Categories
News

‘United for Progress’: Daily Progress union calls for fair wages, community input

By Ali Sullivan

The story is all too familiar: Media corporation buys local newspaper, budget cuts ensue, and seasoned journalists lose their jobs. The staff at the Daily Progress doesn’t want to be next.

Murmurs of unionizing began in January, and the formal announcement came on October 14. The Progress staff has formed a union—the Blue Ridge NewsGuild, a unit of The NewsGuild-CWA’s Washington-Baltimore Local.

“People shouldn’t be waiting for the day that they come in and their job is done,” says Katherine Knott, a K-12 reporter for the Progress. “That’s particularly terrifying [and] unsettling.”

The Progress, family-owned for its first 78 years, has been bought and sold several times since 1971—first by The Worrell Newspaper Group, then by Media General. In 2012, it was bought by BH Media Group, controlled by billionaire Warren Buffett, who made headlines last spring when he called the newspaper business “toast,” and declared that newspapers are “going to disappear.” In 2018, BH handed management duties over to the media company Lee Enterprises.

“Lee Enterprises has a history of cutting off the edges in places that they manage, so [the union] is more for my co-workers to know they have a little more peace of mind for the possibility of layoffs or cuts in the future,” says Nolan Stout, the Progress’s City Hall reporter.

The union will be fighting for fair wages (Progress reporters currently earn salaries in the low $30,000 range, on average), severance pay, and appropriate benefits, and is asking for voluntary recognition from BH Media. Knott says the company has yet to respond, so the NewsGuild plans to win recognition via a National Labor Relations Board election, which will take place in the Daily Progress office October 30.

The months-long process that preceded the announcement involved attempts to get all sections of the paper on board­—a tricky process considering the high turnover in local newsrooms.

“You don’t just walk up to someone and say, ‘Hey, let’s form a union,’” Stout says. “It took time, and eventually we decided to just do it as a newsroom.”

Following the unionization announcement, the Progress had an all-staff meeting to discuss it. Stout says the meeting in part consisted of managing editor Aaron Richardson discussing “the things he thinks would be negatively affected” by the NewsGuild, but says the decision to unionize wasn’t a personal one.

“We like the people we work with,” Stout says. “We want to keep the environment the way it is, and this is the best way to do that.”

Signs emblazoned with NewsGuild’s logo decorate the newsroom, and Stout says the general sentiment among staff is one of excitement coupled with “a sense of camaraderie.”

While increased benefits and safety nets are central to the Blue Ridge NewsGuild’s mission, members also want to acknowledge the Progress’ checkered history and strengthen the paper’s bond with readers. To do so, the union plans to bargain for greater editorial control, a minority-hiring practice, and the reinstatement of a community-sourced editorial board.

“As recently as 2017 we had an editorial blaming Wes Bellamy for the Unite the Right Rally,” Stout says. “We want to be advocating for our management to let the community have a say.”

Knott and Stout aren’t sure what the future of local news is, but they know that the Blue Ridge NewsGuild is a step in the right direction.

“Seeing newsrooms…and journalists across the country, trying to take back some control and fight for their papers through unionization has really been the only thing giving me hope,” Knott says. “My advice to people is to assist in that movement.”

Categories
News

Capital secrets: News outlets sue VADOC to view executions from start to finish

By Spencer Philps

Four news organizations, including BH Media Group, which publishes The Daily Progress, are suing the Virginia Department of Corrections over procedures they believe violate the public’s First Amendment right to witness state executions in their entirety.

Members of the public, including the press, are allowed to witness executions. But the plaintiffs argue that restrictions put in place by VADOC prevent witnesses from observing crucial steps in the execution process, including the condition of an inmate as he or she enters the execution chamber; if there was difficulty administering the intravenous lines or completing the unknown steps in the electrocution process; or if the inmate was harmed during the procedure.

The plaintiffs in the case—BH Media Group, Associated Press, Guardian News and Media, and Gannett, are being represented by The Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic at Yale Law School.

“Our contention is that being able to see the entire process serves an important function both in terms of ensuring that things are being done according to procedure, and educating the public about whether the procedure is working properly or is consistent with community values,” says David Schulz, the clinic’s director.

Virginia is one of the 30 states in the U.S. that allows capital punishment. Since the death penalty was reinstated by the Supreme Court in 1976, Virginia has executed 113 individuals, the second most in the country behind only Texas.

According to the complaint filed by the news organizations September 23, members of the public can watch the execution from an adjacent room through a window that looks into the chamber. But once the inmate enters the chamber, a curtain is drawn that remains closed until prison officials have strapped down the inmate and the lethal injection has been administered. A second curtain blocks the view of the executioner and delivery of the lethal injection throughout the entire procedure.

In the case of execution by electric chair —Virginia is one of nine states where the electric chair is still authorized—the curtain isn’t removed until the inmate is strapped to the chair and the executioner performs three actions (the specifics of which are classified and redacted from the publicly available execution manual) before the actual execution.

The inability of witnesses to see inmates entering the execution chamber is a new restriction that VADOC introduced in 2017, just weeks after the controversial execution of Ricky Gray. It took far longer than normal—over half an hour—for prison officials to set the intravenous line that would administer the lethal drug. Because the second curtain inside the chamber blocked their view, the witnesses present were unable to discern why the procedure had taken so long, or whether Gray had been harmed in the process.

“It does seem at least that there’s an inference that [the change in procedure] was motivated somewhat to prevent the revealing of the problems that could happen and the pain that can be inflicted in trying to place the intravenous tubes,” Shulz says.

William Morva, who was sentenced to death in 2008 for the 2006 murder of a hospital security guard and a sheriff’s deputy, has been the only individual executed in Virginia since 2017.

VADOC said it would not comment on the pending litigation. The Virginia Attorney General’s Office did not reply to requests for comment.

The ACLU of Virginia has been a vocal advocate in the fight against what it refers to as “execution secrecy” in Virginia. While the ACLU-VA opposes the death penalty, the group argues that, as long as the death penalty exists, it must be done in the most transparent and open fashion possible.

“It’s the most final and irreversible act a government can take, and for it to undertake that act in layers of secrecy…is unacceptable,” says Brian Farrar, ACLU-VA’s director of strategic communications.

In 2018, the group issued a letter to Governor Ralph Northam, calling on him to “lift the veil of secrecy around executions in Virginia.”

Schulz predicts the case will move quickly through the court. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, referred to as a “rocket docket,” is the fastest federal civil trial court in the country.

Greensville Correctional Center is the facility used by Virginia for capital punishment, although the state hasn’t executed anyone since convicted murderer William Morva was killed by lethal injection July 6, 2017.