Categories
News

A change is gonna come: New Democratic government has big plans, big challenges ahead

“No pipeline.” “Climate action now.” “That awkward moment when you burn your own planet.” On December 6, a crowd of about 70 sign-carrying protesters gathered at Charlottesville’s Free Speech wall to demand the city and state government take immediate action against climate change. Carrying their handmade posters, musical instruments, and reusable water bottles, the activists took turns delivering passionate calls to action.

Then Sally Hudson stepped on stage. “For the next three months, turn your eyes to Richmond,” said Charlottesville’s newly elected member of the Virginia House of Delegates. “We have such a special opportunity here, in the year 2020, to finally make progress on climate change.”

Hudson is a member of the Democratic Party’s brand-new “trifecta” government. After the November 2019 elections, the Democrats have a 21-19 majority in the State Senate, a 55-45 majority in the House of Delegates, and a blue—if embattled—governor still in place. The election saw record voter turnout across the state, and handed the Democrats their first trifecta in nearly 30 years. 

“All the energy’s on the Democratic side right now,” says David Toscano, the recently-retired House of Delegates minority leader and Hudson’s predecessor as the representative for Virginia’s 57th district. 

The Republicans are “discouraged and despondent,” says Toscano, while the Democrats are “really fired up.”

“They have a chance to do some really good things,” the veteran lawmaker says. “Hopefully they’ll avail themselves of that chance.”

Climate change is only one item on the Democrats’ long to-do list. The new lawmakers campaigned on a host of issues including gun reform, voting rights, and—in Charlottesville especially—Confederate statue removal. But even with total control of the government, Democrats and their supporters can take nothing for granted during this 2020 legislative session, which began on January 8.

In front of the enraptured crowd at the climate rally, Hudson echoed Toscano’s message. 

“The turnover in the majority makes some real progress possible,” Hudson said. “Possible, but by no means guaranteed.” 

Del. Sally Hudson

 

A brave new party

Democrats last held all three branches of Virginia government in 1993—and the party has changed greatly since then. Creigh Deeds, the veteran state senator who represents Charlottesville and a swath of rural area northwest of town, has been a member of the assembly since 1992. This year, he’ll become the only sitting member to have served in a majority and a minority in both the House and Senate. 

“When I first got there…there were a lot of rural Democrats, there were a lot more conservative Democrats,” he says.

Today, the party is more liberal than ever before. That last trifecta was “such a different membership,” says George Gilliam, a UVA history professor and a veteran of Virginia politics. Gilliam served on Charlottesville City Council and ran for Congress in the ’70s. Even up through the ’90s, Gilliam says, the party was organized through “that good ol’ boy network.”

“The progression was, you serve on the PTA or on the school board, then you serve in the local government, then you move up to state government,” Gilliam says. “That was pretty rigorously observed.”

“Most of the members of the General Assembly were elite white males,” Gilliam says. “Overwhelmingly lawyers. That pattern has been pretty well broken. We’re seeing a much larger number of women, much larger number of people who are not lawyers, and a generally more diverse membership.”

The Democrats elected Eileen Filler-Corn as speaker of the House of Delegates. She is the first woman and first Jewish person to hold the office in the history of the assembly. Charniele Herring is the first woman and the first black person to serve as House majority leader. The new legislature includes Virginia’s first two Indian American legislators and first Muslim senator.

Tim Kaine’s 2005 gubernatorial campaign marked a shift for the party, according to Deeds. Kaine focused less on rural areas than northern Virginia and the Richmond suburbs, where he performed well. That success reflected the changing demographics and priorities of the party.

In some cases, the shift is literally generational. Deeds fondly recalls serving with Jerrauld Jones, a Norfolk Democrat, in the 1990s. Jones left the House in 2002, but in 2017, his son Jay Jones won the race for his dad’s old seat.

Charlottesville’s delegation is a proxy for the wide range of voices in the majority. Deeds is a career politician who speaks with a Southern twang, and Hudson is a 31-year-old economist with no previous political experience. 

“Sally Hudson is going to be an articulate spokesperson for the more liberal side of the Democratic party,” says Gilliam. “Creigh Deeds, I think, presents excellent balance.”

“It would be unfair to say the people I served with weren’t progressive, they certainly were,” Deeds says, but times have changed. “We’ve got a new generation of leaders and a different sort of Democratic party.”

_______________

Remapping  Virginia

The above maps show the Virginia Senate makeup in 2020 and in 1993, the last time Democrats had a trifecta. With the exception of a few long-standing rural members, Virginia Democrats won their 2020 majority by dominating in northern Virginia, Richmond, and Hampton Roads. By contrast, the Democratic majority of the ’90s was a much more rural party, with control in southwestern areas that have since become deep red. Dramatic population growth in northern Virginia over the last decade has helped facilitate this change.

The maps also show the shifting sands of redistricting–the borders of these senate districts have moved meaningfully in the last 30 years, and will continue to move as redistricting gets underway following the 2020 census.

_______________

Balancing act

“The first question out of the box will be, ‘How do Democrats want to conduct themselves?’” Toscano says. In his mind, they have two options: pass everything they’ve been denied for the last decade, or focus on a narrower set of more moderate reforms. 

“Some people got elected because of Trump, and no other reason,” Toscano says. “Too far, too fast” remains a concern for the party, even though many Democratic voters are hungry for change. Voters who came to the polls to sound off on Washington might be alienated if the party moves left, says the longtime lawmaker. 

“People don’t always march in lockstep,” Toscano says. “There will be push and pull within the Democratic party.”

In addition to wrangling their own party, Democrats will also have to contend with a savvy group of opponents.

“The Republicans have the advantage at this point, even though they’re in the minority, because they’ve got legislative leadership experience,” Deeds says. “They can set traps, because they’ve been in charge for 20 years.”

That experience gap could prove especially significant in the House, says Deeds. “Mistakes can happen. They’re smart, they’ve got good leadership, it’s just going to take a little while.”

Democrats will have just 60 days to figure all of this out. The session convened on January 8 and ends March 7.

“The process itself is kind of a barrier,” says Deeds, “You have to move the legislation forward, balance the budget, get it all done in the span of eight and a half weeks.” 

Hudson, though she represents the party’s new guard, seems to understand the challenges of the process of lawmaking.

“The number one constraint is time,” she says. “We’re a little bit less empowered than other trifectas might be. The General Assembly is not like Congress, it’s not a slow deliberative body.”

“If the bill of your dreams doesn’t pass by mid-March, it doesn’t mean that we forgot about it,” Hudson says. 

 

Sen. Creigh Deeds, Del. Rob Bell, former Del. David Toscano

In the minority

Rob Bell has represented Fluvanna, Greene, and northern Albemarle as a Republican since 2002. This will be his first session in the minority. 

“You end up with the same tools you always have,” Bell says of his new role. “A surprising amount is: Can you craft policy that everybody agrees is a good idea?”

Often, upwards of 600 bills are passed in a session, and Bell emphasizes that the vast majority of those are bipartisan bills that have been vetted by commissions and panels year-round.

“There’s nothing glamorous about most of the work we do,” Bell says. For example, these days he’s working on a project to bring school bus drivers in his district out of retirement, to make up for some shortages. 

Every now and then, a high-profile bill comes along. But after the discussion, “everyone in the room empties out, except for the committee,” Bell says, “and then the committee goes, ‘Alright, so now we’ve got 15 more bills to look at today.’”

Even so, the new majority means uncertainty for Bell and his Republican colleagues. Bell says his group isn’t despondent so much as unsure what to expect. “I don’t even know what my committees are going to be,” he said before the session. (Bell wound up on Courts of Justice, where he’s served in the past, though he will no longer be the committee’s chair.) 

In the Virginia House of Delegates, committee assignments matter a lot. Bills must pass through a committee before making it to the House or Senate floor, where the whole chamber can then vote. Speaker Filler-Corn will determine the composition of committees and also determine which committees vote on which bills. 

“In many ways, Speaker Filler-Corn has more power than the Governor over what gets out of the next session,” Hudson says.

“Most bills that are supported by a committee then pass the floor,” Bell says. “Where [Filler-Corn] assigns the bills will impact the reception they receive.”

Matt Fariss and Chris Runion, the two other Republican delegates whose districts include pieces of Albemarle County, did not respond to request for comment. 

Toscano knows a thing or two about serving in the minority—he was House minority leader from 2011 to 2018. 

The Republicans “really don’t know what’s going to happen,” Toscano says, which might be a humbling change. “They’re actually going to have to go to Democrats to get anything passed. In the past they didn’t have to do that at all.”

“I can only imagine how frustrating it must have been,” Hudson says of her colleagues who spent so long in the minority. “Imagine you’re a hard-working, talented legislator going back to Richmond every year and seeing good ideas die. That’s gotta be heart wrenching.”

“It’s a little bittersweet not being there,” Toscano says. “At the same time, I’ll be able to watch my colleagues and know that I played a role in helping a lot of these folks get elected, to make the change that I think ought to be made.”

_______________

Taking the lead

Del. Eileen Filler-Corn, Del. Charniele Herring, Del. Todd Gilbert

Eileen Filler-Corn – Speaker of the House of Delegates

Filler-Corn has represented Fairfax in the House since 2010, and now she’ll have a chance to guide the whole caucus. Filler-Corn, a D.C.-insider lobbyist and consultant, won the internal election for speaker against Lashrecse Aird, D-Petersburg, who represented the more progressive wing of the party. 

Charniele Herring – House Majority Leader

In 2009, Herring became the first African American woman from northern Virginia to be elected to the General Assembly, and she’ll now be the first African American and first woman majority leader. Herring has advocated for expanding voting rights and access to abortion while remaining more moderate on economic matters.

Todd Gilbert – House Minority Leader

Gilbert took over as House majority leader in 2018, but now he’ll be in the minority. The experienced Shenandoah Valley delegate has a reputation as a GOP hardliner, and has taken strong stances against reproductive rights and Medicaid expansion.

_______________

On the agenda

Climate

As the scene at the climate rally shows, voters are eager to see environmental reform and legislators are eager to work on it. This new crop of lawmakers campaigned on climate. Cassady Craighill, the communications director at energy nonprofit Clean Virginia, points out that every flipped seat went to a candidate endorsed by her group. 

Hudson identifies joining the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, an interstate coalition to limit CO2 emissions, and preparing infrastructure to meet Northam’s emissions targets as short- and medium-term climate priorities.

In Virginia, making change in the energy sector means doing battle with our powerful energy overlord, Dominion Energy. Craighill says her group is excited about bills like the Fair Energy Act, which would help regulate the amount that Dominion can charge customers, and the Virginia Energy Reform Act, which would seek to regulate the monopoly system on a broader level. 

“Every year we have this major problem, where we have Dominion giving way too much money,” Craighill says. The energy company donated $1.8 million to a variety of candidates during the 2019 state election cycle and has long been among the highest-spending donors in the state, giving large sums to both parties. Hudson was among a spate of candidates who refused to accept contributions from Dominion during her campaign. Deeds has received more than $100,000 from Dominion since 2001, but stopped accepting the corporation’s donations in 2016. 

Governor Northam still has deep ties to the energy giant. He’s accepted more than a quarter million from the energy company over the course of his career, and recently hired a former Dominion public relations director as his communications chief. 

Dominion’s dominance is bad for the planet and for Virginians’ pocketbooks, Craighill says. “Not only is there a climate crisis nationally, but in Virginia there’s also an energy burden crisis,” she says. “Our electricity bills are too high, and we pay the seventh highest in the country…Even large retail customers are really limited, both for cost and for clean energy.”

Legislation like the Virginia Energy Reform Act, which has sponsors from both parties, seeks to curb Dominion’s influence. “The General Assembly has allowed Dominion to write their own regulatory process in the last few years,” Craighill says. “These bills are a response to that.” 

Legislators looking to bolster renewable resources will have limited resources to work with.

“One of the challenges to confronting climate change at a state and local level is the revenue required for serious infrastructure upgrades,” says Hudson. The Virginia General Assembly is constitutionally required to balance the budget each year, which hampers its ability to make moves that environmentalists might hope for, like an overhaul of the public transportation system.

Still, there’s reason for optimism in a state with a poor environmental record. “Among the 50 states, we’re 49th in per capita expenditure on natural resources,” Deeds says. “We have an opportunity to change our whole focus with respect to environmental policy.”

Guns

Since the November election, more than 110 localities across Virginia have declared themselves “Second Amendment sanctuaries.” Hundreds of people have attended town halls to express concern that the new Democratic legislature will mean harsh restrictions on gun ownership in the commonwealth.

Mike Fox is the legislative head for the Crozet chapter of Moms Demand Action, a nationwide organization advocating for common-sense gun reforms. “We certainly expect the reforms that have been stonewalled and blocked and rejected for so long to finally become the law of the land,” Fox says, especially given that many of the incoming legislators campaigned hard on tightening gun laws. 

Moms Demand says its top legislative priorities are bills that expand background checks and enact “red flag laws,” which temporarily disarm those who might pose a threat to themselves or others.

Northam plans to reintroduce a package of gun legislation that failed in the last session. The reforms include limiting the purchase of handguns to one per month and a ban on the sale and possession of assault weapons. The bill does have a grandfather clause for existing firearms, stopping just short of Beto O’Rourke’s famous debate-stage promise that “hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15.” 

“The background check legislation is, based on polling, the most popular legislation that the Democrats have on their agenda,” Fox says. 

The gun debate shows the effect of subcommittee assignments on the legislature. Gun reform has been a central issue in Virginia since the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting. But, for the last decade-plus, many of these popular, common-sense reforms have been nixed by subcommittees full of pro-NRA legislators. That dynamic has shifted, according to Fox.

“We have made it a winning issue,” Fox says. “I’m confident that, in this past session, if some of that legislation had made it to the house floor, it may have even passed. There was such a narrow majority for the Republicans.”

Moms Demand isn’t phased by the outpouring of feeling in the second amendment sanctuaries. “Our organization believes that every community in Virginia should be a sanctuary free from gun violence,” Fox says. “Even the folks who don’t agree with us.”

Elections

“From day one, my top priority has been election reform,” Hudson says. “I think that’s work that is actually destined to move in this session.”

How people vote, who gets to vote, and where people vote could all change in the next two years.

Deeds is the chief patron of three election law bills that were filed before the session even began—same-day voter registration, removal of the photo ID requirement at the polls, and restoring voting rights to felons. These measures were unthinkable under the previous majority. “We just didn’t have the numbers before. Even if we got things passed in the Senate, the House was a dead end,” Deeds says.

Everything is a process, though. Hudson says that Virginia’s election infrastructure isn’t strong enough to support these reforms right away. Allocating funds for things like improved ballot boxes and voting systems will make those reforms more feasible down the road. “Some of the more ambitious projects, like same-day registration, are going to have to wait for that IT upgrade,” Hudson says.

On the other hand, some election projects have a hard deadline. “I know we’re going to do redistricting reform in this session,” Hudson says. “The census is this year and the maps will be drawn in 2021, so that puts a clear clock on it.”

Every 10 years, following each census, Virginia’s voting districts at the state and federal level are redrawn. 

“When redistricting went on in 2011, the Republicans really were in the driver’s seat in the majority of states,” says J. Miles Coleman, who writes about elections at UVA’s Center for Politics. “So on the Democratic side, non-partisan, fair redistricting became one of their biggest issues.”

Last June, the United States Supreme Court supported a lower court’s decision that the 2011 Republican maps included illegal racial gerrymanders in the Richmond suburbs. In the 2016 congressional elections, Republicans won seven of Virginia’s 11 congressional seats, despite losing the total popular vote across the state. 

Now, Virginia Democrats will have a chance to draw their own maps. This leaves the caucus with an important question to answer. Dems could “stick with their principles and still talk about non-partisan redistricting,” Coleman says—but on the other hand, “There are some Democrats also who are like, ‘we have to fight fire with fire.’”

On the federal level, fighting fire with fire could mean a new congressional representative for Charlottesville. Coleman says the Democrats might move Charlottesville into the 7th district, where Abigail Spanberger won a narrow victory over a Republican incumbent in 2018. The switch would turn the 5th and 7th districts, which both historically lean red, into a solidly red and a solidly blue district, respectively. Election adjustments like that—as well as the reforms proposed by Hudson and Deeds—could shape the course of Virginia politics for the next decade.

 

Some Democrats hope to pass legislation allowing Charlottesville to finally remove our Confederate statues.

Statues

“If our General Assembly cannot act now to remove these beacons of hate, I don’t know when we will have the courage to do so,” said former city councilor Wes Bellamy at a December 26 rally for Monumental Justice Virginia, a new campaign advocating for the removal of Confederate monuments across the state.

With a blue General Assembly in place, there’s now a glimmer of hope that Charlottesville’s Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson statues might finally come down. Hudson has promised to introduce a bill to give localities control over their own monuments, which would allow Charlottesville to move the statues, which are currently protected as “war memorials.”

Will the legislation actually pass? “That’s one of the more interesting questions of the whole session,” Toscano says.

“Even though the Democrats are in the majority,” Toscano says, “the polling data around the state indicate that a majority of Virginians don’t want to give the localities authority on statues.” 

That means that Democrats in swing districts might not be able to support the controversial measure. “It’s got to be done in a very sensitive way,” Toscano says. “There’s going to be a lot of behind-the-scenes maneuvering.”

Republicans like Bell plan to stand firm. “I have voted against that,” Bell says of local control of statues. “I don’t support that measure. It’s going to go to a committee with a different makeup, and we’ll just have to see how the new members vote. It did not pass the last couple of years.”

Hudson thinks the success of the bill will depend on elevating the issue beyond its local significance. “My hope is that we see this as a statewide project, and not the hashtag-Charlottesville bill,” Hudson says. “There are patrons from the Hampton Roads area, and the Richmond area, hopefully from NoVa as well.”

“Our community lived through a particularly painful and acute conflict over the statues and everything they symbolize,” Hudson says, “But the public reckoning with our history is a broader Virginia project.”

_______________

Bills to watch

HB1: Absentee Voting

The first bill submitted in each session is understood to represent one of the top priorities for the new leadership. This session, the Democrats kicked things off with a bill that would “Permit any registered voter to vote by absentee ballot in any election in which he is qualified to vote,” with no exceptions. Currently, voting absentee requires submitting an application in advance with a justification of the need to vote absentee. Expanding ballot access has long been a priority of progressive groups around the country, and this bill represents a solid first step.

SJ1/HJ1: Equal Rights Amendment

The passage of this joint resolution would make Virginia the 38th state to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, an addition to the U.S. Constitution that would formally outlaw discrimination on the basis of sex.  Thirty-eight states makes an amendment official, but the legal history of this particular amendment is complicated, and the ERA will face a long legal battle even after Virginia’s ratification. The bill was passed through the Privileges and Elections Committee, chaired by Sen. Deeds, on the second day of the session.

SB2: Marijuana Decriminalization

This bill would decriminalize simple possession of marijuana, limit the fines for a civil offense to $50, and increase the amount of marijuana required for an “intent to distribute” arrest. Northam and Attorney General Mark Herring have both spoken in favor of decriminalizing simple possession as well as expunging misdemeanors from existing criminal records. Virginia-based Altria, one of the world’s biggest tobacco companies, has been heavily investing in Canadian marijuana companies in anticipation of loosening rules in Virginia.

_______________

In it for the long haul

The Virginia General Assembly is entering its 401st year. It’s the oldest continuously operating lawmaking body in the Western Hemisphere. Virginia is a historic state with a historic government—and historic problems. Legislators agree that change doesn’t happen overnight. For all the excitement over the blue wave, the greatest challenge now may be tempering liberal voters’ expectations.

“There’s an awful lot of good we can do that will make a real difference in real people’s lives,” Hudson says. “I hope the people will get excited about that work, celebrate it, and come out of the session reinvigorated to invest in that work for the long haul.”

Winning the 2019 election was important. But the real work is just beginning.

Since its creation, Gilliam says, “the story of the Virginia General Assembly has been, not steady, but persistent growth towards a more liberal approach to solving problems. With the election this past November, we’re seeing another stage of that generally more liberal approach.” 

This session will be a short chapter in a long story.

“Instant gratification is not going to cut it,” says Deeds. “You have to be invested in the long game.”

 

Correction: This article was corrected on 1/20 to reflect that Abigail Spanberger represents Virginia’s 7th district, not Elaine Luria.

 

Categories
News

You’re being watched: Police quietly deploy cameras near public housing

You wouldn’t notice the cameras if you didn’t know what to look for—but once you see the first one, the others are easy to spot: black balls hanging from telephone poles like sinister Christmas tree baubles.

Rosia Parker noticed the camera near her house in Westhaven when the city installed it over the summer. She can see it from her balcony, which means, of course, the camera can see her balcony. “They had the area blocked off like they were doing big work,” Parker says, “So that’s what made me look at them like, ‘what are they doing?’” 

Parker’s search for answers hasn’t yet turned up the resolution she hoped for. The situation raises serious questions about the relationship between Charlottesville’s law enforcement and the residents of the city’s public housing neighborhoods. 

Parker asked City Council about the cameras during the public comment session of the November 2 council meeting. At the next meeting, city manager Tarron Richardson explained the practice, saying “That was one of our cameras. We move those periodically throughout the city based on requests from different residents and different community groups.” 

That comment elicited surprise from City Council—“Oh yeah we need to discuss that more,” said Mayor Nikuyah Walker—and a retraction from the city, which later said via social media that the city “does not have a program related to citizen-requested security cameras.” The cameras are placed at the discretion of law enforcement, not residents.

At the January 6 City Council meeting, Parker and local civil rights attorney Jeff Fogel brought up the cameras again. Walker revealed that four cameras had been installed, three near Westhaven and a fourth near the entrance to another public housing neighborhood on Prospect Avenue. When asked about the purpose of the cameras, Walker said, “I can’t answer that, I don’t have the information.” 

A camera hung at the corner of 7th St NW and 8th St NW

The placement of the cameras rankled Fogel and Parker. Westhaven and Prospect are majority black neighborhoods. “They’re clearly targeting black communities,” Fogel says. 

“There are white neighborhoods where still, you have meth labs,” Parker says. “Why were Prospect and Westhaven the only two chosen?”

“The problem here is that there is a misperception that crime doesn’t happen in predominantly white areas,” said local resident Angeline Conn at the January 6 council meeting. “I’m not for state surveillance at all, period—but if you’re not extending the same surveillance to those communities, you’re being biased.”

Parker and Fogel feel the camera dust-up reveals the police department’s lack of willingness to collaborate with the communities it’s policing. “If the city really wanted to be transparent with the community, and especially the black community, they should at least have had a town hall meeting or something,” Parker says. “I appreciate being safe, but I would also like to know that I’m under surveillance. That’s my privacy.”

Fogel says the surreptitious installation of the cameras suggests the police department is more focused on punitive measures—racking up arrests—than proactive problem-solving. “What was the purpose of these cameras? Are they to get people arrested? I’d rather see them prevent the crime,” Fogel says. “The way to do that is, if you have cameras, you announce the heck out of them.”

City spokesperson Brian Wheeler responded to questions about the cameras in a brief statement. “The Charlottesville Police Department will continue to deploy cameras in the community in response to crime trends, shots fired incidents, robberies, and larcenies,” read part of the statement. “The cameras are for investigative purposes only and there is no active monitoring of the camera feeds.”

According to Wheeler, the only other area where the city maintains similar cameras is a four-block radius around City Hall. 

The city did not answer a question about how it decided where to place the cameras. Also not addressed: if evidence from the cameras has been used to make any arrests.

John Whitehead, a civil rights lawyer at the Rutherford Institute, says that surveillance like this treads on shaky constitutional ground. “The police should be notifying anyone when they’re watching them,” Whitehead says, “because it implicates the Fourth Amendment, which dictates that before any government agent is doing surveillance on American citizens they have to have probable cause.”

Whitehead says that surveillance like this is not an uncommon practice for police departments around the country, and that municipal governments have the ability to intervene. “It’s the job of the City Council members to reel this in and tell them to stop it,” Whitehead says.

For Fogel, the cameras are one more example of what he calls  untrustworthy behavior by the Charlottesville Police Department. He cited the department’s reluctance to release stop-and-frisk data and its 2018 purchase of a Dodge Charger—the same make and model as the car used to kill Heather Heyer—as recent examples of actions that can be interpreted as egregiously tone-deaf at best. 

Parker, meanwhile, is determined to keep looking for answers. “I’m going to stay on them,” she says, “until we figure out what’s going on and why these cameras are here.”

 

Categories
News

‘Put up or shut up’: New organization will lobby Democratic legislators for statue removal

The campaign to take down Charlottesville’s statues of Confederate generals Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee has taken on a new tenor with the election of a Democrat-majority government in Virginia.

The Monumental Justice Virginia Campaign, a new organization dedicated to removal of the statues, launched with a press conference at the Free Speech Wall on December 26. A larger rally will be held in Richmond on January 8. 

At the press conference, activists once again stated the case against the statues. A collection of supporters stood behind the speakers, holding crisp blue posters with the slogan “Monumentally Wrong” and large red Xs over images of the Lee and Jackson statues. 

“This is an opportunity for Virginia to get on the right side of history,” said Lisa Woolfork, an associate professor at UVA. “These statues are not neutral objects, they are racist relics forced upon communities who do not worship the white supremacy they maintain.” 

“It is past time to correct these monumental lies with some monumental justice,” Woolfork said.

Advocates for removal of the statues see a legal path forward that seemed unlikely before: The passage of a bill that would give control over statues back to localities. 

Delegate-elect Sally Hudson has promised to introduce such a bill when the General Assembly session begins on January 8. Former delegate David Toscano proposed similar bills in the last two General Assembly sessions, but neither made it out of committee. 

Though the movement’s hopes rest on Hudson and her legislation, the new delegate made sure to emphasize the broad coalition that has formed in opposition to the monuments.

“Movements like Monumental Justice change the world. Politicians just cut the ribbon,” Hudson said. “We wouldn’t be here today without the activists and artists and educators and all of the elected leaders who have elevated this issue.” 

“Thank you to every member of our community who has done the very ordinary yet essential work of correcting our public memory,” Hudson said, “Of sharing a fuller understanding of our history neighbor to neighbor and friend to friend.”

Woolfork read a statement from Zyahna Bryant, the student activist whose 2016 petition helped start the statue fervor. “Our public spaces should reflect the principles we strive for, one of them being freedom,” Bryant wrote. 

In her statement, Bryant made sure to underscore that removing the statues will not fix the larger systemic inequalities in the area. “We must also focus on the structural and situational change that must come along with removals as a package deal,” she wrote. 

Hudson acknowledged Bryant’s point. “In the days ahead, my colleagues and I will be introducing substantive legislation to confront white supremacy in all of its modern incarnations,” Hudson said. “Whether that is mass incarceration or segregation or the persistent inequity in our every institution.”

Former councilor Wes Bellamy spoke with his young daughter in his arms.

“If our General Assembly cannot act now to remove these beacons of hate, I don’t know when we will have the courage to do so,” he said.

For Bellamy, structural change and statue removal aren’t mutually exclusive. 

“People ask me, ‘Why can’t we focus on affordable housing? Why can’t we focus on schools?’” Bellamy said. “We can walk and chew gum simultaneously. In fact, we have an obligation to walk and chew gum simultaneously.”

“The time for those statues to move was yesteryear,” Bellamy said. “It’s time to put up or shut up.”

Categories
News

New year, new council: Incoming City Council looks to build houses and trust

On January 1, three new Charlottesville City Council members will officially begin their terms. Michael Payne, Sena Magill, and Lloyd Snook will join current councilors Heather Hill and Mayor Nikuyah Walker as Wes Bellamy, Mike Signer, and Kathy Galvin ride off into the sunset. 

Magill and Payne say their priorities continue to be the issues that they built their campaigns around—housing reform and environmental policy. 

“Something that I really want to get to work on immediately is climate change,” Payne says. “The city set a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target—carbon neutrality by 2050—but how do we create specific plans within each emission sector, and reach out to nonprofits in the community, to develop specific plans that can actually help accomplish that goal?”

“We need to look at how we are going to be incorporating protecting our environment and continuing our work in affordable housing,” Magill says. 

That’s easier said than done, of course. “Housing is a combination of federal, state, and some local. We don’t have the control over it that people think we do,” Magill says. 

Snook did not respond to resquests to be interviewed for this article.

Incumbent councilor Hill emphasizes that the first challenge facing council is getting everyone on the same page.

“I’m looking at some very foundational things that need to happen for both this council and this administration to be successful,” Hill says. “Alignment among our council is just so critical to any path forward on any other priorities that any of us individually want to pursue.”

“I think that right now, the way we’ve historically operated, nothing gets done,” Hill says. “Truly, some things are never getting done, and a lot of money and resources are being spent on them.”

Hill’s comments come on the heels of a council session that strained interpersonal relations between members. Those disagreements were put on display at a team-building retreat in December 2018, when The Daily Progress reported that the councilors “aired their grievances with each other, the media and the community members who address them at meetings.”

“No one has to be friends with each other, but we have to be committed to working with each other and hearing each others’ perspectives,” Hill says.

Magill says that all her fellow council members are “in it for the same reason.” 

“There is no thought that anyone is using this as a stepping stone to something else. We’re all in this because we live in this community and want to do right by this community,” she says.

The stakes are high. Payne points out that mistrust between councilors exacerbates long-standing issues of trust between city residents and local government. “If we’re consumed by infighting, that only makes it harder for us to take action on affordable housing, climate change, all these issues,” Payne says. 

For Magill, rebuilding the city’s trust in government comes down to openness and honesty. “Try not to make promises you can’t keep. Try to be clear and open with your abilities and what you can and cannot do,” she says.

One of the first tasks council members will face will be electing a mayor and vice-mayor. Walker (who did not respond to a request for comment) has just completed her first two-year term as mayor, but is eligible for another. Before her, Mike Signer served one term, but the three mayors before him each served two. The council members declined to speculate on the 2020 selection process. 

“It’s historically been a pretty opaque process, a lot of behind-the-scenes discussions and negotiations and jockeying,” says former mayor Dave Norris, though Walker’s election two years ago was a notable exception. Of the new councilors, Magill received the most votes in the general election. 

“I think that’s going to be very telling, who the new mayor is,” Norris says. Norris describes Payne and Walker as being “of the progressive, change kind of camp,” and  Hill and Snook as “a little bit more moderate.” 

“And then you have one Sena Magill,” he adds. “It’ll be interesting to see what kind of councilor she’s going to be. The vote on the mayor will be one sign of that.”

The beginning of the new session means that all five councilors who were on the board during the summer of 2017 will have concluded their time on council. 

“We lose a lot of the experience of those councilors, who did sit on the dais during a very difficult time in our community, and I hope they continue to be resources to all of us,” Hill says of the outgoing group. 

The fresh faces in government might help the city move forward, however. “Hopefully, without the baggage, it’s easier to trust that the decisions we’re making are in what we feel is the best interest of the community,” Magill says.

“I don’t think it’s a turning point that changes everything,” Payne says. “It’s important that we don’t fall into a mindset of, ‘Let’s go back to how things were five years ago’…There’s a lot of work to be done. It’s not something that’s going to happen overnight.”

 

Categories
News

Housing divided: Critics say new budget puts parking over people

“By failing to fund affordable housing in your city, you are quite literally causing and creating homelessness,” said Alliance for Interfaith Ministries director Kimberly Fontaine at the Planning Commission’s public hearing for the city’s Capital Improvement Plan last week. 

The Capital Improvement Plan covers non-recurring projects that last for five or more years and cost upwards of $50,000 each. Every year, the city manager’s office drafts a five-year plan, and the planning commission then puts forward non-binding recommendations. This year’s plan includes almost $5 million for a new parking lot on Market Street and another $5 million for the Belmont Bridge, along with smaller projects like replacement traffic lights, new police radios, and air quality adjustments at the Smith Aquatic Center.

What’s absent from the budget, however, drew the most comments at the hearing. As testimony after testimony piled up, the meeting became an emotional referendum on Charlottesville’s housing emergency. The proposed CIP spreads out appropriations for the Charlottesville Regional Housing Authority over a longer period of time than initially proposed, effectively resulting in a 50 percent cut to the CRHA budget for the next two fiscal years. 

Council chambers were standing-room only, even though the CIP won’t go into effect until April. Many people in the audience held printed signs reading “Fully Fund Affordable Housing.”

“It takes at least two and a half full-time minimum wage jobs to afford a market rate two-bedroom rental home here in Charlottesville,” said Sunshine Mathon, CEO of the Piedmont Housing Alliance. “We have an opportunity to realign our priorities, redressing the historical outcomes our systems were designed to—and did—produce.”

Elena Cleveland owns a house built by Habitat for Humanity. She said her mortgage is half of what she used to pay in rent. “With the rent being so high, we didn’t have money for anything else,” Cleveland said.

“We’ve been talking about this for a long, long time,” said public housing resident and activist Joy Johnson. “We live in the city, we’re taxpayers. You have a responsibility to make sure that folks who are not homeowners still have affordable housing to live in.”

Former mayor Dave Norris reminded the commission that city investment in housing earns generous matches from philanthropic groups and state programs. “That $3 million that was allocated this year leveraged in turn about eight dollars for every one dollar put in by the city,” Norris said.

Housing wasn’t the only point of contention—other residents voiced their concerns about the potential environmental impacts of the new plan. The proposed CIP includes funding for an $8.5 million parking garage on Market Street, but does not include any new money for sidewalks or bicycle infrastructure. 

“If you keep burning more and more fossil fuels, you will accelerate the destruction of this planet, said resident Josh Clark. “Which is a different kind of housing crisis, if you think about it.”

“As we turn our sights to hitting our city’s emissions targets, the city has few levers to pull,” said resident Andrew Jones. “Encouraging zero-carbon, low-cost transportation through cycling and pedestrian infrastructure is one of the few obvious paths forward to hitting these targets.”

For some, those concerns were secondary to housing. “If people can’t afford to live here, it doesn’t matter how many bike lanes we put in,” said resident Don Gathers. 

After more than 90 minutes of public comment, Commissioner Lyle Solla-Yates put forward a motion: “I’d like to move that the CIP needs additional work.” 

The planning commission addressed housing first. “Why are we making this so much harder than it needs to be? We’re fully funding it,” said Commissioner Taneia Dowell. 

The commission passed an amendment recommending that the city front-load their six-year, $15 million commitment to the Charlottesville Regional Housing Authority, increasing the budget from $1.5 million to $3 million for fiscal years 2021 and 2022 and effectively reversing this CIP’s proposed cut. The commission also asked the city to increase funding for the Charlottesville Affordable Housing Fund over the next five years. 

Freeing up funds for housing meant cutting other projects. The commission identified the Market Street parking garage construction as fat that could be trimmed. Building a new parking garage is “morally wrong, at any dollar amount,” said Commissioner Rory Stolzenberg. 

“I do think there’s something that can be done there, other than just an ugly old parking garage,” said Commissioner Lisa Green. “There’s so many options out there.”

The commission recommended that the project remain unfunded until the city has had an opportunity to produce alternate options.

From there, finding projects to defund became more difficult. At one point, Solla-Yates suggested postponing a request for a new ambulance. “It wasn’t in the projection, it’s not an emergency,” he said. His motion died without being seconded. 

“A friendly reminder to my fellow planning commissioners,” Solla-Yates said. “If we don’t decrease anything, we don’t get to increase anything.”

Towards the end of the discussion, Mayor Nikuyah Walker said that simply setting aside more funding for public housing wouldn’t solve the problem. The city wouldn’t know how to spend the money even if it became available.

“Where’s all this affordable housing we’ve been funding for years?” Walker said. “We are talking about meeting the needs of thousands of families. We haven’t been able to produce a quality program that can do that.” 

Walker said she doesn’t want to “keep tossing money into a lot of different things without measuring the effectiveness.”

The Planning Commission eventually passed a motion with nine amendments, each suggesting revisions to the CIP. Its resolutions are not binding. City Council will vote on a finalized plan in April.

Updated 12/18 to clarify the location of the garage.

Categories
News

Tunnel vision: Emmet renovations include bike lanes, pedestrian underpass

A central stretch of Emmet Street, from Arlington Boulevard to Ivy Road, may see some improvements thanks to the state-funded Emmet Street-scape project. Plans for the renovations were on display at a public design hearing last week.

New bike lanes, an expanded sidewalk, handicapped-accessible crosswalks, and better landscaping are all in the future of this chunk of currently nondescript roadway. The speed limit will be lowered from 35 miles per hour to 25. 

The project aims to improve access for bikes and pedestrians—“make it safer, more efficient, and more inviting,” project manager John Stuart says.

The flashiest new feature is a pedestrian tunnel that will run underneath the railroad line. “If you’ve ever been to a basketball game at JPJ, when it lets out and people are trying to walk down, it’s like a big bottleneck here,” says Bill Wuensch, a traffic engineer whose firm, EPRPC, is assisting with the project. “This’ll be really nice, to be able to go through a nice tunnel.” 

UVA owns 95 percent of the land along the strip of road under development. The University’s construction plans for the land that once held the Cavalier Inn, at the corner of Ivy and Emmet, are not connected to this project.

The state will pay the $12 million bill for the renovations. Virginia evaluates transportation infrastructure projects using a system called SMART SCALE. Wuensch says the renovation scored points on the SMART SCALE system for increasing walking and biking safety and decreasing traffic congestion. “This is part of the Route 29 system, so it’s a corridor of state significance, even though it’s a business route,” Wuensch says.

The meeting was sparsely attended. Peter Krebs, community outreach coordinator at the Piedmont Environmental Council, says he’s noticed that the community has not been vocal about this project, despite the fact that it’s one of the “top three bike-ped projects” currently underway in the area. “My theory is that it doesn’t go by anybody’s house,” Krebs says.

However, the construction will pass the Lambeth Field Residence Area, which holds 174 university-owned student apartments.

At the meeting last week, Gay Perez, the executive director of housing and residence life at UVA, worried that the project would leave those students in the lurch. 

“There is no real safe way that I see the Lambeth folks being able to cross the road to the beautiful tunnel,” Perez said.

“Students take the most direct route that they possibly can,” Perez said, suggesting that students would forsake the proposed crosswalk at Massie Road and instead cut through the parking lot and jaywalk across the street.

“With the constraints we have, we’re doing our best,” Stuart replied. 

The planning commission and City Council will still have to review and vote on the project. 

“I’d love to predict it’ll go smooth as ever, but you know, I wouldn’t bet the house on it,” Stuart says of the approval process.

Wuensch says the project has “enjoyed pretty wide support,” and Krebs praised it as a good example of collaboration between the community and the university. “It’s important that the city and the county and the university work together on transportation,” he says. “That makes me happy.”

According to Stuart, the project’s design phase is 60 percent complete. Construction is projected to begin in 2021. 

“I love this project,” Krebs says. “The only thing that doesn’t make me happy is that it’s not already done.”

Categories
News

SLAPP-happy: Virginia’s weak anti-SLAPP law attracts defamation lawsuits

What do Johnny Depp, California Congressman Devin Nunes, and Confederate statue defender Edward Tayloe II all have in common?

This year, they all filed defamation lawsuits in Virginia. Depp sued his ex-wife Amber Heard for allegedly defaming him in a Washington Post op-ed in which she wrote about being a victim of domestic violence. Nunes sued both Twitter and his hometown newspaper, The Fresno Bee, for various perceived slights. And Tayloe sued UVA associate professor Jalane Schmidt, reporter Lisa Provence, and C-VILLE Weekly for writing about his family’s slave-owning past.

This bizarre collection of cases highlights the weakness in Virginia’s rules concerning defamation lawsuits. All of these suits have been called “strategic lawsuits against public participation,” commonly referred to by the acronym SLAPPs. 

In their statement about the Tayloe case, the ACLU described the suit against Schmidt as a typical SLAPP: “litigation intended to silence, censor and intimidate critics out of the marketplace of ideas by burdening them with the cost of a lawsuit they may not be able to afford.”

A recent high-profile SLAPP in West Virginia involved late-night TV host John Oliver, who was sued by coal tycoon Bob Murray after Oliver’s show “Last Week Tonight” aired an episode about Murray’s business practices. Oliver described the SLAPP in layman’s terms—“Obviously the lawsuit was a bullshit effort to silence us,” he said in a follow-up segment on the show. 

“Winning the case was never really his goal,” Oliver said, arguing that Murray simply hoped his lawsuit would intimidate and inconvenience “Last Week Tonight.” “Lawsuits are like famous Instagram pugs,” Oliver said. “They don’t have to work to be considered very, very successful.” 

Thirty-one states have adopted legislation—known as anti-SLAPP laws—to prevent these kinds of lawsuits from being filed. Virginia expanded its anti-SLAPP legislation in 2017, but  advocates say the new statute still isn’t strong enough to be effective. 

Evan Mascagni, policy director at the Public Participation Project, highlights two important components of strong anti-SLAPP statutes that are absent from the Virginia law: a mechanism for frivolous cases to be dismissed before the trial begins, and a provision that requires unsuccessful defamation plaintiffs to pay the attorney’s fees of the defendant.

In the Tayloe case, ACLU lawyers representing Schmidt argued that the case should be dismissed through the anti-SLAPP law. But although an Albemarle County Circuit Court judge found that there was no legal basis for the defamation claims, he declined to rule on whether the case was a SLAPP.

Jen Nelson, co-director of the UVA School of Law’s First Amendment Clinic, attributes that decision to Virginia’s weak anti-SLAPP statute.

In a state with stronger anti-SLAPP laws, she says, the Tayloe case might have been dismissed earlier and Tayloe might have been forced to foot the bill for Schmidt and Provence’s attorneys. That didn’t happen.

In fact, Virginia’s anti-SLAPP law is so weak that the state has become a popular site for non-Virginia residents to file defamation claims that they fear might not pass muster in other states.

“Forum shopping is when a plaintiff will seek to file a SLAPP in a state where there’s no protection against SLAPPs, or there’s very weak protection against SLAPPs,” Mascagni says. “We see that all the time.”

Nunes and Depp are obvious examples, Mascagni says. Both are California residents, but California has some of the country’s strongest anti-SLAPP laws, and so both chose to file in Virginia.

The connection to Virginia is tenuous in both cases. Depp can sue Heard, another California resident, in Virginia because “the op-ed at issue there was published by the Washington Post, who have printing presses in Springfield, Virginia,” Nelson says. 

In October, a judge ruled that Nunes’ suits against his hometown paper, The Fresno Bee, and two anonymous Twitter parody accounts, Devin Nunes’ Cow and Devin Nunes’ Mom, could take place in Virginia. Charlottesville-based lawyer Steven Biss is representing Nunes in both cases.

“If a plaintiff is filing what could potentially be a SLAPP in Virginia, when there’s no real connection to the state of Virginia, one can only assume that they did that to avoid a stronger state anti-SLAPP law,” says Mascagni. “Where does Devin Nunes live, California, right? He doesn’t want to file that lawsuit in California.”

Nelson says she believes the problem is on the radar of the state legislature, and that she “wouldn’t be surprised” if the incoming majority-Democrat government worked toward legislation to strengthen Virginia’s laws.

For now, though, Virginia will remain an appealing destination for those hoping to file intimidating defamation cases. “If your goal is to punish the defendant for having spoken out or made a statement on a matter of public concern,” Nelson says, “to drag them through litigation for as long as possible, and make them pay a lot in attorneys’ fees, then Virginia right now is one of the states where you can do it pretty successfully.”

 

Categories
News

Doing the work: Social Services department seeks to innovate and reflect

The Charlottesville Department of Social Services oversees a broad array of programs; everything from Child Protective Services to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Medicaid, and more.

In its November 18 annual report to City Council, the department’s advisory board highlighted some of the complicated challenges CDSS faces, along with its dedication to internal improvement. Medicaid expansion has been a particular focus over the past year. 

“An individual who had lived in a tent with medically complex issues is now housed and receiving medical care,” CDSS Advisory Board Chair Christine Gough said, citing one example of the effect that Medicaid expansion has had on the lives of city residents.

Virginia’s statewide Medicaid expansion took effect on January 1, 2019, and local applications more than doubled: the CDSS received 903 Medicaid applications from October to December of 2018, compared to 458 in the same period the preceding year. 

“It’s incredible to see the difference in health care for our homeless. It’s really amazing. There’s no more standing in line hoping you can get some meds,” said Diane Kuknyo, the director of the department, at the council meeting.

Of course, an increase in services rendered means additional work for CDSS staff. “The agency has faced some challenges during this period,” Gough said. “There has been a 50 percent increase in ongoing Medicaid renewal work. However, the positive results in our community far outweigh the increase in work.” The state has provided funds for two additional employees, but the department hopes to add another administrator as well.

More localized concerns have also shaped the recent work of the department. Charlottesville’s lack of affordable housing has been felt in particular by Child Protective Services—unstable housing creates unsafe situations for children.

“Housing is a problem. The cost of housing is a problem. Along with drug use and domestic violence,” Kuknyo said at the council meeting. The cause of many CPS interventions “is not abuse, it’s neglect, and the neglect falls into inadequate housing or inadequate supervision.”

Assistant Director Sue Moffett expands on that point in a later conversation at the CDSS offices. “We’re really active with the mainstream housing programs,” she says. “Families and individuals can grow when they don’t have to worry about where they’re going to sleep at night and how they’re going to keep themselves safe.”

Moffett emphasizes that more affordable housing isn’t a cure-all, however. “It’s certainly easier to feed your children, and have adequate child care, and have a house that’s adequate, when you’re not poor,” she says.

The city councilors in attendance expressed their admiration for the department’s work given the resources available. “I’m rather perplexed with the amount of help that’s still needed,” Councilor Wes Bellamy said. “With our three new councilors still in the room… I hope and pray that all of you can push this up to the front of our budgetary needs.”

Moffett, however, draws a distinction between the funds required to complete the day-to-day work of the department and the resources required to innovate. The department currently has 107 employees. “Based on the current caseload standards, we’re not understaffed, we’re essentially right on target,” she says.

“I will say this in comparison to other localities,” Kuknyo says, “generally City Council has been pretty fair with us.”

The city budget doesn’t affect the department’s major programs like SNAP and Medicaid, which are federally funded. City money can help the department push forward in other ways, though. “We know that if we want to continue to be a best practice agency, and a trauma-informed agency, that we need to do some innovative programming, which would require some local dollars,” Moffett says. 

Some of that innovative programming is already underway. The CDSS has displayed commitment to turning a critical lens on its own practices, exemplified by an ongoing study undertaken in conjunction with UVA. Professor Michele Claibourn runs the university’s Public Interest Data Lab, which has produced a detailed report examining racial disparities in the city’s child welfare system.

“We asked for it,” Moffett says of the study. She says CDSS is “the only agency in the state” examining its practices in this way.

One of the study’s major findings was that black and multiracial children were referred to child welfare services more frequently than white children. In response to the study, the CDSS has begun to run experiments in which CPS reports are processed without any identifying information available to the intake worker. The department hopes that any racial disproportionality coming from within the department will become apparent through this blind review system.

From Claibourn’s perspective, the study offers an opportunity for her students to learn hands-on social science skills while at the same time putting the power of the university to good use. “The students learn to use data in ethical ways towards equity and justice, not just towards industry and Google and commercial interests,” Claibourn says. They also “extract more university resources to answer questions that the community has.”

The department has conducted these experiments on top of completing its regular responsibilities. For Claibourn, that sets it apart. “I think the overall existence of this collaboration is a signifier of how hard the department is working,” she says. “In doing the work, you don’t always have time to take a step back and evaluate in a really deep dive kind of way.”

“I’d love to see the possibility of doing more work like we’ve done here,” Claibourn says. “And I think the city’s been very open, actually.”

 

Categories
News

Power struggle: Residents and homeowners associations clash over solar panels

For Lillian Mezey, installing solar panels on the roof of her family’s home wasn’t just about saving money—“We just care a lot about environmental issues,” Mezey says.

That’s part of the reason Mezey was so frustrated when the homeowners association that governs her neighborhood rejected her request to install the panels. Mezey, a psychiatrist at UVA, lives in Old Trail, a sprawling development just south of the Crozet town center. 

Last year, Mezey had two local solar companies, Sigora and Altenergy, appraise her home for a panel installation. Both recommended the same placement—on the south-facing roof, in the front of the house.

However, the Old Trail HOA’s rules only allow solar panels on the back of the house, so it denied Mezey’s request. 

Altenergy then devised an alternate layout that would produce a similar amount of energy, but it would cost 15 percent more—a $3,000 increase. “The Plan B was going to be less efficient and more expensive,” Mezey says, “so we just chose not to do it at that time.” 

Mezey isn’t the only prospective solar owner in Virginia who has been stymied by an HOA. Aaron Sutch is the Virginia Program Director of Solar United Neighbors, a group that seeks to help individuals install panels through bulk-purchase programs and other initiatives. They’ve facilitated 830 solar installations since 2014.

“In every jurisdiction,” Sutch says, “we undoubtedly have issues where homeowners associations block solar installations for the people in their communities.”

Sutch feels that aesthetic concerns—that solar panels are unattractive—are  misplaced. “The current state of the technology is totally different than what they may imagine,” Sutch says. “Anecdotally, we see HOAs that think solar is still what it looked like in the 1980s.” 

At Old Trail, Mezey sought to amend the HOA rules. She gathered “35 to 40” signatures from neighbors, she says, and sent a letter to the property manager, Allen Billyk, requesting a loosening of the rules. That was in August.

“The first time, he said it’s under consideration, and the second and third time I checked in I just got radio silence. I haven’t heard back,” Mezey says. “Part of the frustration is that we haven’t gotten a good explanation from anybody.” 

Billyk tells a different story. “It wasn’t declined,” he says of Mezey’s application.

For Billyk, Mezey’s initial proposal was an obvious breach of HOA guidelines. “If you drove by there, you would immediately see her house like wow, that doesn’t make sense,” Billyk says. “It’s just not a house set up for it. Part of these things are to protect people from themselves.”

And he says solar panel placement hasn’t been a problem for other residents of the neighborhood. Billyk wasn’t moved by Mezey’s petition, which he describes as “20 signatures in 700 houses.”

“This is the only one in the five years I’ve worked here that has become a newsworthy situation,” Billyk says. 

In Virginia, HOAs are not legally allowed to ban their residents from installing solar panels outright. But they are allowed to impose “reasonable restrictions” on their placement. The code never specifies what “reasonable” means, however. “It’s really nebulous language,” Sutch says.  

The Old Trail case falls into the murky zone left by that unspecific language. Matthew Gooch is a Richmond-based lawyer who works with environmental law and regulatory agencies, including HOAs.

“That’s right there in the gray area that might or might not be reasonable,” Gooch says of the Old Trail situation. “I can’t tell you for sure what a court would do there.”

Other states have more concrete guidelines. California law, for instance, specifies that an HOA-mandated change that would cost $1,000 or more would be considered an unreasonable increase on a proposed plan.

In the Old Trail case, Billyk questions Mezey’s assertion that the alternate plan—at $3,000 more—represented a significant cost increase. “When you’re investing $20,000 over 18 years, that doesn’t seem that prohibitive.”

When asked whether HOAs ever prevent residents from installing solar, Chris Poggi, the Charlottesville branch manager at Altenergy, immediately recalls Mezey’s situation. 

“HOAs—they have a lot of power, man,” Poggi says. That’s especially true when they control areas as large and affluent as Old Trail. The neighborhood currently consists of more than 700 homes, and the developers hope to build hundreds more.

“It just sounded fishy all around,” Poggi says, recalling Mezey’s case.

Poggi wonders if  Mezey’s Altenergy proposal was rejected because the developers have a deal with Sigora.

Billyk says that Old Trail does not have an official partnership with Sigora, although he estimates the company has done 90 percent of the solar installations in the neighborhood, and that leads to more business through word-of-mouth.

Regardless of the reason for the rejection of her proposal, Mezey feels that any resistance to solar panels is misplaced, given the current political climate and the need for sustainable energy.

“I’m less focused on my house right now and more on the idea that there’s a major development in Albemarle County where the HOA has a restriction on where you’re allowed to put solar panels, in this day and age,” Mezey says. “We talk a lot about personal choice. If somebody wants to do this, they should be able to do it.”

 

Categories
News

Moving on: City Council votes 4-0 to remove statue of Lewis, Clark, and Sacagawea from West Main

Rose Ann Abrahamson has seen nearly every depiction of her ancestor Sacajawea in the United States. 

“This statue in Charlottesville is the worst we have ever seen,” she told City Council at a meeting on November 15, referring to the statue of Lewis, Clark, and Sacagawea on West Main Street. The imposing monument depicts the Shoshone guide cowering at the feet of the two Virginian explorers. 

After nearly five hours of conversation, (and years of local debate) City Council voted 4-0 to remove the statue. Councilor Mike Signer left before the vote, citing a professional commitment. 

Though the statue has been a source of controversy for years, the idea of removing it came up again last year, as Council considered a new streetscape plan for West Main that would require moving the statue roughly 20 feet. In a June meeting, City Council declined to form a commission to study the issue, instead deciding to invite Native American consultants to weigh in at a special work session.

The morning began with a traditional Shoshone smudging ceremony, led by Emma George, a descendant of Sacagawea. George delivered a blessing while other Shoshone visitors walked in a circle, holding bunches of smoldering herbs and stirring the fragrant smoke with feathers. 

George and Abrahamson, who traveled to Charlottesville from Idaho, were among multiple Native delegations who voiced their displeasure with the monument. 

“It made me feel sadness and worthlessness,” said Dustina Abrahamson, Rose Ann’s daughter.  “And that’s not how I was brought up.” 

Kenneth Branham, the chief of the local Monacan nation, said he has 11 grandchildren and that he wouldn’t want them to see the statue. “I ask that the statue be removed, because it doesn’t depict the truth,” Branham said.

The statue was erected in 1919, a gift from Paul Goodloe McIntire, the same donor responsible for the Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson statues. In 2009, a plaque detailing Sacagawea’s contributions was placed near the foot of the monument, but her subservient position (some have argued that she is tracking) has remained a source of contention. 

The Native American representatives showed no such confusion about the monument’s message, and advocated for its swift removal. “The first thing we need to do is — do you have a truck and a chain?” Rose Ann Abrahamson said. 

That sense of urgency propelled City Council to bend procedural tradition, writing a resolution requesting a plan for the statue’s removal and then passing it in the same meeting. 

Councilor Kathy Galvin initially voiced concerns about the decision to proceed directly to a vote on the resolution without allowing more time for public comment, but eventually yielded. “The substance of the matter outweighs the concerns about process,” Galvin said. “We have to be committed to doing both right.”

“There will be no paved road for the path that we’re on,” Mayor Nikuyah Walker said, advocating for a situational exception to the council’s traditional operations. 

As this statue is not a war memorial, it does not fall under the same legal protections that have kept the Lee and Jackson monuments in place.  

The plan will still have to be approved in a separate City Council vote, and the cost of transporting and rehousing the statue has not yet been evaluated. Council also did not specify where the statue will go, although the Lewis and Clark Exploratory Center has volunteered to house it. City staff have been directed to present Council with a plan for a new statue of Sacagawea and other memorializations of Virginia native peoples. 

When the council passed the resolution, Rose Ann Abrahamson led her family in a victorious whoop. “Today we are going to make history,” she said.

Addressing the council, George added: “I would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart.” 

 

Updated 11/18/19 to note plans for a new statue.