Categories
News

‘You are not alone in this:’ Inside a local abortion clinic

By Sydney Halleman

The waiting room of Whole Woman’s Health mimics that of a spa foyer. A selection of organic herbal teas lies on a back table, amid an array of fitness and mindfulness magazines. On the wall is a quote from Georgia O’Keeffe, in pale purple: “I’ve been absolutely terrified every moment of my life—and I’ve never let it keep me from doing a single thing I wanted to do.”

It’s not what you might imagine an abortion clinic would look like. But the positive, relaxing atmosphere is part of the larger organization’s mission—to end the stigma around terminating a pregnancy.

Today, the nonprofit has taken its pledge one step further. As a growing number of states attempts to outlaw abortion, the Charlottesville clinic has opened its doors to the community, inviting the public to take a walk-through of the facility.

Besides the staff, I’m the only one here.

“Our goal is for you to see what it’s like to be a patient here,” says Sean Mehl, the clinic director. Though I’m only here for a tour, I’m a bit nervous.

If you’ve heard of Whole Woman’s Health before, it’s likely because they were the plaintiffs in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision challenging abortion restrictions in Texas. In Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, in 2016, the court found that a Texas law that required abortion clinics to meet the same regulatory standards as ambulatory surgical centers, causing clinics throughout the state to close, created an undue burden on those seeking abortions.

CEO Amy Hagstrom Miller now lives in Charlottesville (C-VILLE ran a profile of her last fall), and Whole Woman’s Health has filed litigation against abortion restrictions in Virginia and Illinois.

The proactive fight for abortion rights seems far away from the waiting room, where I’m suddenly feeling much more relaxed—maybe from the light instrumental music that has started to play in the background.

“Women are walking in expecting to be judged,” Mehl says, leading me down a hallway. “A patient should expect a much higher level of care.”

Mehl and Jessica Shein, another staff member, show me to the sonogram room, which looks more like a doctor’s office. Virginia law requires an ultrasound before an abortion, something Mehl says is “definitely not necessary in most cases,” and could potentially make the patient uncomfortable. Yet the serene atmosphere of the waiting room has clearly been designed to carry through to this room, which has its own inspirational quote (Tracee Ellis Ross: “I am learning every day to allow the space between where I am and where I want to be to inspire me and not terrify me”).

Next door are two small counseling rooms. The staff hopes to make the state-mandated counseling sessions soothing to the patient. “We want to reinforce that what they’re feeling is normal,” Mehl says. But they’re required to repeat the potential risks of abortion complications (though the complication rate is less than 1 percent), as well as give patients information about abortion alternatives. “It’s another way to throw that information at them in hopes that they’ll change their mind,” Mehl says.

Patients are required to wait 24 hours between the counseling session and their procedure, as long as the patient lives within 100 miles of the provider. That means a woman who lives, say, an hour and a half away from the nearest clinic must either go back home between visits or stay overnight near her clinic. These are the restrictions Whole Woman’s Health is fighting in Virginia, in the class action lawsuit Falls Church Healthcare Center et al v. Norman Oliver.

Mehl and Shein then take me to the procedure room. I’m not quite sure what to expect. I know almost nothing about the medical side of abortions. The room is, well, normal. It’s the same size as the sonogram room, with the same shade of purple on the walls. I notice some medical equipment and Mehl unwraps blue paper, showing me metal tube-like rods on the inside. I learn that this equipment is used to dilate the cervix.

“There’s no incision in the procedure,” Mehl says as he re-wraps the equipment. “That’s a common misconception.”

Finally, Mehl and Shein show me the aspirator, which removes the pregnancy. It’s small and flimsy looking. Surprisingly not intimidating, it’s not even as big as my forearm. There’s a lever. It’s made of plastic.

“A woman came up here on a tour once,” Shein tells me later. “And once she saw the simplicity inside the procedure room, she said, ‘Is this what everyone is fighting over?’”

The last stop on the tour is the recovery room. There are huge leather recliners, a giant picture of Audrey Hepburn, and a Frida Kahlo quote on the wall. More tea sits on a coffee table, blended and mixed by the CEO herself.

“The blend is supposed to help with uterine contractions,” Shein tells me. Blankets lie on each chair.

As I sit in the recliner, imagining the women who sit in this room after a procedure, Shein hands me a small notebook. Inside are pages upon pages of notes written by patients who have recovered in this room. The words are meant to encourage those women who come after them.

“You made the right choice for you,” one page reads. “You are not alone in this.”

Categories
News

Planned Parenthood Project detours in Charlottesville

The McIntire Amphitheater was lined with pink crosses October 7 as the Planned Parenthood Project, an organization dedicated to defunding the 98-year-old reproductive health services organization, held an informational session with students about abortion and women’s health. The crosses, totaling 897, were symbolic of the number of abortions that the group claims Planned Parenthood performs every day.

Michele Hendrickson, a regional coordinator for the Planned Parenthood Project and a member of Students for Life of America, explains that the project is traveling around the United States by bus, stopping at college campuses to inform students about the statistics surrounding abortion at Planned Parenthood and to encourage them to choose other healthcare options.

Hendrickson notes that there are “…thousands of federally qualified health centers out there that do not commit abortions. They don’t sell abortions or profit over abortions at all.”

Ann Clare Levy, a second year student at UVA and a member of Hoos for Life, firmly agrees in supporting other healthcare centers, such as the Pregnancy Centers in Charlottesville, calling Planned Parenthood’s treatment of women “misleading.”

“Ninety-four percent of women who go into Planned Parenthood who are pregnant get an abortion,” Levy says, “That’s not a choice to me. That is a very biased push toward abortion and that’s because Planned Parenthood makes a profit off of it.”

Allegations that Planned Parenthood profits off of abortions are unconfirmed, but many anti-abortion advocates note the high cost of abortions as an indicator that abortion is a large source of revenue for the healthcare provider.

A fact sheet on Planned Parenthood’s website tells a different story about the abortion services it provides, stating that abortions account for only three percent of their services. Out of a total of 10.6 million, that amounts to 327,653 abortion procedures a year. However, the organization does not provide information on the total number of pregnant women who seek out services at Planned Parenthood, making it hard to prove or disprove Levy’s statistic. Planned Parenthood did not return multiple phone calls.

Although abortion is a controversial issue, Levy and Hendrickson both report having mostly positive interactions with students, and Levy even calls the students at UVA “a pro-life generation.”

“The conversations have been great,” Hendrickson concurs. “Even when we can agree to disagree on abortion… because it’s really not even about that today. Students are kind of seeing Planned Parenthood in a new light and they’re open to hearing all of these facts about Planned Parenthood.”

Despite Levy and Hendrickson’s positive attitude on the event, third-year student Molly Sall calls the activist group “deceptive,” condemning the facts used by the project.

“I think it’s very unfortunate,” Sall says, “that they’ve taken what are essentially just totally false facts and blown them up on a big banner with a fancy font.”

Sall also expresses confusion over why students at UVA would be affected by the project’s message when college campuses are primarily liberal environments.

“People are just walking by,” she says. “People don’t particularly care. The ratio of work that went into this event versus turnout is pretty dismal and I think that’s a really good indication of how people our age tend to feel about this issue.”