Categories
Arts

Community Supported Art shares come to Charlottesville

For years, people around the country have been participating in Community Supported Agriculture (CSAs), programs where locavores and the green-minded can subscribe to weekly shares of local produce. Now The Bridge PAI is launching its own CSA: Community Supported Art. “You already eat local; it’s about time you ART local!” is the slogan.

The program is based on a national model originated by Minneapolis’ Springboard for the Arts organization and is already used in over 20 cities. Fifty subscribers to The Bridge’s CSA buy a $200 share, which then goes to fund the work of four local artists, handpicked by a committee from a pool of over 45 applicants. The Bridge is hosting an event in November where the subscribers can meet the artists and see works in progress, and in December they receive a box containing completed work from all four.

“I think the biggest thing about that project is trying to lower the hurdle for people to collect art, to make it really accessible to people,” said The Bridge’s Director, Matthew Slaats. “It’s intimidating to walk into a gallery and just plop down $300 on a print of some sort. One of the hopes is that this program would sort of lower the barriers, and use this cultural model to get people excited about collecting art. There’s a bunch of them around the country that have been going on, so it’s exciting to see that here, and for us to be a part of it. And that’s something we’ll be doing every year, starting this year.”

The artists are sculptor and installation artist Aaron Fein, known for his long-running “White Flags” piece, which reproduces all the flags of the United Nations in white; spoken-word performer Bernard Hankins, host of the monthly Verbs & Vibes event (now relocated to The Bridge after a long tenure at Random Row Books); Terri Long, who makes collages and sculpture out of found objects (who recently had her wonderful Ex Ex Libris show at The Bridge in March), and illustrator Salena Hitzeman, a McGuffey Arts Center resident who makes accurate, evocative ink drawings from the natural world.

It remains to be seen precisely what these artists will produce for the CSA’s shareholders, but plans are already under way. In terms of how to translate Hankins’ work into a saleable object, Slaats explained, “We’ll be doing really unique events where the shareholders will get invited to a specific location, where he’ll be doing a performance for them. His work is very performative; it’s not enough, I think, to just have him write something down on a page and print it and give it to someone. We’ll do a series of short performances—you’ll get a text in the morning, show up at a certain site, and then we’ll record those, and edit them down, and give copies of them to the shareholders.”

According to Slaats the Bridge has sold 26 shares out of the 50. “We’re doing really well, and it’s only been three weeks,” he said.

For the buyer, it seems like a great way to meet and support local artists directly. But I was surprised when I saw the breakdown of the financial numbers for the project, in a copy of the budget that Slaats provided me. (It’s based on the model budget provided by Springboard for the Arts.) Only 40 percent of the $10,000 raised by selling 50 shares will go directly to the artists. The remaining 60 percent is retained by The Bridge, the majority of which goes towards operational and promotional costs for the CSA. Of the $4,000 budgeted for the artists, it will be divided four ways. And since each artist only receives half of their $1000 up front (the other half upon completion), that leaves them each with only a $500 budget to produce 50 pieces of art — which seems like a difficult arrangement for working artists.  One initially selected artist chose to withdraw upon realizing that the stipend being offered wasn’t sufficient enough to fund his proposal.

When I asked Slaats if he thought that budgeting arrangement would prevent artists from participating, he responded, “Yeah, totally. It’s kind of a limited program. There’s only so much we can give to the artists. We’re trying to cover the costs and promote them as much as possible. But one of the things we didn’t do a good job of upfront was telling the artists that they would get paid, and how much they would get paid.”

He’s already considered how to make the program better. “One idea for next year is that we’re going to switch it up, and have a higher price point, include eight artists, but lower the amount of production,” he said. “This year is a total experiment. We’re trying to figure out how this works in Charlottesville.”

Slaats feels that the program will go a long way in building goodwill within the art community. “This is also one way to make an effort to sort of rebuild the relationships with people, to rebuild some of the trust that’s eroded,” Slaats said. “For a long time, artists had been asked to give free work to the art auctions. This way, we can do it so that there is a stipend covering production and time.”

The meet-the-artist event is tentatively scheduled for early November. Shares are available through The Bridge’s website, by e-mail, phone, or in person at The Bridge. “I’m really looking forward to getting feedback at the end of the year, to hear how it all worked, and how good it felt for [the artists],” Slaats said.

Share your thoughts on supporting local art through CSAs in the comments section below.

Categories
Uncategorized

C’ville Art Blog: A studio visit with Andy Faith

Recently I went to visit Andy Faith, a local artist whose artwork would fit perfectly in Baltimore’s Visionary Art Museum. It was a treat to meet someone whose personal sense of style so embodied the aesthetic of her art work. When I met her she wore a purple velvet cape with spiked hair, pink glasses, and a carved resin necklace in the shape of a snakes’ head. Here is what she had to say about her artwork and her artistic vision.

Tell me a little about yourself as an artist.

I have always been the type of person who believes that if you follow what your passion is, then you can make things work. Do what you love, be happy, don’t worry, just chill, and it will be okay.

I am a retired elementary school teacher, and I didn’t start making art until I got a divorce. Then all of a sudden this stuff came pouring out of me. My house looks like my studio, filled with stuff. I have always been attracted to things like rust and beeswax, and as I get older, I find that I am using more natural materials like branches and deer antlers, etc. When I first started, I was doing all this kitschy Jesus art similar to the kind that I love from Mexico. But over the years my artwork has evolved to be more autobiographical. All of my figures are me, and they depict my life story through various stages of aging, being single, and being a mother.

Hall of Figures
Andy Faith’s Studio and artworks

Around the time that I separated from my husband, I remember walking down the street in South Philadelphia, and there was this store there where everything comes from Mexico. I loved to shop there, and I loved to look at the sculptural work. I said to myself, “I’d really love to get that, but I can’t afford it. ” And then I started just making stuff like that. I was very whimsical and funny and people liked it. I even had a one woman show on the Downtown Mall.

I had so much stuff for art materials at the time that I had boxes and boxes stacked up in my bedroom. I had to make a pathway to get around them. And I would get up in the middle of the night and start working on two or three pieces at a time. I just had this energy, and it really floated me. Doing artwork helped me get through a very difficult time.

I also found that I had reinvented myself. I wasn’t Andy the wife anymore, I was Andy the artist. I even changed my name after the divorce to my sister’s middle name, Faith. My motto is “I have faith that everything always works out in the end,” and I feel that I represent “A” faith. I’m not any religion but simply having faith will get you through in the end.

What are you working on now?

I usually have several different projects going on at any given time. A piece that I am currently working on is called “The Unbearable Lightness of Being.” It’s all about where we come from in nature and utilizes the imagery of the vagus nerve. The vagus nerve is the main nerve in your body that hits every internal organ. This symbolizes the mind-body-soul connection and a lot of the spiritual things I have been studying lately. I’m not sure I would have been working on a piece like this five years ago, but I’ve been doing a lot of soulful work with various teachers, and it has come into play in my artwork. All of the heart stuff and all of the soul stuff is an important part of my collection.

Do you have any formal training?

No. But I’ve always had a soul that is attracted to unusual, provocative art pieces that really make you think. Like works by Joseph CornellMarcel Duchamp or Edward Kienholz. I remember going t the Philadelphia Art Museum when I was a kid. I went into this room, the Marcel Duchamp room. There was the broken glass piece, the urinal, and the upside-down wheel. And then he had this piece where you had to look into it, and he made you a voyeur. There was this woman inside, a sculptural thing. But that was my favorite room in the entire museum. I will never forget that, and I went back again and again to see it.

I also feel very inspired by the kids that I teach. I base a lot of my kids’ projects on artists I love like Louise Nevelson or Hannah Hoch, African art, Sailors’ Valentines, even shoe design books.

What would you call your style?

I do call it mixed media, but it is also intuitive. Because for me it is an experimental process of deciding what works and what does not. I try to integrate different objects into a piece and make them meaningful. And different people see my work and they offer so many different reactions. Some people are put off by the religious imagery I use. Some people can look at my skulls and respond with fear. They say, “Oh that’s so scary!” I find it interesting that people interpret my work in their own way depending upon who they are and where they come from in life. None of my pieces are scary to me because they come from me and I’m not scary. So my style is very intuitive.

Sculpture
Sculpture by Andy Faith with permission from artist

What is your medium?

Sometimes I think that I do this art just because I love to collect things.

I have a whole crawl space at home, plus two storage buildings, and my entire backyard is filled with all my stuff. I’m attracted to skulls and barbed wire and little pieces of hardware. That’s the cats pajamas for me.

I also use horseshoes, antlers, baby dolls, manikins, and rust. My daughter travels all over the world, and she brought me a piece of rust from Tajikistan. I love it, and it goes really well on a piece that I am currently working on.

I have these spoke thingies that make great breasts and these portions of a lampshade that make great shoulders. I have baby doll eyeballs that I love. If you remove the face from an old baby doll, you will find that the eyes are amazing. I use old eyelash curlers, bullets casings, eyes glass lenses, animal bones, clock parts, and iridescent beetle wings. I even utilize used tea bags and I have a whole collection of teeth and partial dentures.

I am just so in love with my materials.

Andy Faith’s Studio

What is your method of working?

It’s funny because in my ad for my kids classes, I always advertise that art making is a problem solving process. And the process is so very important. I want the kids to know that there is no “wrong” in art. I will model ideas as the instructor, but I always want them to maintain their own vision and figure out a way to make things work and take ownership of the fact that they are artists, too.

In terms of artistic process, I will usually choose a form and then gather my materials. I’ll just start looking through my stuff to get inspired. My materials are my inspiration, and once I get started, the piece will take on a life of its own and become what it wants to be. I don’t usually start with a set idea in mind, so I let the materials inform the direction the piece needs to take to be completed. I’m constantly experimenting, and I like to follow my gut. I will try different materials until I know I have found the right ones. I’ll know that it’s finished when it’s finished.

Do you use photographic sources?

Not usually. I start with one thing and then keep building until I feel that it is finished. My favorite art is African art, and I have made figures that are inspired by African masks. But I try to let my materials inform the work.

How regular is your studio practice?

I try to come to the studio often. You can find me here most days. I always have multiple projects going on, so once I am in the studio, there is always something to do.

What is your favorite Bodo’s bagel?

Cinnamon raisin with coffee or an everything bagel with tomato, cucumber, and the baked salmon and whitefish salad.

Categories
Arts

October First Fridays Guide

First Fridays is a monthly art event featuring exhibit openings at many Downtown art galleries and additional exhibition venues. Several spaces offer receptions. Listings are compiled in collaboration with Piedmont Council for the Arts. To list an exhibit, please send information two weeks before opening to arts@c-ville.com.

The Bridge PAI 209 Monticello Rd. “Banner Days,” by Tom Hughes and a talk by Belfast-based artist Johanna Leech. 7-9pm.

Chroma Projects 418 E. Main St. “The Forests” by Jean Peacock in the Front Gallery, “Cahier Memoire” by Lillian Fitzgerald in the Passage Gallery, “Man With a Cello” by Blake Hurt in the Black Box. There will be music by Judith Shatin. 5:30-7:30pm.

City Clay 700 Harris St #104. “Sculptural Clay Vessels” by Ted Sutherland featuring slab-built stoneware. 5:00-7:00pm.

CitySpace 100 Fifth St. NE. “2013 Rising Star Awards,” an exhibit featuring the accomplishments of talented area high school art students. 5-7pm.

C’ville Arts Cooperative Gallery 118 E. Main St. “Dancing in the Sun,” featuring batik painting by Lisa O. Woods. 6-8pm.

Eloise 505 W. Main St. Local artist Max Olivas will showcase his latest work. 5-7pm.

Fellini’s #9 200 W. Market St. “Shooting Stars of Jazz” photography by John Wright. 5:30-7pm.

FIREFISH Gallery 108 Second St. NW. “Tiny Lights,” recent acrylic paintings by Jesse Meehan. 5:30-7:30pm.

The Garage 250 First St. N. An exhibit by Clay Witt. 5-7:30pm.

The Honeycomb 310 E. Market St. “These Things Happen” by Kimberlyn Penrose. 7-10pm.

Les Fabriques 206 E. Water St. New oil paintings by Ron Martin. 5-7pm.

McGuffey Art Center 201 Second St. NW.  “Glass. Metal. Fire” by Charlene Cross and “Colorscapes” by Etta Harmon Levin in the Susan B. Smith Gallery. Art With A Mission presents 100 paintings by Rwandan children in the Hall Galleries. 5:30-7:30pm.

Patina Antiques 1112 E. High St. Paintings and music by Paxson Henderson. 6-8pm.

Second Street Gallery 115 Second St. SE. “SUPERCLUSTER ARION AND OTHER PHENOMENA” by DM Witman. Reception from 5:30-7:30pm with artist talk at 6:30pm.

Telegraph 110 Fourth St. NE. “Arcana” prints offer different interpretations of iconic cards from Tarot’s Major Arcana. 5-10pm.

The Women’s Intitative 1101 E. High St. “Women Artists: A Retrospective for the Women’s Initative,” featuring 10 local artists works in oil, watercolor, pastel, and encaustic.

WriterHouse 508 Dale Ave. “Spontaneity,” paintings by Nina Ozbey. 5:30-7:30pm.

WVTF and Radio IQ Studio Gallery 216 W. Water St. “Food: the Stories Beneath,” new photography by Jill Bascom. 5-7pm.

 

OTHER EXHIBITS

Angelo 220 E. Main St. “Message in a Bottle,” new photographs by John Grant.

Fralin Museum of Art at the University of Virginia 155 Rugby Rd. “Ansel Adams: A Legacy,” “Looking at the New West: Contemporary Landscape Photography,” “In the Shadow of Stalin: The Patterson Family in Painting and Film,” and paintings by Émilie Charmy.

Kluge-Ruhe Aboriginal Art Collection 400 Worrell Dr. “Ngau Gidthal (My Stories),” linoleum and woodblock prints by David Bosun.

Atelier ONE Gallery 1716 Allied St. “Wide Open Spaces,” paintings by Donna Clark.

Second Street Gallery 115 Second St. SE. “Untitled” an installation by Hong Seon Jang.

Thomas Jefferson Memorial Church 717 Rugby Rd. “Fertility,” paintings by Sarah Sweet.

Warm Springs Gallery 105 Third St. NE. New paintings by Angela Saxon.

Westminster Canterbury 250 Pantops Mountain Rd. Watercolor paintings by Chee Kludt Ricketts.

 

Check out PCA’s Google Map of local galleries and cultural hotspots to plan your visit.

View Charlottesville Arts & Culture Map in a larger map.

Categories
Arts

Émilie Charmy defied convention with her masculine style

Born in 1878 in the town of Saint-Étienne near Lyon, France, Émilie Charmy was groomed for the proper profession of teaching. But Charmy, whom I had never heard of before the Fralin show, had other ideas, taking up painting instead. Initially, she focused on traditional scenes of domestic life in an Impressionist style. But, she soon began painting subjects that had been the province of male artists. One of the first paintings in the show, Charmy’s shimmering “The Salon,” c. 1900, features naked prostitutes in a brothel—though you might never know it, given the decorous soft focus with which they’re painted.

Charmy must have been something to set up her easel in a house of ill repute at age 22. At the time, female artists were banned from art classes with live models, so her behavior would have been deeply shocking. But from Charmy’s perspective, painting in a bordello was practical in that it provided access to the nude models she yearned to paint. One of the impressions that bounces off the Fralin walls, and that is borne out by this example, is how very ambitious Charmy is. Not in an obnoxious, dog-eat-dog way, but you can see how she constantly challenged herself. She wanted to be a really good painter and achieve equal footing with her male counterparts.

So instead of enchanting studies of women and children that would have been her expected lot, Charmy gives us a morphine addict. The figure in “Woman in an Armchair,” c. 1897-1900, reclines in a narcotic fog. A whisper of a handkerchief is clutched in her hand, and the tools of her addiction are on the table beside her. Charmy’s brushwork matches the mood. In the sitter’s daringly strapless dress, the paint has a leaden quality. Pushed across the surface with a palette knife it adeptly conveys the texture and weight of the velvet.

“Young Girl in an Armchair,” c.1900 presents a striking portrait of a child wise beyond her years. With an appraiser’s eye, she sizes up the viewer. The delicately rendered face is captivating, but what I like are the broad expanses of pigment, the scumbled gray of the dress, the vertical brushstrokes that compose the fabric of the chair and the lively treatment of the floor. There’s also an audacious blotch of scarlet in the background, a sketch of something—a saint, perhaps—under a Victorian bell jar. The color choices in this painting are so unorthodox—about as far as you could get from Mary Cassatt—and the bold treatment of the paint is, dare I say, masculine.

In 1902 Charmy moved to Paris. Here she encountered Matisse and his circle of Fauves (A.K.A. “wild beasts”) with whom she would work closely. Their influence can first be seen in Charmy’s “Still Life,” and “Flowers and Fruits,” both of 1904. In the former, paint is applied with joyous abandon to produce a rich pastiche of color. “Flowers and Fruits” is an exuberantly splashy painting that combines a heavily painted foreground against a blurred, almost watery pattern signifying background wallpaper.

Then there are Charmy’s infinitely appealing landscapes of Corsica where she travelled with her Fauves cronies. “Piana Corsica—Stone Pine,” 1907-10 conveys that hard-edged quality of the sun when a storm has passed through or is coming. The clarity of the townscape contrasts with the blurred indistinct middle ground of sea where agitated brushstrokes suggests choppy water. “L’Estaque,” 1910, one of four Charmy paintings exhibited at the famous Armory Show of 1913, is a paradigm of a South of France landscape. It gives you everything you need, sparkling light, lush palette, and vista of ocean. With very little, Charmy describes the distinctive vegetation, tiled-roofed architecture, and topography. Stripped down to essentials, the quite abstract “Corsican Landscape,” c. 1910, provides an interesting stylistic contrast and demonstrates that Charmy was in synch with the latest art trends.

There follows a wonderful assortment of paintings of women, both clothed and nude. While I love the chic fashionistas Charmy depicts (especially “Self-Portrait with an Album,” 1907-12, featuring herself in a striking navy dress against a terra cotta background), the nudes, which run the gamut from erotic to matter-of-fact, are fascinating—done from a woman’s perspective, as opposed to with the “male gaze.”

Seemingly caught with her mouth open as if in midsentence, “Self Portrait in an Open Dressing Gown,” 1916-18 is a remarkable depiction of sangfroid. “Nude Holding her Breast,” 1920-25 uses a calligraphic treatment to render the expressive face and also, in an elegant flourish, to describe the pubic hair. “Portrait,” 1921, featuring a clothed model has striking color and a wonderfully austere composition. Here, Charmy allows the woman’s arm to dissolve into her dress and I realized that she doesn’t spend a lot of time on hands in any of her paintings. Maybe she didn’t like to draw them, but it doesn’t really matter because she’s very good at suggesting them.

What I admire about Charmy is her inspired palette, her superb compositional sense, and her dogged determination to succeed as a painter on equal terms with male artists. I concur with novelist, Roland Dorgelès’ assessment: “Émilie Charmy, it would appear, sees like a woman and paints like a man; from the one she takes grace and from the other strength, and this is what makes her such a strange and powerful painter who holds our attention.”

The Émilie Charmy exhibit runs at UVA’s The Fralin Museum of Art through February 2.

 

Categories
Living

Page by page: City artist Lara Call Gastinger leaves a local stamp on a botanical opus

Ever since she was a child, Lara Call Gastinger has found ways to combine science and art.

“My parents would take us to these National Wildlife Federation Summits where I started keeping a field journal, like this one,” she said, pointing to the notebook of illustrations on a desk in the sunny studio in her North Downtown home. Over the last 11 years, similar sketches have allowed her to illustrate Flora of Virginia, the massive tome published by a coalition of experts last year that, for the first time, offers an index of nearly every plant species in the Commonwealth. “I remember having that realization, that I could draw plants that people could identify,” she said. “It was sort of a great moment.”

Gastinger studied biology and architecture at UVA, and pursued landscape architecture before deciding she wanted to do more field work. She went back to school, this time to Virginia Tech for a master’s degree in plant ecology. It was there she learned about the nonprofit Flora of Virginia Project, formally created in 2001 by botanical experts from the Department of Conservation and Recreation and numerous partnering organizations, who came together to build the first comprehensive plant guide since Flora Virginica—published in 1743 and written entirely in Latin, it was more a relic than a relevant tool.

She contacted Chris Ludwig, one of the primary authors, who ultimately hired her to illustrate the book. That kicked off a relationship with the project and the team that has defined her career for more than a decade.

And because she moved back to the area not long after she began working on the book, Albemarle County has left its own special, if invisible, stamp on the book. Gastinger draws and paints largely from live specimens, and her rambles through the nearby Piedmont and Blue Ridge with expert botanists provided many of those specimens.

Not every entry is graced with one of Gastinger’s simple black-and-white drawings. That would have been impossible, she said, as it details 3,154 species.

“We mainly focused on ones that amateurs will see,” she said.

Now that the collaboration has borne fruit, Gastinger is focusing on other work, including large-scale watercolors, a collection of which won her a gold medal at the Royal Horticultural Society’s annual exhibition in 2007. She works on commission, creating custom sketchbooks and paintings for people who want to document their properties and immortalize favorite plants, and teaches watercolor workshops, one of which is coming up November 9.

“There’s definitely still sometimes an ‘I can’t believe I did this,’ moment,” she said of the project—understandable when you realize the collaboration yielded a book that’s 1,500 pages long and weighs seven pounds.

Her own copy of the Flora sits on her desk, and it’s usually open. It’s gone from her main job to an important reference point for new projects. “Toward the end, things were going so fast I couldn’t really learn the plants’ names,” she said. “Now it’s great to actually be using it and keying them out.”

More images of Gastinger’s work and details on her upcoming workshop are at laracallgastinger.com.—G.B.

Categories
Arts

The intriguing story of the Patterson family provokes questions at the Fralin

In 1932, a group of 21 African-American artists and intellectuals, including Langston Hughes, traveled from Harlem to the Soviet Union. The trip was part of an outreach effort by the Meschrabom-Film studio, which hoped to produce a propagandistic feature film, Black and White, criticizing segregation and racism in the U.S. The intention was to forge solidarity between the stars of the Harlem renaissance and the international Communist cause. Unfortunately, the Soviets proved woefully unfamiliar with the realities of race relations in the U.S., and the project collapsed before film production began.

Given the Stalin regime’s history of brutality and oppression, the attempts to paint the Soviet Union as a harmonious utopia now seem foolhardy in retrospect, but at least one of the visiting Americans found happiness on the trip. Actor Lloyd Patterson remained in Moscow and married a Ukranian designer, Vera Aralova. They had three children, including the acclaimed poet James Patterson.

Despite the failure of Black and White, a film on the topic of race was eventually produced, called Tsirk (Circus), a 1936 drama comedy musical directed by Sergei Eisenstein protégée Grigori Aleksandrov. The narrative loosely parallels the lives of the Pattersons—a white American circus performer faces discrimination in America because of her half-black infant son, but finds acceptance among the people of the USSR, who surround them in the film’s climactic scene and sing a welcoming lullaby to the child, played by a 2-year-old James Patterson.

The story of the Pattersons is an intriguing one, embodying an unlikely meeting between two largely disparate yet contemporaneous cultural and artistic movements. It’s a largely unknown story, and the Fralin Museum’s current exhibition, “In the Shadow of Stalin: The Patterson Family in Painting and Film,” promises an enlightening view of the Pattersons. Unfortunately, the exhibit just scratches the surface of the story, with only a few materials on display.

The original material in the exhibition consists of a photograph of Friends of the Soviet Union’s Harlem chapter en route to Russia, two Soviet realist propaganda lithographs (unrelated to the Pattersons, but provided for context), and a painting of Lloyd Patterson. The portrait—painted by an unknown artist, and discovered rolled up in the back of a Moscow store some years ago—is excellent. The striking elder Patterson’s handsome young features are sharply captured, and on its own it is worth a trip to the Fralin.

The exhibition is supplemented by three explanatory placards, two exceptionally grainy photos of the family, two reproductions of promotional posters for Circus, and a flat screen that plays the climactic lullaby scene from the film—all on display in the small foyer area on the museum’s ground floor. The exhibit comes as something of a surprise, piquing visitors’ interest but failing to satisfy their curiosity, and attendees will inevitably depart with more questions about the Pattersons than they arrived with.

The museum’s excellent upstairs exhibit, a full retrospective of work by painter Émilie Charmy (read the full review here), is a comparatively comprehensive look at an artist and a life outside of the standard art history canon, and the Patterson show could have benefitted from the same thoroughness and rigor. Hopefully, the October 26 symposium on African American Artists and Intellectuals in Soviet Russia, a free event held in Campbell Hall, will answer some of the questions raised by the intriguing but unfulfilling Patterson exhibit (which is on display through December 22).

Smog effect

When Bill Callahan first began releasing music under the name Smog in the early ’90s, the efforts seemed deliberately halfhearted. His non-committal song ideas were defensively shielded in a dense layer of home-recorded hiss and grit. But eventually, small buds of coherence began to blossom. Callahan’s lyrics grew into cryptic, captivating narratives, and more professional recordings gave them space to be heard, fleshed out with drums, backup singers, and cello. The mid-’90s Smog albums were overwhelmingly melancholy, scattered with driving dirges that dealt with topics like depression, disappointment, and addiction in ways that were poetic, mysterious, and darkly funny. A few songs, like the career highlight “Bathysphere,” were instant classics. Callahan became something of an indie-rock darling, dating Cat Power’s Chan Marshall and collaborating with Jim O’Rourke and Royal Trux’s Neil Hagerty.

But guarded, caustic wit and insurmountable melancholy are tough traits to maintain over an extended career, and some time around the turn of the century, Callahan’s mood lightened, his voice deepened, and his music took on a folk-country tinge. He allowed a laid back charm to seep into his music, and though his darkly funny outlook still took center stage, it was often leavened with a sad romanticism and sly humor, exemplified in songs like “Dress Sexy at My Funeral.” Over the past decade, Callahan dropped the Smog pseudonym and used his own name, experiencing something of an artistic renaissance that earned him critical reassessment and a new generation of fans. Today, he’s rightfully viewed as one of indie rock’s best songwriters, alongside peers like Will “Bonnie ‘Prince’ Billy” Oldham and David Berman of The Silver Jews.

Bill Callahan’s most recent album, the fine and admirable Dream River, was released in September on the Drag City label. He will appear at The Jefferson Theater on Tuesday, October 1. The opening acts are the genteel Ned Oldham (brother of Will, member of the local group Old Calf, formerly of Palace Brothers and The Anomoanon), and New Bums—a newly-minted duo consisting of Ben Chasny from Six Organs of Admittance, and Donovan Quinn of the Skygreen Leopards.

Share your thoughts on indie rock’s best songwriters in the comments section below.

Categories
Arts

C’ville Art Blog: A studio visit with Cynthia Burke

Cynthia Burke is a local artist who paints in a style similar to that of Alex Gross and Mark Ryden. Her studio at the McGuffey Art Center is filled with inspirational objects, and dozens of quirky paintings hang on the walls. We paid her a visit to find out more about her work and her artistic vision.

Tell me a little about yourself as an artist.

Well, obviously I paint birds and animals. I never expected that I would be painting them forever, but there just seems to be no end to the subject matter. When I first started out here at McGuffey, I was painting these floor coverings, huge floor cloths, a type of early American craft that I updated to be more modern. Those were done with acrylic on canvas. From there, I moved them to the wall where I worked on them like tapestries. They were all representational and had a medieval feel, much like the Unicorn Tapestries of the late 1400’s. I always put animals in them, and then I started leaving the people out. I realized that I enjoy painting animals much more than I do painting human beings.

From there my work developed into a portrait style, very much in the line of medieval portraits similar to that of Hans Holbein and Jan van Eyck. I swear that I am reincarnated from the 1500’s or the 1600’s because whenever I need to be inspired, that’s where I go. That being said, I have never done a pet portrait, and I have also never painted an animal in its natural habitat. Somehow I feel that to get away with painting animals you have to do something really different with them. But I have been doing these portrait-style paintings for a very long time, and I love doing them.

Animals are very dignified, so the portrait medium feels right. There is something about staring into the eyes of an animal; if you stare into the eyes of a person in a portrait, you have such a clear feeling for who they are and what they are, but the longer you stare into the eyes of an animal, it feels as though you know less and less about it. You never know what’s going on in there. It’s fun to watch the viewers of my paintings staring into the eyes of the animals that I paint. They are immediately making up what is going on inside the head of that animal.

I had a show once where I painted nothing but chickens. The pieces were large ovals, and it was framed like a hall of ancestors. It was so much fun watching people look at the pieces because they were all going along the hall exclaiming, “Oh! This looks like my uncle, and this looks just like my aunt!”

Recently, I have started a new series that is going to have a lot more narrative in it. I’m trying to keep it open to the viewer so that they can create their own narrative.

Do you have any formal training?

Well, I was an art major and received my BA, but I can’t say that I really learned anything during that time. I’ve learned more through the process of painting every day.

What would you call your style?

I would call it fantastic realism. There is also an element of surrealism because it is very dream-like.

What is your medium?

I use oil paint and Liquin. If it is a smaller piece, it is always on board, and the larger pieces are on canvas. For me, that just works. Obviously, I also make all my own frames. I think framing is so important. And with these pieces, it just goes with the period to be a little overboard on the frames which is a lot of fun. For the bigger frames, I use a molding and there is gold leaf on the front and a subdued pattern on the sides.

What is your method of working?

That depends on what series it is. The ground is always a color, often pink or Prussian blue, which is a really wonderful base. But some pieces I put together piecemeal, whereas others I have done by completing the background first and then adding the figure later. A lot of that has to do with the subject matter as well. I paint very thinly in oil and I use Liquin which is a fast drying medium so I don’t have to wait. I can continue working the next day.

Why painting and not photography or another medium?

It doesn’t get more precious than paint. Hopefully, painting won’t die out entirely. It’s a little worrisome because photography seems to be very dominant right now. I just love painting. It’s a wonderful craft and it’s unfortunate because as people paint less and less, their knowledge of the craft also diminishes. It’s a craft, and I don’t want it to be lost.

Do you use photographic sources?

Yes. Usually, I use a whole bunch of photographs, many of which I have taken myself since I have traveled all over the world. I’ve been to Africa and the Galapagos Islands, South America, India, and a lot of places that offer a lot of beautiful nature scenes. China and Morocco have really influenced my work since I am very drawn to textiles and patterns.

How do you choose your subject matter?

Where does creativity come from? I’ve really been trying these days to not know ahead of time where a painting is going to end. I think you spend a lot of years trying to gain control of your medium, and one day you are controlling it too much. It can take a lot of the creativity out of the end product. It doesn’t leave the door open for surprise.

Recently, I never know where my work is going to go. I don’t do a drawing ahead of time and it’s more of a stream-of-consciousness process. It can take longer to complete a piece because one day you’ll finish up in the studio and you’ll say “Wow! That’s great. It’s been a really good day.’ And the next morning you come in and wonder “Argh! What was I thinking! That looks awful!”

How long does it normally take you to finish a piece?

I work in various sizes from very small to very large. I’m a fast painter and I can finish a small painting in two days, whereas the larger pieces can take me up to a month to complete.

How regular is your studio practice?

I’ve  always wanted to do art, and I spent quite a while trying to figure out how to make a living off of that, which is no small feat. I reshaped my lifestyle to get closer to the purest form of what I wanted to do. I started with a faux finish wall painting business. That was as close to being a painter as I could get. And it was very successful, so successful in fact that I realized I wasn’t doing my art. I didn’t have any time to.  Then for a while I was doing the floor cloths and tapestries while maintaining my business. But finally, I went cold turkey and started just painting. By that time, my work was starting to sell. I am a really hard worker, and I am here working every day. If you are going to be self-employed, you have to acknowledge that the buck stops here. Your only recourse, if you aren’t making it financially is to make more art! And get it out there! Plus, it’s what I love to do.

It would be very hard for me to do this from home. Because coming here is like going to the office. When you are at home, there is always something else you could be doing. But if you go somewhere else then you have to maintain regular hours because you are at work.

I also usually work in series towards a show. I have a show a year from now, so I try to work simultaneously on work to sell currently as well as work for my upcoming show.

Who do you consider to be your audience?

Being right here at the McGuffey is wonderful. I have been here for many years, and although people don’t come through here in droves all the time, First Fridays is a good time to meet new people. I also have work in a few galleries away from Charlottesville. Some of those venues I pursued and others found me. I also have a web presence.

There is a balancing act that I have had to get used to between painting what I want to paint and painting what the market demands. It’s a very fortunate artist who doesn’t have to pay attention to that line. Even extremely successful artists have to give some thought to their audience and what they want. I try to provide a variety of sizes, shapes, media, and content. There is a lot going on and a lot of options.

What is your favorite Bodo’s bagel?

You know, I’m embarrassed to say my favorite bagel would probably be the plain one.

With anything on it?

Nope!

You can see more of Cynthia’s work on her website, Studio Burke, or in person at the McGuffey Art Center near the downtown mall.

~ Rose Guterbock and Aaron Miller

Categories
Arts

C’ville Art Blog: Lindsey Obergs’s encaustic allegories

The dreamlike encaustic collages of Lindsey Oberg currently on display at Mudhouse on the Downtown Mall have a soft, ethereal quality. The medium is unusual, and something not seen very often. It is indicative of an artist who has experimented with and fully understood her medium of choice. Although collage can often become flat and heavy, these paintings create vast spaces and landscapes with a surreal, kitschy mystical vibe.

The images are collages with thick layers of encaustic wax and oil paint on the surface. A variety of photographs and objects, some old and full of history, are embedded in the surface of the images.

The painting aspect in each image is minimal and apparent primarily in the animal figures and the atmospheric washes. The painting is good, almost great. While there is a sense of care in the craft of the painting, the animals often look copied from nature photographs. This makes the animal seem out of place, more like collage than painting. This is evident in the larger work which contains an elephant with odd dark shadows indicative of bright sunlight. It’s not bad, it’s more eerie, and begs the question “Why paint at all rather than only collage?”

Several of the images are fantastically executed. In one, a black bear peers over a small ridge in the bottom left of the image, at a fort of sorts, which has been constructed there by the artist. Each element is made with simplicity in mind and the composition is seamless. In another, beneath the layers of wax, doodles and sketchy drawings of building emerge, which are amazing and perfect for their contrasted purposeful marks.

Oberg does a great job of being wild and low key at the same time. Furthermore, her work is beautiful. Although a few seem arbitrarily aesthetic, which is to say highlighting design rather than content, the show is predominantly fun and immersive. Each poetic label is intriguing to read and allows the viewer to wallow in the artwork’s allegorical implications.

It is worth noting that The Mudhouse often has interesting artworks on display. Some shows have been more successful than others but this display is certainly a success. It  is nice to see a local gallery like Le Yeux De Monde working in collaboration with a local business to bring good art to the people.~Aaron Miller and Rose Guterbock

Categories
Arts

Hong Seong Jang’s mostly tiled floor

Material based sculpture can be immensely captivating, transforming everyday and unexpected objects through scale, quantity, and precision of assembly into breathtaking constructions. The untitled work of Hong Seong Jang currently installed at the Second Street Gallery falls into this category. Like many found object works of art, however, it struggles with the contrast between low quality materials and their re-purposing as a sculptural medium.

There are two aspects to the installation. Dark images on the walls appear to be scratchboards, a matte black surface with a silvery image peeking though. A closer look reveals a matte black surface with tiny strips of frosty cello tape layered one on top of the other to reveal an image. The small pieces of tape are crisp edged and architectural, they seem almost computer generated, like a 1980’s imagining of future graphics. The image is that of dark forests and clouds which swim into focus through an unusual play of light. The forests are lit as though a bright light shines into the trees on an overcast pitch-dark night.

These works are transformative, which is to say the medium is revealed only upon close inspection. The image of fluffy clouds seems like the work of a procrastinating office worker passing hours in his cubicle. The images seem to capture a feeling of haunted longing, with cold office materials imagining the dark natural world far beyond. While the works are beautiful and interestingly crafted, the images overall seem more meditative for the artist than interesting for the viewer.

Turning away from the images on the wall, there is a large installation covering the floor. Laminate squares lay side by side, each with a design gaudier then the last. Some of the laminate squares rise up to form short walls, small obstructions, or obstacles. They seem to be climbing objects in a child’s playground or the slick short walls of a bath house.

The artist’s attempted transformation of the space fills the gallery with a bright play of colors. However the initial sense of wonder fades quickly as the piece suffers from a lack of scale. The artist statement refers to the floor of the Sistine chapel as inspiration for the piece. The laminate squares stop abruptly leaving a large portion of the wall bare, which heightens the cheap feeling of the laminate and leaves the room feeling incomplete. While the artist may have intentionally done this to contrast the illusion of his installation with the nature of his materials, it diminishes the effect of the altered environment and costs the viewer the unexpected experience of an exotic mosaic tiled floor.

There is something missing, whether it be the a larger sense of extravagance, a complete and purposeful over-taking of the gallery space, or an understanding on the artist’s part of how to carry a message through. The piece is curious and engrossing, but it somehow manages to miss the mark.

~ Rose Guterbock and Aaron Miller

Categories
Arts

Graphic novelist Laura Lee Gulledge found inspiration in Charlottesville

When you ask Brooklyn-based artist and graphic novelist Laura Lee Gulledge about Charlottesville, her upbeat voice turns nostalgic. “Places like the IX building were full of my people. People who cared more about what you did than where you went to art school. People who helped me make art.”

Creative community is the crux of Gulledge’s sophomore work, a young adult graphic novel set in Charlottesville. In Will & Whit, which Gulledge wrote and illustrated, a teenage girl must face her fear of the dark —and a family tragedy—when a hurricane knocks out power and threatens to ruin the carnival her friends have been building.

Gulledge, who lived in Charlottesville from 2002-07, based her fictional storm on Hurricane Isabelle, and the novel references several institutions that locals will recognize. The longtime artist and teacher chose details, like a flier for Moto Saloon, consciously. “In Will & Whit, I wanted to model a creative community for young people,” said Gulledge. She drew the grassroots Charlottesville that helped shape her own artistic path as “my little love letter to the creative scene.”

In her debut graphic novel Page by Paige, Gulledge explored the way creativity helps students understand themselves. Nominated for both the Eisner and Harvey awards and one of YALSA’s Top Ten Books for Teens in 2012, Page by Paige reflects Gulledge’s own experience as a teen.

“When I was younger, I could draw out my stuff even if I couldn’t say it. I could use pictures, not words,” she explained. “Now we work out our issues on paper so we can share them with other people.”

Gulledge describes herself as an instrumentalist artist, someone who makes art to convey an idea or teach a concept. “Education and art are the same thing,” she said. “I approach new stories, like the picture book I’m currently working on, as ‘what do I want to teach these little kids?’ Their brains are like sponges.”

Long before she wrote her first graphic novel, Gulledge earned her master’s in art education from James Madison University. She moved to Charlottesville to teach, working in the Louisa County school system for a few years. But the public school “felt really wrong,” Gulledge said. “We need creative people, but the outlets to teaching creativity [in schools] are getting squished and squashed.”

Once you acknowledge the complexities of the creative process, Gulledge said, standardized education looks one-size-fits-all, and you see “a disconnect between how we learn and how we teach.”

Conflicted by her chosen career, she left the school and took a job in the furniture store The Artful Lodger. Flexible hours allowed Gulledge to start making art for herself. “You can’t teach someone else to be an artist if you aren’t an artist,” she said, “so I started experimenting. I lived in this renovated motel room near the railroad tracks, and I painted murals. My first art show ever was held at Fellini’s, and I was, what, 26?”

It was a happy time, and Gulledge immersed herself in Charlottesville’s collaborative art-making scene. But as local venues like Traxx, Starr Hill (music hall), and the IX building disappeared, Gulledge and her friends began to look elsewhere. “People told me I should go to New York to make connections and discover my niche,” she said. “Even my boss—she liked working with me and knew I was good at my job, but she told me ‘this is my dream, not yours. You should figure out your dream instead of playing it safe.’”

In 2006, C-VILLE Weekly’s readers voted Laura Lee Gulledge Best Artist. A few months later, she packed her bags and “took 2007 as my science experiment year.” She spent a few months with the Junior Art Club in Ghana, West Africa, as a volunteer art teacher in elementary after school programs, and then she moved to New York.

“As an artist you need help—a docent, a cheap living situation, a spokesperson, something—you just can’t do it on your own,” Gulledge said, and when the redhead became an au pair, she discovered it to be true. “The children’s mother was one of Leonard Bernstein’s daughters, and we were on the same wavelength about so many things. That young people need to express themselves, that creativity belongs in education.”

Her new mentor gave her a gift that would change her life: her first graphic novel. “For years, I’d only worked in sketchbooks,” Gulledge said. “I had spent years trying to figure out where my oh-so-personal-metaphorical drawings fit in, from self-publishing zines to gallery shows,” and graphic novels were the piece of the puzzle she didn’t know she’d been missing. Like the heroine of Will & Whit, Gulledge discovered that “once I stopped trying to control my life, everything got easier. Like trying to swim upstream versus just floating.”

Not that life as a working artist is easy. She’s worked as a scenic artist for department store Christmas windows, an interactive event producer, and a body painter for burlesque dancers. She also does publicity tours for her novels. “It’s a long game, the comic industry. You have to keep plugging away and going to shows and conventions,” she said. “But it’s also much more soul-satisfying.”

These days Gulledge practices education-
in-process through therapeutic illustration and collaborative art projects. “When people use their hands, they just open up. We need to use our hands. It unplugs all this other stuff.”

In her work, Gulledge reminds us that art is not self-indulgent, not trite. “As kids, we all naturally make stuff. Until age 7 we sing and tell stories. It’s how we’re wired, it makes us happy. In fourth grade we put ourselves in a context and start censoring ourselves, but you’re the only person who is qualified to write that book. It’s one little volume in one small corner of the huge library of human experience, but only you can do it.”