Categories
News

Tactical change: Not your grandpa’s protest

In images from the civil rights movement of the 1950s and ’60s, African-Americans in their Sunday best peacefully protested, and when violence occurred, it came from police or from virulent racists.

Those are not the optics of today’s demonstrations.

Instead, protesters knock cell phones out of people’s hands, blast them with bullhorns, block filming with hands or hats and link arms to prevent passage—and that was just at the May 14 vigil in Lee Park after the Richard Spencer white nationalist crew was there the night before.

And a video circulating from May 20 shows right-wing blogger Jason Kessler with three other people sitting at a restaurant table on the Downtown Mall, surrounded by a dozen or so people shouting, “Nazis go home” and ordering them to leave.

“You don’t get to dictate who comes in or out,” said a police officer responding to the scene.

“White supremacists should not be allowed to move quietly in public spaces,” says Pam Starsia with Showing Up for Racial Justice, which has been active in confronting Confederate memorial supporters and the alt-right—although Starsia says she’s speaking only for herself, not for SURJ.

In sharp contrast to the 1920s, when members of the Ku Klux Klan met secretly in the dark wearing white hoods, yet passed by day in polite society, she says, the strategy now is to disrupt and “to loudly call out white supremacists in public spaces.”

And yet some local activists’ tactics straddle the line between free speech and criminal behavior.

“It’s very disturbing,” says Charlottesville Commonwealth’s Attorney Dave Chapman. The heated rhetoric leads “to an atmosphere of antagonism,” which leads to escalation. “We should all discourage behavior that stops short of criminal offenses.”

In his more than 30 years as a prosecutor, Chapman has seen a number of protests. The difference in the current crop is “the intensity and the physical confrontation accompanying it,” he says, as well as the participation of people from outside the community.

UVA professor and activist Jalane Schmidt explains the trajectory of protest tactics since the 1950s, when Martin Luther King Jr. organized a movement of “respectability politics” and was influenced by Gandhi and Henry David Thoreau’s nonviolent resistance.

That changed in the 1960s and ’70s with the Black Panthers, who wore military garb and “eschewed respectability politics,” she says. “The tactics always change with time.”

She says, “The 21st century descendants of the Klan are the alt-right. They should not be allowed to circulate anonymously in polite society.”

A May 24 press release from the anonymous Cville Solidarity suggested a laundry list of ways to resist white supremacy. “Refuse to employ, work with, serve or shop with Nazis. Refuse to sit next to them at a bar or restaurant. Refuse to let them sit peacefully in a public space,” it said.

“There’s a harassment and intimidation campaign being led by Joe and Pam Starsia,” Kessler says. Joe Starsia was in the video of the mall shouters, and activist Veronica Fitzhugh can be seen yelling in Kessler’s face, “Fucking go home. Get up and go home.”

Earlier that night, Kessler said he went to Champion Brewery and was refused service. “They violated my civil rights,” he says.

Can businesses deny service to those whose politics or philosophy they don’t like?

“Beliefs and philosophies are protected constitutionally against actions by government,” John Jeffries, former dean of UVA’s law school, writes in an email. “Private parties are free to act against unwelcome beliefs and philosophies, unless there is a statute against such discrimination.”

For Champion owner Hunter Smith, Kessler’s civil rights “didn’t cross my mind for a minute,” he says. “He assaulted someone who works for the business. It was a safety issue.”

Jay Taylor, the man whom Kessler punched on the mall January 22, frequents the brewery and does work there, says Smith.

However, in the face of demands that service be denied, Miller’s is taking a different tack after some white nationalists came there for beers following the tiki-torch assembly at Lee Park. Miller’s Scottie Kaylor calls for courtesy on Facebook and writes: “Our policy is simple: if any person or group, on either side of the political spectrum, displays an overt hatred or disrespect for others at Miller’s, they will be asked to leave.”

Arrests from protests are mounting. After the February 11 Lee Park rally that brought gubernatorial candidate Corey Stewart to town to protest City Council’s vote to remove the Robert E. Lee statue, Kessler filed charges against Sara Tansey for snatching his phone. She was charged with destruction of property and Tansey filed an assault charge against Joe Draego, claiming he grabbed her arm when he retrieved Kessler’s phone.

At the May 14 candlelight demonstration at Lee Park, Jordan McNeish was charged with disorderly conduct for allegedly spitting on Kessler, Charles Best was charged with felony assault for hitting an officer in the head with a thrown cell phone, and Kessler was charged with disorderly conduct for refusing to leave the park and inciting with a bullhorn, say police.

“Police said I wouldn’t leave the park,” says Kessler. Protesters “wouldn’t let me leave. They were blocking me. They encircled me so that I was trapped.”

“Jason Kessler barged into a peaceful space that had been created by people of color with every intention of inciting a confrontation,” says Pam Starsia. “He was the aggressor.”

In video and photographs from the May 14 event, a young man filming is encircled by people who are asking why he was filming, blocking his camera and, he says on the video, knocking his cell phone out of his hand.

Blocking people filming is a tactic that comes from a practice called “doxxing,” says Starsia, in which leftist activists are filmed and their images are put online to “encourage harassment.”

“It’s a mob tactic used online by the left and the right,” says Kessler.

Rutherford Institute founder John Whitehead compares current protests to ’60s sit-ins, where demonstrators “didn’t stop someone from free speech,” he says.

“The more I read about it, these people don’t want free speech,” he says. “You can’t block other people’s right to move on public property. These people need to grow up and respect other people’s rights.”

Is it free speech or assault?

What’s legal and what’s not in the resistance? We checked with Commonwealth’s Attorney Dave Chapman.

Slapping away a person’s cell phone: “Unwanted touching in an angry, rude or vengeful manner can constitute assault in Virginia,” says Chapman.

Invading one’s personal space: While there’s no law against trespassing in personal space, close contact and yelling in someone’s face could be disorderly conduct, says Chapman, escalating into allegations of being jostled. See unwanted touching above.

Using a bullhorn in someone’s face: Could violate the noise ordinance, and doing it aggressively in someone’s face in a way that interferes with her free speech potentially could be disorderly conduct.

Linking arms to prevent passage: If it’s restricting someone’s freedom and not letting them go, it could be abduction, says Chapman.

Categories
News

Less prosecution: Fogel announces run for commonwealth’s attorney

Attorney Jeff Fogel has been in the thick of almost every civil rights action in the city during the past decade. He sued the city for its restrictions on panhandling. He’s sued Albemarle police on behalf of plaintiffs who say they were targeted by an officer because they were black. And he’s sued Charlottesville police under the Freedom of Information Act to release stop-and-frisk records.

Now on a platform of criminal justice reform, he’s seeking the Democratic nomination for Charlottesville commonwealth’s attorney, a seat currently occupied by Dave Chapman, who says he will not seek a seventh term.

“I do this out of great concern for the criminal justice system,” said Fogel at a January 26 press conference. “We’re sending too many people to jail. It’s costing us a fortune and we’ve got too many people of color in jail.”

Citing the “incredible discretion” of the top prosecutor’s office, Fogel pledged to try to keep nonviolent people who don’t prey on others out of jail, referring them to treatment or social services when possible. He vowed to not overcharge crimes that result in felonies to get a plea bargain when they could be misdemeanors.

He said he would not prosecute marijuana possession cases and he would scrutinize all cases brought by the Jefferson Area Drug Enforcement Task Force, especially those that used informants.

And he said he’d try to avoid charging anyone with an offense that carries a mandatory minimum sentence, taking aim at the war on drugs and the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act that gave states money to build more prisons if they enacted mandatory minimum sentences. “We need to reinstitute parole,” he said.

The New York-born Fogel is a graduate of Rutgers Law School. After working for the public defender’s office and as a criminal lawyer, Fogel says he felt he could do more to impact the criminal justice system as a civil rights lawyer rather than defending one client at a time.

He’s served as the executive and legal director of the ACLU of New Jersey, the Center for Constitutional Rights legal director and taught at Rutgers and NYU law schools.

Fogel is a co-founder of a new political group, Equity and Progress in Charlottesville, that hopes to channel the enthusiasm from Senator Bernie Sanders’ run for president and work on income inequality and affordable housing.

“We’re a political organization but we’re not a political party,” said Fogel January 17 when the group debuted. It seems likely he’ll get EPIC’s endorsement.

Fogel is challenging Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Joe Platania, who has been endorsed by Chapman and seemingly much of the legal community, which turned out for his announcement in January.

“Lawyers don’t comprise that many people,” says Fogel, undeterred by Platania’s popularity with his peers. “Joe’s been here a long time. They know and like Joe, and he has a reputation as a very decent guy with a good heart. I’m not running against Joe as a personality.”

Says Platania, “Jeff has long been a tireless advocate for his clients in civil cases and I have a great deal of respect for him. I’m pleased to see that much of Jeff’s platform is already common practice locally at the Charlottesville Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office.”

The two will square off on the ballot in the June 13 Democratic primary.

FIVE FOGEL FACTS:

  • Successfully defended three prisoners charged with kidnapping in the New Jersey Rahway Prison riot in 1971, the same year as the Attica riot. 
  • Represented Rubin “Hurricane” Carter co-defendant John Artis, who spent 14 years in prison, in his second murder trial. 
  • Inspired to run for commonwealth’s attorney by Senator Jeff Sessions’ nomination as attorney general. 
  • Listed in C-VILLE’s 2015 Power Issue: “If power can be defined as the ability to give a voice to the voiceless, attorney Jeff Fogel would be yodeling at the top of the list.” 
  • Typically found on Monday nights speaking at City Council meetings.
Categories
News

Chapman passes prosecutorial torch to Platania

Charlottesville’s legal community turned out today for Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Joe Platania’s official announcement that he wants the job of his boss, Dave Chapman, who will not be seeking a seventh term.

Chapman introduced and endorsed Platania, whom he hired in the city prosecutor’s office in 2003. “It’s important to me who’s the next commonwealth’s attorney,” said Chapman, and that person should be able to “look on the face” of a lengthy murder trial and “not have knees knocking.”

The commonwealth’s attorney should be able to “walk down the mall without fear, even when you’re near people you’ve put in jail and who call you by your first name,” said Chapman.

Platania, who worked in the public defender’s office when he came to Charlottesville in 1999, stressed prosecutorial discretion. “This community demands more from its prosecutors than simply jailing those who commit crimes,” he said.

platania
Joe Platania. Staff photo

“I will strive to keep the community safe while prosecuting those who commit crimes fairly,” said Platania.

The position requires experience, integrity and innovation, along with a “common-sense perspective,” he added.

City Space was packed with Platania supporters, despite another big Dem event taking place 45 minutes later: Tom Perriello’s announcement he was running for the party’s nomination for governor. Among those present for Platania were former Albemarle commonwealth’s attorney Denise Lunsford, county clerk Jon Zug and city clerk Llezelle Dugger, city Sheriff James Brown, Mayor Mike Signer, Councilor Kathy Galvin and former city Republican chair Buddy Weber.

“I’m going to support Joe,” said Weber. “I think he’s the best and that’s why I’m here.”

 

 

Categories
News

City receives grant to study race in our criminal justice system

Charlottesville City Council moved a step closer last week to launching the most comprehensive study ever undertaken in Virginia on the role race plays in the criminal justice system.

The city was recently awarded a $90,000 grant from the Virginia Department of Human Services to begin collecting data on the rate that African-American adults enter the criminal justice system in Charlottesville and Albemarle County compared to white adults, and whether that rate is proportional to their population sizes.

City officials are asking the city for a $10,000 local match. If awarded, this would make a total of $100,000 to fund a yearlong study of what’s known as disproportionate minority contact, or DMC.

Kaki Dimock, the city’s director of human services, says most of that money would be spent collecting data. Each juncture of the criminal justice system—the police departments, the commonwealth’s attorneys, pretrial services, the courts and magistrate’s offices, the regional jail, state prisons, probation services—collects its own data.

The goal of the funding is to use the data to paint a comprehensive picture of how a person’s race correlates to his experience within the criminal justice system. Human Services will subcontract through Offender Aid and Restoration, with likely help from the Justice Management Institute, a Virginia-based nonprofit.

“Once we start to get some data in, then we’ll engage a larger steering committee and community engagement group to help assess and understand where the problems are and then design and try to implement some solutions,” says Dimock, adding that it will likely take at least a year to get to that stage.

The push to study adults follows the city’s unprecedented study of juveniles, which found that African-American youth are arrested, placed on probation, stopped and frisked, and jailed at a higher rate than their white peers, despite making up a minority of the city’s population. For two years, a city task force studied the issue, and it has implemented a series of more than a dozen actions to address the disproportionality.

Task force and community members have called for a study of the adult criminal justice system, arguing that children often emulate adults.

Commonwealth’s Attorney Dave Chapman says he hopes the funding will help develop a template by which the data sets are streamlined, so that not only can Charlottesville and Albemarle continue to monitor DMC with minimal additional effort, but that other jurisdictions in Virginia could also use the model to conduct similar studies.

“I think that, in this day and age, it’s critically important to do things like eliminate unmerited differences on the basis of race or other factors in the criminal justice system and be able to, with evidence, understand whether what you’re doing is working in terms of improving outcomes,” said Chapman.

At a minimum, two years of funding is needed to effectively begin studying the issue, city officials say. The city is eligible for a second $90,000 state grant, but must apply again when the initial year of study nears completion. The required local match could come from the city again or the county.

City Council is expected to vote on whether to approve the first year’s $10,000 in funding at its next meeting November 21.