Categories
News

A Little Night Music

stage

Talk about pedigree. A Little Night Music, with music and lyrics by Stephen Sondheim, was inspired by the late Ingmar Bergman’s exquisite, angst-free-except-in-a-brilliantly-understated-comic-way film, Smiles of a Summer Night, which was inspired by A Midsummer Night’s Dream. And then there’s this: In the words of an audience member in the Live Arts lobby before the show, "Stephen Sondheim rocks!" Translated into nonlayman’s terms: Since the 1950s, Sondheim’s lyrics have injected new life—uncommon grit, silliness, erudition, you name it—into the American musical, and his music has added classical splendor and inventiveness to the traditional show tune regimen.
 


Send in the clowns, sure, but let’s not overdo it: The music hits home, but the comedy of Sondheim’s A Little Night Music hits just a tad too hard.

In short, the opening night of Sondheim’s 1973 A Little Night Music (book by Hugh Wheeler) was crawling with high expectations. Would this Live Arts production bring to life the 19th century Swedish world of Fredrik Egerman (Dan Stern), who’s saddled with a frigid teenage wife (Rosa Parma Brown) and whose mind keeps wandering to a former lover, the actress Disiree Armfeldt (Linda Waller)?

The answer is a limp, though not quite frigid, "sort of."

It’s time once again to dust off Oscar Wilde’s famous warning to comic actors to play their parts with an unconscious seriousness. In other words, the comedy falters if the audience is aware that the actors are aware that they’re in a comedy. Director John Owen’s principal actors are prone to exaggerating their characters and dressing up their lines, and therefore the audience doesn’t have the chance to joyfully teeter on a subtle edge. Owen is in an unenviable position: Encouraging too much seriousness can lead to flatness. But good productions of comedies are all about brewing up some thespian magic to create a fine balance. The lack of balance also seems to have affected the pacing. The whole production vacillates between moving with a stately grace and moving in slow motion.

The good news is that the 15 cast members and Owen and musical director Greg Harris are adept at presenting the elaborate toying with show tune conventions in Sondheim’s lyrics, as well as the often cunning and always bewitching rhythms of his music. All this despite the fact that the four-person ensemble led by Harris at the keyboard off to the edge of the stage sounds at times like it’s behind a concrete bulwark.
 
In short, an enjoyable night at the theater is tempered by the sense that Live Arts has a ways to go before it can claim to be the No. 1 place in town to see a musical.

Categories
Living

Back Porch: Fireplace: the idea

"Fireplace"—few nouns are so melodious. A phrase such as "Come and sit by the fireplace" evokes the magical sense that one of barbaric earth’s elements can have a genteel, eminently approachable home.

All right, so if the mere idea of a fireplace can make me swoon, why don’t I live in a house that has one? True, they’re not that common anymore, which restricts one’s home-buying choices, and true, the notion of adding a fireplace to a fireplace-less house seems like a whole mess of trouble. But c’mon, desiring one isn’t tantamount to an actor boarding a Greyhound bus to Hollywood with 50 bucks and a dream.

Perhaps, for me, the answer begins with Santa Claus.

I grew up in a house designed by my hip architect father. Incorporating a traditional fireplace into its ultramodern design would have been like painting a 16th-century Florentine prince onto one side of a Jackson Pollock. And so, after the myth of the portly, gift-wielding Santa was planted in my brain, confusion set in: With no chimney to clamber down through, how would he get inside? My parents’ answer was ingeniously uncomplicated: They would leave the front door open and he would just waltz right in. This made not having a fireplace seem like a perfectly rational choice, which may explain why as an adult my burning desire for one isn’t accompanied by a burning desire to fulfill that desire.

True, I did once rent a house whose main "selling" point for me was that it had a fireplace. But then, after I was all moved in, I learned that the landlord didn’t want me to use it. At first I took the blow in stride, but things changed as winter grew from a few early morning frosts on the front lawn to icicles hanging from the gutters. I decided to lobby the landlord, assuring him over and over that by using the fireplace I wouldn’t accidentally turn his whole property to ashes. My landlord relented. I was ecstatic.

But then….

No, there was no accident. Just the sound of an idea colliding with reality. After a month or so of acting like an 18th-century peasant and making fires as if my life depended upon it, I began to resent the fireplace. A steam engine that needed constant stoking, I felt, would take up less of my time. I couldn’t leave the fireplace be. It was like a dog always looking at me with cow eyes and whimpering for me to build it back to life. It took on a kind of negative magic. While the word for it continued to sound melodious, the actual thing no longer made my heart sing. I wanted a more simple life—why clamber down a chimney when you can just open an unlocked door?

And yet….

I know it’s crazy given my track record, but I still have visions of cozy times inside by a fire. I hear newspaper crumpling, the snap as a piece of kindling breaks across my knees, and the whoosh as I add the first big log to the equation. I sit back and drink in the crackling of the raging end product. And even though in these visions the flames never die, and I’m never forced to disturb my statuesque position and do the work of building up coals again, I still think I might possibly one day maybe again have a fireplace.

After all, the whole idea of it is just so cool.

Categories
News

State to pay for six new profs

The London-based company, Rolls-Royce, which no longer makes cars that only 99 percent of the population can afford, has announced plans to build a jet engine manufacturing plant in Prince George County, southeast of Richmond. End of story? Hardly. With the company’s decision to include Virginia in its future comes a sweet deal for the University of Virginia. In addition to Virginia Tech and the Virginia Community College System, UVA will form what it’s calling an "innovative partnership" with Rolls-Royce on a number of engineering and business fronts.


Rolls-Royce jet engines like this one in Great Britain will soon be rolling off assembly lines in Prince George County. UVA will receive state funding for new profs and renovated facilities to provide training for the plant.

In a University press release, UVA President John Casteen III explains how Rolls-Royce can not only provide an economic benefit to Virginia, but also impact higher education around the state. "Rolls-Royce has an impressive history of collaborating with universities to support and develop research in academic centers of excellence to develop the company’s workforce, as well as to create new technologies." Casteen says that the educational and research activities will be substantial and will involve faculty and both graduate and undergraduate students. The School of Engineering and Applied Science and the McIntire School of Commerce will be particularly impacted.

Underneath Casteen’s statement lies a whole other dimension. A huge part of the reason Rolls-Royce chose Virginia over seven other states involves, in addition to direct financial incentives to the company, Commonwealth funding to UVA. The University will provide Rolls-Royce, as Virginia Secretary of Education Thomas Morris puts it in a press release from the Governor’s office, "research and development capabilities with a continuous pipeline of engineers," and in turn the state, in support of the partnership, will shower the University with $3 million over a five-year period beginning in July 2009. The state will fund six chaired professorships, three in engineering and three in the McIntire School, as well as graduate fellowships and undergraduate internships. They will also provide the means by which UVA can introduce a manufacturing minor to the engineering school and renovate mechanical engineering laboratories. And one of the two major research centers that will be created—The Center for Aerospace Propulsion Systems—will have its headquarters at the University.

C-VILLE welcomes news tips from readers. Send them to news@c-ville.com.

Categories
News

Bullet for Unaccompanied Heart

stage

I’m all in favor of complex phrases that, as Wallace Stevens said, "resist the intelligence almost successfully." But I just can’t wrap my mind around the title Bullet for Unaccompanied Heart. Because a heart, unlike a lung, has no twin, I can’t see how it can’t be accompanied. (Sure, I know that "heart" stands for lost or lonely human being, but still…) By entering the heart will the bullet give it accompaniment? Is death what the incomplete heart needs to be complete? Ah hell, I don’t know.


Cross your heart and hope to die: Blues run the game for Dugan McBane (Allen VanHouzen) in Cakes’n’ale Theatre Company’s Bullet for Unaccompanied Heart.

Fortunately, the title is the only real weakness in Robert Wray’s play, Cakes’n’ale Theatre Company‘s premiere production, which had a three-day run last weekend at a fourth-floor space at Live Arts, and will have two performances at the Bridge Progressive Arts Initiative early next week. Wray, a veteran writer and actor who has paid his dues in New York City and Los Angeles, employs a device that not only helps give his play an uncommon flavor, but also serves to express what introducing a new theater company to a city is all about: extending the bounds of artistic freedom.

Bullet takes place in the country of the mind—specifically, the mind of blues singer and guitarist Dugan McBane (the name blues lover Van Morrison would adopt if he wanted to announce his Irishness to the world), played by Allen VanHouzen. McBane, haunted by the ghost of his muse and ex-girlfriend, Anya Magnifico (Claire McGurk), is locked in what looks like an ordinary urban apartment building living room—in fact, it’s the prison, so to speak, of his botched past, complete with a guard named Milo (Don Gaylord) who waves a gun in McBane’s face every time he thinks about trying to let go of his thoughts.

Just as the mind contains innumerable possibilities, the play is like a blues song that hints at the standard lyrics while also flourishing beat poet rhythms, David Mamet-speak, Samuel Beckett-like existential ghoulishness and just about anything else Wray can think of. The task he’s presented himself is to keep all this indulgence from spilling over into self-indulgence, and for the most part he succeeds (director Sean Chandler chimes in by keeping the tone and atmosphere tight and consistent). And even when the play threatens to disappear in the heavy mist of its influences, it maintains a hearty individuality that’s an entirely welcome contrast to much of what’s available for Charlottesville theatergoers.

It should also be noted that the play, with its lengthy monologues that aim to exhume with words a buried past, and its emotional intensity, presents a huge challenge for actors, and the always-surprising pool of local acting talent has delivered. While Gaylord in the supporting role is solid, VanHouzen and McGurk do all the heavy lifting with unwavering confidence and professional panache.

Cakes’n’ale Theatre Company present Bullet for Unaccompanied Heart again at the Bridge Progressive Arts Initiative on November 26-27 at 8pm. Tickets are available in exchange for donations at the door.

Categories
Living

Back Porch: Come together, right now

That holidays—especially the fall and winter type—can be fraught with anxiety, loneliness or other nasty concepts has become a staple of modern American consciousness. On the loneliness front, I’ve been lucky to have plenty of family support when it comes to major holidays, though, like a lot of people, I’ve experienced at least one exception. In my case, it was a Thanksgiving in 1991, when I found myself adrift with nowhere to go. But here’s the thing: Though 16 years have passed, the memories of that day linger more than all the other "normal" Thanksgivings combined. That’s due a little to the awkwardness and the—yes—anxiety associated with what transpired, and a lot to how being deprived of my comfort zone led to a startling happy ending. In fact, the memories are so acute that my brain can process them on demand like a well-oiled machine.

Step one: Get invited by an acquaintance of a friend to a Thanksgiving bash with seven other "adriftees." Naturally, I am hesitant. Eight losers in one house sounds like a bad reality TV show before such weirdness existed. But I am won over by the incisive and charming instructions from the uberloser, i.e., the host: "Bring anything you want, as long as it’s not a turkey." A nontraditional Thanksgiving meal—that sits well with me.

Step two: The inevitable meet and greet. Though every one of us knows at least one other person, it’s as if eight strangers sitting far apart in a Greyhound bus station suddenly decided to get together and share bits of their sandwiches and candy bars. The meet and greet location—the kitchen, of course—is swimming in manufactured and perhaps genuine kindness. There’s only one big cog: A guy in a black t-shirt and red sweater vest gives off the distinct impression, as strong as the odor of overdone turkey, that he’d rather be lonely.

Step three: Discover the true meaning of the host’s instructions. There is a turkey, and there’s nothing in the air to indicate that it’s overdone. She just didn’t want to end up with eight of them. I am delighted. A nontraditional Thanksgiving meal—what was I thinking? I can feel my loser aura vanishing.

Step four: Who are you, my grandmother? The host begins ordering everyone around before we get a chance to really talk. Obviously because I am a man and shouldn’t be handling the food, even the scalloped potatoes that I brought, I am assigned to set the table in the dining room. Hardly a complicated task. I’m struck by how I’m about to have a nice meal for very little effort.

Step four: Watch from the sidelines as seven people, like seven servants serving themselves, bring in all the food. The variety is stunning. No dish has a duplicate, despite the host’s general instructions. Besides my potatoes, there’s stuffing, grilled asparagus, bread, some sort of mystery casserole (it looks delicious, actually), roasted squash, carrots, and of, course, the turkey.

Step five: Random seating. Or a sinister divine plan. Thanks, God, for putting me right across from t-shirt and sweater vest guy. Thanks a lot.

Step six: Dig in. The casserole, and everything, is indeed delicious, and everyone, including my black and red shadow across the table, seems deliriously hungry and happy to have the cure right in front of them. It’s uncertain what sort of dinner conversation there will be, but right now hearty eating is taking complete precedence over talking.

Step seven: Find myself having a long, interesting conversation with the guy in the cool sweater vest. Satiated hunger, it seems, has wiped the misery off his face. It turns out we both lived for a while in Amherst, Massachusetts, and have an abiding and perhaps unhealthy obsession with Emily Dickinson. And then I have a long, not quite so interesting but very fun conversation with the woman next to me about the virtues of late-night grocery shopping. And then…

Step eight: Discover the true meaning of Thanksgiving. Well, not really, but I’m having a genuinely good time and don’t even care when the host orders us to retire to the living room with her and play some stupid games.

Categories
Uncategorized

The Virginia Film Festival: notes for a screenplay

Here’s an idea: The Virginia Film Festival, now in its 20th star-studded, "talented unknown-studded," vibrant year, would be a great subject for a film. With that in mind, we asked Richard Herskowitz, VFF director since 1994, to consider his fondest memories of the annual event in light of a few screenwriting terms. Here’s what he came up with.  


Richard Herskowitz, director of the Virginia Film Festival


Establishing Shot—the memory that says to you: "This is what the Virginia Film Festival is all about"

More Film Festival coverage:

Part pulp, part opera, all NYC
John Turturro’s labor of foul-mouthed love

Animated sounds [with video]
Brendan Canty performs live soundtracks at the Film Fest

Home movies [with video]
Adrenaline junkies, assemble!

Visit vafilm.com for a complete festival schedule.

The Dog Day Afternoon premiere had everything. We brought one of the world’s leading contemporary artists, Pierre Huyghe, who had given us his art installation on Dog Day Afternoon for display at the Art Museum.  Pierre Huyghe’s installation was called "The Third Memory," and it was so incredible to be able to bring it to the Art Museum and have it coincide with our film and our discussion.

It was just the kind of synthesis of art and film and typified our desire to be a festival of all the arts.

That kind of encounter of crossing over film and art and sort of having facilitated the meeting of the screenwriter with the subject and having that happen, that was one of our great moments.


Jump Cut—two separate memories that are edited together in your mind

In 1995 we brought the blacklisted writer Paul Jericho.  He was on a fantastic screenwriter’s panel with younger and older screenwriters.  One of the most moving things about that panel was when one of the younger screenwriters, Mari Hatta, turned to Frank Pierson and Jericho and told them how much their films had meant to her as a writer.

Then, in 1997, we brought a blacklisted director, John Barry, who had emigrated to France. Incredibly, the day before our festival started, Barry got a call that Jericho, who was a friend of his, had left some kind of tribute event organized in Hollywood in which Hollywood basically apologized to the blacklisted writers in the film industry for what they had done to them.  And leaving that event, Jericho had gotten into a car accident and died.

Barry, who has also since passed away, was one of the most unforgettable guests for me both for his reminiscences at the screening and the conversations we had between screenings, which were so jaw droppingly powerful and moving that I can’t begin to tell you.  I remember asking him if he was going to write an autobiography with all of these stories and he said he was, but as far as I know, he never completed it.

Freeze Frame—a memory that you hold in your mind like a still photograph

One of my favorite, most blissful nights at the Festival was in 1995 when we had our closing night party at the airport. We brought a salsa band from Washington and they were performing there.  Late in the night, Ruben Blades got up and joined them for a rendition of "Guantanamera" that he stretched out for close to half an hour.  You cold see in the faces of the musicians how honored they were and you could see in faces of that crowd that we all felt it was an experience nobody was going to forget.

Zoom—a memory that closes in on a particular guest you were honored to meet

I spent about three hours in the Boar’s Head dining room with Jason Robards and he was telling story after story about his life in the theater with fellow actors like Colleen Dewhurst and Christopher Plummer.  He was the nicest, most generous person.  He was like that in the same way as Vanessa Redgrave was.  A lot of the stars we have brought here have been unbelievably accessible and generous.  Vanessa Redgrave was the last person to leave the party at the Art Museum and talked to everybody.  

I think a lot of that has to do with the atmosphere created at the festival and with the atmosphere in Charlottesville.  Often, filmmakers and actors come here thinking they are coming to a normal film festival and that they are going to be in their publicity "hide" mode.  For example Anthony Hopkins, when he showed up he probably figured he was going to be dealing with tons of press and receptions, and the first thing he did was meet with students in the drama department.  It completely relaxed him and showed him that this was not going to be your typical festival.  He ended up giving the students as much advice as he possibly could.  His mood was so good throughout the course of the day that by that night, when he was on stage, he was electric…literally standing up and performing parts like his Nixon part right there on the stage.

Another great memory was the ovation for him as he left the stage with Roger Ebert, who told him, "Tony, I’ve done hundreds of these things and I’ve never seen anything like this."

Montage—a series of memories strung together in your mind

Roger Ebert made an enormous impression on me over the years. I think he is one of the best teachers whom I’ve ever encountered and his way of orchestrating the discussions for the whole audience is something that was just remarkable.

In my mind I have a whole montage of memories of Ebert, one of them being his absolutely masterful interview with Nicolas Cage.  It was after Sonny, a difficult film that had made the audience very uncomfortable.  You could actually feel the real tension in the room as to how the Q and A was going to go and what Ebert was going to say about the film.

There was no one who could have conducted that conversation better.  He talked about Cage’s whole career as an actor and asked him great questions.  It so relaxed Cage and the audience that you could just feel this immense sense of relief from everybody.

What people didn’t know that was going on was even more stressful than you could even imagine.  Just before Ebert and Cage went on stage, Cara White, a leading film publicist and longtime festival consultant and now board member, told me that there were tabloid reporters in the audience who were determined to ask questions about Cage’s relationship with Lisa Marie Presley, who was there in the audience that night.

I asked Ebert to please do the whole interview himself and not to open the floor to questions.  And Ebert again did such a masterful job that nobody even noticed there was no audience participation.

Shooting Script—a memory that has the perfection of a final draft of a screenplay

We had been looking for a long time for an interviewer as good as Ebert was because, obviously, his health issues have made him not able to return for the past few years.  We really feel grateful that we found David Edelstein, who is now the film critic for New York Magazine.  He has a very different style from Ebert, of course, but he is funny and smart.

Last year the rapport he created with Robert Duvall was truly something to behold.  The first thing Duvall said after coming on stage following the screening of The Apostle was how funny it was after a film about an evangelical preacher to be out there being interviewed by a New York Jew.

You could see in Duvall’s body language how pleased he was as the interview went on with Edelstein’s evident admiration for The Apostle and for Duvall’s film work as well as for his incredible knowledge of the medium.  They had an absolutely perfect rapport.

Reverse Angle—a memory of an experience that totally surprised you

The visit of "Dog," John Wojtowicz from Dog Day Afternoon.  He was in the audience for opening night 2003 when we did the screening of Dog Day Afternoon and we brought Frank Pierson, the screenwriter.  Pierson was meeting him that night for the first time and he was the subject of that film.

All the sudden I started hearing barking sounds coming from the audience and it took a while to realize that was Wojtowicz’s signature voice, how we voiced approval.  Based on the success of Dog Day Afternoon he decided to give himself the nickname "Dog" and one of his characteristics was to use a bark to express approval.

I was very nervous about the "Dog" and Pierson encounter because after I had set it up, I discovered that the film Dog Day Afternoon had created problems for Wojtowicz in prison because the movie implied that he had possibly ratted out his partner to the FBI and it turned out that his life was in danger, and it was not true.

Pierson had felt guilty about that.  I became very nervous that Wojtowicz may have stored up years of resentment that he may have let loose when he got on stage.  I was in a state of terror.  Then he gets up there and presents the most moving testimonial, saying it had taken him a while to come to the realization that he felt immensely grateful that a screenwriter as talented as Frank Pierson had been the one to dramatize his life.

Aerial Shot—the thoughts that go through your mind when you think of the Virginia Film Festival as a whole, as if from a certain distance

What pops into my head is the unusual combination of filmmakers who meet each other.  When we brought Sigourney Weaver we also had the punk, avant-garde filmmaker Craig Baldwin, who showed up at the reception for Sigourney Weaver and scarfed up as much food as he possibly could and could be seen doing so in the background of a number of photos of her from the event.  

Also, I think of experimental Su Friedrich, who is returning to the Festival this year, going on a tour of Monticello with Roger Ebert.  What happens is you get these unexpected encounters of people from totally different worlds of film.

Categories
News

The Virginia Quarterly Review

words

While many North Americans are familiar with South America through traveling or lineage or other means, the majority, it seems, view it as nothing more than a reflection of a surface name. And it’s not only the complex history of that distant continent that feels so, well, distant. What is its current identity? What in the world does "South America in the 21st century" mean?

How many quarters are there in a year? C-VILLE takes on the Virginia Quarterly Review. From cover to cover. Again!

That’s what’s emblazoned in red letters across the cover of the new Virginia Quarterly Review, and it’s a comfort to know that this empty phrase is backed up with 322 pages of a special issue on the subject (a nice break, by the way, from the journal’s usual dizzying eclecticism—rewarding though it is). The issue, co-edited by VQR helmsman Ted Genoways and Peruvian journalist and fiction writer Daniel Alarcón, has 17 contributors, and the focus of the pieces ranges from an enduring symbol of poverty in Buenos Aires, Argentina, called the White Train, to a nonfiction love story originating in a neighborhood in Lima, Peru, to a 2002 anti-Hugo Chávez protest in Venezuela that turned deadly, to the connection among soccer, Holland and the tiny country, Suriname, to a "mysterious albino town" in Argentina, as well as work by an Argentinean cartoonist and two fiction selections.

Readers who get through every page won’t end up graced with a manageable understanding of contemporary South America. Rather, seemingly countless details will continue to thrash and churn in their brains, along with a realization: The cultural and political panorama of North America, though different in significant ways from its counterpart, is just as sprawling and untameable. South America will become not just a mysterious continent, but a mysterious, sister continent.

And if such a wide approach is too hot to handle, immersion in any single piece is a way to cool and calm down. Julio Villanueva Chang’s profile of the former blind mayor of Cali, Colombia, who came "under suspicion for crimes he claims he never saw," is evidence of the almost mythical reality that pervades South America. Peruvian-born artist Ana de Orbegoso’s images of saints with their faces replaced by the faces of Peruvian women of today and Hwa Goh’s photographs of Inca descendants work as visual tools to chip away at the essence of the continent. "Soy in the Amazon," by Californian Pat Joseph is far more fascinating and trenchant than it appears. And finally, Marjorie Agosin’s series of poems, while not as graceful as her famous countryman Pablo Neruda’s, get at the bare bones—literally and figuratively—behind recent Chilean politics.

Categories
Living

Room for ideas

I like my kitchen—just not for the same reason most people like their kitchens.
Let me explain.

My first memory is of being hoisted onto a kitchen counter and sitting there with my legs dangling while my mother’s arm, like a bar on a ski lift, kept me from falling. I think she was talking on the phone, which hung on the wall beside the refrigerator—I think. What I do remember clearly is that I was the only thing on the counter, and that, in fact, the whole kitchen was bare and spotless, like the clean skeleton of a kitchen.

And I—I’m not making this up—also clearly remember appreciating, almost the way an adult appreciates a fine piece of sculpture, how unassuming, how undisturbed, how nothing the space was. I felt safe, not only because I wasn’t falling, but also because there was no indication anywhere that I could see that life was about doing. It was about being. It was about clothing the skeleton with beautiful thoughts about the skeleton.

Which brings me to my main, and far less poetic point: I don’t use my kitchen. Well, I mean I don’t use it a lot. I go in there. I—to reiterate—like it. It’s nice. But I don’t use it a lot. I get an apple or some pieces of raw broccoli out of the refrigerator. I pop a piece of store-bought quiche into the microwave. And other such things that make nary a splash or a stain and don’t put every appliance and surface to use. If it were a person, my kitchen would feel neglected and hurt. It might even scream and throw a plate at me.

I know what some of you are saying: It’s a guy thing. To which I retort: It’s time for the second half of the story. While my mother cooked aplenty when my brother and I were kids, later in her life when she was single the secret emerged: She hated to cook. She hated pots and pans. She hated turning on a stove. She even pretty much hated opening a refrigerator. She never really expressed it that way. She didn’t have to. Wherever she lived, the kitchen was like a quiet enclave removed from the other rooms and, for that matter, the whole rest of the world.

They never repelled me, her tomb-like kitchens. They were each like a separate vision of my first memory. Each in its own way seemed to welcome me back into an original state. Like her, I never felt up to tarnishing them with a lot of activity.

Is all this a genetic connection? I wouldn’t mind believing so. If you’re an astrology buff (as I am sometimes, and as my mom was sometimes), you would say it was cosmic. My moon sign is Libra. My mom’s moon sign was Libra. An astrology book I read once refers to those with this moon sign as “not really physical people.”

But in other rooms of my house and in other interior places, my need for doing in addition to being kicks in. I’ve spent my share of time working in restaurants, and I didn’t despise it all that much. In general I’m not, and never have been, comatose. I played so much soccer when I was growing up that dreams of professional stardom danced in my head. I played so much basketball that the skin on my fingertips was perpetually down to its last layer. And other people’s bountiful, vibrant kitchens never repel me.

So the mystery remains, I suppose, and my kitchen remains a special place—just not for a utilitarian reason. An ineffably special place. Some kind of meditation room I go to when I need a simple snack.

Categories
News

The Clean House

stage 

As far as I know, the theater lexicon doesn’t contain a word comparable to “chick flick,” so I guess that’s what I have to call Sarah Ruhl’s 2004 Pulitzer Prize-nominated play, The Clean House. As every movie (or theater) buff knows, there are three kinds of chick flicks: art house fare that any man with three quarters of a brain appreciates and even wants to discuss afterwards; sappy romances; and stories that are strictly about women, which can make some men feel like they’re observing a sociological experiment involving aliens from Venus. While The Clean House is intelligent enough to fit in the first category, it’s firmly placed in the third. Yet Ruhl’s sly and sometimes silly humor, as well as an unexpected plot and tonal twist that’s too good to give away—all captured nicely by the cast and crew of Live Arts’ production—extend a welcoming hand to anyone and everyone.


Under where? Christianna Queiroz (left) and Cynthia Burke (right) uncover a few domestic secrets in The Clean House at Live Arts.

Real-life sisters Susan and Cynthia Burke play sisters Lane and Virginia. Both live a suburban life in what Ruhl describes as “a metaphysical Connecticut.” (Lane’s house, designer Krista Franco’s main set, looks like it’s straight out of an empirical Hollywood Hills, but it does the trick.) Lane is dealing with two problems: Her Brazilian maid, Matilde (Christianne Queiroz), doesn’t actually like to clean, and her doctor husband, Charles (Bill LeSueur, who by day is C-VILLE’s art director), is having an affair with one of his patients (Kay Leigh Ferguson). Virginia, who absolutely loves to clean (read: she’s a germaphobe), befriends Matilde and takes over her job, absolutely loving the fact that she can order her sister’s life behind her back.

The first half of the play, delightful though its jokes are, seems mired in a generic domestic dramedy, especially when director Amanda McRaven’s touch in the fairly serious moments fizzles a bit. It’s just a staging ground, however, for Ruhl to unleash a flurry of surprises, and for McRaven to keep up with her step-by-step by piling on ideas and making what can only be described as a sumptuous mess.

But the production really belongs to two Live Arts veterans, Cynthia Burke and LeSueur. Burke’s delicious comic timing keeps the first half buzzing, and she practically oozes the neuroses of a woman who wants to tidy up the whole world or, better yet, sweep it all into a plastic bag. And LeSueur, with his dead-on portrayal of a man who believes floating on a cloud of love nullifies all manner of sins, injects a dose of energy into the second half that carries through all the way to the end.

Categories
News

Anais Mitchell

music

With all the excitement surrounding the return of Bob Dylan to Charlottesville, it’s easy to forget that his foundation—straight-ahead folk music—has been largely banished to the shadows. New folk singer-songwriters, awash not in Dylan’s resplendent history, must scrape together bits of acclaim here and there. Lord, they might as well be poets or intellectual novelists.

Who puts the “lounge” in Gravity Lounge? It’s Anais Mitchell, who delivered an intimate set to an equally intimate crowd on Tuesday night.

Well, at least the foundation is still alive. And in the case of the new women folkies, blood is seriously flowing. Antje Duvekot tops some people’s lists, and many others stand out, such as Kris Delmhorst, Meg Hutchinson, Miranda Stone, Lizanne Knott—and Vermonter Anais Mitchell, who performed a gorgeous set for a sparse audience at Gravity Lounge last week.

That audience likely fell into two camps: those who had been exposed to the baritone sax riffs and other high-production elements (roughly akin to Ani DiFranco’s recent concoctions) sprinkled throughout Mitchell’s 2007 Righteous Babe Records release, The Brightness, and those who had no other experience of Mitchell but as a woman with a guitar on a raw stage—the foundation’s foundation, so to speak.

Make that a woman with a guitar and a man with a guitar: Michael Chorney, who produced The Brightness as well as—with less extracurricular fireworks—Mitchell’s first album, Hymns for the Exiled for the lesser-known folk label, Waterbug. His ear for adding subtle and befitting textures to sometimes traditional/sometimes innovative rhythms was on display in Mitchell originals such as “Your Fonder Heart” and “Shenandoah.”

Mitchell has played for much larger audiences, but it’s clear she’s comfortable with pouring her heart out to coffee house-sized samplings of people, and working hard to engage them. Asking the audience for some local news and hearing about the drought prompted her to move up on her playlist her take on Hurricane Katrina, “Out of Pawn.” The song is just one example of the way she extends that famous singer-songwriter angst outward toward the concrete world without overreaching into hollow objectivity. It was hard to tell at several points in the set what was our world and what was her creation. In a live setting even more so than in her recordings, such conscious artifice seemed to flesh out the natural power in the uncommon timbre of her voice—almost a female version of a Neil Young effect.

Private concerts by Neil or Bob—that’s what public concerts of great folk music are often like these days. More than a little bitter. Though very sweet.