Categories
Living

November 2010: Circle forward

 

The vibrant iron and mahogany-hued exterior is enough to turn heads on a street full of houses in varying shades of white, but Mike and Lisa Ryan are laid-back about the design of their house; they weren’t trying to make a statement. For them, the house is just a reflection of long-held aesthetics and some budget considerations.

While the initial house-hunting goal was to find space for a growing family of four, the Ryans decided to build their own house in Belmont, working with local design build firm Latitude 38, owned by Jeff Erkelens. “When it was over, we said it was the biggest art project we’d ever done,” says Lisa. 
The house has surprising details at every turn—artfully tangled light fixtures in the stairway, dark bathroom tiles that act as faux bathmats, ceiling panels of birch plywood on the main floor—but the most striking feature is the large, circular open doorway between the living room and the kitchen. “Because it’s open and such an angular house, this is a great, organic shape,” says Mike.
The main floor has quickly become the central nerve of the house: “We spend so much time down here that we sometimes have to force [the kids] upstairs,” laughs Lisa.—Lucy Kim
 
 
Mike: “I’ve always wanted a modern aesthetic to a house, but wasn’t sure about how it would work in the context of this neighborhood. I mean, just today I saw a cyclist go past our house, then put the brakes on to get a better look.”
Lisa: “We expected it would stand out but we weren’t trying to be exhibitionists or anything.” 
Mike: “My dad suggested buying a kit house a while back…I was entertaining the idea of something like that until I saw Jeff Erkelens’ house on sale on MLS…It was only on sale for about a day but it caught my eye. I called him, took him out to lunch—that was about two years ago. I basically wanted to know, what does it take to build that kind of house? She must have thought I was crazy.”
Lisa: “No, I didn’t think you were crazy. We thought that we would end up having to get a brick rancher and fix it up—then we realized that this was affordable and his aesthetic was attractive to us. The biggest thing we thought he’d nix was the circular doorway. I kind of had my heart set on it.”
Mike: “We used to be Dwell magazine subscribers and there was this picture of an old Chinese restaurant in San Francisco that a couple fixed up, but they saved the round doorway. We saved and scrap-booked that picture. When we brought it up with Jeff, I remember he just smiled and said, ‘I’m up for it. Every house needs a challenge.’ We thought it was cool enough to take one of our magic tokens.”
Lisa: “I was surprised by how much location makes a difference. We’re downtown, so we have access to the goings on in the city. Mike bikes with Gray or I’ll walk to the library with the kids. We’re more connected to the community and I feel like more of a city resident.” 
Mike: “One thing I’m surprised by is the view. It wasn’t until later I realized we had views of the Blue Ridge Mountains, Southwest Mountains, Montalto…We bought a flat piece of land and realized we’re at the top of the city. The best part is not the design, it isn’t the house, it’s living downtown.”
Categories
Living

April 2010: Little houses in the big woods

 From the unfinished great room on the main floor, built on piers to lend an illusion of floating in mid-air, John Forasté points out a far-off hillside filled with orderly dots of bare trees. Apple orchards, he says. In the distance are grazing cattle, clearly visible against the thick snow. Foraste’s half-built house is seated on a steep slope at the end of a winding driveway laid out by his son Alex Forasté, a civil engineer with local landscape architecture firm McKee Carson.

Scout Hill, one of two Bundoran houses designed by Jeff Sties, features a long sightline through kitchen, dining room and living room.

“When Alex first told me about this project, I was like, ‘Preservation development?’ What? C’mon…” says Forasté with a wry smile. Despite initial reservations about Bundoran Farm, Forasté and his wife Diane were eventually sold on the concept and the landscape. “Bundoran Farm was just done so well, with an eye towards preservation,” explains Forasté, “We originally thought to buy an existing house, then thought about what a project like this means.” To the Forastés, investing in Bundoran meant buying into an ideal: that it was worth the effort and expense to join a community that values and promotes green building.  

While the prominence of environmental values is the most notable difference between Bundoran and traditional housing developments, you don’t have to be an eco-enthusiast to understand the place’s appeal. Although the farm spans 2,300 acres and is designed to accommodate 108 lots, it could easily be mistaken for a single residence. Entrances to different sections of the farm are unobtrusive, seamlessly blending into the surrounding woods and giving way to narrow roads that curve up hills and over wooden bridges. Instead of a series of pushy pillared mansions competing for attention, houses seem content to stay quietly in the background, leaving the expansive horizons intact.

The skepticism that Forasté originally expressed is an attitude that Bundoran’s development director Joseph Barnes is used to encountering. While acknowledging a tough real estate market—only four houses are currently standing or under construction at Bundoran, three years after the Albemarle Planning Commission approved the project—he says, “We’ve actually been pleased that the underlying concepts of Bundoran Farm—of preserving and protecting the character and use of the land and environmental stewardship—has struck such a chord with people.” 

Of those four houses, two were designed by Jeff Sties of Sunbiosis, a local sustainable architecture firm. The Woodhill and Scout Hill residences belong to the Forastés and Lewises respectively. Working on Bundoran was a natural fit for Sties, who worked at high-profile green design firm McDonough + Partners before founding Sunbiosis; he dates the development of his environmental consciousness back to childhood. “When I was in first, second, and third grade, every year there would be a fundraiser at my school. Back then, there were really only newspapers to recycle so I dragged my wagon across town collecting newspapers.”

Sties says that the basis of his design approach is passive solar orientation, meaning that houses are built to take advantage of natural heat and shade. Sties’ houses are typically south facing on the long axis, designed with eaves that control heat, and range from 1,800 to 2,000 square feet—efficient in construction and use of space, qualities that he thinks are essential to a house designed with sustainability in mind. The Woodhill and Scout Hill designs reflect Sties’ philosophy: efficiency, small scale, and quality materials. 

Ideas becoming real

“We talked long and hard about what we wanted,” says John Forasté, “We wanted something to work with the rolling hills, the openness.” John and his wife Diane approached Sties with a binder of design inspirations and ideas, part scrapbook, part tech spec, and part wish list. An old Peanuts cartoon, lists of wants and needs, picture cutouts and printouts lay side by side in the book with architectural drafts. In spite of this extensive planning, Forasté says that he and his wife never had a specific design in mind. Since 2007, when the couple first stepped on the lot, the idea of a home evolved from a log house to a house with a wrap-around porch built entirely on piers, before settling into its final design—a house set in a hill, with a great room on piers that provides a stunning view of the farmland below.

As Forasté walks through the bare frame lines of his house, still lacking a roof, he lays out a vision of the completed house. The main hallway will double as a track-lighted gallery to showcase Forasté’s work as a photographer. The hallway leads into a combination kitchen and great room, where he envisions a large gathering table and bench as the focal points of the room. The oak panels for the floor of the great room will come from trees felled on Bundoran Farm, a way of bringing the outside in. Forasté is cheerfully determined to meet a move-in deadline of June, in spite of the constant winter snowfall that has set back construction—he grins when saying that he spent the morning of our interview shoveling snow from inside the house.  

While Forasté approached Sties on the advice of his builders, Artisan Construction Inc., Grady and Diane Lewis—two of the few who already call Bundoran home —connected with Sties via a basic Internet search for Charlottesville architects. “I just saw the name Sunbiosis and thought, ‘What a cool name!’” Grady says. It was Sties who suggested that the couple check out Bundoran Farm.

Open to the outdoors

“For our first drawing of the house, Jeff pulled out paper and pen on a pile of mulch out there and started drawing ideas,” remembers Diane Lewis. A southerly breeze, felt the moment the couple walked through the lot with Sties, was the inspiration for such an immediate response to the land.

 

(Top) Built-in bookshelves were on Grady Lewis’s wants list for Scout Hill; (Bottom) Visitors gather in the Lewises’ kitchen.

Like the Forastés, the Lewises had a flexible attitude about the final appearance of the house, but carefully cultivated a list of wants and needs for the design of their home. “We had design criteria in terms of likes over the years, an umbrella concept of a simple, small house,” says Grady Lewis. “I still can’t believe that what started out as a list in a coffee shop in Richmond materialized into what we wake up to every morning here,” adds Diane. While Grady’s half of the list included specific features he wanted—built-in bookshelves, a fireplace, a screened-in porch—Diane’s half addressed more abstract desires for the feel of the house—words like “renew” and “re-energize.”

Their complementary styles were tested when it came to deciding on concrete details. The Lewises took charge of designing the interior of their home; their goal was to make the house “mechanically simple” and infuse it with character. The flooring of the main floor is from wood processed by Appalachian Sustainable Development, with character knots in the grain. The kitchen and reading nook are both bump-outs, giving the house a more interesting exterior silhouette. 

One striking detail of the house is a small stained glass window by the front door. Grady says, “I used to draft romantic little scenes with smoke wafting from chimneys”; he approached local stained glass artist Jane Meniktos with the idea of incorporating one of his works into the house. The small foyer leads into a kitchen bump-out. From the kitchen, one has a long sightline through the dining room and living room, ending with a glimpse into the reading nook at the opposite end of the house. Nine-foot ceilings and large windows along the south wall heighten the feeling of being in a continuous open space. 

The spare room in Scout Hill holds the most surprising feature of the house—at the back of the built-in closet is a smaller door that opens into a large, well-lit storage space, a room within a closet within the room. The space is directly above the master bedroom, and large enough that Diane practices clogging on the plywood floor, even while surrounded by spare boxes.

GET TO THE POINTS

Scout Hill is certified as LEED silver, a feat that requires commitment and meticulous documentation. With the encouragement of their builders, Shelter Associates, the Lewises tenaciously pushed through the process. Diane says that the most rigorous aspect was just making sure that they understood the requirements. “I was going through the house counting lightbulbs, trying to see if we had enough points to get a non-CFL chandelier for the dining room,” she remembers. 

Redefining "amenities"

Diane points out another design aspect that makes the house seem so open—“The house meets ADA regulations…so we can stay here as long as possible!” A hallway leading away from the living room leads back to the master bedroom, directly opposite from the screened in porch. The air current that inspired Sties runs from a valley below the house and moves through the screened porch to the master bedroom.

The vision of a small space, one reminiscent of a cottage, was an important one to the Lewises. To maximize space and create distinct personal areas in the house, Grady purposely put his reading nook on the main floor on the opposite end of the house from the upstairs television room that Diane uses mostly for reading. “I was interested in how two people can get away from each other if they have to,” jokes Grady.  

Since moving into their home in June 2009, the couple has immersed themselves in the natural amenities and the surrounding neighborhood. “We’re few in number, but strong in community,” says Diane. Enthused by the abundant wildlife, she is currently pursuing certification as a master naturalist, while Grady is cultivating a shiitake mushroom farm with a member of the Bundoran team. They invite me to come back in the spring to look at the wildflower garden hidden somewhere underneath the snow of their yard. 

“We were told that the amenity is the world around you; it’s where you live. It’s the hills, the grounds, the trees,” says Diane.

Categories
News

Zoning fee increases recommended to Board of Supervisors

AMENDMENTS TO ZONING MAP

Planned Developments: under 50 acres
    Current fees: $1,020
    Recommended fees: $2,500      

Planned Developments: 50 acres or more
    Current fees: $1,570
    Recommended fees: $3,500      

All other map amendments: under 50 acres
    Current fees: $1,020
    Recommended fees: $1,250

All other map amendments: 5 acres or more

    Current fees: $1,570
    Recommended fees: $1,750   

SPECIAL USE PERMITS

Home Occupation — Class B
    Current fees: $440
    Recommended fees: $1,000   

SITE PLAN

Preliminary site plan, residential
    Current fees: $1,190 plus $13 per unit
    Recommended fees: $1,200 plus $15 per dwelling unit and $0.015 sq ft. nonresidential structure

Preliminary site plan, nonresidential
    Current fees: $1,580 plus $13/1000 sq. ft.
    Recommended fees: Same as above

Final site plan approval administrative
    Current fees: $410
    Recommended fees: $1,500

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS

Request for variance
    Current fees: $120
    Recommended fees: $500

Request for appeal
    Current fees: $120
    Recommended fees: $240

Source: Albemarle County Planning Commission

“Before you think about who’s going to pay them, let’s think about what the costs actually are,” said Jay Willard, a member of the Blue Ridge Home Builders Association who spoke during last Tuesday’s public hearing of the Albemarle County Planning Commission. The sentiment was echoed closely by other members of the public who called for the commission to consider internal changes and cutbacks before resorting to raising zoning fees. Ultimately, however, the commission voted to recommend the increases.

The idea of increasing fees has received heat from politicians and citizens alike, most recently during the county Board of Supervisors’ campaign. Proponents of raising zoning fees cite the increase as a necessary one, since Albemarle County’s fees have been static for a number of years, while detractors fear that such changes would negatively impact the business community.

Albemarle’s Director of Community Development Mark Graham presented the recommendation for restructuring fees, Albemarle’s uniquely high standards set by the county for zoning applications. The director reminded the commission that the last comprehensive review of fees was in 1991 and that the fee adjustment made in 2002 (a general 25 percent increase in fees) was significantly lower than what was required to cover costs of service.

Commissioner Don Franco was the only speaker to directly question what real benefits come from high zoning application standards. “Is it really necessary? Are we really better off than other counties?” he asked.

Commissioner Marcia Joseph said that the high standards were a reaction to community values. “I think that we are asking an awful lot of applicants, but it’s part of what citizens have wanted and it’s part of what former commissions and former boards have wanted. So I think it’s part of the community’s responsibility to help pay for part of that review,” she said. Commissioner Linda Porterfield disagreed. “I’m not sure that the average taxpayer should be having to fund the majority of these services that are being asked for by various individuals, businesses, whatever,” she said.

The final vote was 4-1 with three special provisions, including the exemption of fees for temporary fundraising activities (Christmas tree sales, for example), and a delayed implementation date of July 1, 2010. One particular fee, much-scrutinized by some local watchers, is the original application fee for home-based businesses with two non-family employees (there were only three in 2008). It was reduced from $2,000 to $1,000.

The recommendation and provisions will go to the Board of Supervisors on December 2.

C-VILLE welcomes news tips from readers. Send them to news@c-ville.com.

County Planning Commission recommends higher zoning fees

In last night’s regular meeting, the Albermarle County Planning Commission voted to recommend an increase in zoning fees to the Board of Supervisors.

The recommendation proposes a 30-35 percent average increase in zoning fees, with a few special provisions. One such provision was the exemption of fees for temporary fundraising activities—a change made in response to Robert Walters, a volunteer with the Boy Scouts of America who asked that fees be removed for nonprofits who do fundraising activities such as selling Christmas trees.

Another provision was the lowering of the original application fee for home-based businesses that have two employees who are not family members. That increase had been the subject of recent public discussion. While staff recommended an increase of $2,000, the commission amended that to $1,000.

While a 25 percent adjustment to zoning fees was made in 2002, the last comprehensive review of fee structure was in 1991.

The commission voted in favor of the recommendation in a 4-1 vote. Commissioner Linda Porterfield voted against adopting the new fee structure.