Categories
News

Running at Ragged? Public weighs in during third meeting

On a pleasantly wet Wednesday evening in late April, 60-odd people congregated at Trinity Presbyterian Church for the third public meeting about the Ragged Mountain Natural Area and its future. One of the many issues to be decided is who gets to use the park, now restricted to hikers and fishermen. Will mountain bikers, runners, horses and/or dogs get to join in the fun?

The public feedback meeting was called a map session with table exercises. Eight tables filled with maps and other research materials were used to garner opinion and gather information about whether Ragged Mountain would remain a natural area or become a recreational area.

Chris Gensic of Charlottesville Parks & Recreation explained that “if a consensus was reached tonight,” it would be passed on to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board and City Council for approval.

The first speaker of the night was Peter Krebs, a master’s candidate at UVA School of Architecture. Krebs had compiled a comprehensive fact sheet of other similar municipalities and what they had done with reservoirs.

Roanoke and Lynchburg stood out as comparable, although Krebs explained there is nothing exactly like Ragged Mountain. According to a handout, “Other cities’ actions are not a decision factor, only to inform land use expectations.”

Devin Floyd with Charlottesville’s Center for Urban Habitats said he and an army of volunteers have mapped and documented all flora and fauna at the Ragged Mountain Reservoir. He has counted more than 300 different species, including 53 tree species, 19 ferns, six orchids and 147 birds. He has teams assigned to track mammals as well as butterflies, aquatics and non-native exotics.

“It’s quite a treasure,” he said.

The proposed trail map has a little more than seven miles for walking and a three-mile stretch wide enough for a car. Floyd’s map shows areas of ecological sensitivity, native habitats, evidence of previous land use and exotic flora not native to this region. Although eradication of non-native species is a current hot-button issue, it was not discussed at this meeting.

When the floor was opened to questions, one attendee asked, “What actually constitutes a natural area?” This prompted several other audience members to suggest that with all the diversity, maybe trails should not be carved out. Several participants admitted to not feeling qualified to make decisions regarding the natural area, and asked for leadership from their elected officials, with one woman stating, “This is an exercise in futility.”

Gensic then took control and suggested everyone put these concerns on paper that he would, in turn, deliver to City Council. In kindergarten style, starting with the first row, he had everyone say a number from one to eight so the tables would have a greater diversity. As people obliged and then settled down to their task, the future of Ragged Mountain Natural Area remained undecided.

Another public meeting will be held May 24, and the issue will go to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board in June, which will have 30 days of public comment before it makes a decision. City Council could vote in September on whether Ragged Mountain remains a natural area or becomes a recreational space.

Categories
News

Resident omission: Will Friendship Court be unfriended?

The public announcement September 21 that Piedmont Housing Alliance would option its right of first refusal to purchase the land and housing complex of Friendship Court has the potential to forever change the landscape and fabric of downtown Charlottesville. The fully occupied 150-unit complex, designated as lower-income housing, sits sandwiched between the increasingly popular Ix Art Park and the Downtown Mall. Although the proposed acquisition won’t happen until the end of 2018, plans are already underway to redesign the 11.75-acre property.

Frank Grosch, CEO of PHA says, “We are absolutely committed to keeping the Section 8 housing, and to preserve the community and families that live there.” Although none of those families were invited to attend that announcement, Grosch explains that PHA is still keeping everything internal.

PHA has received a $500,000 challenge grant from the Donovan Corporation in New York to help facilitate the planning process. Like matching funds, this is a dollar-for-dollar grant to help with design and planning only. Heavy-hitter David Dixon, a Boston architect and recipient of an American Institute of Architects Jefferson medal for “a lifetime of creating livable neighborhoods,” leads the charge. Marc Norman, a former Deutsche Bank banker and Harvard-educated planner who worked on the revitalization of Skid Row in Los Angeles, and Liz Ogbu, an internationally recognized architect who consults on projects throughout Africa, South America, England and the U.S. and whom Grosch refers to as “sort of a rock star,” are also on board.

Dixon’s enthusiasm spills out of the phone. “This is an entirely new demographic,” he says. Citing the upheaval and uncertainty in the real estate market, coupled with young professionals without children and empty-nesters as the impetus for a new kind of American Dream, he states, “one size does not fit all.” Cultural differences, ethnic backgrounds and economic variations are no longer seen as impediments to overcome, but guidelines to strongly embrace, he adds.

“I don’t know if people have become more tolerant, but they will do what it takes to have the urban lifestyle,” he says. Current residents at Friendship Court are essential to making this work, he emphasizes, because “you don’t want a white bubble.” Dixon advocates for full participation to make sure everyone receives the same information, to help residents understand what their options are and to foster constructive feedback.

Brandon Collins, a staffer with Charlottesville’s Public Housing Association of Residents, suggests PHA may have jumped the gun a bit. “They should be working with PHAR,” he claims, and by not notifying it of future plans have “already bypassed resident engagement.”

Todd Niemeier is operations director of the Urban Agriculture Collective, a nonprofit that uses the land surrounding Friendship Court to grow produce, educate residents, stimulate dialogue and supply families with fresh vegetables. He says he invited himself to the Omni Hotel announcement. “They said they were going to invite me but they lost my e-mail address,” he says. Niemeier remains hopeful that it’s early in the process yet, but laments, “The garden doesn’t exist without the community.”

The Strategic Investment Area plan, a comprehensive and somewhat exhaustive document, has been in the planning stages for more than 10 years. The plan, which encompasses roughly 330 acres of prime downtown real estate from the south end of the Downtown Mall to the eastern edges of Ridge Street and Avon Street Extended, puts Friendship Court smack in the middle of land slated for development. Foremost on the SIA to-do list is to rebuild and preserve public and assisted housing, and promote mixed-income residential development without displacing current residents.

The Residents’ Bill of Rights further pushes home the point. Among the tenets listed, there must be a meaningful and enforceable resident participation that guides all substantive decisions regarding redevelopment. There will be at least one-for-one replacement of all affected units with newly built or renovated public housing units. If displacement occurs, each household has the right to return to the redeveloped site.

Where those households will go during redevelopment is a concern for Friendship Court resident Jvonna Clore. “It’s hard to find housing,” she says. “Everywhere you go there’s a waiting list, and this is 150 units.” There’s a waiting list to get on Section 8 as well, she says. “That would be a concern.”

Thus far participation from Friendship Court renters remains minimal. Clore says she did not attend a meeting at the community center. “I’m not planning on being here long,” she says. And several residents say they weren’t aware of the plans at all. However Darryl Rojas, a visitor at the complex, says he thinks mixed-income housing is a good idea, “rather than pockets of low-income housing” as it currently is.

Maybe it all feels too far in the future to make a difference, but even Dixon acknowledges that sometimes you have “to force people to make this work.” Perhaps taking these planning meetings and public announcements behind the wrought iron fence of Friendship Court will help persuade the residents to get involved and stay involved. Any groundbreaking is a long way off and that leaves a lot of time for tweaking the process.

Spearheading the coordinating efforts of so many disparate groups rests squarely on PHA’s Grosch’s shoulders. When pressed about residents of Friendship Court’s involvement, he says, “I’m really trying hard to do this right.”

Categories
News

The path not taken: Humpback tries to keep hikers on official trails

On a recent Friday morning, roughly a hundred people rolled out of bed and said, “Let’s hike Humpback Rocks today.” By 11am the parking lot at the base of the hike was filled. License plates ranged from Alabama to Massachusetts. Several SUVs staked their claim on the grass, nearest to the trailhead. Kids clambered over rock walls as parents collected water bottles and changed shoes. Two backpackers came careening down the hill 20 feet off the trail. The most popular hike on the northern end of the Blue Ridge Parkway was about to be inundated with vista seekers.

And its very popularity threatens the landscape and has led to blocking erosion-causing social trails to keep hikers on authorized paths. Soil compaction and loss of vegetation, along with the sharp incline, leave bare-rooted trees and boulders ready to shift and fall with the next footstep, but attempts to divert hikers have met with little success.

The vertical beginnings leave many panting. Almost halfway up the mile-long ascent, the trail flattens. For some, this is where the path diverges. Historically, this used to be a loop trail, explains Kurt Speers, Ridge District ranger for the Blue Ridge Parkway. Now there is only one way up, marked by the blue trail markers unique to the parkway.

The National Park Service has spent countless hours over the years hauling branches and stumps to keep people from using the old trail. Signs get torn down and the brush is removed. A cable wire tied between two trees is the latest attempt to keep hikers on the sanctioned path. Beyond that cable, a dusty, vegetative-free swath of post-forested land must beckon to some as an easier or faster way to get to the summit.

Speers assumes that those who remember the old loop just want to continue to use it. “It’s the unwary first-timers we’re concerned with,” he says. Using the undesignated social trails has led many trampling tourists to get lost and then they call and want to be rescued. Citing a lack of resources, Speers suggests that it would just be easier if they did not get lost in the first place.

At the top of the mountain, more extreme precautions have been built. “There was a significant erosion problem on the outcropping behind Humpback,” says Blue Ridge Parkway spokesperson Leesa Brandon. Park management decided to form a new loop.

Think of an over-achieving beaver on performance-enhancing drugs. A recently constructed four-foot-high pile of shale and rock stands guard, as well as larger detritus from trees. Sixty feet of cable wire loop through trees and saplings, wherever it looks like an off-trail may have sprouted. “We want to hit them at the waist,” so they know not to cross, says Speers.

Rangers want to get the word out to hikers to stop using the social trails. “Appropriate use is part of good stewardship,” says Brandon. The mission of the National Park Service is to provide safe enjoyment today, she says, and “to manage resources for future generations.”

Anyone with a healthy set of stems and working lungs can make it to the top. The hundreds of people who trample up and down it on any given weekend know the visual reward that awaits them. But if hikers continue to wander around in trail oblivion, it will be a very changed landscape, and one imminently more treacherous. And the damage remains.

Speers insists that the hike will never be closed. But he does want hikers to stay on the open and marked path.

–Lynn Jameson