Categories
News

All you can cheap

Dear Ace: At a buffet the waitperson only brings beverages and takes away the plates. Is a 20 percent tip recommended or do you leave less at a buffet?—Phoebe Buffet

Dear Phoebe: Here at C-VILLE the tipping wars have definitely been a topic of conversation. Any conscientious Rant observer will remember the battle that continued for several weeks between whiny waitpersons and local Scrooges. However, The Rant seems to create more problems than it solves, so Ace will mediate this issue (or at least part of it) once and for all.

   The word “tips” is said to be derived from the acronym To Insure Proper Service. But how do you thank the guy who shows you to your table? And what about the geezer behind the warming trays slopping out an extra heaping helping just for you? (Here Ace pauses for a Great Moment in Buffet History, Randy Quaid’s impeccable Cousin Eddie in Vegas Vacation: “Gimme some of the yellow. And don’t get cheap on me.”)

   Insuring proper service and expressing gratitude is important, but the recent trend toward the 20 percent tip suggests that tipping is equally about displaying status and prestige. If that’s the case, Ace has a question for you, Phoebe: Whom are you trying to impress at the buffet with your 20 percent tip? The guy who brought you your water pitcher has long since ducked out around back to puff puff pass the day away, and Cousin Cletus probab-ly won’t notice your baller status as he combs his mullet over by the soft- serve machine. And if you’re trying to impress your date, you might have started by not taking her to Uncle Ollie’s Family Chum Bucket.

   Tipping procedures around this country are inflated enough. Let’s do each other a favor and give these buffet runners what they deserve: nothing. Ace isn’t bitter, but they really just don’t do anything. Look, if they keep coming back to make sure your glass is filled and your finished plate pile doesn’t begin to resemble the Tower of Pisa, by all means toss them a 10 percent gratuity. It’s a nice gesture, and you won’t feel like you’re throwing five bucks at an overblown busboy when you did all the work. You wouldn’t leave just 10 percent at an upscale sit-down restaurant, but you wouldn’t eat six plates of rib tips and Jell-O, either. Now please excuse Ace, it’s time for seconds.

Categories
News

Are you lonesome tonight?

Elvis famously crooned “I can’t help falling in love with you” and millions of hearts beat a little faster. What has been unknown until now is the never-recorded refrain to that chart-topping song: “Yeah, but I can help falling in love with you, pal.”

   Aah, unrequited love. It sucks. Even more so around Valentine’s Day.

   Perhaps the only thing that hurts worse than unrequited love is requited love gone wrong—you know, getting dumped.

   Here at C-VILLE, we know how you feel, friend, and as misery loves nothing more than company we’re going to wallow with you for a while. We’ve got play lists for the heartbroken and tips for getting back at your ex. The Advice Goddess explains how good things come from bad breakups (uh, right). And, for those of you considering getting back in the game, we help you rank your chances with a simple quiz and show you what’s really going on in local bars.

   Maybe, as The King would put it, they could use a little less conversation and a little more action

 

 

Tough love
Advice Goddess Amy Alkon on heartbreak: If you’re going to go through the pain, make it worthwhile and learn something

It may be a Hallmark holiday to some, but the impending doom of another Valentine’s Day alone got C-VILLE’s resident lonely heart, LuvinLearn, in the mood for some soul searching on the relationship front. Thus, for some expert one-on-one counseling, LuvinLearn made an appointment to talk with Advice Goddess Amy Alkon over Instant Messenger. That way, the Goddess wouldn’t be able to detect LuvinLearn’s voice cracking after a particularly cutting insight into the truths of the heart. Here’s what we had to say.—Nell Boeschenstein

 

LuvinLearn: Houston, are we up and running?

AmyAlkon: Who you callin’ Houston?

LuvinLearn: So down to the business of hearts and heartache?

AmyAlkon: Is it a business?

LuvinLearn: If you’re making a living from it, it is, I think.

AmyAlkon: Yeah, without troubled people, I’d be working at a gas station.

LuvinLearn: I’ve seen some hot gas station attendants in my day. So when it comes to the pain of heartbreak, is something good going to come of it all?

AmyAlkon: Well, it depends. A lot of people go into relationships blind, and come out of them the exact same way. That’s the idiot side of heartbreak. I mean, if you’re going to go through a lot of pain, at least make it worthwhile.

LuvinLearn: That’s the good? So all knowledge is good? Like the apple and stuff?

AmyAlkon: I’m not a good one to go into Bible stories with. I’m, let’s say, post-religious. My business card says “godless harlot.”

LuvinLearn: What about the short term? What’s the good, except that age-old “Well, I won’t have to deal with the toilet seat anymore”?

AmyAlkon: People are too petty. So you have to put the toilet seat down. Big deal. If you get into a relationship with somebody right, that stuff typically matters less. If I hate you, I’ll hate you for having a piece of chicken—tiny, too—stuck in your teeth from across the room.

LuvinLearn: So when talking about the short term, you really don’t believe in benefits? The benefits are all about knowledge, which comes with time?

AmyAlkon: If you don’t eat instead of stuffing your face when you’re unhappy, I guess you could lose a few pounds. But, truly, being unhappy is a great teacher. When you’re blissful, you’re not questioning things: You’re having a lot of sex.

LuvinLearn: Speaking of sex. Does that make things better after a bad breakup? Lots of sex with random Joes?

AmyAlkon: It depends upon the person. I call that “lose yourself in the crotch of another.”

LuvinLearn: Are there benefits to losing oneself in said crotch?

AmyAlkon: Depends upon the crotch…and the loser.

LuvinLearn: The loser being the dumpee or the bar prize?

AmyAlkon: The loser being a snarky way to say the person who got dumped. Some people just need to do something to be out of their heads (i.e., their intellect) for a while. Sex is excellent for that.

LuvinLearn: So say you’ve been pining away over some dude or chick that dumped you for a while now. Is there a time when that becomes unhealthy?

AmyAlkon: Well, people need time to be sad.

LuvinLearn: But is there a time that is too much time?

AmyAlkon: There’s a time when your ass you’ve been dragging around needs to get picked up off the floor.

LuvinLearn: What about that half the time you went out? Isn’t that a “Sex and the City” thing?

AmyAlkon: That was a fictional show.

LuvinLearn: So what about the friends question? Is it worth it to “try and be friends?”

AmyAlkon: I HATE THAT! Is there any more insulting thing you could say than “Let’s be friends”?

LuvinLearn: But the whole thing about valuing somebody as a person…

AmyAlkon: The realistic response: “There are a lot of other people in the world you didn’t break up with. Go be ‘friends’ with one of them…Buttwad.”

LuvinLearn: But I put so much time into this person, do I just let him or her disappear?

AmyAlkon: They’re a person, with feelings, not a stock investment.

LuvinLearn: Stock investment. Point well put, counsel.

AmyAlkon: The fangs of the dog are stuck in your ass. You need time away from the dog.

LuvinLearn: So when the fangs are in your ass, why does it actually hurt so much?

AmyAlkon: Well, because it’s not somebody’s lips kissing your ass. They’re fangs!

LuvinLearn: But is there a reason for the [physical] pain?

AmyAlkon: Any sort of stress [hurts]. There’s a stress hormone, cortisol. Nasty stuff. Best to stay destressed. I’ve always been a “bring it on” kinda girl. Some people aren’t. They should stay home and hide under their beds.

LuvinLearn: Speaking of under the bed, how do I get that blue t-shirt back?

AmyAlkon: Why does the blue t-shirt matter?

LuvinLearn: Because it’s soft and special and my favorite. And I got it at a Stones concert in 1982, man.

AmyAlkon: I had this pottery teacher (and don’t laugh, it was damn hard, pottery class) at the University of Michigan, named Uta Savage, who made me break a pot I made to be less attached to things. Perhaps it’s a good lesson, losing [the shirt]. Don’t leave stuff at guys’ houses? Pay more attention to where the relationship is?

LuvinLearn: If there’s any sense that you might not be going back [to the guy’s house] don’t leave it there, eh?

AmyAlkon: Since it happens so often.

LuvinLearn: Hehehe. Well, I AM in my 20s…

 

You can read more of the Advice Goddess’ divine wisdom online at www.advicegoddess.com and on p. 64.

 

 

Songs in the key of luv
What music is playing on the soundtrack of your love life? We asked a few local music hounds what they put on to celebrate love found and mourn love lost.—Spencer Lathrop

 

Robin Tomlin, WTJU Soul DJ Extraordinaire

Tunes for those in love:

Bobby Blue Bland, “Wouldn’t You Rather Have Me”

The Dramatics, “Whatcha See is Whatcha Get”

Candi Staton, “He Called Me Baby”

Al Green, “Let’s Get Married”

The Intruders, “I Wanna Know Your Name”

Tunes for those losing love:

Lou Rawls, “You’ll Never Find Another Love Like Mine”

Darrell Banks, “No One”

Howard Tate, “Ain’t Nobody Home”

Bettye Swann, “Kiss My Love Goodbye”

Isaac Hayes, “Walk On By”

 

 

Jim Waive, Frontman for The Young Divorcees

Tunes for those in love:

Elvis Presley, “Can’t Help Falling In Love”xz

Elvis Presley, ”Love Me Tender”

The Temptations, “My Girl”

Marvin Gaye, “Let’s Get It On”

Van Morrison, “Into The Mystic”

 Tunes for those losing love:

Patsy Cline, “Crazy”

George Jones, “Flame in my Heart

Dwight Yoakam, “Two Doors Down”

Hank Williams, “Your Cheatin’ Heart”

Bob Dylan, “Positively 4th Street”

Elvis Presley, “She’s Not You”

Bill Monroe, “Blue Moon of Kentucky”

Buck Owens, “Crying Time”

Ray Charles, “Hit The Road Jack”

 

Josh Rogan, Guitarist, Rogan Brothers

Tunes for those in love:

Dire Straits, “Romeo and Juliet”

Bob Dylan, “I’ll be Your Baby Tonight”

John Lee Hooker, “Boom Boom”

Bob Marley, “Kinky Reggae”

U2, “With or Without You”

Tunes for those losing love:

Stevie Ray Vaughan, “Let’s Go Shopping”

Brown/Henderson/Lewis, “Sitting on Top of the World”

Sinead O’Connor, “Nothing Compares 2 U”

            

Be my baby tonight?
You might think that getting lucky is a mysterious combination of a smoking hot wardrobe, ice-cold moves and the inexplicable generosity of the unpredictable love gods. Actually, your chances of snagging that special someone this Valentine’s Day are predictable—so pre-dictable that we’ve boiled it down to a simple multiple-choice quiz. If you want to know if you are going
to get lucky, we’ve got the answer. —Anne Metz

 

1. What do you wear when you go out?

A. Kevlar

B. Fake wire-rimmed glasses

C. Prada

D. Slept-in t-shirt featuring name of bar and/or event involving Jell-O shots, pants with stains of unknown provenance, white socks, Chuck Taylors, fat laces

 

2. What do you think is cool?

A. Late night at C&O

B. Almost anything, so long as it involves mimes

C. Emoticons! Emoticons! Emoticons!

D. OxyContin and Red Bull

 

3. Your drink of choice is:

A. Pina Colada

B. Stoli and Soda

C. Cosmopolitan

D. Belgian beer

 

4. When it comes to text
messaging:

A. You do it all the time.

B. You do it occasionally, but still prefer the phone.

C. You’ve tried it once, but didn’t like the typing.

D. Text what?

 

5. Your CD collection includes:

A. Barry White

B. Sophie B. Hawkins’ “Damn I Wish I Was Your Lover”

C. Color Me Badd

D. Postal Service

 

6. What was the last book you read?

A. Book of Job

B. Chilton’s Manual: 1981 Datsun 280Z

C. Tropic of Cancer

D. A Separate Peace, 10th Grade English class

 

7. What do you say to a woman if you want to meet her at a bar?

A. “Has anybody ever told you how much you look like my mom?”

B. “You know, I think Fashion Bug is sooooo underrated!”

C. “Listen: The last trolley leaves at midnight, so we’ve got to do this fast.”

D. “Your hair style isn’t bad, I mean, for a wig and all.”

 

8. The last movie you saw was:

A. Brokeback Mountain

B. The Shining or any movie with pre-face lift Michael Keaton.

C. Any film from The Evil Dead series.

D. In Her Shoes or any movie in which a sad, but beautiful single woman befriends a crazy old lady only to find true love with a slightly geeky, but nonetheless hunky boy next door.

 

9. What gets you hot?

A. DIY projects around the house.

B. Correcting the grammar and spelling of take-out menus shoved under the windshield wiper of your car.

C. The films of Ingmar Bergman.

D. Long walks on the beach.

10. Last night you:

A. Went out for dinner with friends.

B. Went go-carting with your cousins.

C. Drove up and down 29N with no particular place to go.

D. Stalked your crush via Google and Friendster.

 

Now, tally up your score to see if you will get lucky:

 

1. Give yourself a point if you answered B or C.

2. Give yourself a point if you answered A.

3. Give yourself a point if you answered B or D.

4. Give yourself a point if you answered A or B.

5. Give yourself a point if you answered A or D.

6. Give yourself a point if you answered C.

7. Give yourself a point if you answered B or D.

8. Give yourself a point if you answered A.

9. Give yourself a point if you answered A or C.

10. Give yourself a point if you answered A or D.

If you scored 7-9 points, congratulations, you are so going to get lucky this Valentine’s Day. With your semi-pretentious tastes and your knowledge of ‘negging’ (i.e. insulting someone to impress them) you are doing all of the right things when it comes to the opposite sex.

 

If you scored 4-6 points, then you have a pretty good chance of getting lucky this Valentine’s Day. To increase your chances, you should definitely get with the program when it comes to the latest technology. Like it or not, Friendster and text messaging are the future of romance!

 

If you scored 1-3, we’ve got some bad news. You have very little chance of getting lucky this Valentine’s Day. While you might be well-meaning, you are crashing and burning at every corner. To improve your chances of wooing the opposite sex, ditch the bad drinks, buy some new CDs and give up the go-carting.

 

If you scored 0, well, sorry, kid. Things are not looking so good for you. Either change your ways, your look…well, everything about you, or look forward to a long, lonely life of celibacy.

 

Tender is the night?
Does true love exist on a drunken Saturday night? C-VILLE explores the local bar scene and asks, “Are people really hooking up or does it just look that way?”

By Nell Boeschenstein

nell@c-ville.com

 

Before I don my plastic goggles, fire up the Bunsen burners, get my test tubes off and bubbling, and delve into the question of whether Char-lottesville’s singletons are really making whoopie, let’s make a few things clear:

   First, the object of this experiment is not to hypothesize on or test the mating habits of college students. They are a subset unto themselves about which plenty—nay, too much—is already known or has been speculated about when it comes to the subject of raging hormones.

   Second, I could not be less interested in what married people do when they go out to bars. For all I care, they could be reciting Chaucer while doing a downward dog and keg stand. Unless they are at said bar to hit or be hit on, their presence at the bar, to this scientist, is irrelevant. What I’m interested in, for the purposes of this experiment, are the mating habits of the single 20- and 30something local young professionals.

   Third, I am in no way a fly in this bar scene. My observations of and participation in this experiment are done solely as an observer, an anthropologist, a scientist.

   Finally, while I may be playing the role of scientist, my methods are hardly scientific. The last time I approached Science for a date was the eighth grade science fair when I tested the emotional effects of ROY G. BIV (i.e. yellow makes people feel happy, blue makes people feel sad, etc.). So, do not—and I repeat, do not—apply anything I report in this experiment to any other time, place, or demographic. Doing so could prove dangerous. If not dangerous, then at the very least, demoralizing.

Step One: Observation

O.K., class. Open your eyes and take a good look around for signs of rampant sex.

   Holed up alone in the safety of my own house, for an impersonal perusal of my peer group’s private lives, I turned to the indispensable Friendster. I typed in a search for singles between the ages of 23 and 35 within 10 miles of Charlottesville. I don’t know whether I was expecting loads of blurry photos of half naked people to pop up with “About Me” entries along the lines of “Once, I got drunk on a bottle of champagne at the Frankfurt airport and made out in the broom closet with a Yemenese janitor: Yes, I enjoy getting wasted and hooking up with random people,” but, needless to say, I found no such incriminating evidence. There is the occasional photo featuring flushed cheeks or testimonial along the lines of “Last night was amazing, hott stuff!” But generally speaking, when it comes to Friendster profiles, people spin their images as assiduously as celebrities. Perhaps that’s the glory of it.

   For further material in the observation arsenal, I turned to my own and my friends’ experiences with the bar scene. Which is minimal. We go to bars, but studiously avoid intense gazes bearing down on us from across the room or pointless questions from strangers aimed at jumpstarting conversation. We go. We drink. We talk amongst ourselves. Some people call this “closed off”; I call this “safe.”

   For the final step in my observation process, I ventured out to watch the meat market, live and in the flesh, unfold before me. I selected a Saturday night at Blue Light Grill. The first thing I noticed when I walked through the front glass doors was the soundtrack: pounding techno music. The beats were undeniably…primal.

   “I wonder,” I mused to myself, surveying the scene, “what would happen if I took control of the turntables and forced Leonard Cohen on these people? On the other hand, what would happen to me if, instead of Cohen’s constant moaning, there was this stuff on my Volvo stereo?”

   For 11:30pm on a Saturday, Blue Light was not crowded. It appeared so at first, but past the 50 or so people crowded into the front bar area, the place was empty. A group of middle-aged women in jeans, Lycra tank tops and gold jewelry gossiped around the tables by the front window. At least half were wearing wedding rings. Plus, they were all drinking white wine. My gaze wandered.

   Seated beside me was a group of swarthy young bucks in black leather jackets silently knocking back cocktails. In the name of subtlety, I couldn’t turn and stare, but their lack of conversation was a clear sign they were surveying the room for fresh meat. This being the observation stage, I resisted the urge to test my theory by turning to bat my eyes.

   By the bar, there were a few circles of what appeared to be grad students, a couple of dudes nursing beers alone, and the inevitable crowd I recognized (duck and run for cover!) from high school.

   Thing is, in that hour and a half as I sat and watched each group hold conversations by shouting over both each other and the heavy bass, not once did I observe any cross pollination. Within the greater context of Blue Light, each little circle of revelers appeared, to the casual scientist, to be a world unto itself.

 

Step Two: Hypothesis

The young, restless, beautiful and not-so-beautiful crowd Downtown bars on the weekend looking for something. Tube tops and leather jackets would lead to the assumption that that “something” is sex, but you can’t ever be sure. In fact, observations lead to a more nuanced conclusion: Ultimately, singles are looking for love, but the bar scene is not as forceful a karate chop against the brick of the single life as might first be thought. Thus, I officially hypothesize that when it comes to the so-called local “meat markets,” looks can be deceiving.

 

Step Three: Testes, testes

Properly testing my hypothesis required breaking out of myself a bit. It’s impossible to know whether or not hooking up is happening unless one actually puts on the costume and plays the guinea pig. For my part, I got dolled up in a short skirt and Mary J. Blige boots and headed to Mas!

   Parked at the packed bar, there were a couple of cutie pies to my right, a sleaze bag feeling up some girl in a skin tight leopard print dress to my left, and another girl on her hands and knees searching the beer-soaked floor for her engagement ring that had fallen off her finger (she later found it). It was too loud and chaotic to randomly start a conversation so, instead, I headed downstairs where there was a full-on, sweat-soaked, leg-humping, face-sucking dance party going on.

   “If there’s hooking up in town tonight,” I deduced, “it’s in that thar beer pit.” I descended down the stairs…feeling lucky.

   Props to the mixmaster: If beer isn’t a sufficient social lubricant, then Chic’s “Good Times” picks up the slack. Feeling like a lamb lost in the jungle, I tentatively shot out a few flirtatious glances to my left, right, left and right again. Bingo. Before I knew it I was dancing with a total stranger. Call him L. There was flirting, yes, and I don’t mean to sound cocky, but I think the flirting could have progressed. However, sensing I had sufficiently tested my hypothesis for the time being, I called it a night. But before I could get out the door, I noticed L. talking to an acquaintance of mine. So much for breaking out of my social group: In Charlottesville everyone is three degrees of separation at most.

   Realizing that my own experiences mean little to nothing in the grand scheme of things, the next step to testing my hypothesis was to interview bartenders. If anyone knows about sexual mores in this town, it’s the men and women who provide the Saturday night elixir. I talked with bartenders from Blue Light, C&O and South Street. The consensus? People definitely come to bars to get nookie, stupid. Blue Light, they agreed, was ground zero for local libido. According to the bartenders, the lack of mingling I observed at Blue Light was simply a result of my dorkiness—I was there too early. Last call, apparently, is when things get really interesting: That’s when people are about as drunk and as desperate as they’re ever going to get.

 

Step Four: Conclusion

Testing proves my hypothesis wrong. Hookups happen…if you want them to. That’s the key. Because really, dear readers, whatever makes you happy. Isn’t that what it’s all about, anyway?

 

 

Strike back
How to take revenge on an ex

By Ben Sellers

feature@c-ville.com

When Eminem reunited in Decem-ber with his ex-wife Kim, it struck a backhanded blow to men everywhere. Gone were the days of vicarious living as the rapper—through his lyrics—bound, gagged and trunked that bee-otch, or performed countless other feats of misogynist violence.

   In real life, it turns out, things are not so cut and dry. Regardless of the circumstances, women are a manipulative lot. Hence, it’s important to use extreme caution and deviousness when avenging yourself on one.

   With the proper guidance, however, any man can learn how to go Count-of-Monte-Cristo on the two-timing hussy who stole his prized CD collection and squandered the best years of his youth. While each vindictive deed should be custom fit to the occasion, there are some basic rules of thumb:

 

Attack pre-emptively

The best time to act is when you first sense things going wayward. Get cozy with your ex-to-be’s friends and family in order to cut her post-break support lines. When she finally calls it quits, be slightly too agreeable, though making sure to assert your victim status. Ask her to one last pricey dinner for friendship’s sake. Slip out before the check arrives.

 

Get in her head

Bringing in your psychological game is a must. Use your knowledge of your ex against her. Change her e-mail password before she does, then invite all her friends over for a surprise makeover party when you know it’s her “time of the month.”

 

Don’t get caught

Chances are, the underlying reason she left you was for attention. If your former betrothed knows you still think about her, she wins. Instead of risking your hide on an elaborate stunt, surprise her with several small things, like a subscription to Al-Qaeda’s daily newsletter. For you, spying on her is considered stalking; for Uncle Sam, it’s A-O.K.

 

The Golden Rule of Jealousy

You may be tempted to go to the gutter, slandering her every chance you get. But the fallout can be just as bad. Remember those nude photos of you she has, just waiting to be posted all over town?

   Think positive instead. Focus on getting ripped and finding a sweet piece of arm-candy to tote around for the next time you bump into her at your favorite bar. Also remember that if she did it to you, she can do it to the next guy too. Learn from your mistakes and wait for her to come running back.

Categories
The Editor's Desk

Mailbag

Developing conclusions

  I’m usually impressed by your coverage of local issues, but once in a while an article shows up that’s so unbalanced as to demand a reality check. John Borgmeyer’s piece on the new Rugby historic district is a case in point [“Council approves Rugby historic district,” The Week, January 24]. In researching the issue, Borgmeyer relies heavily on the opinions of real estate developer/manager Rick Jones. What Jones fails to make clear is that when the City rezoned the Rugby-Venable neighborhood back in 2003, public officials promised that protections for the area’s historic buildings would be promptly put into place. Three years and many demolitions later, that promise has been fulfilled. How real estate moguls managed to develop a sense of entitlement in the meantime is none of my business, but it is (or should be) Borgmeyer’s.

   Borgmeyer and Jones leave readers with the impression that historic district status will freeze new construction in the neighborhood. In fact, the ordinance simply gives the Board of Architectural Review (and ordinary citizens) some say over what comes down and what goes up. It was with this goal in mind that more than 230 Charlottesville residents—including UVA students and faculty—signed petitions in support of the district. I assume it is this group that Borgmeyer dismisses as “preservation interests” to whom City Councilors “caved in.” Still, 230 residents seem more likely to represent public interests than a klatch of irate developers who, it’s worth noting, tend to live outside the city.

   Finally, while I am heartened to learn that Jones and other developers are suddenly concerned about sprawl, I suspect their eulogy for the “great idea” of unregulated growth may be misdirected. Many empty lots in the neighborhood are likely to be the sites of new apartment buildings in coming years. And yet the sprawl will continue. UVA has some 20,000 students for whom it provides roughly 6,000 units of housing. Might this cause be more deserving of taxpayer money than yet another football stadium? I’m counting on Rick Jones and John Borgmeyer to pursue the issue with me.  

Aaron Wunsch

Charlottesville

 

 

In the zone

The C-VILLE seems determined to take the developers’ part in its reporting of City Council’s debate on historic preservation in the Rugby Road/14th Street area. Why write the article from the perspective of the “baffled” Rick Jones, president of MSC? Where is the confusion here? Is it in the fact that the City modified its 2003 rezoning decision and, through a process of debate and argument, decided to reign in unchecked development? Does this process sound familiar? It’s “all politics” all the time, Mr. Jones, but usually development (read: money) gets its way. Every now and then, though, a truly good idea wins out, as it did on January 17. The
C-VILLE needs to re-examine its ability (or desire) to evenhandedly report on this important local issue.
 

Judith Kucharski

Charlottesville

 

Let’s hear it for Bluestone

  Charlottesville’s big-time developers of student housing did a great sales job on John Borgmeyer [“What price history?” January 31].

   Charlottesville residents—in case Borg-meyer is interested—thank City Council for its recent vote, which preserves quality of life as well as important local history. Many of us in Venable have been involved in such debates for three or more decades.

   One of the developer-group problems—in addition to an unwillingness to police its own ranks—is its go-it-alone, us-against-them mindset. During the process I personally attempted to engage one of the chief developers in dialogue, only to be told to “mind my own business.” So be it.

   A couple of points:

   -Charlottesville has substantial tax revenues and a triple “A” bond rating.

   -Sorry, but I don’t know any “townies who enjoy mocking UVA undergraduates.”

   -And as far as professor Daniel Blue-stone is concerned, I hope he runs for mayor.  

Dan Friedman

Charlottesville

 

 

UVA should take the lead

In your story “What price history?” you’ve left out one really big key player: UVA. Why is it that the University of Virginia seems to be sprouting massive athletic facilities and other buildings all over the place but doesn’t seem to be providing adequate student housing? It seems to me that much of the student sprawl is the fault of UVA relying on developers to provide student housing, instead of building it on-campus. If UVA has the money and resources to increase its student population by 6,000 then they should also have the money to build more housing.

   Secondly, UVA should commit to not only build it, but also strongly encourage or even require more students to live in it. This should include limiting parking for second- and possibly third-year students. Anyone who drives around in Char-lottesville year-round breathes a sigh of relief once summer is here, students are gone and we can find parking, and travel freely down our streets. If our city is going to preach alternative transportation and responsible development, UVA must start being a leader by teaching students how to live and travel more sustainably.

   Lastly, I’m not convinced about the tax benefits that these developments provide to the City. Students don’t use schools, but they do use water, sewer, electricity, roads and other infrastructure. The less concentrated students are within the city, the more of these resources they will consume. They also have the potential to negatively impact the aesthetic and historic quality of Charlottesville.

   There are also social justice issues involved. Near UVA are many lower income neighborhoods where students play a significant role in driving up the cost of affordable housing. While it is a good idea for student-oriented developments to be concentrated as close to UVA as possible, let us not forget the option of actually building them at UVA itself.  

Lonnie Murray

Charlottesville

 

Natural preservatives

John Borgmeyer’s recent articles regarding the fate of the Venable-Rugby neighborhood (VRN) perpetuate two major misconceptions: 1) that preservation and development are mutually exclusive, and 2) that recent decisions by City Council about the neighborhood were made in haste and in response to intense lobbying by a “special interest group.”

   Developers’ claims that the new ordinance leaves them hamstrung are histrionic. Historic district designation doesn’t preclude development. It simply affords the City and its citizens some control over what happens to the neighborhood in coming decades. Moreover, fighting sprawl and promoting affordable housing for students and city residents are issues of broad public concern (and of particular importance to preservationists intent on keeping culture and people in place and not just on protecting buildings). Our community has provided student housing of many types for generations. To present interest in these issues as the monopoly of developers is simplistic.

   In 2003, the City’s Planning Commis-sion approved high-density zoning for the neighborhood with the explicit understanding that a historic resource survey of the area would be likely to result in a recommendation for an “overlay district” to preserve the area’s historic character. In fact, it has taken more than two years for a zoning amendment to be proposed to establish the VRN district; many buildings have been demolished in the meantime. But the process that brought this new district into being was both democratic and open. Members of Preservation Piedmont and other city residents attended these meetings, spoke out in support of the district, and submitted petitions with more than 230 signatures—many from students and property owners living in the VRN. Those not supporting the district were free to do the same, and did, but in considerably smaller numbers. In this respect, I do not find this process “baffling” but a clear example of how our public process can work—even in spite of development pressure.

   We challenge those individuals who are “hopping mad” about the establishment of the district to work creatively with the Board of Architectural Review and local design and engineering professionals to expand housing opportunities within the envelope the City has provided. This, and not further mud-slinging, seems like the best way to move forward while balancing the interests of all parties.

Gina Haney

President, Preservation Piedmont

Charlottesville

 

Make more than mediocrity

The Charlottesville City Council did the right thing in establishing the Rugby-Venable Historic District. C-VILLE has done a disservice in uncritically giving voice to development community fabrications about that district, especially the illusions that the historic district will mean the loss of $5 million annually in City tax revenue.

   The hubris behind the vision of a neighborhood with $500 million in new building adds to the compelling historical arguments favoring historic designation. The developer vision would mean, for example, building 50 projects the size of the new Venable Court Apartments (assessed at $9,817,500 in 2006) in the district. That means two Venable Courts on every block in the historic district, stretching from University Circle to 14th Street, from Grady to Wertland. That would require demolishing nearly every existing building on those blocks and substituting 2,600 units of housing for about 7,000 students. Who are they kidding?

   Preservationists have at every turn proposed accommodating new development in this historic district. They point to additions to existing houses, empty lots, parking lots, backyards and alleys as potential sites for denser development that will not destroy the existing character of the neighborhood. Preservationists envision a district where new buildings could strengthen the existing architectural, urban and historic character.

   Interestingly, many valued district buildings were originally built by developers who creatively harmonized higher density with the neighborhood’s prevailing domestic character. They appreciated and respected the materials, scale and quality of the neighborhood. In 1916 James Lindsay, editor of The Daily Progress, developed the fine Lyndhall Apartments at 62 University Way. He then moved into the building. In 1928 Frank E. Hartman hired a talented architect, Stanislaw Makielski, and built the handsome Preston Court Apartments. Seventy-five years later Preston Court, along with Lyndhall, are counted among valued neighborhood landmarks—medium density in the midst of detached houses.

   Sadly, there is precious little evidence today of developers hiring top architects, or aspiring to build future landmarks, or constructing buildings in which they themselves would be willing to take up residence. (Few of them are even willing to live in Charlottesville, never mind in their own buildings.) Rather than whine about the modest restrictions that come with historic districts, rather than writing fiction about lost tax revenues, local developers could perhaps more productively turn their efforts to building in a way that rises above the mediocrity of many of their most recent Charlottesville developments. 

Daniel Bluestone

Charlottesville

 

Granting wishes

It is exciting news for the Charlottesville community that UVA has been bestowed a $4.5 million research grant by the MacArthur Foundation to study the effects of mandated outpatient treatment for mental health [7 Days, January 24].

   The MacArthur Foundation is one of the nation’s 10 largest philanthropic foundations in the country, and has been a leading advocate for positive change to America’s mental health care crisis. They have funded the Campaign for Mental Health Reform, a coalition of 16 national mental health organizations, completing an action plan designed to help the federal government better align funding and other resources for mental health care services and treatment. This coalition has helped to identify gaps in mental health care, and supports President Bush’s new Freedom Commission on Mental Health. To have them again support UVA research with this award, as they did before in 2003, is an honor and a partnership in which we should all be proud.

   The subject of mandated outpatient treatment often brings confusion and controversy in mental health law and policy. Residents in Central Virginia who are working for the betterment of people with mental illness are excited to hear that the University can play a leading role. Determining whether community-based services can deliver better outcomes for victims of mental illness than traditional inpatient hospitalizations is a current and lively debate with many voices. Having the involvement and participation of UVA adds a welcome credibility and muscle to the dialogue.

   The mental health community in Charlottesville-Albemarle openly welcomes any participation that the University wishes for partnership, collaboration and input. At a time where Virginia state funding for services is strained, local direct care and support agencies who work with people with mental illnesses and their families are willing to become involved, educated and kept informed of the progress and highlights of the work of this study. This is an important and significant opportunity. It pertains to the very personal struggles of so many and indeed affects many lives.

   All the best to John T. Monahan and the UVA Law School. Many in our community will be eagerly anticipating engaging the University on the findings and results of their work.

 

Pete Armetta

petearmetta@yahoo.com

 

 

Coppin’ a ’toon

I love your newspaper, but…you have got to be kidding. If you think your six choices of cartoons are funny [“Funny pages,” January 24] you need to go back to
the drawing board. Not all of your readers are adolescents.
 

Kent Mills

kent@kw.com

 

Editor’s note: While Mr. Mills might not have liked the strips we selected, hundreds of you did—and told us which one you preferred. Turn to page 33 to see our winner, Keith Knight’s (Th)ink.

Categories
Uncategorized

News in review

Tuesday, January 31
Harding could look for GOP nod

City Police Captain Chip Harding is eyeing public office in Albemarle County, where he has lived for 25 years, according to today’s Daily Progress. If Albemarle County Sheriff Ed Robb decides against running for a second term next year, then Harding will seek the Republican nomination. Harding took a three-day candidate’s training course at UVA’s Sorensen Institute, the same program attended by Rob Schilling, the City’s lone Republican Councilor, before his successful campaign four years ago. Harding is nearing retirement and would welcome an opportunity to speak his mind at last on certain public issues, according to the report.

 

Wednesday, February 1
Tim Kaine: a star is born

Governor Tim Kaine responded to President Bush’s State of the Union address last night in a nationally televised broadcast, and this morning The New York Times dubbed his performance “a coming-out party for a new Democratic star.” His party appeal, like that of his gubernatorial predecessor, presidential candidate-apparent Mark Warner, lies partly in his ability to win one for the blue team in a red state. In his remarks, Kaine questioned whether Bush’s policies were “the best way to win this war [on terror].” “There’s a better way,” Kaine said.

 

Thursday, February 2
Mild temps don’t thwart storm team

The Emergency Operations Center that serves Charlottesville and Albemarle County is getting prepared for severe weather and power outages despite the unseasonable temperatures and confused crocuses, WCAV reports today. Using computer simulation, the emergency group staged a three-day storm that would leave 90 percent of the area in the dark. “In the winter time, in this part of Virginia, it is a very realistic scenario,” WCAV quotes Michael Cocker as saying. Cocker is with the State’s Department of Emergency Management.

 

But do they want paper or plastic?

Head football coach Al Groh has signed
24 players to the 2006 incoming class, and though none of them are “glittery,” in
the words of Daily Progress Sports Editor Jerry Ratcliffe, that may be the least
of Groh’s issues today. More troubling
is Ratcliffe’s incomprehensible simile in the DP to describe the recruiting process: “Football recruiting is kind of like going
to the grocery store.
It’s only a successful trip if you brought home what you really needed.”

 

Friday, February 3
Potts is sad, doggone it

Senator Russ Potts is today mourning the loss of his trusted golden retriever Maggie, according to the Associated Press. The Win-chester Republican, who ran an Independent campaign for governor and may have cost fellow Republican Jerry Kilgore the election, reportedly eulogized the 9-year-old, dessert-loving dog in the Senate yesterday. “There is a great big hole in my heart,” he said. “I hope they’re serving frozen custard in heaven.”

 

Saturday, February 4
Sunrise stumper: What if Duffy leaves WVIR?

Lead topic today on cvillenews.com? Morning TV anchor Beth Duffy’s rumored defection from WVIR. The chipper broadcaster is effectively “the face of NBC 29,” wrote blogger Waldo Jaquith, and, if true, her departure would deal a blow to the leading local TV station. But not everybody was buying it. “What if NBC 29 lost an anchor and nobody noticed?” wrote Big_Al in response.

 

Sunday, February 5
Local investor leads political gift-givers

In a report that was widely reprinted today, AP reporter Bob Lewis identifies Governor Kaine as the recipient of last year’s biggest political gift—a 10-day Caribbean vacation for him and his family from Albemarle County businessman James B. Murray Jr. Last year, Virginia’s elected officials accepted nearly $315,000 in gifts, with Kaine’s $18,000 rest at Murray’s Mustique home leading the pack. Kaine “saw this as a unique opportunity to get away with his wife and three children after a year of campaigning and on the eve of four years in the spotlight,” press secretary Kevin Hall told Lewis.

 

Monday, February 6
Why not repeal the seat-belt law, too, while you’re at it?

“When it’s a 35 mph speed limit on the Blue Ridge Parkway in the middle of summer, why not be allowed to take the helmet off?” That’s the rationale the Richmond Times-Dispatch today attributes to Del. William R. Janis, the Henrico Republican who is sponsoring a bill to turn back the State’s motorcycle helmet law. The bill made it out of committee, but faces an uphill battle. Other no-helmet bills have failed in the Assembly in recent years.

Assembly Watch

LOCALS LOBBY FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS
TRAP, parental consent and family life programs on the agenda

On February 2, Planned Parenthood of the Blue Ridge packed 280 local pro-choicers—including 70 high school students—onto chartered buses and shipped them to Richmond for Planned Parent-hood’s Lobby Day.

   They were primed for a fight over three bills in particular: House Bill 189, the Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP), which would make abortion providers subject to the standards of ambulatory surgery centers; House Bill 868, which would require parental consent before a minor could obtain emergency contraception; and Senate Joint Resolution 171, which calls for a statewide survey of family-life education programs.

   Planned Parenthood favors the Joint Res-olution, and opposes the two House Bills.

   First up for many of the lobbyists: Del. Rob Bell’s (R-Albemarle) office, where 35 people squished themselves in like sardines. The day’s tactic was moderation—i.e. safeguard contraception and sex ed first, then tackle abortion. Appealing to moderate Republicans like Bell was a popular refrain. Bell was in committee at the time, but his aide Mike Broomfield played host.

   Although TRAP legislation is proposed every year—passing the House before dying in the Senate’s Education and Health Committee, chaired by Sen. Russ Potts (R-Winchester)—Broomfield’s response was, “This is the first I’ve heard about all three of these [bills].” A woman then passed the hapless aide information sheets on each bill.

   Supporting Potts was a big theme. If and when he leaves office, the passage of TRAP is a distinct possibility, and would qualify only two existing abortion facilities—the Planned Parenthood offices in Charlottesville and Roanoke.

   Next up, a joint meeting with David Toscano (D-Charlottesville) and Sen. Creigh Deeds (D-Bath County). Lobbying Deeds and Toscano, both of whom Planned Parenthood considers “allies,” is preaching to the choir, but they urged lobbying moderate Republicans because, as Deeds put it, “politics is about choices, but not between perfect or evil.” The best part? Deeds and Toscano wore matching olive green suits.

   Earlier that morning the Health, Welfare and Institutions Committee had voted in favor of the TRAP legislation. This is where Bell had been; he voted in favor of the bill.

   Last up, a rally with the 550 citizen lobbyists from around the state. In keeping with the bipartisan theme, featured speaker and founder of the Republican Pro-Choice Coalition, Delegate Katherine Waddell (I-Richmond), expressed her position to cheers.

   “I’ll support the full range of choices for women: abstinence, contraception, marriage and abortion,” she said. “I will stop focusing on how wide the halls are in an abortion clinic.”

   The morning ended with a variation
on an old classic: What do we want?
PREVENTION! When do we want it? NOW! But the buses were waiting and having done what they came to do,
the group gradually dispersed.—Nell Boeschenstein


WEED AND EWERT SQUARE OFF
Dem Congressional hopefuls vie for nomination

On Wednesday, February 1, Democrat Congressional hopefuls Al Weed and Bern Ewert squared off in a debate at the Jefferson Area Board for Aging on Hillsdale Drive. It was the second of what is sure to be many chances to hear from the two guys who want to challenge Fifth District incumbent Virgil Goode, Jr. (R-Rocky Mount). He trounced Weed in 2004. Weed is back, but first he must contend with former Charlottesville Deputy City Manager Bern Ewert, who boasts an extensive public record and more than 3,000 TV appearances in 13 years. The Democratic primary will be June 13.

   Despite their appeals to bipartisan solutions, both candidates spent plenty of time Bushwhacking, spouting the Howard Dean-ian “we need to take our country back” rhetoric, eliciting whistles and applause from the crowd of more than 100.—David Goodman


CITY SCHOOL BOARD LOSES MONEY IT NEVER HAD
Accounting turnabout means budget cuts needed after all

Elation quickly turned to gloom at the Charlottesville School Board meeting on Thursday, February 2 when it was revealed that nearly $300,000 had never, in fact, been lost and thus was not regained.

   The Daily Progress had reported the day before that a surplus had been “found” in the budget, giving many hope that some tough staff cuts wouldn’t take place.
At meeting’s start, however, financial director Ed Gillaspie said that he was “right the first time” and that the current budget is balanced.

   This deflation didn’t deter community members from advocating for the retention for certain school staff currently on the chopping block. That includes several special education positions at some elementary schools and high school dance teacher Miki Liszt.

   Board member Louis Bograd tried to spin the accounting snafu as “probably a good thing.” According to Bograd, “Now we can trim the budget to free up the things we thought we were going to be able to pay for from this free money.” During the meeting, the board amassed a long wish list, as if the system had triple the surplus it never had to begin with.—Will Goldsmith


OUR VOTES FOR THE NEXT STATE SONG
It’s time to get this party started

Forget roads and schools and unchecked sprawl—the Commonwealth has real problems. We need a state song!

   Until recently, Virginia was the only state without an official state song. On January 24 lawmakers voted to make the 19th-century folk song “Shenandoah” the interim official state song until something better comes along. To do our part, this week C-VILLE offers suggestions for Virginia’s next state song.—John Borgmeyer

 

Song: “I Can’t Drive 55,” by Sammy Hagar

Sample lyric: “One foot on the brake, and one on the gas/there’s too much traffic, I can’t pass.”

Relevance: The Red Rocker speaks to Virginia’s mounting traffic woes.

 

Song: “Big Yellow Taxi” by Joni Mitchell

Sample lyric: “They paved paradise and put up a parking lot.”

Relevance: See Route 29N.

 

Song: “Bad Man, Chi Chi Man” by Been-
ie Man

Sample lyric: “I’m dreaming of a new Jamaica/come to execute all the gays.”

Relevance: Who knew right-wing delegates would have so much in common with a reggae star?

 

Song: “You’re Having My Baby” by
Paul Anka

Sample lyric: “Didn’t have to keep it/You could have swept it from your life/ But you wouldn’t do it.”

Relevance: We’re pretty sure this is the only song on Del. Bob Marshall’s Ipod.

 

Song: “Okie From Muskogee” by Merle Haggard

Sample lyric: “We still wave Old Glory down at the courthouse/and white lightnin’s still the biggest thrill of all.”

Relevance: Ripped on moonshine, wavin’ the flag, and kicking some hippie ass in Virginia. Yee-haw!

MILLER CENTER RECONSIDERS REAGAN
New interviews reveal ex-prez as “the anti-Nixon”

It’s been a busy week for Stephen Knott. The associate professor and research fellow at UVA’s Miller Center for Public Affairs spent last week fielding calls from The Washington Post, the Associated Press, National Public Radio and even the London Daily Telegraph.

   The hubbub was all about Ronald Reagan. Last week the Miller Center released 33 transcripts of interviews Knott conducted with some of the 40th president’s closest colleagues—Cabinet members, White House staff, campaign advisors—between 2001 and 2004. The release accompanied a daylong forum on Reagan at the Miller Center on Monday, February 6.

   Knott, a presidential scholar who has written a book on The Gipper, says the Miller Center’s new Reagan Oral History Project will add to the discussion of a man who has been exalted and vilified (perhaps, in both cases, unreasonably so) since his death in June 2004.

   “In some ways, it is a political thing,” says Knott. “Conservatives have been looking for their own FDR for years. There has been a concerted effort to lift [Reagan] into the American pantheon.”

   These new transcripts will only help that effort. They are mostly fond reminisces from people who worked by Reagan’s side. “We try not to go into these interviews with an agenda,” says Knott. “We try to put ourselves in the place of scholars 100 years from now. What would they want to know?”

   Knott says he found two surprises in the interviews. One is the image of Reagan as a kind person incapable of suspecting the worst in people, a figure Knott describes as “the anti-Nixon.”

   “He couldn’t fire people,” says Knott. “It’s hard to imagine how he got as far as
he did.”

   Reagan could be uncompromising, however, when it came to the two central concerns of his presidency: his deep fears of communism and nuclear weapons. “Everything else was far, far removed for him,” says Knott. Reagan was branded a warmonger for escalating the arms race, but today scholars say his plan to outspend the Soviet Union led to arms reduction and that nation’s collapse in 1991.

   While Knott says Reagan would probably have been embarrassed by the right-wing’s efforts to name infrastructure in his honor, he remains a hero to many Americans—perhaps more for his words than his deeds.

   “For a lot of Americans coming out of the ’70s, he made them feel better,” Knott says. “I think his words will live long after we’re gone. I put him up there with JFK.”—John Borgmeyer  

 


DIVERSITY CHIEF SPEAKS
William Harvey plays his greatest hits for first major speech

 On Thursday, February 2, UVA’s new vice president and chief officer for diversity and equity gave his first major address to the school.

   In his talk entitled “Issues of Race in Predominantly White Institutions,” William Harvey mostly read excerpts from his past writings, as well as those of other race scholars. He said that American colleges do not have enough black faculty, a problem he said is caused by racism and can be remedied by more aggressive affirmative action.

   “Academic institutions must strive to reflect the diversity of the society,” Harvey said to an overflow crowd at the Small Special Collections Library auditorium.

   Digging as far back as 1981 into his file of past writings, Harvey emphasized how little the problem of black faculty has changed over the years. Even though many colleges have the official will to recruit more African-American faculty, Harvey said those goals have been thwarted by subtle and overt racism. Subtle racism keeps blacks and other minorities out of the “informal networks” that help potential professors navigate the highly subjective tenure process. Moreover, the faculty “gatekeepers” who make tenure decisions tend to choose people who look and think just like them, said Harvey.

   But when asked, Harvey did not know how many black professors are currently on UVA’s faculty. “I’ve only been here for 90 days,” he said.

   Addressing incidents of racial harassment earlier in this academic year, Harvey said that if, in fact, the people who wrote racist messages on some students’ dry erase boards were students themselves, he is distressed that no one has turned in the perpetrators.—John Borgmeyer

 

MORE ON HOUSING THOSE ’HOOS
At capacity,UVA dorms only hold half of all undergrads

Of the 20,399 students enrolled at UVA for the 2005-06 school year, 13,401 are undergraduates. According to UVA’s Housing Division, the school has a total of 7,071 dormitory beds available for all students, with 6,325 beds available for undergraduates. John Evans, UVA’s director of accommodations, says that those undergraduate beds are currently 95 percent occupied. Last week, UVA’s Board of Visitors voted to raise the cost of a double-occupancy dorm room to an average of $3,639 per student in 2006-07, an increase of $350.

   Currently 13,328 Wahoos—7,076 of them undergrads—live off campus. As the debate rages between developers and preservationists and the City and County over how to house these off-campus students, C-VILLE hit the streets to ask students this question: “Given the same location, would you rather live in a new apartment complex or an old house? Why?” Here’s a sample of their responses.—John Borgmeyer, with additional reporting by Esther Brown

ALBEMARLE POLICE ARREST JUVENILES IN VIOLENT PLOT ON SCHOOLS
Teens communicated their plans via Internet chat room

Seated side-by-side at a press conference on February 3, Albemarle County Police Chief John Miller and County Schools Superintendent Dr. Pamela Moran announced that after an anonymous source contacted them on January 30, three Albemarle County school kids had been arrested and charged with felonies in connection with a plot to use an explosive on either Western Albemarle High School, Albemarle High School or both.

   “We really believe these acts would have been carried out,” said Miller. “Probably in the next couple of months.”

   A 16-year-old Western Albemarle High School student is charged with communicating a threat in writing to kill or do bodily injury and with commanding or entreating others to commit a felony; a 15-year-old Albemarle High School student is charged with conspiring to commit murder and conspiring to use an explosive on a schoolhouse; a 13-year-old Jack Jouett Middle School student is charged with conspiring to commit murder and conspiring to use an explosive on a schoolhouse.
If convicted, the kids, all of whom are male, could remain incarcerated until their 21st birthdays.

   According to police the three are friends—two live in the same neighborhood—and they communicated their plans in an Internet chat room. Two shotguns and three computers were seized by police in connection with the investigation.

   While none of the children had been previously identified as “at risk” by police, in the course of the investigation, Miller said that evidence surfaced that there were “problems at home.” Moran declined
to say whether the teens had difficulties
in school.

   This is the second time in a year that juveniles have been arrested in plots against their schools. Last May, two Covenant School students were arrested and charged in a purportedly Columbine-like attack they were plotting against their school.

   The Albemarle teens are currently out of school and being held at the Blue Ridge Juvenile Detention Facility. No further information is being released until County Commonwealth’s Attorney Jim Camblos reviews the case.—Nell Boeschenstein

 


TEENS CAUGHT BURGLING WHERE THEY’D BURGLED BEFORE
Been caught stealing before, but that didn’t stop a second act

If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. That’s usually good advice, but not for 18-year-old Joseph Albrecht and his 16-year-old cohort.

   The pair, both from Charlottesville, were arrested in November on charges of breaking and entering, larceny and vandalism of businesses and churches in the Airport Road area. They had been released on bond, but on January 29 they were rearrested again at the same place, for the same charge.—Nell Boeschenstein

 


THEN AND NOW: UVA’S POLICIES ON SEXUAL ASSAULT
Beebe case questions how administrators responded in 1984

Of the many issues raised by the case of William Beebe, the question of how UVA handles—and has historically handled—student re-ports of sexual assault is center stage.

   Beebe, of Las Vegas, turned himself into Charlottesville police in mid-January on charges stemming from an incident 21 years ago at a UVA frat party. In addition to alleging rape, Beebe’s accuser, Con-necticut resident Eliza-beth Seccuro, alleges that when she originally reported the incident
to UVA administrators in 1984, she was discouraged from going to local police.

   UVA spokesperson Carol Wood declined to comment on the Beebe case since it is an ongoing criminal matter, but she did say that UVA reviews and evaluates its policies on sexual assault every two years. Wood also says, “Certain policies were in place [20 years ago] that are still in place today,” including going to police and providing the victim with options—like counseling—to deal with his or her individual health and safety.

   Comparing UVA’s policy from 1984 to what’s on the books today illustrates how ways of addressing the issue have evolved, even if the basic principles have remained constant. It’s clear from UVA’s policy in the ’80s that sexual assault was just emerging in the cultural consciousness as a serious issue: The definitions and procedures in the 1984 policy are notably less fleshed-out than in the 2005 version.

   Perhaps the most glaring contrast between the two policies is that now
“sexual assault” is defined as a separate offense from “sexual misconduct.” The operative word in the definition of “sex-ual assault” is “force.” “Sexual misconduct,” according to UVA’s current policy, “occurs when the act is committed without intent to harm another” and takes into account the fact that “the use of alcohol or other drugs can blur the distinction between consent and manipulation.”

   Brett Sokolow, president of the National Center for Higher Ed-ucation Risk Manage-ment, says that recognizing the difference be-tween the two illustrates a growing understanding on college campuses that force isn’t what date rape is about. In addition, says Sokolow, as campus administrators have gotten better versed in sexual assault, definitions of “consent” have become much more explicit in university conduct codes; UVA falls right in line with this trend. He goes on to say that because the criminal justice system relies so heavily on defining “sexual assault” by violence, it shows how disconnected the system is from collegiate culture.

   The other most prominent difference between the two versions of UVA’s sexual assault policy is the level of information. While Wood said that reporting incidents to the police is a policy that’s been in place from the beginning, that intention was not in writing in 1984. By contrast, the 2005 document provides all the contact info for City, County and University law enforcement.—Nell Boeschenstein

 


UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL WITH RICO
Albemarle’s newest officer loves “Cops,” chew toys

Full name: Rico

Breed: Belgian Malinois crossed with German Shepherd

DOB: October 2004 (no record of day)

Height: Unknown

Weight: 80 lbs.

Provenance: Holland

Family: Albemarle County Police Officer Andrew Gluba

Diet: 6 cups of Professional Lamb and Rice dog food daily

Education: Roughly 1,000 hours K-9 training; ongoing with a minimum 16 hours
per month

Fitness regimen: 20-45 minutes tracking or ball chasing daily

Last crime solved: On January 29 Rico identified where two burglars were hiding after he and Gluba responded to a building alarm.

Law and order heroes: Ingo, Rin Tin Tin

Crime fighting specialty: Excellent at narcotics searches, but, says Gluba, “[Rico is] squared away in just about all the areas we do. He’s a rarity.”

Favorite toy: Kong

Favorite primetime crime drama: “Cops.” Says Gluba, “I record all the ones that they use K-9s in.”

(Finish this sentence) “Rico can’t live without…”: His Kong. According to Gluba, Rico has been clocked at 41 mph while chasing his Kong.

Fun fact: He flies. When he “heels,” Rico jumps from six feet away and flips in beside Gluba. He’s jumped up eight feet to retrieve his Kong out of a tree.

Categories
News

Got a match?

Yo Ace, Whatever happened to Yente the Matchmaker? I’m tired of the bar scene, personal ads don’t work, and now I’m the president of the Lonely Hearts Club. Where’s a matchmaker when you need one? Doesn’t anyone understand?—Anna Tevka

Anna: Ace had always assumed that all of you out there in reader land understood Ace’s status as Charlottesville’s Gangster of Love, but actually your hero is humbled to be addressing this issue. For despite Ace’s A-List status, the truth is that even those of us who are better than you, Anna, join in the eternal human search for happiness.

   In fact, Ace is desperately lonely, and his C-VILLE colleagues have started to get vocal about the toll it’s taking on his physical appearance and personal hygiene. It might be time to call on It Takes 2, a professional matchmaking service in Central Virginia run by that latter-day Yente herself, Carrie Daichman. Sometimes referred to as a “head hunter for love,” Daichman prides herself on the personal approach
to matchmaking that she’s applied since she started her Richmond-based company in 1998.

   Daichman meets with every single who buys her service for a solid 90 minutes to discuss goals, past relationships and problems, and dating methods that have gone flat (on that note, Ace wants to inform all of you out there that, based on personal experience, bringing a date to a hot dog-eating contest qualifies as a dating method that has failed).

   “An individual that comes to me is obviously already emotionally ready to have a relationship,” Daichman says. “I try to create a personalized matching process for each client.”

   One might doubt the personalized nature of It Takes 2, with membership exceeding 1,000. But the testimonials—an average of two to three marriages per month—speak for themselves. Some couples even continue their friendship with the matchmaker years after tying the knot. Daichman insists, “Lots of people view love lightly, which you shouldn’t do. My clients don’t want to take something this personal and put it on the Internet for all to see.”

   Ace admits that he laughs a little every time he sees an eHarmony.com commercial, but nobody can deny that those actors look extremely happy to have found their soul mate. Anna, you and Ace deserve that chance, too. Because like the song says, Ace promises you’ll be happy, and even if you’re not, there’s more to life than that—don’t ask Ace what.