There is a spot in New York City, on Greene Street, in the heart of Soho, where a special light shines down from heaven and into a certain store. The light is simple, golden, minimal and, like the Wise Men did that holy Star, design geeks from around the world drag their tired feet toward it, certain that it’s worth the pilgrimage.
No, I’m not talking about the Rem Koolhaas Prada store (although…). I’m talking about Moss, the go-to boutique for modern industrial design lovers, with the crème de la crème of everything from china to bathroom fixtures to beds on display in glass cases, as if in a museum.
But what if New York is not penciled into your foreseeable itinerary? Well then, Mossonline is a good substitute. The daydreams it inspires are endless. And dangerous. Concoct your ideal wedding registry by clicking through the virtual gallery of Ted Muehling porcelain, or furnish your dream apartment with the classic (the Eames lounge), the soon-to-be classic (the Favela chair), and the brand-spanking-new (oh, so many, many things).
I’ll admit that the price tag for a single piece is probably enough to feed a small African country for a month, but aesthetes understand the sacrifice. Plus, if you can’t afford to furnish the dream apartment, you can at least splurge on one of the little knickknacks for sale (e.g. A model of The Dakota Building as part of the “Buildings of Disaster” series). Every time you look at that knickknack, all you’ll be able to think is, “But I want more, MORE!” And when you’re able to afford it, Mossonline will be there, friends.
Author: nell-boeschenstein
The music man
For those of you who don’t obsessively read media gossip (and really, who would—because really, who cares?), like I’ll admit to doing, allow me to reduce one of the big stories of the past year to 28 words: Lately, The Village Voice has sucked. No surprise, then, that the legendary rag has, for the past year or so, been the site of firings and retirings galore.
Eight Village Voicers suffered at the hands of the most recent round of firings that went down on August 31. Included among the unlucky axed was longtime music critic Robert Christgau. Christgau, who had been at the alt-weekly for nearly three decades, casts a long shadow in the world of music criticism.
With Lester Bangs six feet under, Christgau is the self-appointed “Dean of American Rock Critics.” He’s reviewed everyone from the Mamas and the Papas to Outkast. He saw the genius of Prince and Madonna from the beginning (word); he has relentlessly insisted that Radiohead is overrated (wooooooord); he gave Aimee Mann the “meh” treatment (asshole).
Thus, in honor of Christgau’s ousting, HTS is sending you over to his website to pay some respects, dammit—go ahead and lay some flowers on that grave. Although a lot of his insidery blathering will leave you feeling dumb as a newborn baby, even if you don’t get the references, his writing’s got rhythm, man. I’m the first to admit that I don’t know shit about music, but I enjoy good writing, and there’s plenty of it here.
Take, for example, Christgau’s summation of Elton John’s album Here and There: “I had a syllogism worked out on this one. Went something like a) all boogie concerts rock on out, b) Elton is best when he rocks on out, c) therefore Elton’s concert LP will rank with his best. So if this sounds like slop (concert-slop and Elton-slop both), blame Socrates—or find the false premise. C.”
Oh, I almost forgot to mention—the letter grades? Love ’em, because a letter grade makes a review translatable even if you don’t understand what the hell Christgau’s talking about.
Travel Plans
I’m not much of a planner. And these days, without parents around to plan for me, nor the endless vacations of the academic life that make planning less imperative, I lose out. Every year, those precious two weeks of freedom inevitably arrive with not so much as a sojourn on Virginia Beach planned. Thus, I while away my “vacation” watching HBO at my parents’ house, eating their food (they get the good stuff from Whole Foods) and doing laundry.
And my planning problem is not just a time crunch: It takes some serious dough to get a good old-fashioned vacation penciled into the date book. That’s where www.Site59.com comes into this tale of “What I have-nots.”
A couple of weeks ago, I was talking with my sister’s friend, who lives in New York. She had gone to visit my sister, who lives in Aspen, Colorado, last fall. Courtesy of Site59, my sister’s friend flew round-trip from New York to Aspen, with a rental car included, for $150. Even more incredibly, she had purchased the ticket a week before off Site59. (For those not in the know, Aspen is legendary for the pricey costs of flights in and out of its posh little airstrip.)
I went home and immediately checked out the Site59 goods. Sure enough, last-minute deals abound—well above and beyond the usual Travelocity or Expedia fare. Roundtrip flights to Portland, Oregon, with two nights in a hotel, for $380; a weekend in Las Vegas, including hotel, for $170; an L.A. excursion, with a rental car included, for $200.
I’ll be honest: I haven’t yet used the site to book a flight out of town, but the holidays are coming up, and I’ll be damned if I don’t pick my ass up off this couch and go somewhere worthwhile. Somewhere, that is, that’s not my parents’ house.
The second-floor office is no bigger than 15′ x 20′, but it opens onto the world through a floor-to-ceiling window overlooking Court Square. A bookcase laden with few books, but with 30 3"-thick binders labeled “Ford Motor Co.,” “Bronco II,” “Exhibits,” “Cases,” “Decisions” and the like, serves as a backdrop to a large, wooden lawyer’s desk. A small tennis trophy with a marble base and golden racquet, two model planes and a framed photo of fighter jets break the imposing monotony of the meticulously labeled notebooks.
Sixty-four-year-old Edgar “Hike” Heiskell is at the center of this scene, his legs crossed, hands loosely clenched in front of his chest. He’s wearing khakis into which he’s tucked a blue and white pinstriped shirt that sharpens his already sharp blue eyes. Patterned on his tie, a fox looks up and salivates over a bluebird on a branch. The fox salivates and salivates, but in each mini-scenario the bird escapes death.
He may not be the Hollywood model of a rabble-rouser, but on the national auto industry stage Heiskell, a personal injury lawyer with Michie, Hamlett, Lowry, Rasmussen, & Tweel, is one of Detroit’s biggest and most persistent foes.
“If I’m not public enemy No. 1, I’m in their Top 10,” he says quietly, with a hint of a smile and a touch of a Southern accent.
Over the past decade Heiskell has prosecuted Ford Motor Company in 34 cases nationwide involving Bronco II and Explorer rollovers. The second-largest car company in the nation, Ford is No. 4 on the 2004 Fortune 500. Its products include Lincoln, Mercury, Mazda, Volvo, Jaguar, Land Rover and Aston Martin. Thirty-two of Heiskell’s cases have garnered settlements or jury verdicts in his clients’ favors totaling an estimated $22 million in payments and punitive damages. He’s definitively lost only two cases to the automotive giant.
Heiskell is back in the news again of late, representing the victim in a reopened Ohio Bronco II case from the mid-’80s. A toddler when the accident happened, the victim is now a young man, and on his behalf Heiskell will argue that Ford rushed to settle before all the evidence came to light and that the original settlement does not sufficiently compensate the victim for his injuries. This case is Heiskell’s latest in his crusade to hold Ford’s feet to the fire.
“When I realized Ford had made decisions that injured women and children around the country, that was the starting point. It just kept building in me,” he says. “Building and building the desire to hold Ford accountable.”
Growing up in Morgantown, West Virginia, in the 1940s and ’50s, the son and grandson of prominent local surgeons, Heiskell’s childhood was, as he describes it, “affluent.” He attended West Virginia University and did a stint in the Air Force before coming to UVA for law school, graduating in 1966. Heiskell then returned home and at the tender age of 31 became West Virginia’s first Republican secretary of state since Herbert Hoover.
But the trial lawyer in him wouldn’t give up and he returned to private practice in 1975. A lifelong Republican, Heiskell was hardly thrilled about the way his party portrayed trial lawyers as the scum of the earth, with John Edwards as the dirty poster boy in the 2004 presidential election.
“It really troubles me that my party has become the party of corporate America,” he explains. “Government has not been on the side of the little person. Even more so now after five years of the Bush Administration.”
Heiskell himself has not always been on the side of the “little person.” In the early ’80s he made a name for himself representing R.J. Reynolds, the second-largest tobacco company in the United States, maker of Winston, Camel, Salem and Doral cigarettes.
“He’s a zealot advocate,” says Dave Hendrickson, Heiskell’s former Morgantown partner. “He leaves no stone unturned. Whomever he represents, it’s his client and he represents them with passion.”
The aim of Heiskell’s passion changed forever on January 5, 1991. That night, while going 42 miles per hour in his Bronco II, Heiskell’s friend and children’s gymnastics teacher, Gene Diaz (pronounced Die-ez), hit a patch of black ice on a bridge. The vehicle slipped sideways and then rolled over one and a half times. Diaz’s seatbelt malfunctioned and he was thrown onto the blacktop.
“I read about it in the morning newspapers in Morgantown and didn’t realize how badly injured he was because the newspaper said he had survived,” remembers Heiskell. It was not until later the next day, upon visiting Diaz in the hospital, that the gravity of the situation hit home. “We followed his condition from that point on. It was a long, long period.”
Diaz lay in a coma in the hospital for eight weeks. Eventually he rallied, but has been quadriplegic ever since.
At that time, Bronco IIs had been under fire for their inordinately high rollover rate. According to one of Ford’s own experts, Michele Vogler, in six states alone as of 1997 there were 5,672 Bronco II rollovers and, according to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) statistics, the Bronco II had the highest rollover fatality rate of all SUVs. For comparison, the 1988 Bronco II had a static stability factor (SSF) of 0.99, as opposed to the 1987 Jeep Wrangler, which had an SSF of 1.16. The higher the SSF, the lower the rollover risk.
After bad publicity from Consumer Reports, Ford discontinued the Bronco II in 1990, replacing it with the Ford Explorer. The Explorer has since become the most popular SUV on the market, selling more than 5 million automobiles since the first model. There are still approximately 200,000 Bronco IIs on the road today.
Prosecuting the big car companies for rollover incidents first burst into the public spotlight in the 1960s with the book Unsafe at Any Speed, by then-young consumer advocate Ralph Nader. The book criticized rollover rates in the General Motors Corvair sports car. The fallout brought fame and fortune to Nader; it also prompted the establishment of NHTSA.
In his preface Nader writes, “A great problem of contemporary life is how to control the power of economic interests which ignore the harmful effects of their applied science and technology. The automobile tragedy is one of the most serious of these manmade assaults on the human body.”
According to the federal government, rollovers kill more than 10,000 people a year. Light trucks, especially SUVs, have 127 percent as many rollover crashes as passenger cars.
Oblivious to the Bronco II controversy before Diaz’s accident, Heiskell filed suit on his behalf against Ford, arguing that an engineering defect had caused the rollover that left Diaz in a wheelchair. It was a year of full-time work sorting through documents and depositions (a trip to Heiskell’s “war room” today reveals boxes upon boxes of paper piled to from floor to ceiling) before the case went to court.
“I saw him getting actually more angry at [Ford],” Diaz recalls about watching Heiskell’s evolving spectrum of emotions throughout preparations. “From that point on he’s gotten more and more infuriated with their attitude: the fact that it’s criminal and they know it. He takes it very, very personally.” The case was settled out of court and thus the settlement is not public information, but both Diaz and Heiskell agree that it was “substantial.”
From that case came another. At this juncture, Heiskell’s firm at the time said, “No more Ford cases.” The firm was regional counsel for Dupont, a supplier for Ford. Instead of kowtowing, Heiskell left his $100,000-a-year partnered position and went out on his own.
“After [the Diaz] case,” he says, “came another and another and another.” And he took them all. In the course of a single year, Heiskell had gone from standing by Goliath’s side to standing squarely beside David’s.
His work has been featured in The New York Times, Lawyers Weekly USA, Trial: Journal of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America, Trial Excellence, on “CBS Nightly News,” and in the 2001 book, Why Lawsuits Are Good for America: Disciplined Democracy, Big Business, and the Common Law by Carl T. Bogus.
“He was very sensitive to the fact that I wanted to get the word out about the Bronco II,” says Diaz. “One of the things I wanted was to raise awareness. He’s done that through the media consistently [since taking my case].”
Heiskell now carries a load of about six cases a year, almost all against Ford. As for Diaz, Heiskell visits him every time he’s in Morgantown. They talked on the phone just last month.
In April 1987, at the same time when Heiskell was still defending R.J. Reynolds against smokers blaming big tobacco for their smoking-related ailments, 2-year-old Adam Matayszek (pronounced Mata-zak) was getting thrown out the window of his family’s Bronco II and onto Interstate 77 in Cleveland, Ohio. The SUV rolled three times across the highway after Adam’s father made a quick right-hand maneuver.
In the wake of the accident Ford’s attorney and Matayszek’s father, unaware of the Bronco II’s design flaws, rushed to a settlement based on erroneous health reports that Adam’s prognosis was “excellent.” However, the child’s condition worsened in the years that followed. According to Matayszek’s rehabilitation doctor, he now routinely experiences attention deficit problems and daily seizures.
On behalf of Matayszek, Matayszek’s guardian successfully reopened the case in the late ’90s. At that time, Heiskell had recently won a $17.5 million Bronco II settlement, news that made national headlines. As a result, Matayszek’s guardian brought Heiskell on board in 2000. When the case goes to trial later this year Heiskell plans to seek in excess of $20 million on Matayszek’s behalf.
This case resembles many of Heiskell’s other clashes with the corporation. Based on a library of more than 700,000 pages of documents (“A lot of paper. A lot of work. A lot of work reading that paper,” he jokes), Heiskell’s argument against Ford is singular: Ford knew from the first testing sessions that it had a defective product and that they were marketing that product to American families. The company then deliberately hid this information from the public.
Since the lawsuits started rolling in, Ford, too, has maintained a single, three-fold defense: Driver error, free market economy and the way the cookie crumbles. They were simply giving the people what they wanted. Moreover, some car out there has to have the worst rollover ratings. Too bad it’s ours, but that’s life.
Ford first conceived of the Bronco II in the early ’80s as a way to get on the SUV bandwagon that began with the wildly popular Jeep CJ. In typical Henry Ford “one-size-fits-all” fashion, Ford designed the vehicle with what they already had on hand: the Ford Ranger pickup. Put in a backseat and covered roof in lieu of the Ranger’s truck bed and, presto, a ready-made SUV. This proportional tweaking threw off the center of gravity that made the Ranger a safer ride, encouraging the Bronco II’s habit of tipping over, then rolling over.
When Ford turned over its Bronco II library to Heiskell, 53 key documents were missing. Among them, a risk assessment of the Bronco II conducted by Ford when, out of fear for the safety of their test drivers, they halted testing in the spring of 1982.
Stepping from behind his desk, Heiskell hauls out a small television and VCR, perching them on the edge of his desk. He then slides in a VHS tape of a Ford Bronco II safety test.
After a moment of blue screen and static, a sunny day at Ford’s testing grounds in Minneapolis comes into focus. Part of the pavement has been sprayed with water and left to freeze, creating a thin layer of black ice on the road. The Bronco II’s entry speed is 18 mph. As soon as the vehicle hits the ice it starts to slide. The test driver makes a corrective steering maneuver (Heiskell repeatedly compares it to swerving to avoid a kid on a bicycle) and the vehicle starts to tip. Outriggers attached to the sides of the car stop it from going all the way over.
The test takes no longer than 30 seconds. Heiskell rewinds and watches again. And again. And again.
“They put almost 800,000 American people into this vehicle,” he says, shaking his head and lingering, almost reverently, on the phrase “American people.”
Initially, Ford engineers had presented Ford with five alternate designs, three of which widened the track width, but Ford stuck to its original design. According to Heiskell’s calculations, widening the track 3" to 4" would have put the car in the same category as the Jeep Cherokee, which has 20 percent the Bronco II’s rollover rate.
The major breakthrough in the Bronco II controversy came when Heiskell discovered Ford had been paying off a former staff engineer to testify in the corporation’s favor. David Bickerstaff originally criticized the Bronco II design, recommending that Ford widen the vehicle’s track width to allay stability concerns. In his court testimonies in rollover cases, however, Bickerstaff made a 180 from his original assessment. On the stand, Bickerstaff testified that the Bronco II was O.K. Such testimony enabled Ford, in the original Matayszek case, for example, to conceal Bronco II design defects.
Suspicious, Heiskell issued a subpoena for an “agreement” between Bickerstaff and Ford he’d heard about in the Diaz case.
“I feel I should be reimbursed for my current rate at $4,000 per day in Ford’s favor,” writes Bickerstaff in the document Ford’s lawyers produced. Following a paper trail, Heiskell then discovered that the deal Bickerstaff wheedled ultimately netted him $5 million between 1990 and 1998; it netted Ford supposedly legitimate expert testimony in support of its supposedly safe vehicle.
As a result of Heiskell’s work, Bickerstaff was promptly taken off the stand and off Ford’s payroll. The discovery made headlines everywhere from The New York Times to Trial, and it clouded NHTSA’s opinion of Ford.
“Heiskell performed a real public service in letting the agency know that Ford had withheld information,” says Allan Kam, senior enforcement attorney for NHTSA from 1975 to 2000, “I, for one, became very skeptical of Ford’s representations to NHTSA. It became clear to me that the agency had been hoodwinked by [the company].”
The Bronco II’s rollover rate prompted a NHTSA investigation and while the administration officially ruled in 1989 that the Bronco II was no more dangerous than other SUVs of comparable size, the decision remains controversial.
In response to the decision, the PBS program “Frontline” quoted NHTSA director under President Carter, Joan Claybrook, as saying, “[The Bronco II] was the bad actor, and when [NHTSA] refused to do a recall of that vehicle it gave a pass to every other SUV. It essentially sent a message to Detroit: ‘You can make your SUV as rollover-prone as you want to, this agency is not going to find that’s a defect.’”
That same year, 1989, the Bronco II failed Consumer Reports handling tests and the magazine warned readers against purchasing the vehicle. A year later, Ford put the Bronco II out to pasture, replacing it with the Explorer.
“It’s not just hiding documents,” says Heiskell, riled up after the Bronco II test video and talk of Bickerstaff. “They have lobbyists in Washington working on NHTSA guys, taking them to lunch, taking them to golf tournaments. Then they’ve got their key legislators from Michigan, and they’re constantly supporting conservative, pro-business judges. Whatever Ford wants, Ford gets.”
He sits down at his desk and is silent a moment.
“It’s truly David versus Goliath,” he muses. “And Goliath has lined up a lot of friends.”
Late one recent afternoon, the Boar’s Head’s tennis courts still steaming from a sudden thunderstorm, Heiskell and his tennis partner, Deesh Teja, have donned almost identical tennis whites. Aside from the two of them, the courts are empty and silent, save for the shuffle of their feet on the clay courts and the satisfying sound of a steady rally as the ball makes contact with the racquets. The competitive edge his colleagues and adversaries know from the courtroom is on display when Heiskell steps onto the tennis court.
“I love racquet sports,” he explains on a water break between games, “because you can hit something with all you got.”
By the time he wins the first four games, he’s dripping with sweat and has to switch racquets to let the grip on his primary racquet dry.
Back at it, he misses an easy ball.
“Aw, Hike!” he yells to himself, shaking his head.
Likewise, when Teja hits a tough ball, Heiskell bows his head and walks to the baseline, saying, “Nice one, Deesh.”
Teja gives Heiskell a real workout in the next six games, winning all of them and, thus, the set. Teja, however, laughs between catching his breath that this happens only “once in a blue moon.”
Soaked with sweat and red in the face, Heiskell makes his way toward the parking lot where his “baby” patiently waits: She’s a 1994 forest green manual transmisssion Saab convertible. He loves her. She’s so well loved, in fact, that the driver’s side seat has busted its stitching and the stuffing is popping out. He opens the door and climbs inside. Moments later, the engine revs and Heiskell’s pulling onto the narrow country club road, low to the ground and hugging the turns.
The green machine
In 1999, talking about the headquarters he designed for Gap, Inc., in San, Bruno, California—which, among other innovative touches, featured huge atriums that brought natural light deep into the building—Bill McDonough asked this question: “When it’s a nice day, why feel as if you’ve missed it?” Three years later, he asked another reporter, “What if a car were like a buffalo? Now wouldn’t that be interesting?” Last year, waving a rubber ducky in front of his face, he asked a group of industrial designers gathered in Washington, D.C., “What kind of society would make something like this to put in the mouths of children? Design is the first signal of human intention. What is your intention?”
The question of intention could also be posed to McDonough himself. For the past 15 years McDonough—celebrated architect, green-design guru and onetime “Green Dean” of the UVA Architecture School—has crisscrossed the globe from his base in Downtown Charlottesville, making the case for sustainable design to an estimated 150,000 people.
Those rapt audiences have included international businessmen, political leaders, architects, idealists, cynics, liberals and conservatives. His allies are everyone from Teresa Heinz Kerry to Cameron Diaz. As for clients, he has successfully seduced everyone from the Ford Motor Company to the Chinese government with his eco-friendly architectural vision—a vision of design that treads lightly on the earth, uses materials that derive from renewable sources and emits as few toxins and nasty byproducts as possible.
It’s due in no small measure to his success as an orator. In front of a crowd, he is equal parts architect, teacher, designer, savant, preacher, poet and ad man.
“My job,” McDonough tells C-VILLE, “is to speak of the future in the present tense. And to imagine the exquisitely perfect in order to achieve the practically impossible.”
Living roofs, solar heating, buildings that purify their own water: If nothing else, the man is known for thinking big, and often being years ahead of his time. In the late 1970s, when the notion of convincing companies to build green seemed like a pipe dream, McDonough was at Yale’s graduate school designing and building the first solar powered house in Ireland. By the mid-‘80s, he was building the first green offices for the Environmental Defense Fund’s headquarters in New York City. By 1999, Time magazine had named him a “Hero for the Planet” in its annual list of the 100 most influential people.
Sure, there are other green architects and designers in the world, but, for many, the 55-year-old McDonough’s bow-tied style and Michael Keatonesque, camera-ready mug have become the visual shorthand for the entire eco-design movement.
McDonough’s been featured in such glossies as Vanity Fair, posing with a cheeky grin in front of the Rotunda. He’s been featured in intellectual journals like Atlantic Monthly and Harper’s. He’s had journalists salivate over him in Fast Company, The Washington Post, News-week, Metropolis, Wired, Forbes and on the BBC.
The coverage is always glowing. One by one, it seems, cynics become acolytes, whether they’ve had the rare honor of a one-on-one interview or they’ve just sat in on the standard stump speech (which, to be fair, is hardly standard).
“Imagine a building like a tree,” McDonough often instructs his audiences. (These catchy, poetic mottos seem designed and market-tested to be oft-repeated.) Touchy feely? Yes. Idealistic? Certainly. But they are also supremely effective, earning their creator a growing reputation as the “supersalesman” of green design.
When asked about McDonough, who had been tapped to revamp Ford’s infamously toxic River Rouge plant in Dearborn, Michigan, CEO Bill Ford said simply, “He has a hell of a sales pitch.”
Advertising agencies have figured out that, in order to effectively sell a product, there needs to be a memorable phrase or, for lack of a better term, pitch. Likewise, McDonough realizes that if he wants to change humanity’s worldview, he needs trademarked phrases and a sales pitch, as well. His intention then, to return to the question, is to transform “green” design ideas into easily remembered, yet meaningful slogans.
Just as Nike has “Just do it,” Bill McDonough has “Waste equals food.” Just as Budweiser has “The King of Beers,” Bill McDonough has “Being less bad is not being good.” Just as Sprite has “Obey your thirst,” Bill McDonough has “Imagine a building like a tree.”
Even his website stays on message. Instead of featuring the buildings and the work that McDonough and his Charlottesville-based architecture firm, William McDonough + Partners, has done, the site is largely his face, his biography, his books, his articles (by him and about him) a documentary film about him, and his awards. To the side of the site are smaller links to the architecture firm, materials company and industrial design firm in which he also has a hand.
In short, Coke is to soda as Bill McDonough is to green design. The man himself is a brand; his face is the signifier of an entire movement.
Boiled down, this is Bill McDonough’s worldview: A body shifts ever so slightly in its chair. That chair is made of chemicals deemed hazardous by regulators. As the body shifts, millions of tiny, invisible particles are released into the air to cause cancer, attack the ozone, or slowly poison the sitter’s unsuspecting office mates. The effects of this slight movement are compounded by the fact that the person in question is typing on a highly toxic machine made of plastics, metals and acids that, when inevitably laid to rest in a landfill, will release even more chemicals. Those will only make the cancer worse, the ozone hole bigger, and the death by poison more imminent.
This is no post-apocalyptic landscape. This is the here and now. If you thought nukes were dangerous, take another look at your living room or your cubicle, McDonough insists. In his view, the toxic products our lives are made of can be just as dangerous as a nuclear bomb.
If his crusade is successful, McDonough —who is now on the faculty at Darden, UVA’s business school—will have everyone, businessmen and consumers alike, looking at the world this way. McDonough banks on the assumption that, once people have changed the lens with which they view the world, they can’t help but join his movement to redesign the modern world in the image of nature. He doesn’t just want to make architecture eco-friendly, he wants to make the world eco-friendly. As the subtitle to the 2002 book Cradle to Cradle suggests, McDonough’s grand plan is to “[remake] the way we make things.” He co-authored the book with German chemist and environmental activist Michael Braungart, who also partnered with him to create the “product and process design firm” McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry.
“Waste equals food.” That’s one of McDonough’s big pitches. Those are the three words most often repeated in his lectures and interviews. Here’s his point: Instead of designing on a cradle-to-grave paradigm—the current pattern in which materials are used or used up, then thrown away—he wants the world to embrace a “cradle-to-cradle” paradigm, using only materials deemed safe for the environment, materials that can be used and reused and reused infinitely.
The example McDonough often employs is that of a car, made of reusable components, which could be broken down into its disparate parts and remade into a new car with all the latest technology on a regular basis. This, McDonough argues, would be ecologically sound, while simultaneously good for business and good for consumers.
In McDonough’s view, recycling—that middle-class effort to go easy on old planet Earth—just doesn’t cut it anymore. As he sees it, recycling is simply prolonging the cradle-to-grave paradigm—it’s not reimagining anything.
That said, however, McDonough re-mains pragmatic.
“We’re setting the goal for what it is, a goal,” he says, “to allow people to move toward it. Part of the problem with environmental strategy is that being less bad is not being good.”
The ad man in McDonough really takes center stage when he’s pontificating to a crowd. The “going green” sales pitch is heartily advanced in his slide show. He’s telling jokes; he’s spewing catastrophic facts about the state of the environment; he’s recounting his past successes; he’s reiterating the mantras of his worldview.
But a scan of his interviews and other articles about him show just how well rehearsed his performance has become. Deconstruct the performance further, and McDonough’s plan to win the hearts and minds of the world seems to rely on four equal pillars: the mottos, the rhetorical questions, the pitch-perfect factoids, and his ability to carefully tailor the pitch to
the customer.
First of all, McDonough has a way with words. He’s been known to quote South American poets off the top of his head, and sometimes it’s hard to tell whether he just came up with a line on the spur of the moment, or whether he’s quoting a Nobel Prize winner.
According to him, the mottos (like “how do we love all the children of all the species for all time?”) just pop out. He likes the way they sound, his audience likes the way they sound, and they just happen to stick.
“[The mottos] are extemporaneous, and then I gauge the reaction,” he says. “I surprise myself. I get surprised by things that stick.”
Like advertisers, McDonough often measures the success of one of his aphorisms by hearing it repeated back to him—only then is he fully aware of how well it’s traveled from mouth to mouth.
The second hallmark of McDonough-speak is the rhetorical question.
It’s as if he believes himself so completely that he can’t resist asking, “When it’s a nice day why feel as if you’ve missed it?” for example, or “What if a car were like a buffalo? Now wouldn’t that be interesting?” It’s as if the prospect of disagreeing with those interrogations is so ridiculous that the effect of asking them is almost gleeful.
McDonough denies that rhetorical questions are part of any technique, but admits there’s one kind of question he loves.
“I like to ask the question ‘What if,’ because if you’re trying to imagine something, you have to literally imagine it,” he says. “It’s a question, not reality or fact. What I actually say is, ‘Wouldn’t it be wonderful if…’ That’s the question. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if waste equals food?”
Hallmark No. 3 is the perfect factoid.
While his theories about design may be abstract and philosophical, the scientific facts McDonough uses to illustrate the accuracy of his ideas are simple as pie. They conjure crystalline images of the apocalypse. They take big numbers, complex chemistry and physics and turn them into something that a child can picture.
For example: Did you know that 80 percent of what goes through a Wal-Mart ends up in a landfill or incinerator within two months? Or that industrial Ohio is seeing its average IQ plummet? Also, according to McDonough, coral is turning to jelly in the ocean, plastics are piling up off the California coast, and, as he says at the end of the first chapter of Cradle to Cradle, “all the ants on the planet, taken together, have a biomass greater than that of humans. Ants have been incredibly industrious for millions of years. Yet their productiveness nourishes plants, animals, and soil. Human industry has been in full swing for little over a century, yet it has brought about a decline in almost every ecosystem on the planet. Nature doesn’t have a design problem. People do.”
Ultimately, however, someone has to fund all these grand ideas, and that may be why the fourth hallmark of McDonoughism is paramount. He knows the difference between an audience of designers and an audience of businessmen.
When talking to architects, McDonough talks about process. When talking to a roomful of concerned citizens, McDonough says he talks like he would to himself: simply. However, McDonough has earned the greatest fame and praise by having successfully sold green design to big business.
He was commissioned by Gap, Inc. to design the company’s headquarters in California, and proposed a green roof of prairie grasses; he was commissioned by Ford to redesign the company’s notoriously polluting River Rouge plant in Dearborn, Michigan; he has designed major buildings for IBM, Nike and Wal-Mart.
McDonough freely acknowledges that he won these commissions by emphasizing what his customers wanted to hear: numbers, numbers, numbers.
For example, when presenting his plan for the River Rouge plant to Ford executives, McDonough touted the tens of millions the plant would save the company. The $2 billion project is now reputed to have saved Ford $35 million.
He also gives the “all regulation is bad regulation” speech, too. In so many words, this speech can be boiled down to this: “If there is nothing to regulate, there’s no need for regulations.”
Having grown up in a business family (his father was an executive with Seagram’s), McDonough has learned and perfected the language of business.
“As the son of an executive, I heard a lot of that language,” says McDonough. “I don’t know that I was trained in the language of business, but I picked a lot up by osmosis. I picked up the mental models of people who are searching, on a practical level, for positive results in the short and long term.”
So here’s the ultimate question: Is there an ethical dilemma inherent in working with major global businesses that are bent on improving next quarter’s performance, and probably don’t really give a fig about “green architecture” or “cradle-to-cradle” philosophies? McDonough has a well-rehearsed answer on that front, too, as with so much else: “Who am I supposed to be working with?” he asks. The making of Bill McDonough
A brief history of the most quotable man in architecture
Born in 1951, McDonough grew up spend-ing school years in Hong Kong, where his father worked for Seagram’s, and summers by Puget Sound in Washington, where his grandparents lived. His experiences in Hong Kong greatly influenced his outlook on the scarcity of resources—as he later recalled in interviews, the city had “four hours of water every fourth day.” This contrasted sharply to the greenery and abundance of the Washington state forest. As a teenager, his family moved to Westport, Connecticut, where he was ex-posed to the suburban mindset, and high-flying consumer lifestyle, of New York’s upper crust.
While studying photography with Walker Evans as an undergraduate at Dartmouth College, McDonough enrolled in a Bauhaus training program (Bauhaus was the German school of architecture that became one of the most influential currents in modernist design and architecture). It was then that the young McDonough decided that he wanted to design buildings, not spend his days developing photographs in the dark.
He enrolled in Yale’s Graduate School of Architecture and began to put his evolving theories on green design into practice. As a student, he designed and built the first solar-heated house in Ireland. (The scarcity of sunlight in Ireland only added to the challenge, and McDonough has often cited it as a telling indication of his ambitions.)
In 1981 he founded his own firm, William McDonough + Partners, in New York City.
In 1985 the Environmental Defense Fund came knocking, looking for an architect to design the first green offices in the United States. McDonough answered the call. His first major commission, the EDF offices gave him the sort of big break that most untested architects can only dream of.
In 1991, at a rooftop party in New York City, McDonough met his future business partner, the German chemist Michael Braungart. According to McDonough, this meeting prompted the first utterance of his favorite aphorism: “Waste equals food.”
In 1995, McDonough and Braungart form McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry to put into practice their lofty design ideals.
In 1994 McDonough moved his offices from NYC to Charlottesville so that he could serve as dean of UVA’s architecture school. He served in that capacity for five years, until 1999. He was known as the “Green Dean,” and brought the school a great deal of renown as a place to study sustainable design.
In 1999, Time magazine named McDonough a “Hero for the Planet” as part of its annual list of the 100 most influential people in the world. The accompanying profile described him as “one that sees that his utopianism is grounded in a unified philosophy that—in demonstrable and practical ways—is changing the design of the world.”
In 2002, McDonough and Braungart published their book Cradle to Cradle, articulating their entire design philosophy based on a “cradle-to-cradle” paradigm, as opposed to a “cradle-to-grave” paradigm.—N.B.
McDonough design in nine easy steps
For the 2000 World’s Fair in Hannover, Ger-many, McDonough and partner Michael Braungart articulated their philosophy for design in a paper called the “Hannover Principles: Design for Sustainability.” The principles were later packaged into the more digestible, readable and user-friendly book, Cradle to Cradle (2002, North Point Press) which, four years after publication, still maintains a respectable ranking in the low one-thousands on Amazon. Here, for your reading pleasure, are the Hannover Principles.—N.B.
1. Insist on the rights of humanity and nature to co-exist in a healthy, supportive, diverse and sustainable condition.
2. Recognize interdependence. The elements of human design interact with and depend upon the natural world, with broad and diverse implications at every scale. Expand design considerations to recognizing even distant effects.
3. Respect relationships between spirit and matter. Consider all aspects of human settlement including community, dwelling, industry and trade in terms of existing and evolving connections between spiritual and material consciousness.
4. Accept responsibility for the consequences of design decisions upon human well-being, the viability of natural systems and their right to co-exist.
5. Create safe objects of long-term value. Do not burden future generations with requirements for maintenance or vigilant administration of potential danger due to the careless creation of products, processes or standards.
6. Eliminate the concept of waste. Eval-uate and optimize the full life-cycle of products and processes, to approach the state of natural systems in which there is no waste.
7. Rely on natural energy flows. Human de-signs should, like the living world, derive their creative forces from perpetual solar income. Incorporate this energy efficiently and safely for responsible use.
8. Understand the limitations of design. No human creation lasts forever and design does not solve all problems. Those who create and plan should practice humility in the face of nature. Treat nature as a model and mentor, not as an inconvenience to be evaded or controlled.
9. Seek constant improvement by the sharing of knowledge. Encourage direct and open communication between colleagues, patrons, manufacturers and users to link long-term sustainable considerations ethical responsibility, and re-establish the integral relationship between the natural processes and human activity.
Apparently the Bush Administration’s much- touted law-and-order focus doesn’t extend to actually paying for anything. Like, for example, juvenile justice and delinquency prevention programs. In his latest budget request for Fiscal Year 2007, Bush proposed to cut such federal programs 43 percent, to $176 million from $308.7 million.
According to Rory Carpenter, the juvenile justice coordinator for the Charlottesville/Albemarle Commission on Children and Families, similar cuts were threatened last year as well, but were shot down by Congress. He expects a similar outcome this year—with some funding getting cut, but not nearly as much as Bush has requested.
Should the cuts occur, Carpenter says that they could potentially affect funding in Charlottesville and Albemarle. Each year the CCF receives about $20,000 from the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant to fund programs on gang prevention and restorative justice. Bush’s budget proposes eliminating this grant entirely. In addition, throughout the years, Carpenter estimates that the CCF has received about $500,000 from the Title V Local Delinquency Prevention Grant program. Bush’s budget proposes cutting this funding to $32 million, down from $64.4 million in Fiscal Year 2006.
All in all, however, Carpenter is optimistic about the programs’ chances of survival.
“There’s a good chance that, through the lobbying process, we can get some of these dollars put back in,” he says.—Nell Boeschenstein
In case you hadn’t noticed, C-VILLE Weekly has a new website. And yes, folks, we are very, very proud of it. I know that in the past I’ve given other unsuspecting sites grief about their poor design or oversights in the useful information department (charlottesville.org 1.0, I’m looking at you) when, all the while, my home team website left a lot to be desired. However, while I’ve been known to bite the hand that feeds me on occasion, in this case I somehow managed to keep my choppers to myself.
Having said that, please indulge me for a moment as I turn this column into a blatant advertisement:
If you have a minute today, type yourself on over to our pretty little URL. In place of our simplistic black-and-white design of days gone by, you will find our new, oh-so-subtle blue-and-white color scheme (um, go Carolina?). And, in place of our old, just-the-articles austerity, you’ll now discover articles, calendar listings, dining options, reviews, opinions and even my contact information (just in case you’re inclined to ask me out to dinner).
And before you start giving me grief about the search-related shortcomings of the new site, let me reassure you that the archives are coming, the archives are coming! It’s just that putting 17 years of newspaper content online is going to take a while, O.K.? And believe you me: Not having the archives at the tips of your fingers is just as irritating for me as it is for you. Probably more so. So there.—Nell Boeschenstein
What’s in the pipeline for Scottsville
Scottsville, 20 minutes south of Charlottesville on Route 20, is known for its small-town charm. But that doesn’t mean the development craze that has been hitting Albemarle and the surrounding counties hasn’t had any effect on this town of 600 residents. According to Mayor Steve Phipps, the biggest issue facing his town right now is traffic, specifically from the rapidly growing counties of Fluvanna and Buckingham.
The other development-related issue Scottsville faced lately was what to do with a 230-acre lot in town. A development that would have brought about 150 new homes had been under consideration, but citizens concerned about increased traffic nixed that plan. Instead, Phipps says that a by-right development with around 30 homes will likely go up.
Scattered homes in the rural area are where the majority of the development is happening, as farms are broken up and sold off into smaller parcels. This has been a problem throughout the county, contributing to sprawl, but, as Phipps says, “I don’t know how much you can do about that. Family members just don’t want to keep [the farms] up.”—Nell Boeschenstein
The 17 students who took over UVA’s Madison Hall for four days in April are off the hook on their trespassing charges. On Monday, May 23, Judge Robert Downer in Charlottesville General District Court dismissed the charges against all the students. He said that because UVA Chief Financial Officer Leonard Sandridge had told the students that they had five minutes to vacate the building, and yet UVA police began arresting students before that five minutes was up, that the case had to be dismissed on lack of grounds. The judge also said that the University had been sending mixed messages to the students, by agreeing to have a dialogue with them, then having them arrested.
University spokeswoman Carol Wood told C-VILLE that UVA is “totally fine” with Downer’s ruling. “I don’t want to respond to what the judge said. It is out there and he has delivered a clear statement on the case,” Wood said. “There shouldn’t be an adversarial role between the students and the University,” she added. “The door continues to be open.”
In a separate case, UVA anthropology professor Wende Marshall was found guilty of trespassing because the judge said that she had been told specifically that she could not go in Madison Hall.—Nell Boeschenstein
A change is gonna come
Six months ago, in our “2006 Development Forecast,” C-VILLE reported not on how Charlottesville and Albemarle have already changed, but on how our home was going to change. Hours spent adding up rows and rows of numbers from the City and County’s planning offices yielded startling totals: a potential for 18,725 new residential units and 6,235,451 more square feet of commercial space on the way in the next decade or so. Those numbers got us thinking about what we stand to lose—green vistas, sleepy Main Streets, convenience stores, parkland—to make way for the newer, bigger and (we’re told) better buildings ahead. This piece on Crozet kicks off an occasional series, “Places We’ll Lose.” Ten years from now, someone might look back at these accounts to find the answer to that much-asked, rarely answered question, posed by residents of rapidly developing towns everywhere: “What used to be there?”
Crozet is a one-stoplight town, and that one stoplight is always green. There are four stop signs at the intersection of Three Notch’d Road and Crozet Avenue, but even in rush-hour traffic the back-up is never more than four or five cars deep.
On a recent perfect evening, the sky is blue, and no, there’s not a cloud in the sky. The late sun shines down from the west onto the main drag, Crozet Avenue, with that certain slant of light that makes the entire town feel like a dollhouse. The occasional car drives the speed limit through downtown: past the charmingly rickety Crozet Pizza, then right at the intersection, past the hardware store and ramshackle bar on the left, and the white-washed post office, church and Mountainside Senior Living facility on the right.
Mountainside dwarfs everything. Its 25 balconies are strewn with a selection of plastic lawn furniture. A solitary elderly gentleman enjoys the sun on the second floor. He’s not reading or talking on the phone; he’s just sitting, head back, eyes closed, lazy as a cat. Merengue music wafts toward him from the speakers of a nearby restaurant.
Just beyond this cluster of commerce, life is pure country. Someone has set up a volleyball net, the middle of which sags nearly to the ground. Aside from that, it’s all tall grasses and patches of dusty red dirt. This, every sign seems to say, is the stuff of a Thornton Wilder play.
Yet this strip of romantic small-town scenery is scheduled for a facelift. As per the Crozet Master Plan that was passed by the Board of Supervisors in late 2004—a grand vision for the town’s growth that rethinks Crozet’s roads, town center, and overall scale—the County bought an acre of land in downtown Crozet last March. It is intended to provide the canvas for the town’s redesigned center: new roads, improved roads, sidewalks. In addition, a new library, park and civic center are also in the plans. Add a 2,000-home development that’s on the way, and 10 years from now Crozet will be a distant, suburban cousin of the charming country mouse it is today.
Across from Mountain-side, at the corner bar that marks the epicenter of town, the Yankees play the Red Sox on two flat-screen TVs. It’s that awkward hour between dinner and late night, so the bar is nearly deserted, giving it the aura of a lonely Wild West saloon. Crowded together at one end, however, a quartet of carpenters named Ricky, Spider, Mr. Handsome and Mr. Famous (for reasons that soon become clear) are bellied up to their beers after a 14-hour day working construction on Noah’s Ark.
The guys are covered in cedar dust from the huge beached boat they’ve been building here since January for a Hollywood movie filming just down the road. Since their first week on the job, the foursome has only missed two nights of after-work brews: the day they worked 16 hours straight, and the day they worked 20. Like a uniform, they sport 5 o’clock shadows and baseball hats.
The 5-year-old daughter of Mr. Hand-some’s Crozet girlfriend gave both Mr. Handsome and Mr. Famous their nicknames. Mr. Handsome for all of the obvious reasons; Mr. Famous because he always hides behind a pair of sports sunglasses.
Spider shrugs when asked about the provenance of his moniker. “I don’t know…” he trails off. He’s the quiet one.
“You should tell her about Danger! Or Skidmarks! Or Dangler! Or Muffin!” guffaws Rick. “We all got nicknames.” They crack up as the highlights of some gruesome (yet ultimately nonfatal) tales of construction accidents get recounted. Saws are involved in one case. Dangling precariously by a rope in another.
When asked, Mr. Famous gets serious for a moment.
“I love Crozet,” he says. “If I could put a bubble around this place, I would. But it’s too late. The money’s been spent. Plans have been passed. People are coming, man. You say Crozet? I say Nozet!”
“Yeah, that side of town,” Rick chimes in, waving his hand in the direction of the ark they’ve been building, “it’s going to blow up.” He makes an explosion sound like a little boy, pantomiming a mushroom cloud with his hands.
The men all hail from the Baltimore area, and the conversation soon turns to Rick’s Maryland hometown, which went from being a backwater pile of dirt to an endless forest of track housing in the space of three years. They shake their heads, sip their beers, puff on their menthols.
“It was just wrong,” says Rick.
Crozet (population, 3,600; area, 4.5 miles) awaits a similar fate. The town, founded as a whistle stop along the Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad in 1876—and named for Napoleon’s bridge builder and colonial engineer, Claudius Crozet—can already smell that mushroom cloud forming on its horizon.
Based on County estimates, sometime after 2024 Crozet’s population could, theoretically, reach 24,000. The County, however, is quick to add that the number will probably be closer to 12,000. Much of the housing needs of these future Crozetians will be filled by local developer Gaylon Beights. His Old Trail project is the looming development that will bring 2,000 new homes, 250,000 square feet of commercial space and a 250-acre golf course to the western outskirts of town, which is already packed with the track housing of the Western Ridge housing development. Despite the master plan, many worry that not enough is being done to keep the town on track for the impending rapid growth.
A train passes somewhere outside.
“Train!” yells Mr. Famous. Then he points, pleased as punch, to a chalkboard sign that says the first person who calls “train” each time one passes gets a free drink. Things are winding down, but the bartender gladly plunks down another pale ale in front of Mr. Famous. The guys have to be back at work in eight hours. Spider and Rick have gone home for the night. Mr. Handsome is nuzzling his girlfriend with a sleepy eye.
These men fit in here. They may not be locals, but something about them says they’ve been here since time began. Yet, as I walk out the door, I can’t avoid the sense that the scene behind me is fading to black. I don’t come to Crozet very often. And so I know that the next time I drive through, I won’t recognize much: not the place, nor the men at the bar.