It’s gettin’ hot in here
In regards to “Fanning the flames” [February 1]: In my opinion, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s investigation into state funding of Michael Mann’s climate change research at UVA is politically motivated. It’s payback for how the University treated former State Climatologist Patrick Michaels. Cuccinelli is sending a message that state colleges should think twice before fostering an environment hostile to academic and intellectual freedom.
If it’s about global warming, allow me to save taxpayer money and debunk the idea right now. Global warming is a three-part theory, a trinity of postulates.
1) The average temperature of the earth is warming.
2) Some or all of the warming is caused by man.
3) The warming is abnormal and bad.
Mann and Michaels agree on the first two points. But Michaels is not alarmed because his hockey stick temperature chart is much bigger.
If you go back only a thousand years, it looks like a hockey stick. But if you go back 3 million years, it looks like a straight line of ice with occasional heat waves. If you go back 300 million years, it looks like a hockey stick again but turned upside down because of the recent ice ages.
Only 1 percent of geologic time has been as cold as we are today. Earth is 99 times more likely to have alligators at the poles than to have ice. You might say, too much carbon dioxide has been bound into fossil fuels, causing the ice ages.
With cooling since the 1998 El Nino and growing scrutiny of the science, global warming morphs into: 1) We have cooling, 2) We want warming, 3) Warm is good and normal. CO2 is plant food. Plants provide all the oxygen. I leave you with this moral imperative.
If you truly care about the environment, you should generate as much greenhouse gas as you need so Mother Earth can warm back to normal and the polar regions can once again recycle CO2 into oil and natural gas for future generations.
Blair Hawkins
Charlottesville
RIP, socialism!
Kudos to Ken Cuccinelli and the Tea Party resurgence in Virginia and elsewhere. We are not and must never be a socialist country that sees its mission as feeding people and providing health care. How can you stop at health care? How about housing care? And transportation care? And jobs care? These Utopian schemes have been tried again and again, and they all fail eventually. People lose their incentive to produce goods and services if they aren’t prodded by necessity. How long would any of you at the C-VILLE newspaper if your boss just took off and stopped monitoring you? How long would your workmates remain productive? Margaret Thatcher said, “The problem with socialism is sooner or later you run out of other people’s money”.
Granted, for many years it looked really good. Europeans worked easy hours, took long lunches at charming cafes in fairytale towns, road great trains, ate superb chocolate, and enjoyed themselves hugely. But it was doomed, for their low birthrates and slack productivity caught up with them. There aren’t enough workers and flush corporations to pay the tab now.
I’ve lived for years in socialist countries from England across to Hungary, and this is a fact: Socialism is breaking down worldwide. Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain are bankrupt, and they’re losing their sovereignty as the IMF and the EU move in. The other large European Union countries, particularly France, face a very dicey future. Germany, though, is highly productive. They resent it that they’re paying the lion’s share of the EU costs.
China has told its people that they cannot count on womb to tomb government benefits, and will have to provide for themselves. We in America are about to face the worst fiscal crisis ever conceived, and the flim-flam Ponzi scheme of ‘progressives’ in both parties is about to be exposed as a very cruel hoax.
G. Cox
Charlottesville
Liposuction, the sonnet
I was very interested in your Valentine’s issue [February 8] advice from my colleague Steve Cushman on sonnet writing, particularly the suggestion about using the phrase “elective liposuction.” Like so, maybe?
My love could use elective liposuction.
A gift certificate is just the thing.
Her flesh would rise in value with reduction,
And once again my heart would wake and sing.
I do need to be careful how I put it.
You can’t predict how women take this stuff.
Would she just say, Why, thank you, dear? Or would it
Make her real mad? Still, if it does, well, tough!
She really does need to take better care
Of what I care so much about. Her beauty
Is not her own, but something she must share
With me, for one—and guarding it’s a duty.
I’ll put it to her that way! Then she’ll be
So grateful that I’ve helped her to please me!
I’m curious to know if any of your other readers responded to the same provocation.
Gordon Braden
Department of English, UVA