Categories
News

Nelson sheriff candidate indicted for election fraud

William Everette “Billy” Mays, the Nelson sheriff’s office investigator who led the Alexis Murphy missing teen case, was indicted on two counts of election fraud November 24. Mays ran for sheriff and lost to David Hill in the November election. Both men were the subjects of Virginia State Police investigations after a private citizen complained that neither lived in Nelson County.

According to a release by Charlottesville Commonwealth’s Attorney Dave Chapman, named special prosecutor in the case, the state police investigation determined that sheriff-elect Hill did reside in the county and no charges were brought against him.

A grand jury indicted Mays for a felony count of making a false statement on an election form and a misdemeanor charge of willful neglect of election laws duties. He’s scheduled to appear in court January 21.

Similar charges were lodged in 2011 against Charlottesville City Council candidate James Halfaday, who resided in Albemarle County when he ran for office in the city. Halfaday was charged with four felony counts, pleaded guilty to one and served 60 days in jail.

Categories
News

The Weiner factor: How one case derailed Denise Lunsford

Unlike Charlottesville, where it was a given that Democratic candidates for City Council would win, Albemarle had several contested races, including two for board of supervisors and four candidates vying for clerk of court. But the race everyone was watching: Whether Commonwealth’s Attorney Denise Lunsford could hold onto her seat for a third term against challenger Robert Tracci.

When Lunsford ousted her predecessor, Jim Camblos, in 2007, former Albemarle supervisor and commonwealth’s attorney Lindsay Dorrier observed, “It’s hard not to make enemies in that job.” Camblos, who was seeking a fifth term, was blasted for the “smoke bomb” plot, in which four students were held in detention for months for allegedly planning to bomb a high school—even though some of them didn’t know each other and the evidence was meager.

Ironically, eight years later, another notorious case was on voters’ minds when they headed to the polls November 3 and repeated the ouster of an incumbent.

For Lunsford, the Mark Weiner case became the bête noire of her reelection efforts. Weiner, who was held in jail for two and a half years before his abduction conviction was vacated in July, became a national news story, and it was the issue Lunsford could not escape in her campaign. The weekend before the election, she accused Tracci of focusing solely on that case and threatened legal action for an ad that had Weiner’s sister saying Lunsford “withheld evidence” that would have cleared her brother.

“It was one factor in the race,” says Tracci. “For many people it was emblematic.” Tracci says he spoke to Lunsford the morning after the election and they both pledge a smooth and orderly transition. “I want to be as positive as I can going forward.”

However, he acknowledges that it was a contested race and Mark Weiner was a factor. “I do know the support I received was bipartisan,” he says. Lunsford did not return a phone call from C-VILLE.

Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Jon Zug, a Democrat who works for Lunsford, swept to victory with just more than 50 percent in the clerk’s race, unseating incumbent Debbie Shipp. From knocking on doors and being out in the community, he says, “To many, Mark Wiener was a huge issue, the result of statements Mr. [Steve] Benjamin [Weiner’s lawyer] made and reporting by your organization.”

Says Zug, “The impression that Denise intentionally withheld evidence—that is inaccurate. It’s exceedingly troubling to me that Denise Lunsford is being pilloried.” Zug blames Weiner’s original lawyer for not subpoenaing witnesses, and says, “Denise was adhering to the rules of evidence and she’s being faulted for it.”

Norman Dill, a Democrat who narrowly defeated Republican Richard Lloyd by 116 votes for the Rivanna District seat on the Board of Supervisors, says Weiner was a major factor in the prosecutor’s race. “It’s a complicated issue and hard for people to understand,” he says. “It’s easy to blame her, but it’s one case out of thousands she tried. I was disappointed she lost. I think she’s extremely well qualified.”

Scottsville Dem Rick Randolph, in the winner’s circle in that district’s Board of Supervisors race over Republican Earl Smith, says in conversations with the county’s police chief and sheriff, he never heard any issues with Lunsford’s “prosecutorial ability and ethics.” Says Randolph, “To extrapolate from one case over one’s body of work is very suspect.”

Upcoming for Tracci, a former special assistant U.S. attorney, is the high-profile capital murder case for Jesse Matthew for the death of UVA student Hannah Graham, as well as murder and abduction charges for the slaying of Virginia Tech student Morgan Harrington. In light of Matthew’s three life sentences for a 2005 brutal assault in Fairfax, legal expert David Heilberg is dubious that Matthew will go to trial.

“Albemarle is not a community that overwhelmingly craves a death penalty though individual opinions might differ,” he writes in an e-mail. “The cost to taxpayers seems wasteful where Matthews most likely will agree to multiple life sentences without an expensive capital trial or years of appeals.” Matthew has a pretrial hearing November 10 leading up to the trial scheduled for July 2016.

Another issue for the commonwealth’s attorney’s office, which will lose both Lunsford and Zug January 1, is whether Tracci will keep the current staff, which appeared on a couple of Lunsford campaign mailings. “Mr. Tracci could retain all, some or none,” says Heilberg.

Tracci says he plans to meet with with each of the prosecutors  to see what they bring to the office. “Also there’s something to be said for a measure of continuity,” he says.

“The law is nonpartisan,” he stresses. “The position is elected, but it should not be political.” And he reiterates his main campaign issue: “The duty of a prosecutor is to seek justice.”

 

Categories
News

Upsets in Albemarle constitutional races

Incumbent Albemarle Commonwealth’s Attorney Denise Lunsford lost to Republican challenger Robert Tracci by 515 votes in a closely watched race, while other county Democratic candidates sailed to victory. Lunsford received nearly 49 percent of the vote to Tracci’s 51 percent.

Another constitutional officer, incumbent Clerk of Court Debbie Shipp, running as an independent, lost by an even bigger margin. Shipp took 26 percent of the vote in a four-way race, with Dem Jon Zug claiming 50 percent of the ballots cast.

In the Albemarle Board of Supervisors Rivanna District race, Norman Dill narrowly defeated Richard Lloyd. Democrat Dill took 48 percent of the vote to Republican Lloyd’s nearly 46 percent, and independent Lawrence Gaughan received 6 percent.

In the Scottsville District, Dem Rick Randolph bested Republican Earl Smith with 57 percent of the vote.

In the Charlottesville City Council race, unsurprisingly the Democratic ticket with Wes Bellamy, Kathy Galvin and Mike Signer swept to victory.

For more election 2015 results, check the Virginia Department of Elections.

 

 

 

Categories
News

Down to the wire: Lunsford threatens lawsuit over Tracci ad

 

The week before the election, the Albemarle County commonwealth’s attorney race exploded with lawsuits, threats of suits and last-minute retorts in ads between the campaigns of incumbent Denise Lunsford and challenger Robert Tracci.

“The good news is that we have some excitement in local races,” says Richmond Sunlight creator and longtime local political observer Waldo Jaquith.

First was the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by a Richmond attorney October 29.

On October 30, the Schilling Show reports that a Lunsford television ad uses images of Albemarle police officers, including Colonel Steve Sellers, without their consent and implying their endorsement. That ad is edited to include the text “no endorsement implied or intended.”

That same day, Lunsford’s campaign manager,  Thomas Cross, writes Tracci to demand that a television ad be pulled for a “false and defamatory statement” that Lunsford “intentionally” withheld evidence that exonerated Mark Weiner, who spent two and a half years in jail before his conviction for abduction was set aside. The letter also notes that Lunsford has retained powerhouse law firm McGuireWoods in the event Tracci does not edit or remove the ad.

Undeterred, Tracci campaign manager John Darden fires back October 31 with a missive pointing to widespread media coverage of the Weiner case, including excerpts from Slate and C-VILLE, which detail how Lunsford successfully kept out testimony about cell towers that Weiner supporters believe would have demonstrated the woman who accused him of abduction was likely at her mother’s home rather than in the abandoned house where she claimed Weiner had taken her. Darden says Lunsford’s claims are without legal merit and an attempt to stifle public debate.

By November 1, Lunsford releases another ad that accuses Tracci of basing his campaign on a single case—presumably Weiner—and running a “false and defamatory” ad that disregards a court record that affirms her actions in the case. And she points out that Tracci has never been lead counsel in a felony trial.

“It’s not just one case, Ms. Lunsford” declares the November 2 press release from Camp Tracci, which says although it might just be one case for Lunsford, it was much more to Weiner, who lost his freedom, home, savings and time with his family.

Jaquith says he’s not seen the threat of a defamation suit in local elections in the past 20 years. “What’s unusual in the commonwealth’s attorney race is that they’re both attorneys,” he says. “I wonder if the threats of legal action bolster one’s credibility as an attorney.” But to many voters, he says, “I have to imagine at this point it seems like a silly spat.”

If Tracci’s point is to raise concerns about Lunsford, says Jaquith, he’s been successful. “If you want to run for reelection as the steady hand, having all this chaos thrown in the final days of the campaign” is not helpful, he says.

Tracci says he had nothing to do with the FOIA lawsuit, the timing of which looks suspect, says Jaquith, who predicts that the lawsuit will disappear after the election.

Will the last-minute attack ads sway voters? “With a local, low turnout election,” says Jaquith, “the actual number who can be influenced is quite small.”

C-VILLE goes to press November 3 before election results will be in.

Categories
News

October surprise: Lunsford faces lawsuit over FOIA request

Albemarle Commonwealth’s Attorney Denise Lunsford, in a hotly contested race for reelection, faced additional heat October 29 when Richmond attorney Matthew Hardin filed a lawsuit against her for creating a “barrier to transparency” in her response to a Freedom of Information Act request issued earlier this week.

The FOIA request asked for information on Lunsford’s credit card usage, reimbursements she received from the county and correspondence about convicted former supervisor Chris Dumler, overturned abduction-conviction defendant Mark Weiner and Albemarle police officer James Larkin during the period of January 2012 and December 2013.

“We were curious whether she paid for [personal business] trips on personal funds or with taxpayer money. Of course correspondence was requested to see what standards her office was using as regards more controversial cases,” Hardin explains.

Lunsford responded by saying she would need $3,200, as well as five additional weeks to produce the requested documents.

“It’s an incredibly high number and it impedes access to the records,” Hardin says. “It’s more than an average Charlottesville citizen pays for health insurance.”

Hardin acknowledges that Lunsford is allowed to charge a reasonable fee in response to the request, but says that by insisting on reviewing the records herself, Lunsford unnecessarily increased the fee.

“She’s the highest paid employee in the office,” he says, “We believe that her assistant commonwealth’s attorneys could review these at a much lower cost and we believe when that’s available, that’s what the law requires.”

Alan Gernhardt, staff attorney at the Virginia Freedom of Information Advisory Council, says the costs do not surprise him and that he has seen similar fees in the past. Gernhardt specifies that depending on what the search involves, Lunsford’s $3,200 could be a reasonable amount to charge.

“There’s tons of practical and technological questions involved,” Gernhardt says, “Just searching through the mass volume of e-mails can be time consuming.”

Gernhardt adds that the time delay also is not surprising and it’s “not out of the realm of possibility” that Lunsford would require that amount of time to retrieve all of the records.

Hardin stresses that he’s not trying to cause trouble for Lunsford. “It might turn out that everything she’s done is completely correct and honest and I hope that that’s the case,” Hardin says, “but the problem is that without the records I can’t tell.”

The lawsuit falls at an inconvenient time for Lunsford, who runs for reelection November 3. Hardin, who filed the lawsuit on behalf of Tyler Pieron, denies any political motivation in the requests.

“We’re not interested in the elections,” Hardin says, “I will happily drop the lawsuit if the records are produced in a reasonable way at a reasonable time.”

Denise Lunsford did not respond to CVILLE’s e-mail requesting comment, but in other media accounts, she has called the lawsuit “politically motivated.”