During a UVA Neighborhood Advisory Meeting that touched on future plans to decrease construction, increase enrollment and hire more faculty, UVA Chief Operating Officer Leonard Sandridge offered a university perspective on the community water supply plan that suggests shared concerns between the area’s largest employer and Albemarle County officials.
Eight years removed from the 2002 drought that nearly resulted in UVA students being sent home, Sandridge expressed UVA concern for a main component of the long-debated community water supply plan: building upon the century-old Ragged Mountain Dam.
"I am not trying to get into the details of the plan. We are convinced that there are potential problems in building on top of the [existing] dam," said Sandridge. "We don’t think that looks like the long-range, best solution."
Sandridge said he met with Mayor Dave Norris and UVA President Teresa Sullivan following Sullivan’s arrival in Charlottesville. The meting was a "get-to-know-you" event, in which a number of issues, including the water supply, were discussed.
"I told [Norris, ‘I hope that we can reach closure on this water issue,’" said Sandridge. "He [Norris] assured me that he thought we could." Sandridge said the meeting was not for the purpose of discussing the water plan, and said he thinks Albemarle County "is anxious to reach closure as well."
Sandridge’s comments arrive on the same day as a report by a three-person independent technical review team (ITRT) hired to study the feasibility of a Ragged Mountain Dam proposal. Black & Veatch, hired by the City of Charlottesville, proposed building atop the existing dam and offered costs that coincide with an incremental build-up favored by city officials.
Black & Veatch’s study followed a May proposal by Schnabel Engineering that proposed an earthen dam at a cost of $28 million to $36 million. In October, the Albemarle County Service Authority authorized a payment of $869,000 to Schnabel for final designs of an earthen dam.
During a November 23 meeting, an ITRT member told the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority board that cost estimates for building on the existing dam could be steeper than those projected by Black & Veatch.
"There is considerable evidence in the records indicating that the integrity of the 100-year-old existing cyclopean concrete dam is highly questionable and has been since first filling," according to the ITRT’s 13-page report (available here in PDF). The report concludes early on that "the cost required to remediate the existing dam will be high and funds would possibly be better spent in constructing a new dam using modern engineering and construction technology, provided that the respective costs are comparable."