACF Donations Director Kevin O’Halloran, the foundation has made 2,500 grants worth $14 million since 1967. In 2005, the foundation made 500 donations worth $3 million. “We were all surprised by that level of activity,” O’Halloran says.

 

Thursday, December 29
Parkway concept dissed

Proponents of a new bypass around Route 29N fielded questions and criticisms about the road tonight at the Westminster Presbyterian Church. Outgoing Char-lottesville Delegate Mitch Van Yahres, along with would-be congressman Bern Ewert and urban planner Gary Okerlund, argue that turning a portion of Route 743 into what they call the “Ruckersville Parkway” would be a fairly cheap way to ease traffic on 29N. At the meeting, however, some people who live along 743 said they don’t want any more traffic. Three years ago, Albemarle citizens successfully resisted the State’s plans for the five-mile, $180 million Western Bypass; this latest bypass has also provoked resistance from locals. A bypass is favored south of Charlottesville, where Ewert hopes to run for Congress against Virgil Goode in November.

 

UVA prof’s NYT column is a big hit

UVA psychology prof Timothy Wilson’s New York Times op-ed about introspection became today’s most frequently e-mailed article from the newspaper. Wilson argues that self-reflection doesn’t do much good, and in fact can make us depressed. It’s much better, Wilson says, “to act more like the person we want to be, rather than sitting around analyzing ourselves.” Not bad advice for 2006.

 

Friday, December 30
Lawsuit against Ivy Landfill will go forward

Today The Daily Progress reported that a First Amendment lawsuit against the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority will go forward. Federal Judge Norman K. Moon will allow the $16 million suit brought by Patricia Stephens, whose husband died in 2003 when an oil tank he was cutting at the landfill exploded. Stephens’ attorney, Deborah Wyatt, argues that the settlement of a previous lawsuit involving the RSWA restricted the free speech of citizens who could have spoken out about landfill safety issues. That free speech could have saved the man’s life, Wyatt argues. In moving the suit forward, Moon reversed his previous decision to stop the case.

 

UVA faces Gophers in obscure bowl game

Today Wahoos geared up as UVA’s football team faced Minnesota in the Gaylord Hotels Music City Bowl in Nashville. To get their third bowl win in four years, the Cavaliers had to stop the Golden Gophers’ running game, which is ranked second in the nation with 5.5 yards per carry.

Written by John Borgmeyer from staff and news reports.

 

More twists on Little High
Last-minute confusion may nix a compromise between Region Ten and residents

After months of heated negotiation, it seemed that Little High Street residents had finally resolved differences with Region Ten over an apartment complex the agency is building in that neighborhood. No sooner did the promise of compromise appear, however, than it disappeared amid confusion over funding for the project.

   Late this summer, a nonprofit group called Community Services Housing started building an apartment complex at 1111-1113 Little High St. intended to house 40 low-income, disabled clients of Region Ten, a local social service provider. When construction began, Little High Street residents balked—they pressured Region Ten to improve the structure’s design, and asked for assurances that Region Ten staff would be on site to help clients with problems. [For more, see “High Tension on Little High Street,” November 8].

   On Tuesday, December 20, Little High Street residents met with Region Ten, CSH and City officials.

   “We had come up with a major compromise position,” says Little High resident Mark Haskins. “We would accept the 40 units if certain conditions were met. [Region Ten] had made a previous offer to re-design the project, and we wanted some verification that that would, in fact, be possible.”

   At the meeting, however, CSH officials had a shocking announcement—the project was cancelled.

   CSH director Bob Smith did not return calls by presstime. Others at the meeting, though, told C-VILLE what happened.

   At the meeting, Smith announced that due to a miscommunication between State agencies, CSH would not be able to get State tax credits for the apartments. Thus, the project was dead—eliminating any need to discuss possible compromises between Region Ten and Little High Street.

   “The next thing we knew, the meeting was over,” says Little High resident Haskins.

   Then, last week, Region Ten announced that the problem had been cleared up. CSH would get the tax credits, and the project was alive once again. However, CSH’s application to get the tax credits must be submitted before the end of 2005; once the tax credits have been awarded, it is unclear how much CSH will be able to change the project to meet the Little High neighbors’ requests.

   “I think it is very unfortunate that we don’t have the time to continue the discussion [with Little High] prior to finalizing that application,” says Region Ten Director Phil Campbell. He initially resisted residents’ complaints but softened his position as pressure from the neighborhood increased.

   Although leaders from Region Ten, CSH and the Little High Area Neighbor-hood Association all say they want negotiation to continue, it is now unclear whether the back and forth will accomplish anything. For now, it seems that CSH could be able to build the complex as planned without doing anything to appease nearby residents.

   “After all that talk and tense and difficult meetings, I’m not sure anything will change,” says Haskins. “I think the neighborhood has done all that it can.”—John Borgmeyer

 

Love me, build me, Chapter 4

Another empty building that longs for fulfillment

Jefferson School

Address: 201 Fourth St. NW

Area: 70,000 square feet

Empty since: Preschool programs vacated in January 2002

Price: Assessed at $4.5 million

Status: Having escaped the fate of getting converted into upscale condos, the building that housed the city’s all-black high school from 1926 to 1951 is set to be turned into an African-American cultural center, complete with adult-education classrooms and a community space attached to Carver Recreation Center. Estimates for the renovation are running in the $30 million range. The building has also been added to the Virginia Landmark Register, which means private investors can get tax credits if they contribute to the site’s renovation.

 

Keswick seeks permit to dump more wastewater
Citizens can comment on the fate of upscale dookie

  Keswick has its own pool, golf course and tennis court. Did you know it also has its own sewage treatment plant? A company called Keswick Utilities treats the wastewater from Keswick estates, a 600-acre gated community where residents live on two- to five-acre parcels near the exclusive resort. Keswick is seeking to renew a State permit to dump wastewater in a nearby creek, but before that happens citizens have a chance to comment before the permit is granted.

   According to the Virginia De-partment of Environmental Quality, Keswick Utilities is renewing a permit that will allow it to discharge about 99,000 gallons of wastewater per day into an un-named tributary of Carroll Creek and Broadmoor Lake. Currently, Keswick pumps about 66,000 gallons of wastewater into the Caroll Creek tributary. Keswick solid waste, called “sludge,” is buried in Richmond or Orange landfills.

   The permit will help Keswick Utilities handle the extra dookie that will come when the resort adds new lots to its gated community in 2006.

   To get more information about Keswick’s permit, or to comment, contact the DEQ’s Brandon Kiracofe at 540-574-7892 or bdkiracofe@ deq.virginia.gov. The State will take comments until mid-January.—John Borgmeyer

 

The year in crime
2005 was big for legal drama

“Law & Order” ain’t got nothin’ on us. In a mere 365 days, little old Charlottesville saw the courtroom dramas of everything from a pediatrician convicted of abusing his own child to land-use issues so complicated even the Supreme Court hasn’t quite figured them out. Of all the crimes and punishments that were, C-VILLE has nominated our “Big Three.” If you know nothing about local crime, here’s a cheat sheet of the most important cases that filed through City, County and federal courtrooms last year.—Nell Boeschenstein

Charlottesville: Anthony Dale Crawford case

Although he doesn’t go to trial for another few months, Anthony Dale Crawford, the Manassas man charged with murdering his estranged wife, Sarah, and dumping her body at the Quality Inn on Emmet Street, was in court this year for preliminary hearings. According to pretrial hearing testimony, Sarah was found on the bed in “a frog-like position,” and the prosecuting attorney made insinuations of necrophilia. Moreover, according to an affidavit for a preliminary protective order filed by Sarah before her death, Crawford had a history of spousal abuse and she alleged he had told her he “understands why husbands kill their wives.”

 

Albemarle: Rich Collins v. Lebo Commercial Properties, Inc.

Last spring, while campaigning for a seat representing the 57th District in the House of Delegates (Democrat David Toscano won the seat in November), slow-growth advocate Rich Collins thought the parking lot of Whole Foods on Route 29N would be a good place to reach the Democratic base. However, property manager Charles Lebo objected to the would-be legislator’s campaign tactics. According to Lebo, no soliciting is allowed on his properties, and he took Collins to court on trespassing charges. In October, the court cited a personal belief that free expression takes precedence over private property rights, but Judge Stephen Helvin re-luctantly ruled in Lebo’s favor. The case, however, has raised the issue locally of whether shopping centers are the modern-day equivalent of town squares—and thus the domain of constitutional rights. When the Supreme Court took on the issue in 1980, it ruled to leave the decision up to states. This is the first time the issue has arisen in Virginia.

 

Federal: The RICO trial

Alleged members of the local gang “West-side Crew” (a.k.a. “Project Crud”) Louis Antonio Bryant, Terrence Suggs, John Darrelle Bryant and Claiborne Maupin stood trial in late November on federal charges of racketeering, narcotics trafficking, narcotics conspiracy and multiple violent crimes. However, after 10 days of testimony, and after both prosecuting and defense attorneys had presented their closing arguments, Judge Norman Moon declared a mistrial on November 30. Apparently, at the 11th hour, a juror told the judge he had overheard another juror discussing a newspaper article about the case with two other jurors. Now that’s courtroom drama.

 

Dragnet on trial
City, cops and citizens sued for attempts to track down serial rapist

The negative fallout from the DNA dragnet City police conducted in the spring of 2004 to find the serial rapist—during which cops approached black men to request saliva sam-ples for DNA profiles—didn’t end with the neg-ative publicity on national television. Three lawsuits—two against the City and one against a private citizen, and all of which are being represented by local civil rights attorney Debbie Wyatt—have resulted from the police depart-ment’s zealous investigation even as pressure continues to mount on the department to make an arrest. Below is a break-down of the ever-expanding community impact of the serial rapist, who has been linked to seven rapes in the area since 1997.—Nell Boeschenstein

 

Case: Larry Monroe sought $15,000 from the City, Police Chief Tim Longo and City police officer James Mooney.

Court: Charlottesville General District

Issues at hand: Unlawful search and seizure, and assault and battery

Relation to dragnet: Monroe, who did not resemble descriptions of the serial rapist, was asked by Mooney to submit a DNA sample. Monroe refused. His complaints focused on there being no rhyme or reason to the sample requests, save racial profiling.

Status: The City won the case in General District Court but it was appealed to Circuit Court, at which point Monroe and Wyatt opted to revise and re-file the case in Federal Court.

 

Case: Larry Monroe, “on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,” is seeking $15,000 for himself and other complainants in the class-action suit against the City, Longo and Mooney.

Court: Federal

Issues at hand: Equal protection and Fourth Amendment rights

Relation to dragnet: See above case

Status: The class-action suit was filed in Federal Court in mid-December and will go to trial some time next year.

 

Case: Chris Matthew is seeking $850,000 from the woman who mistakenly identified him as her rapist.

Court: Charlottesville Circuit

Issue at hand: Defamation

Relation to dragnet: In its eagerness
to catch the serial rapist, the City
kept Matthew in jail without bond for
five days—leading local media to speculate and float the possibility that Matthew was a suspect—until a DNA test exonerated him.

Status: The case has been filed in Charlottesville Circuit Court. However, Commonwealth’s Attorney Dave Chapman has expressed skepticism as to whether it will go anywhere, since in order for a defamation claim to hold up there must be evidence of malice or ill will.

 

Checking in on charter
Guv gives O.K. for autonomy, but UVA’s human resource policy remains a mystery

When the General Assembly convenes on January 11, legislators will deliver a yea or nay on the details of UVA’s “higher education restructuring,” better known around here as “charter.”

   Last year, the General Assem-bly gave Virginia colleges more autonomy in their relationship with the State. School officials had been complaining for years about red tape and paltry funding from the Commonwealth. Last year, legislators approved a bill creating three levels of autonomy. Big schools with well-heeled donors (namely UVA, The College of William and Mary and Virginia Polytechnic Institute) will get much less State money and a lot more freedom from State oversight; smaller schools can choose charter plans that give them less freedom while re-taining more public funding.

   UVA, Tech, and William and Mary spent the past year collaborating on their “management agreement,” which sets forth the details of the relationship those three schools will have with the State. In November, Governor Mark Warner signed off on the management agreement and included it in his 2006-08 budget. In January, legislators can vote to either accept or reject the management agreement.

   UVA has posted its management agreement on its website (www.virginia.edu; click on the “Higher Education Restructuring” link), and there’s an overview if you don’t have time to wade through the 200-plus pages.

   The management agreement covers real estate development, purchasing, human resources and accounting. But when legislators vote on the management agreements, they will do so without important details on one of the most significant aspects of charter—human resource policy.

   According to UVA’s documents, anyone hired after July 1, 2006, will be employed under a new system. Current employees can keep their current terms of employment, or switch to the new system. Every two years, current employees will have a chance to change to the new system.

   The details of that new system, however, are still in the works. UVA officials will be holding meetings with employees to hammer out the new human resource policy, according to UVA spokeswoman Carol Wood.

   The Staff Union at UVA (SUUVA) has vowed to fight the idea of a two-tiered workforce, putting their hopes in Governor-elect Tim Kaine. “State workers are State workers,” says Jan Cornell, president of SUUVA. “We are hopeful that
the new Kaine administration will discuss this part of the agreement with us.”—John Borgmeyer

 

Syllabi We Love:
Accidental humor from the UVA course catalogue

Syllabus: n. (influenced by Gk syllambanein). Fancy word in the academic world for “to-do list,” in which a professor tells students what they’ll have to do that semester.

   Using a definition to introduce a piece of writing is, in C-VILLE’s opinion, the lazy way out. So, it’s a good thing the syllabus for “Inscribing Culture”—the entry level writing course taught by Omaar Hena for UVA students who didn’t test into first-year English—provides a model example of literary shortcuts by defining both “inscribe” and “culture” at the top of the syllabus.

   Welcome to UVA, where “basic writing” becomes “inscribing culture.” There’s nothing basic about this course, though—on the reading list, for example, instead of Jane Austen’s classic prose, there’s Theodor Adorno, the philosopher who said poetry cannot exist after the Holocaust (that makes the teacher’s job easier, huh?). The kicker, however, is the final paragraph labeled, “Caveat Novicius,” which states, “I reserve the right to update, alter or orphan this syllabus. Of course, I will give due notice to you, my dear students.”

   If these students need the syllabus to define “inscribe” and “culture,” how will they know what the hell a “Caveat Novicius” is?—Nell Boeschenstein

 

Van Yahres under investigation
Local Dems say GOP is trying to “make political hay out of nothing”

A special prosecutor will investigate allegations that retiring State Delegate Mitch Van Yahres violated Virginia’s political fundraising law.

   The accusations stem from a fundraiser for
a local political ac-tion committee called “Democratic Road Back.” According to the Virginia Public Access Project, Van Yahres founded the PAC in 2003; since then the committee has raised more than $50,000 and spent a total of $39,227, mostly on local Democrats such as Steve Koleszar (beaten in November by incumbent Rob Bell in a race for Albemarle’s 58th District delegate seat) and Creigh Deeds (who lost a tight race for attorney general).

   In February 2005, Road Back held a fundraiser at Starr Hill. City Common-wealth’s Attorney Dave Chapman says that he got a letter from City Republican Party Chairman Bob Hodous in April complaining that the fundraiser violated a State law prohibiting delegates from fundraising while the General Assembly is in session. Hodous did not return calls from C-VILLE by presstime.

   Indeed, Virginia Code prohibits members of the General Assembly from soliciting funds for a “campaign committee” or “political committee” while the legislature is in session. A violation can be punished by a fine of up to $500.

   Lloyd Snook, who sits on the Road Back’s board of directors, says the charge against Van Yahres is nothing but legal wordplay. He says that the phrases “campaign committee” and “political committee” have very specific meanings under State code, and he says the law does not pertain to political action committees. The law is designed to prevent delegates from raising money for themselves during the session, and while Snook acknowledges that Van Yahres was the driving force behind the PAC, he says the delegate
never took any money from it and, in
fact, planned to retire at the time of
the fundraiser.

   Furthermore, Snook says that Van Yahres was not at the fundraiser, and that he never solicited money for the PAC while the Assembly was in session. Snook claims that the State Board of Election approved the fundraiser.

   Spotsylvania County Commonwealth’s Attorney William F. Neely will investigate the charges. No special taxpayer money will fund the investigation. “Common-wealth’s attorneys do this as part of their job,” says Chapman. He says he could not prosecute this case himself because he is an active Democrat and “a partisan ally” of Van Yahres. Chapman would not
say why it took him this long to find a special prosecutor.

   Van Yahres, who officially passes the 57th District seat to David Toscano when Toscano is sworn in on January 11, says he thinks it took so long because nobody wanted to waste their time on this case. “I suspect Chapman had a hell of a time getting someone to take the case,” Van Yahres says. “They’re trying to make political hay out of nothing.”—John Borgmeyer

 

Al Weed’s fundraising pitch for 2006
Democratic congressional hopeful says incumbent Goode is vulnerable

It’s never too early in a political campaign to start passing the hat. Al Weed, who is angling for the Democratic nomination to run against Republican Virgil Goode in the 2006 Fifth District congressional race, is doing just that. By his rough estimate, he’s already sent out more than 2,400 donor letters. The basic pitch is twofold: Tim Kaine’s win—both across the state and in the Fifth District—bodes well for Dems, and Virgil is vulnerable.

      Weed doesn’t name the MZM scandal—in which Goode was linked to a defense contractor that was bribing a crooked congressman—in his letters, because, as he says, “I don’t think I need to stir that pot.” But it’s clear the scandal is an unwritten bullet point. A second point is that after 10 years in office Goode’s only gotten one bill through, and that voters will finally call “time” on their man from Rocky Mount.

   Weed wouldn’t disclose the amount of money he’s raised so far, but he did allow that he would be reporting his contributions at the end of 2005, which means he’s raised at least $5,000, the threshold for required reporting.

   Printed below are a few select quotes from Weed’s fundraising letters.—Nell Boeschenstein

Categories
The Editor's Desk

Mailbag

Fair and accurate?

It seems that C-VILLE missed one in the “Cheap Shots ’05” story [December 20]: The “Fox Bias in News Reporting” Award to C-VILLE Weekly.

   C-VILLE’s coverage of the last year’s Charlottesville School Board issues and the City Council’s ultimate responsibility for the fiasco bordered on biased propaganda for the leadership of the Democratic Party. A clear example of C-VILLE getting it so wrong is the Cheap Shot indictment of Jeff Rossman, “winner” of the “Bill O’Reilly Modesty in Politics” Award along with Rob Schilling, for purportedly making statements indicating that the City Council “has been using appointed school boards to bolster a racist agenda… .”

   Jeff Rossman did no such thing in the course of the Scottie Griffin fiasco or during the elected school board referendum. I don’t recall Rossman ever making a statement claiming to be a “defender of local African-Americans.” Rossman’s reference to paternalism had nothing to do with race, but was about the anything-but-transparent control by a few party leaders over issues affecting our schoolchildren. As far as I understand, it was more about City Councilors who called parent activists “troublemakers.” The reference to Dixiecrats was about a small group of party leaders making decisions in smoke-filled backrooms with little or no transparency rather than trusting the wisdom of the citizenry.

   Jeff Rossman was a significant supporter of the Democratic Party this year and for C-VILLE Weekly to attack him for his stance on the elected school board—as well as C-VILLE’s biased coverage of these issues —indicates that conservatives like Fox News are not the only ones engaged in propagandistic tactics (and this from a liberal).

   By mistakenly focusing on Rossman, you missed the real story last year—accountability for the $290,000 Griffin fiasco and the cause of the populist embrace of the elected school board. Or maybe that’s the point. Focus on Rossman and we take the focus off accountability of the policy makers. The referendum for an elected school board was a bipartisan initiative and won with 73 percent of the vote. You are not making things better with this kind of reporting. C’mon, C-VILLE, get it straight. No more agit-prop a la O’Reilly, please. 

Walt Heinecke

Charlottesville

 

Jeffrey Rossman chimes in

While I was touched to have been awarded the “Bill O’Reilly Modesty in Politics” Award in your last issue, I don’t believe that I deserve this honor.

   You say that I have been given the award for “racial pandering” during the elected school board campaign. As evidence, you offer a quote of mine (which, incidentally, you misquoted) that I gave to The Hook shortly after the referendum passed.

   The quote was about paternalism, not race. Some of the arguments made by opponents of an elected school board were indeed paternalistic. Voters rejected these arguments on November 8.

   Contrary to what you insinuate in your award nomination, I never uttered the word “Dixiecrat,” nor did I accuse anyone—Democrats, Republicans, or Inde-pendents—of being racist.

   Having set the record straight, I would like to close by nominating your paper for the “Jayson Blair Award for Imaginative Reporting of the News.”

 

Jeffrey Rossman

Charlottesville

 

John Borgmeyer responds:

In the November 17, 2005 issue of The Hook, Rossman stated: “To me this is the last nail in the coffin of traditional southern Democratic Party paternalism here in Charlottesville.” “Cheap Shots” omitted the words “traditional southern” inadvertently.

 

Mind your House of Mouse

In the “Cheap Shots ’05” issue of C-VILLE, you accuse Joan Fenton and Bob Stroh of trying to turn the Downtown Mall into Disneyland, specifically citing:

-Their sponsorship of an additional crossing for vehicles

-Their support of increased fees for street vendors

-Their desire to remove the newspaper boxes

The Downtown Mall survives on successful local commercial ventures, which nourish the Mall economically and socially. One additional vehicle crossing does not destroy the pedestrian nature of the Mall. Easy access to the Mall businesses will help keep the Mall viable.

   In regards the increased fees for the street vendors—it is the small business that creates and defines the Downtown Mall. An extremely conservative estimate of expenses of a small store would be $35,000 in rent, utilities and advertising annually. If revenues fail to cover those expenses, they close. If the street vendors cannot cover $100 per month in fees, then they must learn the same lesson in market economics as the rest of us.

   If your paper depended on advertising revenue from the street vendors, you would cease to exist. If the Downtown Mall depended solely on street vendors, it, too, would fail. I doubt that you have sought the perspective of the business owners who provide your forum and your existence.

   Removing the newspaper boxes? While I don’t object to the boxes, their removal hardly seems to qualify as “Disneyfi-cation.” Could it be that this proposal strikes too close to home?

   It seems that it is you who wants to be in Disneyland. It is naïve to assume continued success for the Downtown Mall without allowing Mall business owners the tools of that success. Unless you prefer that the small businesses close and the national chains move in. That would indeed be Disneyland on the Mall. Then would you be happy?

Steve Metz

Three Monkeys

Charlottesville