Categories
News

Winning a losing campaign

More on Kucinich’s visit:

The gospel according to Kucinich
Candidate exhorts packed Lane Auditorium to realize potential

Also: Check out the Charlottesville Podcasting Network for audio and video.

Dennis Kucinich is a kook, yes, but he is a kook on a mission, rocketing out of the small conference room where he’s been waiting, head cocked to one side with a look of urgency on his face and a sense of nervous purpose in his stride, through the door and down the hall, where he hits the podium and turns to the crowd with a big grin. Some 500 people are here to listen to a presidential candidate who smart money says has no chance of being nominated. And as he grins, as his smile spreads beneath beady black eyes, he doesn’t seem to be even remotely concerned.


Ron Fisher, down from Northern Virginia, clutches a box filled with petitions to get Kucinich on the ballot in Virginia. "I never go anywhere without my ballots," he says.

Before his talk, as Kucinich waits in that room, the lobby slowly fills with volunteers, mostly older and homelier than those for Obama or Clinton, arranging buttons, balloons and free copies of the Constitution. Ron Fisher, tall, stooped and white haired, clutches a box filled with petitions to get Kucinich on the ballot in Virginia. "I never go anywhere without my ballots," he says, eyes wide behind big, square glasses. He’s here from Northern Virginia to support Kucinich, and he does so with remarkable vigor, moving from person to person making introductions. Fisher was in the Navy with John McCain and organized for him in Virginia in 2000. But when the war and the "Bush thing" happened, he moved to the Kucinich camp. "McCain’s a goner," he says. As he talks, he spits in my face a little, and though I ignore it, he notices. "I had a stroke a week ago," he apologizes, "and sometimes my mouth…" He takes my arm and introduces me to another volunteer.

There are no professional handlers or PR flacks in evidence tonight. Instead there are people like Amy Vossbrinck, a round, motherly woman with a kind face and a stack of papers who follows the Congressman patiently. She was moved to work for Kucinich because of a speech he gave in June of 2002 called "Spirit and Stardust." She works as his scheduler, what she calls "the most wonderful job I’ve ever had."

Part of the secret to Kucinich’s appeal is that he is remarkably accepting. He attracts and takes seriously a lot of people who, like Kucinich himself, hold "strange" ideas and hold them passionately. People who are intense, a little off-kilter, who lean in to talk to you and won’t stop talking about whatever it is that makes them angry. People who twitch and shift and kind of STARE when they ask questions about peak oil, 9/11 conspiracy theories or veganism. These people don’t scare Kucinich. He loves them.

But there are a lot of other people here tonight who are not so strange: teachers, local politicians, musicians, carpenters, and many of the faces you see at local peace protests. I ask a 25-year-old woman named Emma—cute, hair pulled back in a ponytail, standing with two friends—why she’s here. "I don’t know much about him, but I hear he’s pretty liberal," she says. Who does she think will win the election? "Edwards," she answers, "or maybe Obama."

And there’s the rub, the sad refrain that follows a candidate like Kucinich wherever he goes. A lot of people like what he pledges to do (impeach Bush and Cheney, set up a Department of Peace, end the war on drugs, repeal the PATRIOT Act); a lot of people like the fact that he seems to say what he means and mean what he says; a lot of people wish Kucinich, or someone like Kucinich, could be president. But very few people are willing to vote for him, because no one thinks he has a chance in hell of winning.

After he is done speaking, Kucinich wanders slowly up the aisle, unattended, shaking hands and smiling like a tourist lost in New York. People smile back and pat him on the shoulder. A woman shakes his hand, saying, "I honor your humanity and your divinity." Another woman hands him a letter she wrote him, grips his arm, and laughs. Vossbrinck waits patiently as Kucinich receives hugs, poses for photos, and sits in close conversation with people who need to talk to him. He gives his time to everyone, despite the fact that he is way late for a party that Mayor Brown invited him to, and there’s still a line of people who paid for a photo opportunity and he’s still got to drive the long, dark highway back to Washington, D.C. tonight, and then its on to the West Coast and then the political circus that is New Hampshire. Vossbrinck waits. As soon as it’s all over, whenever that is, she will sit in the car with him while he works. He’s always working, she says, "he’s a very diligent, diligent person." Her job involves a lot of long nights like this one, but "it’s a very special thing to have a job where you feel you can make the world a better place."

As things wind down, I ask the candidate if he has time for a quick question. He says yes, gently touching my arm. How, I ask, do you stay optimistic running a campaign so few people think can win? He pauses, head down and hand on chin before looking at me intently, his eyes small, dark and hard like a crow’s. He grins a big grin and says, "Because we don’t have a right to be cynical. …If I don’t believe that, what kind of a president would I be? And if I do believe that, think of what kind of a president I can be!"

C-VILLE welcomes news tips from readers. Send them to news@c-ville.com.

Categories
News

Roots music lover = drug fiend?

Scenes from the War On Weed in the war heavy year of 2007: Over the extended weekend of July 25-29, the Blue Ridge Parkway outside of the one-stoplight town of Floyd, Virginia, was crawling with Park Rangers up from Asheville, North Carolina, part of a special Criminal Interdiction Taskforce (CIT) assigned to police the Parkway while FloydFest was in swing.

The four-day festival netted 181 vehicle stops and citations for 29 drug violations, 22 traffic offences, two DUIs, two outstanding warrants and one charge of public intoxication. It also brought numerous complaints about the CIT rangers’ behavior, including some from area law enforcement and the Floyd County Sheriff. The complaints got so bad that Representative Rick Boucher made a special call to the superintendent of the parkway, vowing to keep the CIT rangers from policing the Festival next year.


Blue Ridge Parkway is home to beautiful views—and aggressive, dope-seeking park rangers—on the way to FloydFest.

Case in point: On July 25, Ranger Bruce Gagnon pulled over 36-year-old Sean Moore of Greensboro, North Carolina, for driving in the evening fog without his headlights on. Ranger Gagnon testified that he suspected Moore of having a weapon because, as Gagnon approached the car, Moore held both hands out of the window in surrender. Finding Moore to be "extremely polite" only increased his certainty that he had pulled over a latter-day Charles Manson. Taking, and keeping, Moore’s driver’s license, Gagnon had him step out of the car, and proceeded to search the vehicle, the luggage, the passengers, and then Moore, finally finding a pipe and a small bag of marijuana. Triumph! One more doper off the parkway!

Unfortunately for Gagnon, a review of the videotape of the traffic stop contradicted most of his sworn testimony. The tape showed that as soon as he heard Moore say he was "here for Floyd[Fest]," Gagnon asked him to step out of the truck, whereupon he began peppering him with questions about drugs and guns and proceeded to conduct a search. Ranger Gagnon’s claim that Moore gave consent to be searched was not backed up by the tape, nor was his assertion that Moore was acting nervous and suspicious.

The U.S. District Court found [pdf] that Gagnon had violated the Fourth Amendment’s ban on unreasonable searches and seizures, ruling that attending FloydFest was not reasonable suspicion of illegal activity, and that there was no evidence that the Festival was a "high-crime area" warranting the heavy-handed behavior of the park rangers. However, videotape did support one part of Gagnon’s testimony: Sean Moore was indeed cooperative and polite.

On October 26, the Court dismissed the charge of possession levied against Moore. That’s Reason 1, Bad-Ass Park Rangers 0.

C-VILLE welcomes news tips from readers. Send them to news@c-ville.com.

Categories
News

Marijuana as First Amendment right

The Rutherford Institute, a Charlottesville-based organization that defends civil liberties, is currently representing Carl Eric Olsen in his 30-year struggle for religious freedom. That in itself is not noteworthy, as The Rutherford Institute specializes in religious cases. But what is unusual is the particular religious freedom for which Olsen is fighting. Since the early ’70s, Olsen has been a member of the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church (EZCC), a religious group that holds that marijuana is a sacrament, and whose members smoke it all day, every day.


Rutherford Institute Founder and President John Whitehead loves his hemp cereal. Rutherford is taking on the case of Carl Eric Olsen, who is fighting for the right to smoke pot as part of his religion.

The EZCC has existed in Jamaica since at least the 1940s, and was first incorporated in the United States in Miami in 1975. In the late ’70s and early ’80s, the Church was involved in several major drug busts, netting as much as 38,000 pounds of marijuana in one raid in 1978.

"I [have been] arrested over and over again," Olsen says from his home in Iowa, and over and over again he has challenged those arrests, losing every time.

But things may be different now. Under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), Olsen, 55, is claiming that the government is keeping him from practicing his religion. According to the RFRA, the courts must use "strict scrutiny" in cases involving religion to make sure that an individual’s First Amendment rights have not been violated.

Enter The Rutherford Institute. Despite a seemingly straight-laced image, defending the right to smoke pot is not necessarily at odds with the Institute’s mission. John Whitehead, Rutherford’s founder, says that the issue is not drugs, but religious freedom. "The question," Whitehead says, "always comes down to, ‘What kind of power does the government have?’" In the case of marijuana legislation, the answer for Whitehead is too much. Whole Foods, he says, used to sell a hemp cereal that he was particularly fond of, but "when Bush got into office…[the government] went crazy for a while" and pulled the cereal off the shelf. "I love my hemp cereal," says Whitehead.

In a 1979 case, the Florida Supreme Court wrote, "(1) the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church represents a religion within the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; (2) the ‘use of cannabis is an essential portion of the religious practice.’" Nevertheless, the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld a ruling in 1990 denying Olsen a religious exemption to smoke marijuana. That ruling meant that he could no longer be a practicing member of the EZCC.

"Without being able to gather with other people and smoke marijuana," says Olsen, "my religion does not exist."

C-VILLE welcomes news tips from readers. Send them to news@c-ville.com.

Categories
News

From the ground up

“Wine’s not expensive compared to what goes into making it. The work of bringing a bottle of wine to someone’s table is extremely varied, with thousands of gestures and centuries of traditions to honor and remember. It’s not an industry, at least not to us.”—Christine Campadieu, co-owner with her husband of Domaine La Tour Vieille in Banyuls France


Harvest time at Lovingston Winery.

More features:

From grape to table: the economics of Lovingston Winery
A look at local winemaking by the numbers

Hey, small spenders
Eight experiments in how to get a grand meal for a humble price

Good food is like good sex Real-life adventures in career food service

Full of bologna Every sandwich tells a story…

Certain inalienable bites What it takes to keep Jefferson’s graduates satisfied

And don’t forget: C-VILLE’s Best of Food & Drink

The small John Deere Gator roars over the rough, recently plowed dirt and rock on a steep hillside above Lovingston Winery in Nelson County. The wind blows Stephanie Puckett’s long blonde hair back as we bounce along, me perched awkwardly next to her trying to hold on and take notes at the same time. Behind us, at the top of the hill, is a small cabin into which her grandparents have just moved, and below and to the left is the white, wooden farmhouse where Stephanie’s parents, Ed and Janet, live, and below that stretches five acres of grapevines. The Gator threatens to toss me out at every turn, and Stephanie and I have to shout to be heard. The grapevines below us curl and twist along thin wire stretched between wooden posts. In a few months, these vines will be weighed down with fleshy bunches of purple fruit, but right now each grape is small and green and the size of a BB. A small industrial building that houses the winery is partially built into the base of the hill, and below that, where the hill flattens, is a pond with a dock and a flagpole flying the stars and stripes and the orange and blue crossed swords of the University of Virginia.

Location has always been an integral part of wine. The French call it terroir. Terroir is a Gestalt theory, namely that what you taste in a wine is more than just the mathematics of fermentation, or the skill of a famous winemaker. Terroir is an epic novel about a certain soil, in a certain plot of land, farmed by a certain person or people. It is a certain grape, in a certain earth, with certain weather, in a certain year. It can be magnificent or tragic. It is, in short, what wine means. In this way, a bottle of Virginia wine represents precisely what wine should be: an agricultural expression of a people, a culture and a place.

Advertising special:

But that bottle isn’t cheap. A perusal of the shelves at Harris Teeter shows that most Virginia wine falls between $15 and $23, with very few bottles in the $10 range. Wines from California, South America or Australia, on the other hand, offer numerous choices below $15, and many below $10. Virginia wines are now starting to creep above $30, and even though plenty of wines from around the world are more expensive, those are balanced by the many lower-priced options. Not so with wines from the Old Dominion. This invites the question: Why is it cheaper to buy wine that is shipped here from halfway around the world, than wine that is made literally down the road?


Exclusive video:  Industry leaders discuss the cost of Virginia wine.

To learn why Virginia wine is “so expensive,” I have looked inside a single bottle of Virginia wine to find out what goes into it. How is it made, and by whom, and where, and why? What is Virginia terroir? I am not talking about taste or quality, but rather process and personality. Not that how wine tastes isn’t important. As someone who markets Virginia wine told me, “All the marketing in the world can sell one bottle of wine. You’ve gotta have the quality to sell the second.”


Jeff and Michelle Sanders arrived in Free Union one year ago, with the dream of starting a vineyard. “If you close your eyes,” Michelle says, “you might think you’re in the French wine country."

And yes, Virginia, there is good Virginia wine. Just not in every bottle. Part of my own fascination with the wine that my home state produces is that I so rarely love it; yet it is a wonderful surprise when I do. It is, however, getting better. And many people, including families like the Pucketts, are moving here in increasing numbers to be a part of it. The wines they are making, or will one day make, might be expensive, but given what goes into making them, they might also be worth it.

Curse of the glassy-winged sharpshooter

Ed Puckett is a large man with a ruddy face that shines through his white beard, and in glasses, gray sweatpants and a black t-shirt, he looks a little bit like Jerry Garcia. In the early 1980s, Ed became interested in wine. It began slowly; he was the general manager at GNB Battery Technologies based in Minnesota, and at corporate dinners it was helpful to be the person who could handle the wine list. Soon he was reading magazines like Wine Spectator, visiting Napa Valley, and beginning to put together a collection. Wine had become a passion.

In the early ’90s the company moved its headquarters to Atlanta, which suited the Pucketts fine, as it was closer to Charlottesville where Ed had gone to school. On weekend trips to see UVA games, they began to visit local wineries. At one of these wineries, Afton Mountain, Ed had what he calls “a moment.” Drinking the wine, looking out over the rows of vineyards, he turned to the owner of the winery and said, “You’re doing what I want to do.” “You don’t know what you’re getting into,” came the reply.

“He was right,” Ed tells me. It is 15 years later and he is standing in his winery surrounded by dogs. There are eight dogs on the farm, a ragtag collection of salvaged canines, including the aptly named One-Eyed Jack and Bostwick, a 72-pound basset hound. I lean against the sink as Ed talks, swirling a glass of new red wine that moments ago was aging in a wooden barrel. In 1997, five years after the Afton moment, Ed bought a vineyard in North Georgia. The sale included a five-acre vineyard, a cabin, and three dogs (one of whom, Bella, is still with them). It was a mess, filled with a grab bag of grape varietals: Chardonnay, Syrah, Viognier, Nebbiolo, Mourvedre, Cabernet Sauvignon and two rows of Carignan, which was basically just deer food. The owner, a depressed chef, gave Ed a one-day lesson in vineyard management and then left.

At that point Ed was leaving his job and, as part of the deal, GNB gave him a small business in Texas that they were certain would fail. The company, Atomized Products Group, manufactures powdered metals that are used as lubricants in, for instance, oil exploration, but are also key components in radiation protection, like the bib you wear when the dentist takes x-rays. The company has done well, in part due to the current war on terrorism; GNB, meanwhile, went bankrupt.

The day-to-day operations in Texas could be run by someone else, leaving Ed free to spend three to four days a week at the vineyard. It became a family project, everyone staying at the little cabin on the weekends, and soon the vineyard had doubled in size to 10 acres, growing grapes that were sold to a Georgia winery called Chateau Elan. Stephanie and her younger brother Lee were in high school at the time, and they spent their weekends working in the vineyard, hauling water in buckets to the farthest four acres in the hot Georgia summers. “One day,” Stephanie’s grandmother told her,” all this will be yours.” Stephanie looked at her and replied without hesitating, “And the next day there will be a ‘For Sale’ sign up.”

But, the climate in Georgia is unsuited to quality grape production. Worse, the vineyard soon developed Pierce’s Disease, which is carried by a bug called the Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter and can only be cured by ripping out the vines. So, in 2002, with both kids at UVA, the Pucketts sold their house and put the vineyard on the auction block. “It was,” Ed says, “a tough day.” The vineyard hadn’t come close to making back what they put into it.
 
The oak chip incident

Stephanie Puckett is the assistant winemaker at Lovingston, helping Riaan Rossouw the head winemaker. Riaan, 30 years old, was born in Wellington South Africa. Growing up, his house bordered a vineyard and he knew from a very young age when it was time to harvest the grapes. He came here seven years ago and his gamble has paid off. He is head winemaker at Lovingston, consultant for Oakencroft (where he first interned), and is also starting his own small label, to be called Springbok. He and his wife live in a house on the hill near Ed and Janet, who consider them part of the family.

At first glance, Stephanie is a typical 25-year-old—when I first visited the winery, she greeted me in jeans and a Keystone Light t-shirt, groggy after spending the previous day at Foxfield. But her life differs from most of her peers. Although Stephanie lives in Charlottesville, she spends a lot of time 40 minutes away at the winery, even sleeping there during important periods like harvest. She helps make the wine, handles the sales and runs her own distribution company to market and deliver the wine. Her life is almost entirely consumed by the family business.

Although she grew up around grapes, she now says it took “maturity and being able to drink wine [legally]” for her to see her father’s obsession as a labor of love. “Most of my friends,” she says, “are in transitional jobs, they don’t work with their families, they don’t know if they’re happy or not. I love what I do.” While large corporations were interviewing her UVA classmates, Stephanie began sending resumes to local wineries.

During the year that Lovingston was being planned and built, Stephanie worked in the tasting room at King Family, and in the wine cellar at Keswick and Oakencroft. At King Family and Keswick she worked with well-regarded local winemaker Michael Shaps, and at Oakencroft with Riaan. During the ‘04 harvest, she would work all day at Oakencroft, then drive to Keswick and work until midnight or 2 in the morning in the winery, often by herself. She made mistakes, like the time Shaps told her to throw a bag of oak chips into the Keswick Norton. She had never seen oak chips before, and so she did what she was told, throwing the chips into the wine still in their foil bag. Ironically, Keswick won an award for their 2004, accidentally unoaked, Norton.

Stephanie learned the hard way, and both she and Riaan are proud of having not gone to school to study winemaking. Both of them learned by doing, and perhaps most tellingly, both of them began their training in vineyards.

The tyranny of the scorecard

After a bumpy couple of years at the start, Lovingston has grown successful, partly by being different. They do not grow Cabernet Sauvignon or Chardonnay, despite the fact that both grapes are easy to sell and are the most popular in the world. Instead, the Pucketts have championed two obscure grapes; Petit Manseng, a rare white grape from the Jurançon region in France, and Pinotage, a South African hybrid made by breeding Pinot Noir and Cinsault. Lovingston is not the first Virginia winery to bottle these particular grapes, but it may be the most successful. The Pinotage, especially, is a risk. It is often very strong and funky, with what is politely called a “barnyard” odor. But Riaan is a big believer. “I’ve worked with it in South Africa, seen it from vine to wine,” he tells me one day as I watch him extract some Lovingston Pinotage from the barrel. “It’s a hell of a beast to tame.”

Riaan uses only South African yeasts to ferment his Pinotage, but the end result is nothing like the South African versions. In fact, Pinotage is Lovingston’s best-selling wine. Riaan sticks his nose into the glass of Pinotage and smells deeply. “Mmmmm … it’s that Old World cellar smell. Reminds me of home.” It is a grape that really challenges a winemaker, but “the effort,” he says, “is worth it when you taste the bottle.” “Which is why I want to punch that guy who gave it a 79,” Stephanie replies angrily.

The Pucketts recently sent their Pinotage into the influential magazine Wine Spectator to be reviewed and it scored a 79 out of 100, which according to the magazine’s key means “Average: a drinkable wine that may have minor flaws.” Wine reviews matter a lot in the wine world. A bad score can be a financial disaster to an established winery, and it can keep a young winery wallowing in regional obscurity. When I ask Stephanie and Riaan what the biggest obstacle is to making wine in Virginia, they do not say the weather, the expected answer. Instead Stephanie immediately tells me that it’s the attitude towards Virginia wine outside of the state, especially when it comes to scores.

No Virginia wine has ever scored a 90 in either of the two most important wine magazines, The Wine Advocate and Wine Spectator, and despite lots of glowing press proclaiming Virginia’s promising future, in a narrow commercial sense the score is all that matters. A few Virginia wines have come close, scoring in the high 80s, but the general feeling among many in the local wine trade is that publications like Wine Spectator have a bias against wine from outside of California, Washington or Oregon. One winery employee told me that if Virginia wineries could afford to take out a full-page ad, then maybe they’d get a 90.

Lovingston is open by appointment only; there is no tasting room staff, but whoever is around will gladly give you a taste if you call. Visitors during the week are rare. On weekends there can be as many as 10 or 12 people, or as few as one. I am helping Riaan, Stephanie and Ed one day when we are interrupted by the arrival of a young couple sent by the bed and breakfast in Lovingston. Ed greets them, and while Riaan and Steph go back to work, he begins to give the couple a tour of the winery. It is the same tour that he gave me the first time I ever visited, and the same one he gives to all of their visitors, with the same stories. But almost everyone who visits buys something. “He’s doing what he does best,” Stephanie says as her dad leads the guests to the tasting bar. “He’s a great salesman. Always has been.”

The tasting room at Lovingston is just a bar and some stools overlooking the winemaking equipment, a far cry from most wineries with their stone fireplaces, elaborate decks and banquet rooms. Tasting rooms cost money, money the Pucketts want to put into the wine, but they also prefer it this way. They want people to see the wine being made and see the family that is making it. It’s their way of expressing Lovingston’s terroir. The Pucketts are their wine; you can’t truly know one without knowing the other.

Why, I ask Riaan, if making wine in Virginia is so hard, would anyone want to do it? Because it’s the ultimate challenge. “If you can make good wine here, you can make it anywhere,” he answers.
   
Five dollars on the margin

Jeff and Michelle Sanders moved here one year ago, with the idea that they might want to grow grapes, and maybe even make wine. They had lived for five years in Roatan, Honduras, where Jeff ran a plant nursery. “I have a green thumb,” he says, “but grapes are different.”

The couple bought a 22-acre farm in Free Union, with a barn that had been converted into a house, and plan on planting five to eight acres of grapes in April. Before planting, however, they will have to prepare the land, which is no small process.

First, the Sanderses will have to remove any and all trees, no matter how pretty, from the future vineyard site. Grapevines can’t have any competition for sunlight (later, when the vines are mature and producing fruit, they will benefit from competition for water and nutrients. It is a truism in grape growing that vines that struggle produce the best grapes, saving all of their nourishment for the fruit, instead of new shoots or leaves.) If the vineyard site needed to be cleared of a lot of trees, then the leftover roots still in the ground must be removed, either by leaving them to rot or by digging them out. There is a fungus called White Rot that grows on tree roots, but will kill the roots of grapevines.

Next the Sanderses will have to dig up the soil with a ripper 2-3′ deep to break it up so the young vine roots can go deep enough to find the water they need. The soil will have to be analyzed to see how much it must be fertilized, and whether any chemical corrections to things like the pH level are necessary.

Finally, the Sanderses will have to determine the layout of the vineyard: things like how the vineyard is oriented to the sun and wind, and the proximity of the vines and the rows. Close planting, with a lot of rows per acre, ensures that the vines must fight with each other for nourishment. This is the standard in Europe, and again, the idea is that the more difficult it is for a grapevine to survive, the better the fruit will be. Close planting means that grapes must be picked by hand, as most machine pickers won’t fit between closely spaced rows.

Paradoxically, the practices that winemakers look for in the vineyard to produce the best fruit, are the very ones that work against the best interests of someone growing grapes to sell. The fewer grapes a vine produces, the better those grapes will be, for the all-important sugar will be concentrated in those few berries. If you are just a grower, however, and you get paid by the ton, as is the norm, then low yields don’t exactly make you happy. For that reason, most wineries like to either own or control the vineyards where they get their grapes. The relationship between growers and winemakers can be difficult at times. Think of it this way: Few farmers have a chef looking over their shoulder complaining about the crops.

After all that, it will be two to three years before the vines produce fruit. The Sanderses have had people from the enology department at Virginia Tech come up to look at the place, as well as the Nelson County Extension Agent, who handles grapes for the entire Commonwealth. “[Albemarle] county,” Michelle says, “has wanted to help us.” “The state is helpful,” Jeff adds, “the industry is helpful. …I think that most people think that if there’s more people involved in the industry it’s good for all of them.” And locally, the industry is booming. Virginia is the eighth largest commercial grape producer in the country, and Albemarle County is the leading producer in the state, with 1,116 tons annually.

As much as anything, The Sanderses are attracted to the wine lifestyle. “It’s just so fun,” Michelle tells me smiling, “the culture of going to the wineries.” Before Honduras, they had lived in Arizona, “a place where they had no wine, [but] you could go to wine events seven nights a week, two or three a night.” They are not planning to sell their wines in shops; they want to focus instead on tourism and winery events—the whole wine experience. Michelle admits that they don’t love Virginia wines, finding them thin and watery, “like a rosé.” But Jeff insists, “Wine is getting better here year after year. The trend is upward.”

Neither of the Sanderses is currently working full time. “We don’t consider ourselves retired,” Jeff laughs, “we’re just not working.” But he’ll be working soon enough. “[The winery] is going to be a huge challenge. It obviously won’t be easy.”

“To grow grapes,” Jeff tells me, “if you want a simple thing, it’s probably $20,000 an acre…if you want to put in irrigation it’s more.” Many wineries in the state do have irrigation, and, although mature vines like it fairly dry, in the first two to three years they need a lot of water. “The thing about grapes is, it’s agriculture. It’s a modest investment and the payback is forecastable.” It’s possible, he explains, to break even growing grapes, minus labor. “At five acres I can probably do this myself.”

“If you go to a winery,” Jeff says, “it’s a whole ‘nother level of investment. …To produce a bottle of wine here it’s probably at least $5 on the margin.” I ask Jeff why he thinks it’s so expensive to make wine in Virginia, and he doesn’t hesitate at all before answering: “I think it’s pretty straightforward. It’s more difficult to grow grapes here than in a good climate.” Veteran insiders estimate the total cost of planting a 10-acre vineyard at $150,000, minimum.

Virginia is rife with things that can kill a vine. The humidity can cause downy mildew, which

Albemarle, home of the grape

At 6,200 tons of grapes grown each year, Virginia is currently ranked eighth in U.S. grape production. Albemarle County is the state’s largest producer, at 1,116 tons. With quality grapes selling in Virginia for $1,600 to $2,000 a ton, Virginia’s annual harvest adds up to more than $10 million.

coats the grapes and leaves in a soot-colored layer, eating the grapes’ skin, and powdery mildew which coats the underside of the leaves with a white film, causing the leaves to fall, and the grapes to rot. The list of pests that eat the vines or the grapes is various, including Japanese beetles and deer. And perhaps worst of all, the weather is entirely unpredictable. From hurricanes, like Isabel which turned 2003 into one of the worst Virginia vintages ever, to late frosts, like the one this April that killed much of the state’s Chardonnay, Virginia is nothing like the “stick it in the ground and let it grow” climates of Chile and Australia. There is a lot more spraying, maintenance, and hands-on vineyard work that must be done here.

And if does snow in May, or rain for three weeks in August, a bad year can’t just be ignored. Unlike growers of most agricultural products, a grape grower has to spend just as much time and money tending to the vines even in a year when they produce nothing. Most vintners depend on one year’s vintage to be able to fund the next. In an industry where the quantity and quality of your product varies year to year, and is sometimes completely out of your hands—well, let’s just say it can be a bit tense in a winery around harvest time.

There is also a natural limit to the economy of scale in Virginia that keeps the prices at a certain level. The kind of huge, corporate operations found in California, Chile and Australia, with thousands of acres of grapes producing millions of cases of wine, where massive machines ride down endless rows of vines, ensuring that you almost never have to touch the grapes with your hands, do not exist here. Virginia doesn’t have thousands of continuous acres of plantable land. Neither does it have weather that is stable enough for anything but hands-on, boutique wineries. We simply can’t make $10 bottles of wine that taste good, and still turn a profit.

The Sanderses and I leave their island-themed house, (a disappearing edge pool, bamboo torches and comfy outdoor couches around the grill) and walk the 100 yards to the hill where they plan on planting their grapevines. The hill slopes down to a lake with an island in the middle they call “Little Roatan” and is dotted with cows that will be leaving when the vines go in. Earlier, at their kitchen table surrounded by brightly colored wooden monkeys, Jeff had impressed me with the intensity of his interest in the process of growing grapes and making wine in Virginia. He is tall, well over 6′, and muscular, looking more like a Russian athlete then a wannabe winemaker. His face is endearingly goofy, but his eyes don’t leave yours for a second when he talks. I am fascinated by the seeming ease with which they are facing this epic endeavor. The Pucketts from Lovingston laugh later when I mention the Sanderses’ plan not to sell their wine in shops and to focus instead on tasting room sales and events. They have taken the opposite tack, and are focusing on getting their wines into stores and restaurants. The Pucketts tried one wine festival, but found, when they ran the numbers, that it wasn’t worth the hassle. “We’re not in the entertainment industry,” Ed explains succinctly. The Sanderses may have a rude awakening ahead of them, years of hard work and no profit to show for it, standing sore-footed and sweaty at festivals selling wine to inebriated tourists. Or they might suffer the aggravation of having your home open to the public, the constant weddings and events that test your hospitality and the patience of your neighbors. But the Sanderses have come to Virginia to grow a perfect life; they’re not the first and they won’t be the last. As the three of us stand amidst the cow shit staring out at Buck Mountain, Michelle tells me why she wants to make wine here: “If you close your eyes,” she says, “you might think you’re in the French wine country.”

The sound of two hands clapping

Here’s Ed Puckett on how much it costs to start a winery in Virginia: “The first law of wine economics is have another business somewhere else.” The success of the little business in Texas has enabled his family to build and run the winery and, at this point, is still paying their way. Lovingston Winery has not yet broken even; in fact, from 2002, when they planted the grapes, until November of 2006, it didn’t make a single dollar. Lovingston still loses $2 on every bottle they sell in a retail store. How can this be?

Each bottle of Lovingston wine costs between $15 and $17 to produce. The Merlot sells to retailers for $12, the Petit Manseng and the Rotunda Red for $13, and the Pinotage and Cabernet Franc for $15. The Pucketts have decided to sell them for less than they cost to make so as to keep the retail price of the wine at around $20. If they sold the wines to retailers for what it actually cost to produce them, they would sell for $23 to $26 on store shelves. To actually make money, say a modest $5 per bottle, the wines would have to sell to customers for $27 to $30, compared to the ocean of $7 to $15 wines from other places in which they must swim. For now, the idea is to get their name out there and establish a reputation for quality, and that’s hard to do if people don’t buy your wines because they seem expensive (or because the critics don’t like them). Initially, about 60 percent of Lovingston wines were sold out of shops, and 40 percent from the winery, but this has recently reversed, with sales from the winery and online increasing, thanks, in part, to repeat customers.

The Pucketts are prepared to endure years of cash outflow with little inflow in order to succeed in producing a quality wine in Virginia. They hope some day to reach the maximum capacity of the winery, which is 2,500 cases, and once production increases, the cost per bottle will go down. Going beyond 2,500 cases would mean hiring a staff, which they can’t afford. Currently it’s just Stephanie and Riaan doing most of the work, pulling all nighters from August to January. How can you make money with such small production? Riann says you have to focus on quality—build a legacy. “When you’re building a winery,” he says, “there is no short-term investment.”

 “I recognize,” Ed tells me, “that this year and next year we’re gonna get a bloody nose.” But the Pucketts’ commitment adds value to the wine, I think. Upon leaving them, I stop at Foods of All Nations and buy a bottle of the Lovingston Petit Manseng. The wine costs $19.99. It is lovely, rich and full of fruit, with sweetness and acidity wrapped around each other in the finish. At dinner that evening, my father, who knows almost nothing at all about wine, proclaims it the best he’s ever had. Earlier, dressed in sweatpants and surrounded by his family, Ed had explained why the effort was worth it: “When someone really lights up and likes your product, it’s like applause. A lot of people go through their whole lives and never get applause.”

Get in on the ground floor

Rows of grapevines suddenly appear on the left side of Route 690, back in the hills past Crozet. The road is almost one lane, past the vines, past McMansions and trailers with unseen barking dogs, and abandoned churches, snaking under the 250 overpass. I turn into the driveway and pull up in front of the future site of Pollak Winery.

The more I look at the history of wine in Virginia, and the more I talk to the people who are currently part of it, the more I start to think that there is something happening now. Call it a new wave, Virginia Wine version 2.0. The modern era of Virginia wine began in 1976, when Farfelu Vineyard in Rappahannock County became the first to sell Virginia wines commercially. The early pioneers, like Al Weed’s Mountain Cove in 1973, Gabriele Rausse and Barboursville in 1976, Horton in 1988, and Oakencroft in 1983, laid the foundation. Early on, all kinds of grapes were thrown in the ground and grown, some were successful, but most were ripped up and replanted. Wineries were housed in old barns, grapes were planted more with an eye to where they looked good than where they grew well. I even heard a story about one winemaker in the early days who would take the same bottle of white wine and put on a sticker for whatever wine the customer had ordered—Chardonnay, Riesling, Sauvignon Blanc—saying, “They won’t know the difference.” Mistakes, it’s fair to say, were made.

But others have learned from those mistakes. With many years of positive press, and with “up and coming” practically part of its name, Virginia is now a serious destination not just for people who want to drink wine, but also for the people who want to make it. A quick count shows me that at least 13 out of the 24 wineries around Charlottesville were founded between 1998 and 2007. Many of these are among what I consider the top wineries in the state today, like Veritas, King Family, Blenheim, Keswick and Kluge. Virginia is still barely a glimmer on the horizon to most of the wine world, which is why Virginia is, right now, a good place to get in on what is still the beginning, before costs become really outrageous, and all the good spots are taken.

From the early 1970s to the mid ‘80s, David Pollak was involved in growing grapes and making wine in the then-nascent California wine scene. In 1986, figuring it was time to concentrate on furthering his career, he sold the winery he part owned, thinking he’d seen the last of the wine business. But, as the years went by, he could never pass a vineyard without stopping. Eventually his wife Margo suggested that maybe it was time to get back into wine.


David and Margo Pollack’s love of the wine lifestyle has taken them from California in the 1970s to their Albemarle acreage today. They settled here, David says, for reasons of simple economics: “I couldn’t touch 100 acres in California."

And so they have, but they didn’t choose to return to California. In 1999, the Cincinnati Inquirer, (the Pollaks still live in Ohio), had a story about Charlottesville wine country. David was interested, and in 2001 he came to the area to look around. It took about a week to decide that this was the place. Working with Chris Hill, a noted Virginia vineyard consultant and grape grower, David began to search for the perfect site. “I want 25 premium acres, south facing, on a slope,” he told Hill. It took a year and a half to find the current location, 100 acres of what were once organic vegetable fields in Greenwood.

The Pollaks began planting in 2003 and currently have 25 acres of vines, with plans of increasing to 27. They have decided not to plant their vines densely, going with 625 vines per acre, as opposed to the Pucketts’ 1,200. The first vintage that will be bottled under the Pollak Vineyards name is now aging in barrels at a makeshift winery on the property. The site is ideal for grapes, on a south-facing slope, dropping from 900 feet to 800, with cool breezes that sweep down from the surrounding mountains. The vines are exquisitely groomed, the top angled like a solar panel, the back pruned to allow for exposure to sun, air and spraying. The bottom of the vines is trimmed in a “ballerina” cut with long, delicate tendrils extending like legs downwards and out.

I meet with David, Margo and Jake Busching, their vineyard and farm manager, at the site of their winery, still under construction, overlooking a large lake and farmhouse, where the Pollaks plan on living. The winery is impressively sized, with 7,000 square feet of production area, and 3,000 square feet of tasting room and office space. It is very modern and carefully planned. There is a massive 14′ wrap-around deck, with views of the lake, mountains and vineyards, designed to never be in the direct sunlight. David Pollak uses the word “vista” six times as he shows me around. The planned opening date for the new winery is next spring.

In contrast to Stephanie and Riaan at Lovingston, “weather” is the first thing David and Jake mention as being a challenge to winemaking in Virginia. They lost 25 percent of their vines as soon as they were in the ground due to the heavy rains that year, which had some parts of the vineyard under two feet of water. They installed underground drainage and replanted. Deer are another big problem: “You’ve got 100 acres for a deer to graze on, and the only plant they want to eat is the one you’ve just put in the ground,” David says. To combat this, they have installed 1.6 miles of deer fence around their property. Hurricanes, frost, mildew, bugs—the familiar list is rattled off. I ask the obvious: If it’s so hard to grow grapes here, then why do it?

Part of it is simple economics: The east coast is comparatively cheap. “I could afford to buy 100 acres in Virginia,” David tells me. “I couldn’t touch 100 acres in California.” He pauses, “I couldn’t touch 40 acres in California.” Virginia is also one of the few places on the East Coast where the weather allows you to grow European grape varietals well, farther south and it’s too hot, north and it’s too cold, a fact the state seems to recognize, as it actively encourages the growth of the wine industry.

So then I ask them: Why is Virginia wine so expensive? “We can produce wines that rival the best wines in the United States,” David says, “but we’ll never be able to produce enough of it.” It’s economy of scale again.

David echoes Jeff Sanders and Ed Puckett when he tells me that the natural price for a bottle of Virginia wine is $20. “We can handcraft everything and give you a good value at $20,” he says. But for good, cheap wine, “the economics just don’t work in Virginia.” The issue is farming costs, or as David puts it: “You’re hand-tending 18,000 vines.”

The amount of pruning, shaping and spraying that has to be done in Virginia, usually without the aid of machines, is just enormous. In California, David tells me, in a good, dry vintage, you might do a lot of the work by hand, but there’s a lot less of it. Here you have to constantly work to maintain the vines or the quality will drop.

Virginia is for wine lovers?

Winemaking in Virginia is, no doubt, a challenge. But that has not slowed its growth. In the last six years, the number of licensed Virginia Farm Wineries has increased by 50 percent, bringing the current total to more than 120. The number of acres planted with grape vines nears 3,000 today from 50 in 1973. Most of these are small boutique wineries making 200 to 5,000 cases a year, or medium-scale producers in the 10,000 to 30,000 case range.

Virginia wines have improved dramatically in the last decade, just as wines all over the world have improved, reaping the benefit of advancing technology and scientific knowledge. In addition, the local wine industry has benefited from over 30 years of accumulated knowledge that has been passed around between generations of winemakers and grape growers.

Naturally there are hurdles. The price of land and the cost of labor and operations are only increasing. Virginia may be a cheap wine region to buy into compared to Napa Valley or Long Island, New York, but the days of small, hobby wineries, is over. More importantly, our famously wine-friendly state regulations just took a blow with the loss of self-distribution for wineries. The biggest hurdle of all may be the hardest to fight: the ingrained, negative opinion of all “regional” wines like ours. Despite what I am sure will continue to be glowing articles about Virginia wine, it might very well be a long time before it stops being a curiosity and becomes just another choice on the shelf.

Or maybe not. Because there are a lot of reasons for the Virginia wine industry to feel pretty optimistic right now.

Virginia is way out ahead of the rest of the pack when it comes to challenging California, Washington, Oregon and New York. The breadth of experience operating in the state right now is staggering, with people arriving from California, Italy, France and South Africa, to work alongside natives, some of whom have been growing grapes and making wine here for more than 30 years.

And wine is hot right now. Mainstream media publications are increasingly covering wine. Wine tastings, winery visits, movies and books about wine have become a part of everyday life. The organic movement is giving way to the “eat local” movement, and why not pair a local meal with local wine? And wine, like the local food movement, is at its heart agriculture, the only agricultural area in our state that is not just growing, but thriving. And its growth saves our state from being overdeveloped; every acre planted with grapes, is an acre free of new houses, as well as an acre that contributes to millions of dollars in sales and tourism. All perfect reasons for Virginians to start paying attention to the local industry that is operating right under their increasingly discerning noses.

“You’ve gotta love the lifestyle,” David Pollak tells me, and his wife adds, “There’s a passion that goes with it.” Ultimately, that’s what it comes down to, passion, because otherwise, no matter how much money you have, making wine in Virginia just wouldn’t be worth it. “This is,” David Pollak says, as he sits inside his future winery and looks out at the fruits of his labor, “my one chance to leave behind something of artistic value.”

Return to terroir

I feel near the end of my work on this story that I want to get still deeper into it somehow. I send Stephanie Puckett an e-mail saying I’d like to talk to the family over wine and food. She invites me to dinner.

The house in Lovingston is small and cozy, with low ceilings, innumerable wine-themed knick-knacks, and rows of grapevines within 10 feet of the kitchen door. Everyone helps to prepare the food, and I ask if they have always enjoyed good meals together. “We did eat dinners every night,” Janet calls out from across the kitchen, “the old family dinner.” Ed agrees: “We always had that, we always had the kids and us at dinner together.”

After dinner, which is noisy and delicious (cheese and crackers to start, then steamed crab legs and grilled vegetables, wines from France, California, Australia and Washington State), we all take a walk, wine glasses in hand, through the vineyard. They point out numerous problems; damage from a recent bout of hail—hard, blackened berries among the healthy green ones, looking like they’ve been split with an axe—and Japanese beetles busy eating the tops of the leaves. One row is mysteriously dead, the leaves brown and withered. The prevailing theory is that it was hit by lightning.

The Pucketts seem unconcerned despite these many dangers that threaten their life’s passion. The light is fading, and we walk on, hands reaching out to touch the grapes, feet surrounded by a mass of misshapen dogs that stop now and then to pee on the vines. Ed, who had been lagging behind, takes the lead on the way back, empty wine glass hanging at his side.

We gather in the den and open a bottle of the soon-to-be-released Lovingston Estate Reserve, only 166 cases of which were made. Everybody settles into chairs and couches. The television is turned to a baseball game but the sound is left off so we can talk. After a while, I bring up a comment an acquaintance made at a party. She didn’t like buying Virginia wine, she said, because she didn’t want to subsidize the hobby of retired rich people. Stephanie bristles. “You have to start with money to be able to do this,” she says, leaning forward and speaking forcefully, “and lose money for a number of years before it makes money. And the thing is, all those people have made money by working their butts off. This is their retirement because they don’t want to be inactive, and be part of the golfing community.” It is clear that she takes it personally, and why shouldn’t she? For her, all of this can’t be anything but personal. “Dad worked in the lead industry for God knows how many years,” she continues, “before he was able to buy a separate company, that still we have to keep going because that is what funds this venture. Yeah, he doesn’t have to put on a suit and tie and go to work everyday…but he works hard every day.”

I look over at Ed who is asleep on the couch. He is about to turn 59, and the family will celebrate with a pig roast. I suddenly have a clear vision of Stephanie, years from now, taking over and running the winery. She looks at her parents. “They have the same excitement for that winery that I do, the same love, passion. It’s our family; it’s our life down there. I don’t want to fail them…they are the ones I want to succeed for more than anything.”

Categories
News

From grape to table: the economics of Lovingston Winery

Harvest

Number of Mexican pickers hired at harvest time: 4

Average each is paid per eight-hour day: $102

Amount of grapes picked on a normal day: 3 tons

Total harvest cost: $3,000

In addition to these costs, in 2005 the Pucketts purchased five tons of grapes for an additional cost of $9,000.

The Winery

Purchase price for the Puckett Family’s farm (in 2002): $380,000

Cost of planting 6,000 vines on five acres: $10,000-15,000 per acre

Tractor: $27,000

Sprayer: $11,000

Gator tractor: $7,500

Weed sprayer: $500

Annual cost of chemicals and pesticides: $2,500-3,000

Cost of building 4,000 square foot
winery: $600,000

Monthly mortgage on winery: $4,000

Four stainless steel fermenting tanks: $400,000

Propane generator to cool the barrel room: $8,600

Thirty-five barrels, some French oak and some American oak, many of which will be replaced in three years: $25,000

Lab equipment: $10,000

Winery insurance: $600 per month

Web design: $2,000


The Bottle

Cost of bottling, including labor: $3,300

Cost of hiring Napa Valley company to design labels, according to Stephanie Puckett: “Several thousands of dollars.”

Production cost per label: $1.25

Cost per glass bottle: $1.10

Cost per cork: 67 cents

Cost per tin capsule: 14 cents

Total annual production: 13,200 bottles

Advertising special:

Categories
Living

Movers and scrapers

“He don’t even look like an operator,” the man in the mesh cap says, his arms folded across his big belly. His companions, similarly clad, nod in agreement. Some poor geek is in the Caterpillar Mini Excavator 303.5 struggling vainly with the front-loading bucket equipped with a moveable “thumb.” His failing mission? To lift a log from the ground in front of him and place it inside a tire lying nearby. The geek scoops up a bucketful of dirt along with one of the logs and dumps it into the tire. Trouble is, the log remains in the bucket, wedged tight. One of the Caterpillar guys comes running over with a sledgehammer, the building trade’s equivalent of a rodeo clown, and beats at the log to free it. The crowd laughs good-naturedly and the geek turns back to the log-into-a-tire problem. My heart beats a little bit faster as I clutch my scorecard. It’s the first annual Construction Rodeo at PVCC and I’m next in line.

I want to be a construction worker when I grow up: Hands-on exhibits like this one attracted folks of all ages to the first annual Construction Rodeo at PVCC.

There are more than 7 million construction workers in the United States (about 900,000 of them are women, represented at this event by the local chapter of the National Association of Women in Construction, or NAWIC). But it’s not enough. With older workers retiring, and little new blood coming in, the industry faces shortages. To help with recruitment, the industry puts on day-long, family fun-fests like this, with corporate booths offering free logoed trinkets, Clydesdale rides for the kids, and the main event—the Construction Rodeo, a competition to test the over-18 set’s skills at doing relatively silly things with manly yellow machines.

Most of the crowd comprises construction workers and small boys, the boys all running around looking at the machines with covetous awe. The men are here on a Saturday to do what some of them spend up to 60 hours doing every week, but there are bragging rights and cash prizes at stake, $100 for the winner in each event, which include the Skid Steer Loader Obstacle Course and something called Backhoe Tennis. “That’s pretty good money for a Saturday,” someone says.

The best operators of machines such as the 420E Backhoe Loader, an $85,000 beast that weighs about 11 and a half tons, are able to maneuver its arm gracefully, their hands fluid and steady on the twin joysticks, the loader arm reaching out to flick a tennis ball off a cone, or deposit a basketball in a laundry basket, delicately, carefully, like King Kong wiping a tear from Fay Wray’s cheek. Such is not the case for your correspondent. The machines buck and clank at my touch, like something violently short-circuiting. The events are timed, and while I bring in times around one or two minutes on the various events (I did especially poorly on the Mini Excavator Thumb Grab, for which I blame my bookish tendencies), the best operators glide, spin, and dance their way to scores in the 30 seconds or under range.

It ain’t pin the tail on the donkey. It’s lift a log from the ground and place it inside a tire. If you can do it, maybe the construction biz is for you.

Young guys outfitted with camo on their caps, knives in their belts, and girlfriends on their arms, queue up with old men in khaki work shirts whose leathered hands raise big cigars to their ruddy faces. They talk about labor. They talk about machines. They complain about their scores, about penalties for things like knocking over a cone. They watch their fellow competitors and harrumph: “I know what I can do, but I do it in the real world.” “I can do things with these machines that no one has ever thought of.” They watch the likes of me make a mockery of their trade and say, “He don’t even look like an operator. Reckon he makes as much an hour as we do?”

The Construction Rodeo is a celebration of the kind of work that pays a little over $20 an hour for the most experienced of the operators (though that’s not counting overtime). It’s also a chance for people like Lissa Weathers, a Special Education graduate student at UVA, to do something way out of the norm. She takes a comparatively long six minutes to carefully pick up the logs and place them in the tires. But her grin is miles wide as her two sons watch. “I could do this all day,” she says. This is exactly what groups like NAWIC, which is hawking hotdogs and barbecue to raise money for construction-training scholarships, want to hear. Eleven-year-old Ryan and 9-year-old Nathan cluster around Lissa’s legs after her triumphant ride on the bucking excavator. I ask Ryan what he thinks of his Construction Cowgirl Mom. “I think it’s hilarious,” he says.

Categories
Living

Where's Westhaven at? [with video!]


Go long! UVA cornerback Chris Cook prepares to dunk Mayor Brown, whose taunts of "Bring it on" had that distinct underwater sound seconds after this picture was taken.

Mayor David Brown unzips his shorts, dropping them to his ankles, and removes his shirt. Naked except for a pair of black swim trunks, he climbs up the ladder to the platform, turns to the crowd and raises his arms. "Bring it on!" he says. "Bring it on." Sheriff Cornelia Johnson, splendid in her brown uniform with yellow brocade and a big hat, pays $1 and steps up to the line. She eyes the mayor, takes aim and fires. The rubber ball rockets into the dirt, well short of the target. The sheriff, surprise, surprise, throws like a girl.

It’s Saturday, August 4, the 10th annual Westhaven Community Day, and at 10am, Hardy Drive is blocked off at both ends and cars are lining the adjoining streets along Eighth and Page. Though I was born in Charlottesville and grew up in Albemarle County, I hadn’t known where Westhaven was until a few days ago. More cars pull in as I park. It’s hot and getting hotter. Stretching away from the stage in the center of the street are tables staffed by various organizations that provide services to the residents of the city’s oldest public housing project and that today are providing free pens, fake tattoos, candy and church fans.

Plenty is going on here, crammed into the small stretch of street that runs through Westhaven. The police have set up an obstacle course with orange cones, and the preteen set is lining up to navigate it on a pocket bicycle, little knees up by little heads, wobbling clown-like but serious around the course, while a cop yells color commentary through a cone: "Gregory Taylor, making his way down the track…he checks behind him to see if anyone is catching up, but he’s way out ahead!"


Pocket man: Neither 90-degree temps nor teeny-weeny little pedals deter kids on the obstacle course.

Just up from the tikes-on-bikes is a big, rubber, bouncy castle, packed with kids careening off the walls and into each other, and next to that is the dunking booth, where the mayor, seated on the spring-loaded platform, chest alarmingly white, repeats, "Bring it on!" One buck gets you three throws, and after Sheriff Johnson fails to dunk the mayor, he calls out to Chris Cook, a UVA cornerback, taunting him. Cook throws the football from, like, three times the official distance, casually, not really trying, and hits the trigger. The mayor goes down ass first. Through the window in the booth, you can see his body descend in slow motion, amid bubbles and spraying water, arms and legs over his head. He resurfaces, sodden and grinning. Cook stands with two other football players, all of them looking like they aren’t sure what to do when they’re not on the field, and lobs casual, loooonnngg passes down the street to the kids.


Exclusive video from Westhaven Community Day.

An hour into the all-day affair, it’s heating up, literally and figuratively. The sun beats down, and the DJ playing loud music under a big lawn umbrella turns an electric fan face down on his receiver to keep it cool. The street is filling with residents, friends and volunteers. Kids and bicycles and scooters weave in and out. The organizations whose tables line the street illustrate both who is investing in the community and the problems that must be faced: the Bookmobile, the Music Resource Center and youth media workshop Light House. New Beginnings Church adjoins an End the War/Impeach Bush table. National College, UVA, PVCC and Virginia Tech have set up tables, as have Planned Parenthood, the AIDS Service Group (providing free testing all day), and the Sexual Assault Resource Agency. A guy twists balloon animals. There’s a snow cone booth and cotton candy. It is a block party, yes, but with a pronounced undercurrent of poverty, politics and race.

Farther down, in the last apartment on Westhaven’s east end, Maybelle Kenney sits on her porch surrounded by plants and eating some lunch. The music is muted. Ms. Kenney has lived here "40-some years" and tells me that this is the biggest Community Day yet. She is not well: She’s just started on a kidney machine; she has a slipped disc and diabetes. Her doctor says she shouldn’t be out in the heat, so she sits in the shade with the door open to let an air-conditioned breeze blow on her back. "I’m not going up there," she says, craning her head around the porch column to look up toward the music, "but I really am enjoying myself." She sits back and pauses to eat some more potato chips before continuing, "It’s a beautiful community; it’s just the outside people that come in and do wrong."


Like a Polaroid picture: Girls belonging to the Men and Women of Distinction Social Club take over Hardy Drive.

The first Westhaven Community Day in 1997 was a half-day event organized so residents could get to know each other. Joy Johnson, Westhaven’s longtime beating heart and raised voice, moves over to make room on the cooler full of drinks where she is sitting in front of the Neighborhood Policing Substation. At the next Community Day, she tells me, they decided to bring in the people who served the community—many of whom didn’t actually know where Westhaven was.

Johnson issues commands and takes questions while she talks to me, finally answering one from me as she readies to move on. What is your favorite part of Community Day? "Watching all the kids have fun," she replies, "and being able to showcase that our kids have talents." She pauses, looks at me, and then adds with wry smile, "They all have white t-shirts on, but they ain’t in gangs."


The Men and Women of Distinction Social Club puts on a dance in the street. Eight girls, maybe 5 to 16, are wearing black shirts with the club name on them, and white shorts, and the DJ plays James Brown’s "Papa’s Got a Brand New Bag" and, like the song says, they do the Monkey, and the Mashed Potato, and the Twist, feet stutter-stepping on the sizzling pavement, faces sweaty, turning cartwheels and then doing splits, as the crowd waves their fans in slow synch. A male step group from the Omega Psi Phi, known as Que ("kew"), is up next, in purple shirts, camouflage ranger’s hats, and combat boots painted gold. Two of them proudly display fraternity brands on their bare skin, the scars puffed up and glistening. Their dance is more like martial arts, all muscularity and growls. They stomp, chant and pose. At the third song, there is a rush as the girls and the younger kids join the True Ques, everybody doing the moves together: Slide to the left, take it back now y’all, two hops, left foot stomp, Charlie Brown! Take it back now, Cha Cha! Let me hear you clap your hands!
   
Lounging against the railing in front of the Policing Substation, Wayne Arabie tells me what he just told the TV cameras: "Everybody says this is a bad neighborhood. This ain’t a bad neighborhood. It’s the elements that come in here from outside." In June, Westhaven was in the news again for the city’s first murder of the year—its reputation as a haven for criminals reinforced, despite the fact that neither the presumed shooter nor the victim were Westhaven residents. I ask Arabie why these outsiders come to Westhaven, but his wife, Teresa, answers: "Because they don’t have to live here."

Wayne and Teresa lived in Westhaven for eight years, before moving to Louisa. The first thing Teresa was told when they moved to Charlottesville and applied for public housing was "Stay out of Westhaven." She was terrified when she found out that they had indeed been placed there. She sat in the truck crying and had to be dragged into her new home, she says. But they stayed and raised their kids and come back often to visit a place that now feels more like home to them than anywhere else. 

What the Arabies hope is that Community Day next year will see the many businesses that have made donations today (businesses such as Plan 9 and Whole Foods) actually attending and taking part. They want to see more people from "outside." "Outside" they say, from "the rich city" of Charlottesville. Wayne and Teresa tell me repeatedly how proud they are to have been Westhaven residents and how much they love the Westhaven community. Never once do they substitute "Charlottesville" for "Westhaven." It sounds, I point out, as if they are talking about two different worlds. "Westhaven was built in a hole so that UVA couldn’t see us," Teresa says. She looks at me intently. "They’re scared of us," she says, and then lowers her voice, "but we’re just like them."

By 4pm Community Day is winding down. There will be dancing until 8pm, but the information tables are cleared, the dunking booth is empty, and the bouncy castle is deflated. People are heading back to their houses, kids are grouping off to dance or goof around. A young man rides by on his bicycle and I see that he has "CRIPS" tattooed on the inside of his forearm.

All day I have been an outsider looking in, seeing Westhaven for the first time. UVA can’t see Westhaven despite the fact that it sits just on the other side of the not-entirely metaphorical railroad tracks from W. Main Street, less than a mile from the Corner and the Rotunda. Most of Charlottesville can’t see Westhaven, tucked away in a crescent bowl at the exact center of the city. From Westhaven you can’t see the doublewide trailer in Louisa that the Arabies were eventually able to move into. But from the brick and tan stucco housing units, dirty and soot streaked, you can see—clearly rising up above the laundry lines and small, fenced yards—the Tyvek-covered skeletons of some of Charlottesville’s expensive new condos.

Categories
News

Appetite for Destruction

cd

Scenes from a preteen wasteland. Nineteen-eighty-seven, the year Metal broke, the year I turned 12, the year I first got loaded like a freight train and the year Guns N’ Roses released Appetite For Destruction.

It wasn’t Nirvana that killed Metal, it was G N’ R. It was this album. Nothing was ever going to be the same again. How could I go back to Bon Jovi, Def Leppard or Poison? When Appetite For Destruction came out, I intuitively felt that it was Real. Real in the way that nothing else seemed to be at the time: real rock ‘n’ roll, real danger, real ugly. I remember reading a quote from Slash where he described how his tongue had turned black from a steady diet of Jack Daniels and Marlboro Reds. "That’s so cool," I thought. I had a G N’ R patch on the back of my jean jacket, I tried to do the side-to-side snake dance at parties and I once had a dream where I was Axl Rose singing "Paradise City" in front of millions.


Anniversary for destruction: Twenty years after its release, Guns N’ Roses’ masterpiece remains a filthy, ferocious glimpse into lawless rock music.

Appetite For Destruction was real L.A. sleaze before L.A. sleaze became a pose for Williamsburg hipsters. Appetite, like a lot of ’80s metal, is music that’s great to blow coke to (listening to it now gives me a Pavlovian nose bleed), but unlike its contemporaries, Guns N’ Roses never made L.A. debauchery sound like fun. In song after song, Axl told us how cruel the city was for a small town white boy like himself. I can’t think of a single G N’ R song, except "Sweet Child O’ Mine," that describes anyone having a good time, and nothing’s cooler when you’re young than hating life.

In 1988, the year that the "Sweet Child O’ Mine" video made G N’ R the biggest band on the planet, NWA released Straight Outta Compton, another album that seemed very Real. Looking back, the pair seem strangely similar. Both albums are unrelentingly male, and both profess to be telling the truth straight from the streets of Los Angeles. Both albums tell stories about troubled kids trying to get by in a fucked-up world, struggling with cops, drugs, sex and poverty. Both also sell kids a fantasy way out, either by being an L.A. rock star or an L.A. gangster. Both are misogynist, violent and immature (Axl Rose is, after all, an anagram for "oral sex"). But both albums still send shivers up my spine.

The biggest difference between the albums is not skin color, however. It’s that the reality expressed in Appetite For Destruction is less about the world and more about the darkness inside its lead singer. The next G N’ R album, Lies, contained the song "One in a Million," one of the most controversial songs of the ’80s. In it, Axl digs down a little too deep, laying bare the xenophobia, racism and homophobia that lurks in his psyche. It is an ugly song, and not one that I feel good about defending. But it is, I think, the most honest song I’ve ever heard, one that portrays the fear, anger and despair that lurks in the heart of many an American man, black or white. After Matthew Shepard, 9/11 and Katrina, the song is impossible to feel comfortable about, but it is also very, very real. It’s the best song Axl ever wrote, and the song that marked the beginning of his decline.

Looking back, it’s easier to see all that "realness" as partially the product of Axl’s diseased mind. In the current Rolling Stone, Brian Hiatt describes Axl’s room as a padlocked oasis of O.C.D. neatness in the middle of the filthiest rock ‘n’ roll depravity the Sunset Strip had ever seen. After Lies came the manic-depressive, multiple personalities of Use Your Illusion I and II, the numerous arrests for domestic violence, the 20-minute videos and the kilts. Now, Axl is hunkered down with his plastic face and braided hair, endlessly perfecting his never-ending-album, Chinese Democracy.

But Appetite For Destruction is a great rock album, a modern classic. It’s Nirvana’s Nevermind without the self-awareness and politically correct angst. It’s a pre-ironic album that proves that metal doesn’t have to be the joke that The Darkness and Andrew W. K. have tried so desperately to make it. It kicks serious ass.

Maybe Axl took it all a little too seriously. "Take this one to heart," he says at the end of "Out Ta Get Me," his version of Johnny Rotten’s proclamation "We mean it, man!" Guns N’ Roses certainly did mean it, but thankfully the 12-year-old me didn’t really understand what he was talking about.

Categories
Living

How to buy a suit that stinks [with video!]


Best Place to Buy a Man’s Suit: Beecroft & Bull.

Gentlemen. This, above all else: To thine own size be true.

A story from Ashley Pillar, 28, who has worked at Beecroft & Bull for three and a half years, and in men’s clothing since he was 18: "I have a guy, who’s like a 38 waist. O.K., he comes in every fall and says, ‘Ashley, show me where your 32s are!’ I just hand him the 38s without any questions. One time I handed him 32s and he said, ‘These must be Italian. They’re mis-sized!’"

A man looks best in a suit, and a man looks better in a suit that fits. As soon as you walk into Beecroft & Bull, they have you sized up; head to toe, cuff to collar, make and model. They are here to help. They are here to make you look stylish, or, as Ashley likes to put it, stinky.

They will start with a suit off the rack in the right general size. They will look at your body. Forget, for the moment, what is fashionable. Pleats or flat fronts? It depends on your body type. A bit larger in the, ahem, rear? Go with pleats. Do you have high shoulders? Avoid the heavily padded Italian suits. How’s your posture? Are your hips level? See that little bubble of fabric nestled under your right armpit? Your right shoulder droops a little, but don’t worry, they’ll fix that. Got clown feet? Your pants can be adjusted to hide it. Look at your body. At Beecroft & Bull, all of its quirks and deformities can be smoothed away with the proper draping of fabric.


Ashley Pillar demonstrates the anatomy of a suit.

Let Mark Klalo, a nine-year Beecroft employee, find the right size and model suit for you and then stand in front of the triptych mirror, with Mark behind you, and let him fit you. He will look at your back, making sure the shoulders don’t extend too far out. He will examine the collar, looking for places where it rolls.

He will do this mostly with his eyes. Leaning back, head cocked and chin down. Mostly the eyes, but also the hands, tiny tugs and brief brushes across the shoulders, as if flicking away something undesirable. Look. Examine. The front panel is slightly full (Dimitri, the tailor, can fix it, taking the excess out of the front because the sides and back look so good), and the sleeves need to be shortened (Ashley will tell you that showing a lot of cuffs is very stinky).

Last, but certainly not least, the all-important break, where the pants hit the shoes. Americans generally go for what is called a full break, where the pants reach the top of the heel. Europeans, on the other hand, because they have such great shoes and stylish socks, use a very high break. You should probably go with what Ashley calls "the Mid-Atlantic solution," halfway between Europe and the U.S.

Last minute rules: A half-inch of collar, a half-inch of cuff. Make sure your jacket covers your seat. If you’re tall, go with a three-button jacket. A notch lapel is traditional, a peak lapel is stinky. Working cuff buttons are seriously stinky. Always choose side vents. And always wear a handkerchief in your breast pocket.

There (tug, tug), looks right. Looks (brush, brush) perfect. (Eyes, steps back.) Looks…

Stinky!

Categories
Living

The best wines of my generation

Confidence. That’s the mood filling the room as Al Schornberg, joined by the shining blonde triumvirate of his wife, Cindy, and their two youngest daughters, addresses four or five dozen partygoers. The occasion? The grand opening of Keswick Vineyards’ tasting room. A single overhead light shines down milky white and sickly into the cavernous winery, arrayed with tables of food and wine, shadowing everybody’s eyes and making us look like ghosts.

“If in the next 20 years,” Schornberg says, “we see the same progress we’ve seen in the last 20 years, I truly believe [Virginia will] be the No. 1 wine destination in the country.”

Vine, thanks, how are you: Al Schornberg drinks to the future of the Virginia wine industry at the opening of his new tasting room at Keswick Vineyards.

Rarely is the opening of a tasting room a grand event—certainly not an occasion for a party. Tasting rooms open everyday, and most of the time we pay them no mind. But that may be changing, because Virginia wine is moving fast, becoming impossible to ignore as an agricultural product and as a tourist attraction. Polls show Americans now prefer wine to beer. Wine is sexy and happening, and Virginia wine is coming on strong, poised to be the next big thing.

In 2000 the Schornbergs, having sold their $30 million software company, moved to Virginia from Michigan to fulfill their dream of making wine. They purchased the 400-acre Edgewood estate in Keswick, planted vines, and in 2002 bottled their first vintage. The reserve Viognier from that year was named “Best White Wine in the U.S.” at the Atlanta International Wine Summit.

Surrounded by oak barrels and large steel fermenting tanks in the winery behind the new tasting room, guests move among tables sampling the hors d’oeuvres from Café Europa that have been paired with Keswick wines. Little crab cakes with the Viognier, duck confit and plum sauce in crepes with the Norton, and the Nektar dessert wine with Roquefort-rolled grapes dusted with ground pistachios. The wines are good, but the pairings are perfect.

Gabriele Rausse, the man who made real Jefferson’s dream of a Charlottesville wine region, is here and, as always, is surrounded by a crowd. Stephen Barnard, Keswick’s young winemaker, approaches humbly to thank Rausse for coming. It is a telling moment, as two generations of Virginia winemakers, one, Rausse, an Italian, and the other, Barnard, a South African, come together. It is not a passing of the proverbial torch, for torches burn a long time in the wine world, but it signals the depth of what is happening here: Talents that span 30 years and the entire globe are converging in Central Virginia. Barnard turned down an assistant winemaking position at California’s well-known Beringer Vineyards to come here. “You can’t make wine in Virginia,” he says he was told, to which he says he replied, “Sounds like a challenge.” That winemaking in Virginia is a “challenge” is something that is repeated almost universally by everyone making wine or growing grapes here, yet still they come, expanding the industry every year. There are currently over 120 wineries in the state, 30 of them within a 40-mile radius of Charlottesville. “Virginia,” Barnard says, “is just a few steps away from becoming a major wine area in the country.”

Chris Hill, like Rausse, was here at the start of the expansion, and he’s at Keswick tonight, tall and white-haired in a green sport coat. The Virginia native’s name appears on not a single bottle, but he is a force in the business—the epitome of a gentleman farmer and a vineyard consultant for a great many of the state’s wineries. Someone asks him what the biggest difficulties are that face the industry today. Normally a deliberate speaker, he answers quickly: failed immigration reform and the rising price of land. “When you go from $10,000 an acre to $30,000 an acre,” he says, “there’s gonna be consequences.”

Undoubtedly this is so, but for the next couple of hours confidence, optimism and enthusiasm carry the room anyway. Most of the guests are not in the wine industry. They are media people, lawyers, restaurant managers, PR people, B&B owners, politicians. Yet they too are joining the wine world here in a major way as collectors and investors, critics and consumers. They swirl and sniff with growing assurance. Sure, another tasting room is opening, another destination for tourists. But under the surface, it’s infrastructure that’s being born, a growing network that carries one clear message: If you’re not drinking Virginia wine now, you will be soon. Believe the hype.

Grand Opening
Keswick Vineyards’
New Tasting Room
Thursday, June 28