Categories
News

Major evidence at stake in porn case

A motion hearing in the child pornography posession case against former Albemarle High School JV girls’ soccer coach Raja Jabbour ended without a ruling from U.S. District Court Judge Norman K. Moon.

At stake was whether evidence obtained after an Ohio arrest in January 2004, including computer hard drives, would be admissible at trial. The defense team, which includes high-profile lawyer John Zwerling, argued that Jabbour’s arrest was improper. With an undercover Ohio cop from Tuscarawas County on the stand, attorneys on both sides spent hours poring over an expansive three ring binder of internet chats between Jabbour and the undercover, who posed as a mother of 12- and 7-year-old daughters.

Jabbour allegedly thought the woman would let him sexually “initiate” her daughters, and the prosecution highlighted several graphic chats on the topic. He drove to Ohio in January, with teddy bears in tow, where he was arrested outside a Pizza Hut. Yet Ohio prosecutors dropped the case for reasons that remain unclear. At the hearing, one of Jabbour’s attorneys, Andrea Moseley, led the undercover cop through chats that might suggest entrapment.

Judge Moon had issued no ruling by press time.

Categories
News

Biscuit Run: New design, same issues

In virtually every discussion of area growth—whether it be talk of new houses, new roads or new retail space—Biscuit Run, an expansive planned development on 1,300 acres of the southern side of Charlottesville, must be invoked. So a November 14 County Planning Commission work session devoted to new designs for Biscuit Run predictably drew a crowd.

When Elizabeth and the late David Breeden sold their property last year to developer Hunter Craig and his partners (officially Forest Lodge LLC), initial designs for up to 5,000 new housing units were on the table. After several public hearings, the developers ditched that initial design, hired the award-winning New Urbanism firm, Torti Gallas, and have produced a scaled-down version of 2,500-3,5000 new units more closely aligned to the “neighborhood model.” (How could it not be? When the County decided to move toward the “neighborhood model” for future growth, it hired Torti Gallas as consultants.)

The master planners, referring to the development repeatedly as a “village,” said they took a step back to get a better sense of the land, discussed connector roads and “village” retail space. Speaking of the parking arrangement for the retail space, designer Beth Hesler said the neighborhood model is about “creating places where humans are comfortable—it’s not about vast seas of parking or extra wide streets where cars are going fast.”

The new design earned some positive comments from both County Planning Commissioners and some area residents, but such positive comments usually preceded “but we still have concerns…” Almost a dozen members of the public, both city and county residents, took a turn sharing such concerns about Biscuit Run (no member of the public spoke in support the development), with a heavy focus on overtaxed roads.

At the same time, the City Planning Commission was also discussing Biscuit Run traffic. “The quality of life could be crushed for citizens living on [the four roads affected],” said Commissioner Michael Farruggio, counting Avon Street Extended, Fifth Street Extended, Route 20 and Old Lynchburg Road.

Next up for Biscuit Run is a December 19 work session devoted solely to transportation. The City Planning Commission intends to join the County for that hearing.

Categories
News

City Planners relent on tree cutting

At last the ghost of a 150-year-old beech tree may be laid to rest. At their November 14 meeting, the City Planning Commission conditionally approved a landscape plan amendment for the Watson Manor project at 3 University Cir., a project that has been halted since its manager, David Turner, violated the site plan by cutting down an aging 48” caliper beech tree on the property.

“We did not respect the process, we did not respect the work of the commission,” said Joseph Davis, who has now assumed leadership for the Watson Manor project. Davis is a UVA professor with the Institute for Advanced Studies and Culture, which is renovating the rundown boarding house at 3 University Cir. for office space. “That was wrong, it was foolhardy considering our immense stake in that property.… It’s no understatement to say that the faculty of the institute is ashamed to be in the position that we’re in tonight.”

The City swiftly issued a stop-work order following the tree cutting in August, which Turner appealed to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). At that October 26 meeting, Turner’s attorney, Fred Payne, accused the City of violating the law by stopping site work.

But Turner resigned as project manager after the appeal was denied, and Davis exchanged sharp words and accusations for abasing apologies and reconciliation. The commission, facing the choice of either leaving the construction site in limbo by revoking the special-use permit or allowing the construction to proceed, chose the latter option with blessing both from City staff and University Circle neighbors.

“Our support for them was based completely on the new project person [Davis] and a very mature landscape plan,” said Karen Dougald, a representative of her “small but feisty” neighborhood. The neighbors negotiated for an 8” caliper beech tree to take the place of the old one. The Institute for Advanced Studies and Culture will also pay the neighborhood $5,000.

Some commissioners shared concerned of setting a lenient precedent that future developers might take advantage of. The City only levied a combined $200 fine—the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office didn’t want to press criminal charges.

The matter still requires City Council’s stamp of approval.

Categories
News

Local campaign donors: Goode-Weed Race

The following individuals gave $2,000 or more to candidates for the Fifth District U.S. House of Representatives in 2006, according to the Federal Election Committee. In the race between Democratic challenger Al Weed and Republican incumbent Virgil Goode, Goode lost Charlottesville and Albemarle but won the district overall by almost 20 percentage points.

What can we tell from who gave? The list of top donors for Goode includes a number of presidents, owners and CEOs. The list for Weed includes several attorneys, educators and a slew of retirees. High-profile developers like Wendell Wood, Hunter Craig and Charles Rotgin all gave to Goode, while high-profile celebrities like John Grisham and Boyd Tinsley gave to Weed. We guess sometimes the stereotypes are true.

Virgil Goode

Thomas F. Boland, Douglas E. Caton, John Dudinsky, Rosemary P. Galbraith, Leslie F. Gilliam, Richard Gilliam, Cindy Hewitt, Richard B. Hewitt, James L. Jessup Jr., C. Wilson McNeely III, James F. Rose, Charles Rotgin Jr., Fred Scott, Phil Wendel, Doris Wilsdorf, Marlene C. Wood, Wendell W. Wood

Al Weed

William J. Abbott, Michael D. Bills, Melinda Brown, Richard Brown, L. W. Deneveu, Robin Dripps, Llezelle A. Dugger, Lawrence R. Eicher, Catherine Goldschmidt, Vesta L. Gordon, John R. Grisham, Shea Grisham, Robert Hobart, Cri Kars-Marshall, Katie Kellett, Gary Kendall, Harold H. Kolb Jr., Anna T. Lane, William Lankford, George Leaman, Russell M. Linden, Anne J. Logan, Helen H. Logan, Mark B. Logan, John F. Marshall, Thomas B. McIntosh, Eugene J. Meyung, Catherine G. Peaslee, Lucia Phinney, Grace D. Riggs, Beverly Seng, S. S. Smith, W. M. Thompson Jr., Boyd Tinsley, John O. Wheeler, Roberta B. Williamson, Marie J. Woodward

Categories
News

Wahoos win first game in John Paul Jones

Indoor fireworks, lighted torches, green lasers, a mascot rappelling from the ceiling, players making a smoky entrance, Michael Buffer proclaiming, “Let’s get ready to rumble”: UVA certainly made a spectacle in opening the $130 million John Paul Jones Arena for its first men’s basketball game November 12 against No. 10 ranked Arizona. Bright orange t-shirts lined every seat and the opening video broadcast on the high-res jumboscreens had a digitized Cav Man vanquish a villainous Wildcat, with cameos from Head Coach Dave Leitao and namesake John Paul Jones.

But for the first half of the game, the welcoming fanfare far outperformed the unranked basketball team. Though the sold-out crowd was raucous during the opening minutes, Arizona deflated the onlookers’ energy by climbing to a 19-point lead. Leitao did some yelling, both at his players and the refs, and All-ACC point guard Sean Singletary was able to trim that deficit with back-to-back three pointers. Still, the Cavaliers retreated to the locker room down 49-36.

They returned rejuvenated, more patient on both offense and defense, and thanks to lights-out shooting from Mamadi Diane (he hit 5 of 6 three-point attempts) and workhorse regularity from Singletary (who played all but three minutes of the game, despite cramps), UVA tied Arizona with 11 minutes to play. They finally took the lead on a Diane three at the 5:42 mark and kept it down the stretch, winning 93-90 after the Wildcats missed an open three at the buzzer.

he crowd played its part in the comeback. One of the touted design features is a surprising intimacy for a building that seats 15,219, brought largely by steep inclines that get the upper deck closer to the action. The proximity perhaps helped: The crowd erupted after each big play, cried “Buuull-shiiit” after a bad foul call and were pin-drop silent when the home team attempted free throws. Even the oldtimers were on their feet for the final minutes of play.

“Tremendous, tremendous,” said Leitao of the atmosphere. “Not being able to even hear yourself think.”

“It’s a great building here,” said Lute Olsen, the wizened Arizona coach, already a member of the Naismith Hall of Fame. “There’s no doubt [the crowd] helped Virginia get back into it.”

In an earlier game, the women’s basketball team won as well, beating Old Dominion 92-72.

Categories
News

More student housing south of city

The final site plan for a 300-unit residential development off Sunset Avenue, just south of I-64 on the western side of Charlottesville, has been approved by the County Planning Commission at their November 7 meeting. Developed by Athens, Georgia based Dovetail Companies, the “Woodlands” will bring more student housing to the outskirts of Charlottesville, joining Eagles Landing, Jefferson Ridge and College Park.

Woodlands’ preliminary site plan came before the Planning Commission in January because residents of the neighboring Sherwood Manor subdivision, downhill from the site, were concerned about drainage, sighting and lighting issues. But Woodlands’ engineers appear to have answered those concerns as Gary Leavel, president of the Sherwood Manor Homeowner’s Association, now endorses the project.

“We have found a few things that convinced us that the stormwater management issue would work itself out,” Leavel said at the meeting.

Not everyone’s concerns have been addressed. “It’s just more frustration for us,” says John Santoski, president of the Fry’s Spring Neighborhood Association. “One of the issues has been that these developments are taking place in the county but yet all that traffic comes through the Fry’s Spring Neighborhood.” He says his group plans to meet with the Jefferson Park Avenue Neighborhood and City officials to discuss the possibility of closing Old Lynchburg Road until some of the connector roads are built in the county.

Valerie Long, the local attorney representing the Woodlands development, says that they hope to break ground in three weeks and finish in time to be available to students next August. Dovetail Development has other “Woodlands” in the college towns where University of Georgia, Georgia Southern University, Texas A&M, Clemson University and University of Tennessee are located.

“The units are very high-end, they have a wonderful amenities package,” says Long. “They have a clubhouse in every one of their communities with a very nice endless pool, volleyball courts, basketball courts, tanning beds, saunas—they have even an office center.”

Long says they don’t plan to rent the units. “[The developers] tell me their most typical investors are the parents of students,” says Long. “They also have a lot of alumni who buy the units for coming back to football games, coming back to reunion weekends, just coming back to Charlottesville.”

Categories
News

Parking lot on sale for $2.4 million

The parking lot west of the former C&O railroad station building at 600 E. Water St. is for sale. The asking price for less than a third of an acre? $2.4 million, or roughly $200 per square foot. And that’s just the parking lot, not the former station.

“It’s an excellent spot for a mixed-use development, which is precisely what the City is looking for,” says Bob Kahn, whose realty company is brokering the lot’s sale. He describes the “infill” possibilities, with first floor retail and high-end condos or apartments above. “The city is in desperate need of true ‘class A’ space Downtown.”

“Water Street is a very very hot area right now,” Kahn says. “It’s going to be one of the finest addresses Downtown for residential and office environments, and the opportunity to be on Water Street with infill development is quite unique.” He notes that top-floor condos (or apartments, depending on what the developer wants to do) would have excellent views of both the mountains and the urban landscape of the Mall.

Water Street’s newfound desirability, along with zoning that allows for nine-storeys, presumably justifies the asking price. The City Assessor’s Office values the entire 0.829 acre property, including both former station and parking lot, at $1,051,200, or $29 per square foot. By that math, the lot would be worth $350,000, though City assessments are almost always lower than selling prices.

Neil Sansovich, who owns the property (including the former railroad station), justifies the price by comparing it to the per-unit cost of County development, with its larger demands of land and infrastructure. The Downtown zoning on the lot allows 87 residential units per acre, and up to 200 with a special-use permit.

Kahn says that the shape of the lot, which narrows towards its eastern boundary, could make for creative architecture. “We see it as Charlottesville’s version of the Flatiron Building in Manhattan. It could have just wonderful architectural features. Of course, that’s up to the developer. We’re merely selling the land and creating a palate for an architect and developer’s creation.

Categories
News

Virginia passes marriage amendment

It’s hard to say that either the House race or the Senate race was a surprise. Last minute polls had Virgil Goode far ahead of Al Weed and Jim Webb slightly ahead of George Allen. But the constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and any civil union was passed by a far greater margin, 57 to 43 percent, than the latest Mason-Dixon Poll had suggested. That poll had 49 percent for the amendment, 45 percent against and 6 percent undecided, according to The Daily Progress.

The amendment results were the only ones that caused “mild surprise” for Keith Drake, chairman of the Albemarle County Republicans. Though he had expected it to pass, he had expected the gap to be slimmer than it was. At the Republican’s election night party at Club Rio, Drake spoke early in jubilation to a momentarily excited crowd (otherwise pensively watching monitors and sipping dollar beers) that marriage is now protected from “liberal judges” who would “legislate from the bench.”

Why wasn’t the voting closer, as the polls suggested it would be?

“When you’re looking at ballot initiative and ballot measures, polls are often a little bit less accurate than your actual candidate versus candidate horse race,” says Matt Smyth, director of communications at UVA’s Center for Politics. He says that national issues led to crossing-the-aisle votes in the Senate race, but “when you focused things back on Virginia, the sort of natural trends they would have as more moderate, somewhat conservative voters came through.” Smyth notes that Virginia was close for a Southern state, where those amendments often pass with “possibly more than a 20 point split.”

In the end, Virginia could not muster the votes to become the first state not to pass an amendment “defining” marriage as between “one man and one woman” when offered the choice. Instead, Arizona took those accolades in a tight race—a fact that Smyth says might be a trend, either regionally or state-by-state, in 2008.

Charlottesville, at least, stands apart: Of all Virginia localities, it had the highest percentage voting against the amendment with 77 percent (the next highest was Arlington County, with 74 percent voting “no”). “I know Mayor [David] Brown is happy about that,” says City spokesman Ric Barrack. City Council passed a unanimous resolution against the amendment on the eve of the election at their November 6 meeting. In Albemarle County, 59 percent of poll-goers voted against the amendment.

No one quite knows if and when the unintended consequences that have worried opponents might rise to the fore, but one thing that’s certain is that we haven’t heard the last of ballot measure No. 1 in Virginia.

Categories
News

Virginia turnout sets midterm record

Despite glum weather and crowded polling stations, local voter turnout was significantly stronger than in the midterm election of 2002. Albemarle saw 59 percent voter turnout, up 14 percent, while Charlottesville had a respectable 50 percent turnout, up 11 percent.
Nationwide, voter turnout for a midterm election hit its highest mark since 1982, with 40.4 percent turnout, and set a record here in Virginia, where statewide 43.7 percent of registered voters cast a ballot, according to the nonpartisan Center for the Study of the American Electorate at American University.

“Certainly that energy that was seen nationwide was seen here in Albemarle as well,” says Lee Catlin, County spokesperson. City spokesman Ric Barrack says he was pleased, but that City officials had hoped that turnout would be closer to 55 percent.

Despite some Associated Press reports of malicious calls (threatening some voters they could go to jail if they voted) and negative leafleting designed to discourage voters elsewhere in the state, neither County nor City had reports of such problems.
“We only had good news problems,” says Catlin, such as parking and traffic. Barrack echoed similar sentiments.

Sheri Iachetta, general registrar for the City, says of the election: “We were just as pleased as we could be.” The only other issue she found, beyond the long lines, was that some precincts got a slightly later start because vendors bringing the newly tested electronic poll books got lost. The poll books on the whole saved time, however, as it allowed on-site poll workers to find the proper precinct for confused voters. “The election officials loved it,” Iachetta says.

The official vote has been sent to the State, which will certify the results November 28.

Recent Registration and Turnout
            Locality             Registered    Total Voters    Turnout
2002    Albemarle         54,128          24,518           45%
            Charlottesville   22,104          8,700             39%

2004    Albemarle         58,479          43,884           75%
            Charlottesville   23,373         15,634            67%

2006    Albemarle         60,934         36,063            59%
            Charlottesville   23,564         11,849            50%

2006 Election Results
       
House of Rep.

                                     Charlottesville             Albemarle
       
        Candidate               Votes    Percentage        Votes       Percentage
       
        Al Weed (D)            8,824    74.6%              19,560    54.4%
        Virgil Goode (R)       2,880    24.4%              16,106    44.7%
        Joseph Otto (I)        102       0.9%                318         0.9%
        Write Ins                 21         0.2%                28           0.1%
       
Senate

        Jim Webb (D)           9,159    77.3%               20,821    57.5%
        George Allen (R)       2,575    21.7%               15,048    41.6%
        Gail Parker (I)               99     0.8%                      293     0.8%
        Write Ins                      19     0.2%                        36     0.1%
       
Marriage Amendment

         No                           8,949    77.0%                20,979    58.6%
         Yes                          2,670    23.0%                14,796    41.4%

Sources: Virginia State Board of Elections; City and County Departments of Voter Registration and Elections

Categories
News

Program fights to maintain rural land

In its efforts to preserve rural areas, the County’s Board of Supervisors hasn’t managed to impose restrictions on development rights, known as “phasing.” Yet it has managed to preserve 3,776 acres in the last four years through the Acquisition of Conservation Easements (ACE) program.

Conservation easements overlay certain restrictions on land with the idea of preserving it the way it is. The ACE program, funded mostly by County property taxes, buys conservation easements from those with agricultural or forested land who don’t want to develop it (or sell it to those who would). With an annual budget of roughly $1.4 million, the program aims to preserve 1,000 acres per year.

Already in place are federal and State tax incentives for residents who want to put their land under conservation easements. But because many of these tax incentives have historically worked best for the wealthy, the ACE program is aimed at the “landowner of modest means” who is cash poor but land rich, according to ACE administrator Ches Goodall.

“Frankly, there are properties out there that have been protected through the ACE program that simply would not have been protected if the ACE program didn’t exist,” says Rex Linville, land conservation officer for Piedmont Environmental Council (PEC). “So it’s really filling a need.”

Applications came due October 31, and merely eight were submitted. Goodall says that number is typical and that three-fourths are usually accepted. Over four years, the ACE program has eliminated 258 development rights (roughly the average number of building permits issued in the rural areas each year).

Linville’s only criticism is the length of time the program takes. He estimates that between submitting an application and receiving money for the easement, a landowner would have to wait 12 to 18 months.

Neil Williamson of Free Enterprise Forum thinks the public should weigh in on whether the ACE program deserves more or less funding. “It’s amazing to me that a program that spends $1 million a year has never been up for an independent public hearing,” says Williamson. He also thinks the ACE program’s scoring system, which rewards landowners with lower income levels, should be rejiggered so that “the best lands available” are prioritized instead.

Already, 62,000 of 465,040 county acres are protected under conservation easements, according to PEC.