Categories
Arts

The critic’s picks: Four films you shouldn’t miss at the 25th Virginia Film Festival

You know you’ve got a good film festival, like this year’s Virginia Film Festival, when it gives you a sense of the world seeming small and large all at once. Small for having gathered so many mini-worlds in one place; large for, well, the overall largeness they collectively imply. Bearing in mind that films made beyond America’s shores offer good ways to get out of comfort zones, here’s some fest fare worth seeing not just for its excellence but also for its cosmopolitanism and complacency aversion. Notably these selections include an American director getting to know a Chinese artist, an Indian director reminiscing with Swedes, and an Austrian director working in French (plus a French director working in French, which sort of ruins the pattern here, but not really because most festival-worthy French films are innately worldly anyway). It’s always an epiphany, and one well suited to cinema, to see ostensible foreignness revealed as universality.

Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry
Alison Klayman’s documentary profiles the Chinese art-star activist Ai Weiwei, whose ongoing problems with authority beget increasingly creative solutions. Klayman’s aesthetic sense is a lot less refined than her subject’s, but a more important qualification might be her receptiveness. Ai says early on that he prefers hiring helpers to implement his big ideas (which most often have to do with transparency and persistence), and the filmmaker’s access to him seems, agreeably enough, like a sort of enlistment. Looking cutely aggressive, like some post-punk Buddha, and confronting the surveillance operatives who always seem to follow him around, Ai achieves absurd camera-on-camera standoffs in which opposite tyrannies—of old totalitarianism and new media—stare into each other’s abysses. The essential insight to Klayman’s conscientious, yet unfussy portrait, is about how the contemporary Chinese Communist Party has produced a culture so desperately in need of jamming, and also the jammer it most deserves.

Amour
From the elegantly pitiless Austrian filmmaker Michael Haneke, here’s a chamber play of sorts about the most basic human stuff: love and death. (Significantly, love alone is what the title comes down to.) It stars Jean-Louis Trintignant and Emmanuelle Riva as an elderly Parisian couple coming to terms with the end of their life together, along with Isabelle Huppert as a vexed daughter. The pedigree of talent promises mastery, and in very straightforward terms the story delivers it. Maybe no other living filmmaker can so frankly assay the buildup to bereavement—that universal terror of lost companionship, and certainty, and consolation—as the rigorously intelligent Haneke. Amour draws great power from its maker’s subtlety, and from its main players’ affirmingly lifelike but anti-sentimental intimacy. It’s not just because the leads are elderly that this movie makes so many others seem like trite juvenilia.

Liv & Ingmar: Painfully Connected
What better pretext for a documentary than the profound and complicated relationship between creative soul mates? Especially if the souls in question are those of a titan of international cinema, Ingmar Bergman, and his muse Liv Ullmann? As she puts it here, in her imperfect but telling English: “I used to be a happy person, a very happy person, but you know, five years doing his films, I was also getting a kind of depressed, neurotic person.” Well, that’s just scratching the surface, and filmmaker Dheeraj Akolkar knows his material well enough to go much deeper than surface-level. Ultimately Liv and Ingmar’s painful connection spanned 42 years and a dozen films—several of which still stand as pinnacles of the art form. And in Akolkar’s project, Ullmann’s cinematic assets—her great face, her depth of feeling, her fearlessness—again are on display. It’s a bracing reminder not only that most films are too shallow, but also that if you’re not careful, so might be your life.

Polisse
As it happens, the penchant for ripping procedural melodrama from the headlines is not exclusively American. The French have been doing it beautifully for generations. Polisse, an extraordinary ensemble drama from 2011 just now arriving stateside, plays out very much like a grand, Gallic episode of “Law & Order SVU.” But instead of tautly topical formula best-suited to a half-watched TV show, it sprawls with unruly big-screen dynamism and doesn’t dare let go of your attention. As seen by a shy photographer, played by director/co-writer/force of nature Maïwenn Le Besco—or, as the credits call her, just “Maïwenn”—it’s ostensibly a group portrait of short-fused cops at the child protection unit. “We don’t judge; we don’t care,” one officer says, coaxing a confession, and it is the movie’s great privilege to investigate that claim. What’s miraculous is the degree of lyricism it derives from unquenchable and innately compassionate psychological curiosity.

Categories
Arts

Film review: Finding Nemo 3D

The 3D re-release of Pixar’s 2003 undersea saga may or may not be a bid from director Andrew Stanton to make back some of the cash his John Carter lost at the box office. Or it may just be de rigueur for controlling partner and distributor Disney to slap a 3D stamp on its most profitable properties (see also Beauty and the Beast and The Lion King—and, for that matter, the first two Toy Story films) in an era of smaller screens stealing audience attention.

In any event, and most importantly, Finding Nemo still holds up. (True, it’s less than a decade old, but being hailed as classic always implies a kind of antiquation.) And it’s still just the tale of an overprotective single-dad clownfish (voiced by Albert Brooks) on a quest to rescue his curious young son (Alexander Gould) from a dentist’s office aquarium.

Set in the vast and beautifully animated Great Barrier Reef, this proves once again to be an affecting adventure. It maintains that pleasant Pixar sense of having risen to a self-imposed challenge—not just the establishment of an oceanic world, but also that of the population therein. Toys and cuddlier animals are easier to anthropomorphize than fish, to which cuteness and pathos adhere less readily, but of course this is also the studio that gave us A Bug’s Life. We shouldn’t be surprised to discover (or rediscover) some engaging personalities among even the scaliest of Finding Nemo’s swimmers, which include stoner turtles, twelve-stepper sharks, and Ellen DeGeneres as Brooks’ goofy, forgetful helpmate.

Plus, as befits a proper odyssey, it isn’t afraid to venture into dark depths. To have gone a while without seeing it is perhaps to forget how Finding Nemo starts with an episode of terrible, albeit natural violence (mercifully offscreen), and how nimbly its makers braid character investment with a reasonably kid-friendly explanation of the food chain.

The visual complexity is less rich than in more recent Pixar projects, but the point is that you don’t think about that because it’s plenty rich as is, and because unless you’re some heartless brute who just can’t get into cartoon fish stories about family separation, it’s all too easy to get carried off by this narrative current. What remains most impressive is how Stanton and co-director Lee Unkrich, working with a carefully rendered story by Stanton, Bob Peterson, and David Reynolds, commanded their movie without over-controlling it. This seems useful for any film, but particularly for one which happens also to be a fable about possessive parenting.

Agreeably preceded by the short Partysaurus Rex, which segues characters from the Toy Story series into an aquatic context of sorts, Finding Nemo 3D fits the bill for that increasingly rare cinematic treat: a big room full of oohing, ahing, laughing, sniffling kids. Of all ages. It didn’t need a 3D retrofit to deserve another big-screen run. Then again, it didn’t need a sequel either, but reportedly and happily one is on the way.

Finding Nemo 3D  (G, 100 minutes) Carmike Cinema 6

Playing this week

2016 Obama’s America
Regal Downtown Mall 6

The Campaign
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Celeste and Jesse Forever
Regal Downtown Mall 6

The Cold Light of Day
Carmike Cinema 6

The Dark Knight Rises
Regal Seminole Square 4

The Expendables 2
Carmike Cinema 6

Finding Nemo 3D
Carmike Cinema 6

Hope Springs
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Ice Age: Continental Drift
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Last Ounce of Courage
Carmike Cinema 6

Lawless
Carmike Cinema 6

Moonrise Kingdom
Regal Downtown Mall 6

The Odd Life of Timothy Green
Regal Seminole Square 4

ParaNorman
Regal Seminole Square 4

The Possession
Regal Seminole Square 4

Raiders of the Lost Ark
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Sleewalk With Me
Vinegar Hill Theatre

The Words
Carmike Cinema 6

Categories
Arts

Film review: Lawless

With more precision and presence of mind, Lawless might have pitched itself as an origin story of the whole gangster-movie genre. But like the transparent moonshine its backwoods brooders guzzle down in just such a way as to remind us it’s fake, the movie itself seems conspicuously diluted, more water than fire.

Sourced from Matt Bondurant’s historical novel The Wettest County in the World, and focused on the three Bondurant brothers who ran a bootlegging racket in Virginia’s Franklin County in the early ’30s, it’s also a faithful booster of family lore. What story there is here has the brothers protecting their operation, sometimes brutally, from various violent encroachments.

Of course, on account of being portrayed by actors from three different countries, these Bondurants don’t really look or sound related, but they do at least have a common fervor for going to town on their given dialect. Howard, played by the Australian Jason Clarke, is a volatile drunk. Forrest, played by the Brit Tom Hardy, is a fearless WWI survivor, tough and taciturn except when croaking out little speeches to build pre-beatdown suspense. Narrator Jack, played by Shia LaBeouf, is the youngest, dramatized and directly described as “the runt of the litter,” but impressionable and ambitious and at least, in his way, genuinely American.

Given his appearance and his standing here, Jack’s sort of the Wesley Crusher of this enterprise: the innocent contrived conscience we could do without but may eventually agree not to mind. It is therefore somewhat unsettling to discover that, with the exception of Dane DeHaan as Cricket, Jack’s obviously expendable accomplice and pal, LaBeouf actually delivers the movie’s least mannered performance. And this includes Jessica Chastain and Mia Wasikowska in thankless threatened-damsel parts.

The aforementioned encroachers include Gary Oldman, underused as a local gangster, and Guy Pearce, overused as a dandyish federal deputy. “It’s special deputy,” he insists, and we surmise that he’s the villain of the piece, meant to seem both menacing and amusing. A little laughable but never quite funny, Pearce promptly lapses into his familiar tendency to strive harder than the material warrants. At best, when screwing up his face, he looks like Sigourney Weaver on the prowl for aliens.

This ought to enliven what otherwise just seems like a more rural and less capacious “Boardwalk Empire,” but no such luck. Written by Nick Cave, who with fellow Bad Seed Warren Ellis also presides affectionately over its music, Lawless offers possibly too-comfortable turf for director John Hillcoat, who managed other unstable family clans in the pre-civilized wilderness of The Proposition (also written by Cave) and the post-civilized one of The Road (also scored by Cave and Ellis). As its conflict escalates and a mutual vengeance takes the place of any sort of substantively dramatic anticipation, the movie never finds a stance on the violence it portrays. Are we to think it atrocious or awesome? Ah, maybe both, and that’s what makes it interesting, eh? Ah, maybe not.

Lawless/R, 115 minutes/Carmike Cinema 6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Zl7S1LaPMU

Categories
Arts

Film review: Celeste and Jesse Forever

When you’re young and in love, “forever” is a word you dare to carve in tree trunks or wedding cakes. Getting older, if you’re not careful, that same word could mean a purgatory of codependence. Such is the wry wisdom of Celeste and Jesse Forever, a romantic comedy whose main characters spend the duration figuring out what the audience already knows: not that they belong together, but that breaking up is hard to do.

For the eponymous L.A. couple played by Rashida Jones and Andy Samberg, directed by Lee Toland Krieger, the courtship phase occurred long ago. Now they’re just two great friends in a failed starter marriage. As obvious as it is that things won’t work out between Celeste the careerist and Jesse the aimless artist, it’s equally obvious that they’re inseparable. Even after announcing the divorce, they’re still hanging out together, avowing mutual love, running unabashedly through their familiar repertoire of inside jokes, and seriously weirding out their friends (Ari Graynor and Eric Christian Olsen).

To clarify, Celeste points out, “I love Jesse dearly but he doesn’t have a checking account. Or dress shoes. The father of my children will have a car.” He isn’t much help with assembling her IKEA furniture in any functional way, but he knows how to turn it into a robot sculpture. Yet, as soon as another woman (Rebecca Dayan) appears in Jesse’s life, and he suddenly seems ready for adult responsibility, Celeste reconsiders, albeit indignantly. It’s a complicated bundle of feelings, and Jones nails it.

A professional trend forecaster (she’s written a book called Shitegeist), Celeste is accustomed to rattling off pop-cultural pronouncements, and it shows in her withering dismissal of a sweet but slightly unhip financial analyst (Chris Messina) who hits on her in a yoga class. The scene is ingeniously played, a gender reversal of the similar business put over by Woody Allen in Annie Hall, to which Carol Kane famously responded, “That was wonderful. I love being reduced to a cultural stereotype.” Here, Messina’s character duly allows Celeste’s appraisal of him, admitting that in fact he only took the class to meet girls. Later, it takes an obnoxious young pop star (Emma Roberts) to call her on her habit of “contempt prior to investigation.”

Jones co-wrote the Celeste and Jesse script (with actor Will McCormack, who appears here, amusingly, in a supporting role), and she has created an opportunity for herself, to affirm not just her beauty and on-screen appeal, already obvious, but also the range of her emotional intelligence. Accordingly it’s more Celeste’s movie than Jesse’s, and Samberg, for his part, seems relatively and shrewdly subdued; we may say this film better justifies his departure from “Saturday Night Live” than That’s My Boy. Although not without a few rom-com clichés, it’s also authentic and self-aware, evidently aspiring to the highest standards of the genre. Silly and messy, as you’d expect, and also sad and true.

Celeste and Jesse Forever/R, 89 minutes/Regal Downtown Mall 6

Playing this week

2016 Obama’s America
Regal Downtown Mall 6

The Bourne Legacy
Carmike Cinema 6

Brave
Regal Seminole Square 4

Celeste and Jesse Forever
Regal Downtown Mall 6

The Campaign
Carmike Cinema 6

The Dark Knight Rises
Regal Seminole Square 4

Diary of a Wimpy Kid:
Dog Days
Regal Seminole Square 4

The Expendables 2
Carmike Cinema 6

Hit and Run
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Hope Springs
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Ice Age: Continental Drift
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Lawless
Carmike Cinema 6

Marvel’s The Avengers
Regal Seminole Square 4

Moonrise Kingdom
Regal Downtown Mall 6

The Odd Life of
Timothy Green
Carmike Cinema 6

The Oogieloves in the
Big Balloon Adventure
Regal Seminole Square 4

ParaNorman
Carmike Cinema 6

The Possession
Regal Seminole Square 4

Premium Rush
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Sparkle
Carmike Cinema 6

Ted
Regal Seminole Square 4

Beasts of the Southern Wild
Vinegar Hill Theatre

Movie houses

Carmike Cinema 6
973-4294

Regal Downtown
Mall Cinema 6
979-7669

Regal Seminole Square Cinema 4
978-1607

Vinegar Hill Theatre
977-4911

 

 

Categories
Arts

Film review: The Bourne Legacy

The best way to enjoy The Bourne Legacy is by not having seen the other three Bourne films. (Oops.) That way, those trilogy tidbits which play out again here, as a sort of instigating background action, won’t seem redundant but instead like alluring ads for the better and more adroitly managed movies that still await you.

This time inspired by the books of Robert Ludlum rather than adapted from them, The Bourne Legacy was written and directed by a writer of its three predecessors, Tony Gilroy, along with his brother Dan. Matt Damon isn’t around—except in a passport photo, fittingly enough—but Jeremy Renner is here as another secret super agent ducking out on his dubious federal employers and consequently dodging extreme prejudice termination.

Alert, affable, and only violent when absolutely necessary, Renner gets across the plot-driving idea that he was a regular grunt once, and his extraordinary mental and physical sharpness actually is a matter of pharmacological enhancement. Indeed, drama is derived not just from his rescue/abduction of a research scientist (and requisite nursemaid) played by Rachel Weisz, but also from the perpetual worry that he’ll run out of pills to pop.

Like Damon before him, he’s presented as the product of a sinister intelligence division that’s desperate to protect its own secrecy and ominously adept at surveilling, controlling, and shutting people down. The chief operator there is a steely-eyed Edward Norton, looking quite at home in dark rooms full of video monitors, chewing out his subordinates or supervising drone strikes against them. It’s thanks to the actual Bourne having blown the division’s cover, and Norton’s scorched-earth response, that Renner’s guy becomes a target.

The Bourne legacy, then, is a military-industrial complex in lethal bureaucratic panic. And Gilroy, the shady-dealings enthusiast, also of Michael Clayton fame, goes about his business like an espionage wonk. His idea of suspense is cross-cutting between fairly boring scenes that swear they’ll build to something eventually. But he’s good at earnest, jargony banter, and those portentous moments when characters face off and size each other up, thinking or saying, “How do I know that you’re even cleared for this conversation?” Maybe the best thing about this movie is its commitment to an authentic aura of agitated bureaucratese.

Maybe the worst thing, and likely proof that three films really was enough, is its nervous urge toward demystification. Chemically abetted gene tweaking seems like comic-book superhero stuff, and ordinarily that’s fine, but where this otherwise proudly plausible franchise is concerned, it’s disappointing—dangerously close to that ruinous moment in the Star Wars prequel when the Force was explained away as something precisely measurable and molecular.

It is intriguing to think that without his mental-boosting dope our hero is sort of a dummy—and frustrating, therefore, that Renner doesn’t get a real regression to play with, unless you count the entirety of this movie.

The Bourne Legacy /PG-13, 135 minutes/Regal Downtown Mall 6

Playing this week

2016 Obama’s America
Regal Downtown Mall 6

The Bourne Legacy
Carmike Cinema 6

Brave
Regal Seminole Square 4

The Campaign
Carmike Cinema 6

The Dark Knight Rises
Regal Seminole Square 4

Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days
Regal Seminole Square 4

The Expendables 2
Carmike Cinema 6

Hit and Run
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Hope Springs
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Ice Age: Continental Drift
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Moonrise Kingdom
Regal Downtown Mall 6

The Odd Life of
Timothy Green
Carmike Cinema 6

ParaNorman
Carmike Cinema 6

Premium Rush
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Ruby Sparks
Regal Downtown Mall 6

Sparkle
Carmike Cinema 6

Ted
Regal Seminole
Square 4

Total Recall
Regal Seminole
Square 4

Beasts of the
Southern Wild
Vinegar Hill Theatre

Movie houses

Carmike Cinema 6
973-4294

Regal Downtown
Mall Cinema 6
979-7669

Regal Seminole Square Cinema 4
978-1607

Vinegar Hill Theatre
977-4911

 

 

Categories
Arts

Film review: The Campaign

The agenda of director Jay Roach’s new movie is obviously not to mine the finer nuances of American electoral procedures. This might come as a shock or a relief, depending on whether you go into The Campaign remembering Roach as the politically-minded maker of HBO’s Recount and Game Change or you only know him from the Fockers films. In any case, now Roach has split that difference. His agenda, for what it’s worth, is lowbrow bipartisan spoofery.

Well, America, what is it worth? In The Campaign, Will Ferrell plays an entrenched North Carolina congressman challenged by an unlikely opponent in the form of Zach Galifianakis. Unlikeliness, of course, used to be the Galifianakis touch; here it’s a dull nudge, or whatever you want to call a weary reprise of the prissy oaf he played in Due Date. Meanwhile Ferrell looks to have hauled out his old George W. Bush impression, and sensing the staleness, hosed it off with a splash of randy John Edwards. The setup alone is a bloodless, been-there farce. But maybe that sends a message of safety and security. So can it count on your vote?

With strings pulled by callous sibling super-funders modeled on the Koch brothers and played by John Lithgow and Dan Aykroyd, the candidates’ contest escalates from gaffe-intensive buffoonery to the brinksmanship of outrageously dirty mud- slinging. Among a clutter of pundits tediously playing themselves, Jason Sudeikis and Dylan McDermott show up as rival campaign managers, respectively servile and shark-like. Before long it’s a slog, quite like a real campaign but otherwise too broad a cartoon and too soft a satire, full of cheap shots at easy targets and many scattered bits of uninspired vulgarity. (Inspired vulgarity would be fine.)

Writers Chris Henchy and Shawn Harwell try to repurpose the usual campaign movie clichés as punchlines but can’t fully forsake their pieties; Roach and his complacent stars take that cue to churn out a film whose sentimental fizzle-ending “heart” seems as much of a cynical calculation as the politically corrosive corporate profiteering it limply sends up. Ultimately this sort of thing is best on cable, and eventually channel-surfed away from. Richer parodies remain available on “The Daily Show” and “The Colbert Report,” as does the parody that writes itself, regularly, in current events.

Someone, somewhere may think the timing of The Campaign’s release is politically motivated. Although scarcely issue-driven, or challenging in any real way, it does seem to have gotten shoved into the doldrums of the August dumping-ground, between peak summer blockbusters and autumn’s onset of prestige pictures. At best it offers a vacation of sorts, some recuperative last laffs before the grim home stretch of real-life campaigning carries us into November. And if the it’s-all-a-joke mindset feels neither constructive nor cathartic, it does have the dubious virtue of staying forever unserious.

The Campaign/R, 88 minutes/Carmike Cinema 6

Movie houses
Carmike Cinema 6 973-4294
Regal Downtown Mall Cinema 6 979-7669
Regal Seminole Square Cinema 4 978-1607
Vinegar Hill Theatre 977-4911

Categories
Arts

Film review: Total Recall

And so another Philip K. Dick story gets another shot at being another movie. Funny how hard it is not to go in feeling protective and skeptical, as if Paul Verhoeven’s admittedly singular Schwarzenegger staple from 1990 were some kind of inviolable masterpiece. This version, from director Len Wiseman and a complex web of writers, seems fun enough while it lasts but in the end not totally recallable. No eyeballs about to pop, no “give deez peepul ayre,” no little man protruding from another man’s belly and demanding that you open your mind. Still, if not as camp then as midsummer popcorn dressing, it’ll do.

In a grimy, concrete city of the doomed future, a factory worker (Colin Farrell) takes a mental vacation from his job manufacturing law enforcement robots, only to find himself on the run from law enforcement robots—and by extension their boss, an evil tyrant (Bryan Cranston) with a world-domination agenda. It happens as a headlong rush of implanted memories, confused identities, and variously toxic atmospheres, not the least of which is our hero’s suddenly troubled marriage. His particular wife-or-dream-girl conundrum, with Kate Beckinsale as the former and Jessica Biel as the latter, involves the special intimacy of martial arts brawls and matching bullet wounds. (Wiseman is married to Beckinsale, and for several movies now he has enjoyed arranging and recording her action-figure poses.)

The movie’s gloomy, rainy sprawl suggests a deeper debt to Blade Runner than to its namesake, which might only mean that Wiseman isn’t fussy about sovereignty. He has vision enough: This domination-threatened world has reverted, post-apocalypse, to a very unhealthy colonial relationship between Great Britain and Australia, now connected by an enormous intra-planetary elevator. Perhaps befitting the impresario of all things Underworld, it’s a world of gravitational challenges, aesthetically intriguing for its extreme verticality of urban density, with characters tending to leap and fall more often and more articulately than they speak. One potential exception to that tendency is a tyrant resister played by Bill Nighy, but the film acts nervous around his intelligence, and squanders it.

With time, completist fans will scour minutiae for illuminating points of continuity between this Total Recall and the first one. At first glance it seems most telling that both invoke fears of accidental lobotomy early on, both find room in their dystopias for a three-breasted sex worker, and both prompt our hero to ask, “If I’m not me, who the hell am I?” Farrell delivers that theme summarizing line with adrenalized desperation, his forte. Having also been in Minority Report, he obviously feels comfortable within Dickian confines of mind-bending pulp; on the run and unsure whether to trust anyone, including oneself, he’s at his best. Farrell’s half-innocent badass beefcake seems more anonymous than Schwarzenegger’s, and that only affirms the perpetual movie-readiness of the source material. As for its cultural staying power, we’ll know more whenever the next version comes.

Total Recall/ PG-13, 118 minutes/Regal Downtown Mall 6

Categories
Arts

Film review: Beasts of the Southern Wild

The feature debut from writer-director Benh Zeitlin, working with playwright Lucy Alibar and a New Orleans collective, rides in on a murky flood of festival hype. And what caused that anyway? The inevitable Sundance-stamped confluence of poverty porn and indie quaintness?
Wow, already this is sounding cynical, but Beasts of the Southern Wild has a habit of inviting audience push-back. For starters, it’s called Beasts of the Southern Wild; right away one senses some amateur anthropology going on, apologized for or at best compounded with amateur poetry. Still, the amateur operates from love, and Zeitlin has that. However patronizing, his reverie aches to be watched, and on as large a screen as possible. It says: Behold!

Newcomer Quvenzhané Wallis steals the show as a brave 6-year-old who yearns for her missing mother, copes with her ailing father (Dwight Henry), and navigates the archly magical-realist realms that lurk amid the muck and grit of her doomed, levee-locked Louisiana bayou. Hushpuppy is her name, and she dwells in a fishing boat rigged from a pickup truck’s rusted rear-end, and she is tough and tenacious, and she has visions of melting ice caps. Behold: the innocence, the resilience, the retrospectively peculiar-seeming fortitude of childhood, galvanized by apocalyptic anxiety. Too much?

Wait, there’s more. Her father is called Wink, as if the movie were just kidding when setting him up as an epitome of rough parental neglect, for in fact his declining health reduces—nay, enlarges—him to a heap of tender devotion. Meanwhile, the aura of romanticized dysfunction extends to the entire community, seen drunkenly and communally weathering an allegorical storm and subsequent flood. Presumably the beasts in question aren’t just Hushpuppy’s half-imagined pack of enormous prehistoric wild boars (set free from that melted ice), but also the central characters themselves—poor, black, modernity-deprived, and too-preciously resilient. In which case, are we not saying that they are animals? At any rate they are marginal to our society, and best kept that way, so as to be fawned over through a magic movie magnifying glass.

To authenticate his and Alibar’s laboriously folkloric calculations, Zeitlin uses nonprofessional actors. Good idea, as the last thing this needs is actors seeming actorly. But playing with regular folks can, and does, backfire because, well, they’re not professional actors. Not helping matters, Wallis gets a voiceover narration full of aphoristic wisdom and philosophy-jive, which only betrays the great cinematic discovery of her face and unflatteringly emphasizes the film’s theatrical origins. As for originality, it’s here, but in quotation marks.
Preferring pseudo-mythology to political seriousness, this amounts to a flamboyant indomitable-spirit demonstration, with undeniable vitality, but also a sort of heavy, beastly dullness. Zeitlin has talent and guts, yes. Ultimately, though, he inspires not wonder or awe so much as our awareness of the pride he takes in his own presentation.

Beasts of the Southern Wild/ PG-13, 93 minutes/Vinegar Hill Theatre

Categories
Arts

The Watch; R, 98 minutes; Regal Downtown Mall 6

Do not think that just because its name was changed, the movie formerly known as Neighborhood Watch has in any way been neutered. Granted, it does have some fertility issues, even within the plot, but those were there to begin with. You can rest assured that The Watch, as it’s now called, takes the maintenance of male genitalia very seriously.

Which seems a little weird given that it’s a comedy. But maybe that’s just the special signature of its auteur, director Akiva Schaffer, who made a movie five years ago called Hot Rod and also is responsible for the SNL Digital Short “Dick In a Box.” Now he wiggles his way through a raunchy script co-written by Seth Rogen, with perfunctory parts for Ben Stiller, Vince Vaughn, and Jonah Hill as self-appointed custodians of suburban safety who wind up warring with invading aliens. For no one involved does this seem like a career triumph. The Watch might just as easily, or maybe even more easily, have been made by a bunch of unknown guys who once got high together and had an eager conversation about how much they loved Ghostbusters, but then got distracted, possibly by masturbating.

Stiller plays the passively domineering manager of a suburban Costco, which turns out to be a focal point of product placement—oh, right, and also of sinister alien activity. As the designated drolly earnest straight-man, he convenes a neighborhood watch group, whose too-few enlistees include Vaughn, in his standard motormouth-bro mode; Hill, tetchy and self-effacingly creepy; and British TV star Richard Ayoade as a peppy odd geek out. There’s a twist involving Ayoade, which is that he’s fresher and funnier than everyone else in the movie.

That’s partly because Schaffer’s way of playing to his more familiar performers’ strengths is to take them shruggingly for granted. It’s hard to tell whether this has to do with feeling intimidated or just lacking inspiration, but it’s even harder to care. With a narrative strategy that seems mostly like wishful thinking, The Watch gets its laugh-out-loud moments to bloom by surrounding them with manure and hoping for the best. The overall experience is not exactly like strolling through a garden.

Helplessly, a few other people are on hand, including Will Forte as a clueless cop, Billy Crudup as a weirdo neighbor, and, as a patient wife, Rosemarie DeWitt, seeming as gracious as possible about getting the chore of her part in this movie over with. So really all that’s left are the dick jokes. And yes, as their man-cave banter reveals, emasculation aversion is important to these would-be macho vigilantes. It’s just not very interesting to the rest of us.
The title became The Watch after George Zimmerman fatally shot Trayvon Martin in February; the movie itself, going through its motions of video-gamey violence and crass, common gags, maintains the integrity of its own dull indelicacy.

Categories
Arts

The Dark Knight Rises; PG-13, 164 minutes; Regal Seminole Square 4

No wonder Bruce Wayne retired from being Batman. Everybody wants to psychoanalyze the guy: His butler, his burglar, his nemesis, his police commissioner, and practically anyone with a hand in managing his assets. Among other things, he is accused of pretense and, perhaps worse, of “practiced apathy.” Well, it was a double identity, and a dubious one, after all.
Of course it’s only a temporary retirement (at least until it becomes permanent), and at the outset of The Dark Knight Rises, it’s more or less mandatory; the caped crusader’s city, historically rather weird with mask-wearers and turncoats, no longer trusts him. All the more grist for director and psychoanalyst-in-chief Christopher Nolan’s mill: Two films in the rebooted Batman franchise already behind him, and still with so much more head-shrinking to do. In Nolan’s estimation, this grand trilogy-capper finale still requires two hours and 44 more minutes of duking and talking things out.

For the casual viewer, familiarity with the vicissitudes of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight is not required. Scripting again with his brother Jonathan, Nolan seems glad to summarize: It’s about power, justice, virtue, and philosophical challenges thereto, not to mention the considered aesthetics of the summer blockbuster set piece. It takes so long because the Nolans think it strategic not just to delve into backstory, but also to revise it while we wait. Although often self-nullifying, this is showmanship, of a sort: They understand that sometimes it’s fun being inside a movie for so long. Even, maybe especially, one so tense, huge, noisy, dark and unswervingly glum as this.

Helpful signposts abound, some in human form: the butler played by Michael Caine, the burglar played by Anne Hathaway, the commissioner played by Gary Oldman. They’re all fine, and comfortably familiar—even franchise-newcomer Hathaway (who only hits a few false notes). The nemesis is a respirator-faced hulk called Bane (Tom Hardy), who resembles Darth Vader without his helmet, or an uppity BDSM man-slave with vengefully revolutionary ambitions. Backed up by a squad of glowering thugs, he’s the Tea Party multiplied by Occupy.
Bane and Batman have a certain personal trainer in common, and it shows when they get to fighting. The fighting is like the dialogue: labored, with most natural movement restricted by so much preliminary suiting up, and a lot of people—extras, the audience—waiting around for the blows to land. They do land, at least, sounding like bombs.

Speaking of stuff blowing up, Bane’s agenda includes a lot of that, not the least of which is a 4-megaton time bomb. Also, there are hostages at the stock exchange, rough kangaroo-court justice, and most of the city’s police force trapped underground. Heavy stuff. One surfacer is a clever beat cop played by Joseph Gordon-Levitt, looking good and growing into the movie as it grooms him—but for what? Let’s reflect on how everything that rises must converge, and how well, over these last few films, Christian Bale has grown into those dubious double-identity heroics. When he finally does retire for real, doesn’t somebody have to take over?