Even as the bulldozers are revving their engines to begin work on the county portion of the Meadowcreek Parkway—that two-mile road that has gestated in the womb of government for 40-plus years—some activists are still hoping for a last-minute halt.
A group calling themselves the Coalition to Preserve McIntire Park has been sharpening its legal toolkit, having hired Andrea Ferster, a D.C. attorney who specializes in environmental and historic preservation litigation.
Opponents are still hopeful that the McIntire Park portion of the Meadowcreek Parkway can be ditched, and John Warner’s earmark used for an interchange and bikeway instead.
|
“She was kind of hesitant about this until finally we explained to her that the interchange goes 775′ into McIntire Park,” says John Cruickshank, president of the local chapter of the Sierra Club and lead organizer for the Coalition, which has raised $3,500 for the fight.
The Meadowcreek Parkway was conceived as a strange beast, one snake-like creature with multiple parents to be born tail-first in three segments. About two-thirds of the road—from Rio Road to Melbourne Road —is a county project. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) hired Faulconer Construction Company for $11.8 million to deliver that section. Work is slated to start in February.
The midsection is the progeny of the city and VDOT, and called McIntire Road Extended. It would slither from Melbourne Road through the McIntire Park golf course to the 250 Bypass. City Council has no more votes left on it, and it is scheduled to go to bid in April.
The third portion is the split-grade interchange at 250, which will come last. City Council is expected to see a final design in the summer. Unlike the other sections, it was spawned by the federal government, in the form of a $27 million earmark in 2005 from former U.S. senator John Warner.
And therein lies the opponents’ opportunity. Federal money requires a different standard of review, particularly where public parks are concerned, and so the fact that the interchange segment extends into McIntire Park and seems to be connected to the McIntire Road Extended project, which didn’t get that higher level federal review, gives a legal wedge for termination.
A federal suit, however, would require triggers that haven’t yet happened on the McIntire Extended project. So the main effort right now is to keep the entire thing stalled a little longer.
“We’re asking government leaders and VDOT not to begin that northern section of it until the other sections have been reconciled,” Cruickshank says. If only the county portion is built, he says, “I think it would be a disaster for people in that neighborhood around Melbourne Road.”
But it doesn’t appear likely that work will stop on the county portion. VDOT won’t even acknowledge the possibility of a halt on the county portion. “We’re moving ahead with construction,” says Lou Hatter. “Weather permitting, [Faulconer’s] beginning to mobilize for construction starting.”
Coalition members are asking city councilors to request that VDOT and the county hold off, but that would require a change of heart from one of the MCP supporters on Council, Satyendra Huja, David Brown or Julian Taliaferro.
The county is standing firm. “To my knowledge, anytime the Board of Supervisors has had to take action on the Meadowcreek Parkway, we’ve voted unanimously to support the project,” says Dennis Rooker, a supervisor since 2002. “I actually talked to John Cruickshank and told him I thought they were opposing probably the most environmentally friendly [automobile] transportation project that’s ever been built in the area.”
“I completely disagree,” says Cruickshank. “I think that parks should be protected. It’s ridiculous to be taking a centrally located park in the city and cutting it up like that.”
On putting a road through a park, Rooker says, “I wouldn’t say it wasn’t an issue. I would say that the decision was made long ago that this project was going to go through the park, and I think it’s been done in a way that’s the best way possible to do that.” He points out that the McIntire golf course is rarely used, that the Pen Park course was built in part to replace it, and that replacement parkland has been secured.
But even if the beast is partially delivered, the Coalition will keep fighting, according to Cruickshank. “I think some people think it’s a done deal, but there are a lot of people who just want to fight it, even if they’re not sure we can win.”
One of those who has been tireless in the fight is Stratton Salidis. For the umpteenth time, he requested last week that City Council stop the project.
“People ask, ‘This road has been around 40 years, why hasn’t it been built yet, why have people been fighting it so long?’” said Salidis. “I think a better question is, why has it been around 40 years? Who keeps trying to bring it up?”
The Coalition, which includes Rich Collins, Dan Bluestone, Peter Kleeman and Colette Hall, wants to keep Warner’s earmark to create a smaller creature, a split grade interchange and bikeway through the park, sans automobiles. “Who could possibly be against a bikeway?” asks Salidis.
But if the Coalition gets its way, it could fracture relations among the Parkway’s parents. Rooker says it would be “ruinous” for city-county relations. “We’ve been working 20 years on this project. There’s a point at which you reach a point of no return.”
C-VILLE welcomes news tips from readers. Send them to news@c-ville.com.