Warner’s aw-shucks, self-deprecating digs speak to a dominant lead

Good politicians are good story tellers, and Mark Warner can tell a story. Warner kicked off his bid for John Warner’s (requisite parenthetical: no relation to Mark) U.S. Senate seat this week and rolled through Charlottesville yesterday.

In front of a midday crowd on the Downtown Mall, Warner, a former governor, told the story of how, a couple of days ago in Southwest Virginia, a person introduced him as the best governor Virginia’s had since Thomas Jefferson. Warner’s two middle-school-aged daughters were with him, and afterwards one said to the Senate hopeful, "Dad, don’t believe everything they tell you."

Mark Warner in Charlottesville
Hire me! Warner stumps on the Downtown Mall. (photo by Josh Rhett)

The story drew laughs from the crowd, but it also says something about just how comfortably out front Warner is of his Republican opponents, former Governor Jim Gilmore and state Delegate Bob Marshall. Besides being the widely recognized favorite in the race, Warner is crushing his competition in the fundraising department. As of March 31, Warner is sitting on $4.4 million, while Gilmore has a scant $208,000, Marshall just $20,000.

That Warner is able to knock himself down a peg or two says something about how much of a threat either Republican poses right now. In fact, before launching into his stump speech, Warner made it a point to list his past business failures and political defeats (after which, of course, he makes millions and wins the Governor’s seat as a Democrat in an overwhelmingly Republican state).

The Washington Post’s Anita Kumar has an excellent piece on Warner’s kickoff, and the big-ass lead he’s currently enjoying:

"Six months before the November election, the popular former governor is widely considered the front-runner to replace retiring Sen. John W. Warner in a race that could help further solidify Virginia’s gradual shift toward becoming a more Democratic state. The Republican incumbent is of no relation to the Democrat."

Warner’s speech in Charlottesville was preceded by a Who’s Who of local Dems. City Councilor David Brown emceed, Julian Taliaferro and Satyendra Huja were busy glad-handing the crowd, state Delegate David Toscano spoke and Mayor Dave Norris had his introduction interrupted by Warner and his procession making their way to the stage.

But by far the most conspicuous speaker before Warner was Bill Crutchfield, a lifelong Republican. Warner bagged Crutchfield’s endorsement because he is what Crutchfield called "a bridge builder," ("We don’t need more jihad politicians in Washington," said Crutchfield), a highly successful person and good on economic issues.

Warner made it a point to tout his Pro-Business bona fides and  the creation of clean-energy jobs. Regularly the domain of the Republicans, Warner has made business one of his strengths. In 2006, Forbes Magazine ranked Virginia as the No. 1  state for business. Warner will lean heavily on the fact that he turned around what he called a $6 billion* budget deficit that he inherited from the previous governor, who is none other than his potential challenger Gilmore.

He talked the talk of a tough fiscal conservative, saying that Washington needs the smart government that he became known for in Virginia.

And in the end, Warner distilled his campaign down to a job interview, saying to the Charlottesville crowd, "I’m asking you, will you hire me?"

*Correction: The post originally stated that the deficit was $6 million. In fact, it was $6 billion, much more than a "pizza and a beer." The reporter vows to work on the legibility of his note-taking in the future.

Categories
News

City looks long-term for affordable housing

Since 2006, the number of affordable housing units priced under $100,000 in Charlottesville dropped by over 300, from 479 to 144 in 2008. During that time, the city’s focus on affordable housing has shifted from providing housing to middle-class residents to addressing the lack of low-income housing and its homeless problem. From that focus, two solutions are emerging that could fundamentally change the way the city tackles its affordable housing problems.

Previous coverage:

Housing authority readies for redevelopment
Faces challenges of how to handle public housing

“In the last five or 10 years, we’ve become more aggressive at addressing the need for moderate-income, work-force housing,” says Charlottesville Mayor Dave Norris. “Where we haven’t invested hardly anything is the 0 to 30 percent area median income.”

This comes at a time when the 376 units of city public housing are full, with a waiting list 875 people deep.

The city will commit $2.4 million to affordable housing this year, $1 million of it from its Economic Strategic Incentive Fund. One of the projects that Norris calls “our best opportunity” is the redevelopment of public housing into mixed-income housing.

Last year, the city spent $50,000 on redevelopment master planning, and Norris says he expects to spend more this year. The $300,000 proffer from the condo project on the corner of West Main Street and Ridge/McIntire Road is designated for redevelopment.

But talk of redevelopment brings with it memories of Urban Renewal. The city plans to take groups of people to other cities that have tried similar redevelopments. Norris, though, says that many were built without enough resident involvement and, rather than integrating the community, served to displace the public-housing residents.

“To me, if we do nothing else but run with this project—which is a huge project—the potential is tremendous,” says Norris. “There’s a lot of fear from residents that we’re going to come in and pull a Vinegar Hill on them, and I understand that. We’ve got to make sure there’s full resident participation.”

Norris says that the city must shift its focus on affordable housing to a longer-term view. This includes addressing the city’s growing homeless problem, particularly chronic homelessness and the working poor living in temporary shelters, and not just looking at the middle class.


Mayor Dave Norris says that the city must shift its focus in affordable housing to those earning less than 30 percent of area median income.

“Now things are different,” says City Councilor Holly Edwards. “We’re recognizing the need to stabilize our homeless and to create a system of economic justice, where people have opportunities for housing.”

Edwards talks about the need to get the homeless off the street, then address whatever issue may have forced them there. One way to do this would be to add single room occupancies (SROs). SROs function essentially as long-term transitional housing, giving one person a room in a larger building for a minimal rent, usually 25 or 30 percent of their income or a fee of $25 until they are in a more stabile situation. Many have on-site social services.

Norris calls SROs “the answer to homelessness.” The city is looking to partner with a nonprofit group called Virginia Supportive Housing (VSH), which builds and manages SROs. It doesn’t, however, pay for them. The city will consider funding requests from VSH and is currently trying to identify a site for a possible SRO. The zoning is equivalent to an apartment building.

The cost to the city, though, is hard to determine at this point, since it is dependent on the number of units. Norris says that a VSH project in Norfolk came in at a little under $100,000 per unit. Charlottesville’s number of long-term homeless, says Norris, is relatively small.

“It’s a few dozen people,” he says. “We know them all by name.”

Edwards says the focus of an SRO must be specific to address that population.

“In order for it to be really effective,” she says, “it needs the social support in place. Is an SRO a home, or is it transitional living? Let’s call it what it is from the very beginning. But let’s not build an SRO if we only want people to be there six months and then move.”

C-VILLE welcomes news tips from readers. Send them to news@c-ville.com.

Categories
News

Sabato silent in Post and Times

If there is one phone number saved into political reporters’ cell phones, at the top of their speed dials, burned into the muscle memory of their collective index finger, it is that of UVA politics professor and director of the Center for Politics Larry Sabato.

Even way back in 1994, The Wall Street Journal called him “probably the most quoted professor in the land.” A former Rhodes Scholar and author of more than 20 books, Sabato is the go-to political expert for a nation of news writers and TV talking heads.


The last time a Washington Post writer quoted Larry Sabato was February 13. Likewise, Sabato’s last appearance in the New York Times happened February 12.

In April 2008 alone, Sabato was quoted in no less than 72 news stories and broadcasts. His quotes appeared in myriad newspapers and websites: U.K.’s the Guardian, The Richmond Times-Dispatch, Fox News, the Sacramento Bee, the Hollywood Reporter, The Peninsula (Qatar’s Leading English Daily), USA Today, The Times-Picayune of New Orleans, The Voice of America and The Malaysia Star.

But Sabato quotes have shown up less frequently in two of the county’s leading gray ladies: The Washington Post and The New York Times. The last time a Post writer quoted Sabato was February 13. Likewise, Sabato’s last appearance in the Times happened February 12.

The lack of Mr. Ubiquitous from two of the nation’s leading papers may have lead some to wonder, did the Post and the Times place a moratorium on Larry J. Sabato quotes?

“We seek always to have diverse sources in the newspaper,” says Robert McCartney via e-mail, the metro assistant managing editor at The Washington Post, “but there’s no moratorium on quoting Larry Sabato.”

A spokesperson for The New York Times (yes, it has its own press people) did not respond to the question by press time.

So rest easy. No one is shutting Sabato out. Except, perhaps, Ben Tribbett.

Tribbett writes the blog “Not Larry Sabato,” which provides analysis for Virginia political districts. The name, he says, comes from what he sees as the lack of analysis that Sabato gives to reporters.

“He’s always everywhere, but not actually saying anything,” says Tribbett. “It was the kind of thing where 500 people in the state got the joke, and the rest of them said, ‘Oh, that’s such a weird name.’”

C-VILLE welcomes news tips from readers. Send them to news@c-ville.com.

News Quiz answers

News Quiz
1. Which development dream team is putting in four stories of office space next to ACAC downtown?
a. Hunter Craig & Dave Norris.
c. Bill Atwood & John D’earth.
d. Al Groh & Howie Long.
2. How many people will be looking for a place to crash when the Hope Community Center closes in less than 30 days?
a. 12 people.
b. Around 25 people.
c. 42 people.
3. After learning he’d won the Tyler Prize in environmental science, what did UVA professor James Galloway do?
a. Recycle it.
c. Grew Al Gore-like beard, switched to flannel.
d. The Carbon Footprint boogie.

Categories
News

Does UVA really need a CVS?

On April 29, the deal was done. Late-night music at the Corner icon Satellite Ballroom will make way for late-night cigarette and condom purchases. Goodbye indie rockers, local musicians and the crown jewel of the Charlottesville music scene.

Hello national-chain behemoth CVS.

Local businesses Just Curry and Higher Grounds will have to vacate the Anderson Brothers Building near the UVA grounds, as will Richmond-based Plan 9. The deal went down despite protests from locals. A Facebook group named “Coran Capshaw, Save Satellite Ballroom,” 1,836 members strong as of May 1, changed its tactics from urging owner Terry Vassalos to keep Satellite where it is to instead calling for a boycott when the CVS opens.


Currently, this CVS on the Downtown Mall is the closest to the Corner.

If that boycott comes to pass, jilted Satellite lovers will have plenty of other CVS options. With stores on the Downtown Mall, in Barracks Road, Fifth Street and the 250 Bypass (not to mention another a ways up 29N), the pharmacy chain isn’t hard to find.

So what if CVS already has 50,120 square feet of retail space in Charlottesville? The nearest store (Downtown Mall) is a whopping 1.1 miles from the Corner. A store on the Corner would really put the “convenience” in convenience store, no?

But right next to the Grounds? Would other universities of comparable sizes and cities put a CVS on its main drag?

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill doesn’t have any CVS stores on Franklin Street, though it does have a pharmacy. Princeton University does have one on Nassau Street, which runs on the north side of the campus proper. Another state school in a middle-sided town, The University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, does without a CVS on campus.

“We don’t have any on campus, but there are some in the area,” says Justine at the university’s Campus Information Center (which prohibits its students from giving out their last names).

Which, of course, leads to the inevitable question that UVA students will soon not have to ponder late at night: If there’s no CVS, where do you go to get cigarettes, condoms and a beard trimmer?

“I’m not sure,” says Justine, “but I’m going to guess they go to liquor stores or convenience stores. Is there anything else I can help you with?”

C-VILLE welcomes news tips from readers. Send them to news@c-ville.com.

Council sets up later vote for MCP

On May 1, the Charlottesville School Board voted to approve the use of land near the high school for the Meadowcreek Parkway (MCP), and last night City Council granted the first of two readings for the easement. But Mayor Dave Norris made it clear that when the easement comes back to Council for a final vote, he’ll be voting against it.

That announcement may signal a switch in thinking from his last vote on the MCP, when he chose pragmatism over principle.

Five people spoke at the public hearing, all of them against the MCP in general, and granting the easement specifically. Colette Hall and transportation activist Stratton Salidis argued that the replacement land the city is set to receive from the Virginia Department of Transportation is of poorer quality than the land on which the roadway would be built.

Peter Kleeman, long-time critic of the MCP, pointed out that a traffic study has yet to be done at the Melbourne Road intersection and argued a steep grade in the road could prove dangerous around a crowded intersection. Ernest Reid asked Council whether approving the easements violate the intent of previous Councils that the MCP be part of a regional network of roads, like the eastern and southern connectors, none of which have a good chance of being built.

Norris cited all of these concerns as reasons he would be opposing the easements. It remains unclear whether there are two other votes on council to block these easements.

News Quiz

One of the great big plans that is being hatched down here in C-VILLE’s dungeon is to move the weekly news quiz to this here blog. So for all of you who routinely hazard guesses (and your numbers are—quite shockingly—legion), here is the quiz, three questions strong.

Since we have comments just like a real blog, feel free to leave answers there. Tomorrow I’ll check back in with the answers. And without further bluster:

News Quiz
1. Which development dream team is putting in four stories of office space next to ACAC downtown?
a. Hunter Craig & Dave Norris.
b. Phil Wendel & Coran Capshaw.
c. Bill Atwood & John D’earth.
d. Al Groh & Howie Long.
2. How many people will be looking for a place to crash when the Hope Community Center closes in less than 30 days?
a. 12 people.
b. Around 25 people.
c. 42 people.
d. 45-60 people.
3. After learning he’d won the Tyler Prize in environmental science, what did UVA professor James Galloway do?
a. Recycle it.
b. Flew directly to Beverly Hills.
c. Grew Al Gore-like beard, switched to flannel.
d. The Carbon Footprint boogie.

Monday Night Fights: MCP, Round 256,000

Tonight, two of seemingly countless pieces of the Meadowcreek Parkway (MCP) are in front of City Council: construction easements for the Melbourne Road section and the storm water management design for McIntire Road Extended. It will be interesting to see if the new council does any major maneuvering on the MCP as a whole with these two pieces.

If you think about the MCP as a house of cards, pulling one card out sends that whole thing crumbling. (You may also use a Jenga metaphor, if you wanna avoid the cliche route.)

While the easements are a big deal—they give VDOT the go-ahead to start digging—the storm water management is key. That’s because, back in October, council put three conditions on another set of easements, these for McIntire Road Extended. While council voted for the easements, they are contingent upon a couple of things. One of them is finalized storm water plans.

Another is the 11 acres of replacement parkland from VDOT, which hasn’t been done, and, according to Assistant City Manager Maurice Jones, has no timeline for completion.

The third? An above-grade interchange at McIntire and 250. You know, the kind that council recently sent back to the drawing board.

So, no storm water design, no above-grade interchange, no road.

These conditions seem like good pressure points if certain councilors wanted to stop the MCP. If one were to push for an at-grade interchange—which a couple members of the public called for last meeting—that’d be one way. The other would be dragging feet on the storm water design. A third might be voicing reluctance to hand over easements to VDOT without all the replacement parkland in hand.

Speak your mind

Just received a burning missive from the C-VILLE GDDI* that says the comment function is up on both blogs. Never underestimate what can be accomplished in the Balkans over the weekend.

*Grand Doo-Dah of the Internets

Edwards and school board on MCP

New city councilor Holly Edwards has described stepping into the 40-year debate over the Meadowcreek Parkway (MCP) as something akin to walking into a theater in the middle of a movie. She and I talked about the MCP a bit for the story that’s in this week’s paper, and she framed it in a way that I hadn’t heard any councilor, opponent or activist frame it.

"I believe that the desire [to build the parkway] came at the same time as Urban Renewal," she says, sitting at a table in The Nook. "There was this vision of developing Downtown that was about business and transportation and economic stability. And even when those decisions were made, ‘economic justice’ was not the term that was used because urban renewal was poor people removal, bottom line. And there’s no getting away from that."

It’s an interesting connection: the MCP and Urban Renewal. And one that needs to be considered. As long as I’ve been covering the whole MCP saga, the points of contention have centered around the environment, our culture of transportation and whether Downtown businesses will shrivel and die if a road isn’t built directly to them.

But the debate hasn’t focused on people—not people on the lower end of the economic spectrum, or, in Edward’s view, African Americans.

"Even just the face of the people that are in this conversation, I wish there were more African Americans involved in the conversation," she says. "But there even seems to be a cultural divide in that respect. It’s priorities, a sense of making a decision as to where the involvement in civic engagement is even practical. I think that many times within that community there is a sense of apathy that prevents people from getting involved."

And to abruptly switch gears here, today, May 1, besides being International Workers Day (national workers are celebrating even having a damn job, I suppose), is the day that the Charlottesville School Board makes a decision whether to approve the use of land near the high school for the MCP. And after speaking to the chairperson, Ned Michie, I don’t think there’s going to be much of a push to oppose the Parkway.

But that doesn’t mean MCP opponents haven’t been trying. Michie told me that he’d received some e-mails from people urging him to block the MCP with this decision. And the local Sierra Club sent a mass e-mail to its supporters urging them to connect with  school board members and ask them to oppose the land agreement.

It even included some helpful talking points:

  • "Students should not have to give up their athletic field for an unnecessary parkway.
  • Road construction so near the high school will cause increased pollution and hazards for students.
  • School personnel were not consulted during parkway planning.
  • The parkway will drastically reduce the amount of "greenspace" in the city by paving over part of McIntire Park and a softball field.
  • Funds for the parkway should instead be invested in public transit, bike and pedestrian trails that will benefit our students."

All this said, I’ll be surprised if anything comes out of this evening’s meeting other than a rubber stamp.