Categories
News

Free Union fray: Appeals board upholds rural business

Close to 100 of the landed gentry filled Lane Auditorium for an Albemarle Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, a crowd size rarely seen during the usual Board of Supervisors meetings there.

Well-heeled rural residents lined up for and against a Free Union Road business, lobbing accusations of “Californian,” “cronyism,” and “sleight of hand” in a June 4 hearing to determine whether Hilliard Estate and Land Management is a landscape company—forbidden commercial activity in the rural area—or one that provides agricultural services, which is allowed.

Former Tupperware CEO Rick Goings lives at Eagle Hill Farm, an estate once owned by Scripps heiress Betty Scripps. Across the street is a 217-acre parcel owned by Mary Scott and John “J.B.” Birdsall, who serves on the boards of Piedmont Environmental Council and the Thomas Jefferson Foundation, which owns Monticello.

The Birdsalls leased the property to Carter Hilliard and company. Goings, his wife Susan, and a dozen neighbors contend the bulk of Hilliard’s business is landscaping, and they complain they weren’t notified Albemarle had allowed commercial activity. The land also is in a conservation easement.

The county determined that Hilliard’s business provides agricultural services, such as fencing, vineyard trellising, planting, and burning, a by-right use, and confirmed that in a July 26, 2018, letter. By-right activity does not require neighbor notification. And the Virginia Outdoors Foundation, which holds the conservation easement, confirms that ag services are allowed under the easement.

Hilliard says his company acts as a farm manager for large and midsize farms, providing the equipment that wouldn’t be cost-effective for them to buy. He got a permit to build a 4,500-square-foot storage barn in November, and in January, the complaints began.

Then-zoning administrator Amelia McCulley, now deputy director of community development, investigated, and in a February 14 letter, said she stood by her original determination that Hilliard’s business was not in violation of county ordinances.

But the Goings appealed that decision, and at the June 4 meeting, both sides had lawyered up. Eleven of the 16 speakers were there in support of Hilliard, including Stuart and Ali King of King Family Vineyards. Buddy-from-college Stuart said he’d borrowed equipment from Hilliard to use at the vineyards on “many occasions.”

Andrew Baldwin, who owns Piedmont Place in Crozet and who built million-dollar condo project 550 Water, said he was founder of eco-development Bundoran Farm, where Hilliard does maintenance. Baldwin called the appeal “ridiculous.”

Susan Goings said she and her husband had been accused of being “Californians” for complaining about Hilliard. She told the board she cared about open-space protection, and had contributed $20,000 to the Birdsall and Hilliards’ lawsuit against Foxfield to prevent the sale of the 179-acre racetrack.

The county’s July 2018 letter of determination said Hilliard could perform landscaping services as an incidental use. Goings reported multiple lawn mowers and weed trimmers, which she said she didn’t see at her grandfather’s farm.

And she referred to high-end catalog Scout, where last year HELM advertised landscaping services, while this year “all the landscaping equipment is gone.” She also said the company had changed its website so that the landscaping services that were prominent a year ago are absent, and the focus is estate management.

“They’re trying to use some fancy language to call it something else, but if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it is a duck,” she said.

McCulley said in the Goings appeal of her decision, the burden was on them to prove their “irrelevant or unsubstantiated claims.”

Assistant county attorney Rich DeLoria reiterated that McCulley’s original go-ahead allowed some landscaping, and that the Goings had 30 days to appeal—and missed that deadline.

David Thomas, the lawyer for the Goings, suggested McCulley had been misled by Hilliard, and the county took his word about the nature of his business without demanding financial information about the sources of his revenue. He also alleged that when the county did an inspection, Hilliard was notified in advance.

Not true, said McCulley, who also said it was “very rare” to ask for financial information.

“If Mr. Hilliard wanted to hide, he’d never have gone to the zoning administrator in the first place,” said DeLoria. “The appellant is calling him and the zoning administrator liars.”

New Board of Zoning Appeals member Marcia Joseph described the situation as a “he said, she said.” But she came back to McCulley’s original letter, which allowed landscaping as a secondary use.

Former Albemarle sheriff Ed Robb, also on the BZA, said, “We look at the facts,” in particular, that the Goings had 30 days to appeal the 2018 determination, and hadn’t.

“This is a messy business,” said appeals board member David Bowerman, who once served on the Board of Supervisors. He voted to support McCulley’s determination, as did the rest of the board.

The 4-0 vote was followed by applause.

After, Hilliard said he appreciated the board’s decision “as I went through the proper channels to do business in Albemarle County.”

“I was shocked,” says Susan Goings. “We’re very concerned about the precedent, not just for Free Union, but for Albemarle County. It seems like a cronyism system.”

“They’re trying to use some fancy language to call it something else, but If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it is a duck.” Susan Goings

Categories
News

Space issue: Rescue squad sues city over variance

The Charlottesville-Albemarle Rescue Squad hopes to increase the size of its building, which has been nestled on McIntire Road since 1964, to give volunteers more space to meet and make it possible to accommodate the increasing size of emergency vehicles.

“The trucks don’t fit,” says Chief Dayton Haugh. “It’s 2015.”

In May, CARS submitted an application to the Board of Zoning Appeals to request an increase of the maximum building height from 35′ to 45′ and a variance from the building setback to make several modifications including demolishing the north wing of the structure and rebuilding a five-bay garage with two stories of added space above it.

In recent years, Haugh says the number of volunteers has doubled to about 200. Vehicles the squad owns have nearly quadrupled, and the rescuers have to have somewhere to keep all of the ambulances, trucks and boats.

Members of the Board of Zoning Appeals granted a variance to CARS, however not the total amount of requested space (the proposed side and rear setbacks were granted, but the front setback going from 25′ to 0′ was set at 5′, and the building height was set at 40′). The board ruled that Mary Joy Scala, secretary to the city’s Entrance Corridor Review Board, must review and approve any future modifications.

CARS sits beside, but not within, an entrance corridor overlay district. In the petition for an appeal of the BZA’s variance decision, the volunteer rescuers say the board lacks the power and legal authority to designate petitioners’ property as a part of the entrance corridor and they maintain the board erroneously applied the law and imposed corridor design review obligations on city staff not authorized to perform them.

Read Brodhead, secretary of the BZA, says he can’t discuss pending litigation. (C-VILLE co-owner Bill Chapman is also a BZA board member.) Because the board is appointed by the city, CARS filed suit against the city.

According to Haugh, once the BZA approved the variance June 18, CARS appealed the ruling and the case went “to the back burner for a couple months,” he says. Deputy City Attorney Lisa Robertson says she cannot discuss the matter and a court date has not been set.

“We’re waiting to see if we can reach some sort of agreement with the city and we probably can do that,” Haugh says. “And then we can all dismiss this suit.”

The rescue squad is in a residentially zoned area, which is intended primarily for single-family use. In the suit, the city says CARS’ current use of the property is not permitted under the zoning ordinance, but also says the board’s ruling “was not within the authority of the BZA and was otherwise not appropriate,” adding that the board has no authority to grant a variance of setback or building height regulations or to authorize the expansion of a nonconforming structure.

The biggest issue with reaching a settlement, Haugh says, will be the city’s stance on nonconforming use.