Categories
Living

Small Bites

 Star turns

West Main restaurant L’étoile welcomes a new chef this week. Jonathon Gariepy joins the restaurant from Florida, where he worked at The Rivers Inn and under the master chef at the Gasparilla Inn. The former Earlysville resident’s adventures down south, says L’etoile head chef and owner Mark Gresge, instilled in Gariepy a love of cooking seafood, but “he is excited about our relationships we have built…with the farmers, purveyors and citizens of Charlottesville.”

Brian Wilkinson, who held the reins in the kitchen for more than four years, will be moving to Charleston, South Carolina.

Fire update

 

Bell hoppers will love this news: Formerly crispy Taco Bell on 29N near Rio Road is open for business. The building accidentally burned down in early December 2010 after sparks turned to flames during a roof repair. Just shy of seven months later (and an estimated $1 million in damages), the Bell is back with a new “stone” facade and a bright, hot sauce-inspired exterior paint job. Chow down!

 

 

Categories
News

Sovereignty, sexy scholarships and debt ceilings

 It’s obvious that we’re currently suffering through some sort of nationwide spike in lunacy. And while the most obvious manifestation of America’s recent detour into dementia was a laughably incorrect end-of-the-world prediction (unless the Rapture actually occurred on May 21, and this column is—as we’ve long suspected—the sole reading material in Hell), a corresponding increase in local loonies has also invaded our once-commonsensical commonwealth.

Don’t believe us? Well, just take a gander at these completely random acts of insanity that have occurred in Virginia in just the past few weeks:

First we have 31-year-old Michael Creath Jones, a Hanover-area hellion who has a slight problem with authority, to say the least. The trouble began when Mr. Jones drove his car, sporting a nifty handwritten license plate with the words “Virginia” and “private use” scrawled on it, past a state trooper. Needless to say, the officer’s curiosity was piqued, and he promptly pulled Jones over to discuss the man’s unique vehicle registration strategy. It should come as no surprise that Jones’ traffic stop etiquette—which involved locking his doors, providing multiple fake names, and declaring himself a “free citizen on a free highway”—was as unorthodox as his “sovereign citizen” vanity plate, and he soon found himself subdued and packed off to Verona’s Middle River Regional Jail on charges of resisting arrest and driving without a license, among many others.

Our second cracked character is Virginia Beach businessman Henry Allen Fitzsimmons, a prominent restaurant owner and all-around deviant whose philanthropic impulses apparently got all mixed up with his twisted libido. According to three women whom he allegedly “mentored,” Fitzsimmons lured young ladies into his “Spencer Scholarship Program” with promises of free college tuition and lodging, but soon began applying idiosyncratic conditions that gave new meaning to the phrase “academic discipline.” Chief among them? Vigorous bouts of bare-bottom spanking for alleged missteps and infractions. In retrospect, the women probably should have become suspicious when they saw that the program paperwork was actually a Fulbright Scholarship application with the first word altered to read “Full Moon.”

Finally, we come to the most dangerous and demented oddball of all: U.S. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor. Sure, his recent erratic behavior isn’t clinically anti-social or sexually deviant, but that doesn’t make it any less deranged. We’re referring, of course, to Cantor’s repeated and specific threats to blow up the entire U.S. economy.

As you may have heard, the United States recently reached its official spending limit, necessitating the implementation of extraordinary measures to prevent America from defaulting on its outstanding bonds. Now, while most credible economists believe that a debt default would be absolutely catastrophic, Cantor has repeatedly insisted that failing to raise the debt ceiling wouldn’t be a big deal. (He even claimed at a recent press conference that business leaders have told him “Don’t give in.”) To underscore his point, Cantor is even planning to bring a “clean” debt limit bill to the House floor, specifically so that he and his fellow Republicans can vote against it, thereby proving that the gun they’ve got pressed to the economy’s head is fully loaded.

Like we said: pure lunacy. In fact, if you ask us, it seems like someone could use a good spanking.

Categories
Arts

The Hangover Part II; R, 201 minutes; Carmike Cinema 6

 It’s not the worst, as group-of-dudes comedy sequels go. We’re not talking Ghostbusters II here. But of course we weren’t talking Ghostbusters to begin with. We’re talking The Hangover. So this is a little weird: It’s like expecting more and expecting less at the same time.

Ed Helms, Bradley Cooper and Zach Galifianakis take the Hangover franchise to Bangkok for a bachelor party and subsequent game of “What did we do last night?”

The trouble starts early, with that “based on characters created by” credit. What, so Jon Lucas and Scott Moore, the writers of the original, were too good for this? Possibly, yes. Even viewers repulsed by the first will probably prefer that first film to this torpid follow-up.
Where writing is concerned (it seems unconcerned), director Todd Phillips does the dishonors himself, along with Scot Armstrong, who co-wrote Old School with him, and Craig Mazin, who, uh, was one of eight writers on Scary Movie 3 and one of nine on Scary Movie 4. It’s hard to discern each man’s contributions here, but there is a depressing sense of mutual devaluation.

But where were we? Oh yes, Bangkok—with Bradley Cooper, Zach Galifianakis and Ed Helms. The trio is up to its blackout-inducing bachelor-party antics and after-the-fact deductions thereof. Joining them this time is Ken Jeong, Mike Tyson, that other guy from the first one (Justin Bartha), a drug-running monkey, a lost little brother and Paul Giamatti.

We’re in Bangkok because the outwardly docile Helms character has found himself a Thai fiancee (Jamie Chung), whose father (Nirut Sirichanya) compares him to bland rice porridge. He intends to prove that he is not easily digestible after all. Loyally, Cooper’s hardy partier and Galifianakis’ manic man-boy assist.

The men lumber through their paces for a while, then compensate for the resulting stupor with little fits of overacted hysteria. The film just sort of drags. Yes, the antics are “outrageous.” A clerical effort has been made to restage plot points from the earlier film, but rather than matching its predecessor’s unexpected delights, The Hangover Part II manages mostly disappointments. Where before there was debauchery, now we have, what, rebauchery? It would be ridiculous to speak of innocence lost, so let’s call it innocence calloused by too much abrasiveness—grating motions too often gone through.

As gags flop and various surly phobias bloom into knee-jerk hatefulness, we’re left to consider that the most interesting thing about this film is that its cast vetoed a Mel Gibson cameo. This doesn’t seem like a movie that had empathy once, but it got hurt. That might better describe its audience. But at least it does, with its queasy, regret-inducing ache, actually feel like a hangover.

Categories
News

Counting the homeless

 The latest results of the annual “Point-in-Time” census of the local homeless population show a decrease in both the total number of homeless individuals and the number of unsheltered individuals.

While the annual, one-day census counted fewer area homeless, seasonal shelters and a growing Latino population make a defin-itive count difficult, says Kaki Dimock, director of the Thomas Jefferson Area Coalition for the Homeless.

On January 27, volunteers for the Thomas Jefferson Area Coalition for the Homeless (TJACH) visited local shelters and counted beds that were in use. They also went to places where homeless men and women congregate and conducted a 28-question survey about the circumstances that led them to their current state. Ultimately, volunteers counted 253 homeless, down from 274 last year.

The census also found 201 adults and 34 children in emergency shelters or transitional housing. According to TJACH’s count, the most pronounced decrease came in the number of unsheltered homeless folks: 18, compared to 27 last year.

Seventy percent of those individuals surveyed were males, and 35 percent of respondents had been homeless for less than six months.

“A bias people have about homelessness is that it’s permanent,” says Kaki Dimock, executive director of TJACH. Dimock is also executive director of The Haven, the Downtown day shelter that opened in January 2010.

“Nationally, 80 percent of people are homeless less than two years, so they transition out,” says Dimock, who says that Charlottesville data reflects the same dynamic. “Forty percent [are homeless] less than six months. It’s transitional for most people.”

The results, however, may indicate only a portion of the local homeless population.

“We are not capturing a 30,000-foot view of homelessness in our community,” she says. “Because it happens in January, [the census] counts a group of people as sheltered in our community that, six months out of the year, are not sheltered,” she says. PACEM, the area’s major emergency shelter, is seasonal and only operates from October to April.

“The data that we report to the federal government has a tendency to skew towards a more chronically homeless population,” says Dimock. “It appears as though we have a group that is homeless longer with a greater need than we may actually have, if we counted everybody who is truly homeless,” says Dimock. She adds that TJACH’s census also doesn’t account for homeless Latinos who may not access traditional shelters and care systems.

“We don’t know where they are, so we can’t go gather the data, so the data doesn’t reflect their needs,” says Dimock.

TJACH will submit census data to the federally funded Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) as part of a grant request that could bring $350,000 for three consecutive years. The SAMHSA grant, called Cooperative Agreements to Benefit Homeless Individuals, supports the creation of programs to address mental health issues and substance abuse, problems among the chronic homeless population.

The grant request is a collaboration between TJACH, the City of Charlottesville and Region Ten, a local mental health service provider. Grant money would fund a benefits worker staff position with the City of Charlottesville, two clinicians with Region Ten (one for outreach and one for assessment and programming) and a case manager at The Haven.

While Dimock says the likelihood of receiving the grant is slim, the application has helped clarify the needs for the area homeless population. “We might be in a position to take this sort of programming and try to market it to another funder,” she says.

Downtown apartment, restaurant survive weekend fire

On Sunday afternoon, the Charlottesville Fire Department responded to a small fire on the roof of a Downtown apartment building. After carefully threading a fire engine down the Mall, firemen extinguished the blaze. (And without the assistance of a 10-story ladder, at that.)

The fire began on the roof of 420 E. Main Street, following a party held the previous night. While the local fire marshal was unable to determine the cause, Chief Charles Werner said firefighters spotted dry leaves and cigarette butts in the area of the fire, and identified the items as the “likely cause.”

East Mall LLC, founded by late developer Chuck Lewis, purchased the building in 2003 for nearly $1 million. The site currently hosts retail shops on the bottom floor and apartments upstairs.

The building is next to the former A&N Building, the future site of Alex George’s Commonwealth Restaurant and SkyBar. “I was actually out of town when I heard about it,” says George, the executive chef who previously launched Downtown eateries Just Curry and Cinema Taco . He adds that he hasn’t noticed any damage to his site, nor does he anticipate any setbacks to his restaurant’s construction schedule.
 

Categories
The Editor's Desk

Readers respond to previous issues

Keep digging 

Canzi and Fitzgerald’s excellent review and photos of UVA’s architectural history [“‘Jeffersonian’ quest,” May 17] was a delightful, but limited, exposé of Charlottesville’s primary real estate holder and employer. While I trust that the writers are being factually true to someone’s history of each significant UVA structure mentioned, I think that one or two of their titles for the segmentation of the timeline (of construction) are somewhat misleading. I am referring to the prefatory phrases “Baby steps off the lawn” for Brooks Hall, and “Tampering with Jefferson’s Vision” for Cabell, Cocke and Rouss Halls.

Architectural history that I read while living in New Haven, Connecticut, home of Yale University, explained why Yale’s squat, red-bricked Peabody Museum of Natural history looks like a structure belonging to the UVA campus, and why UVA’s soaring, dark-stoned Brooks Hall looks like a structure belonging to Yale’s campus. Simple reason. Because that’s where they belong.

The UVA architectural plans and the Yale architectural plans got mixed up in Stanford White’s architectural firm in New York City while White (1853-1906) was paying less attention to business and more attention to a young, married woman whose husband ultimately killed him (i.e. White), a dramatic event portrayed in the movie Ragtime. If this mix-up is the “real facts” behind Brooks Hall being what it is and where it is, architecturally speaking, then Brooks Hall definitely belongs under the timeline segment title “Tampering with Jefferson’s vision”, or, alternatively, under a re-write of the segment title “Baby steps off the lawn.” May I suggest the title “Unwanted baby near the Lawn,” or “Strange body under the lawn”, or something like that.

Whatever the change, and I know writers and editors must consider community sensitivities, the ideal of the fifth estate still applies: to communicate accurately the processes of continuation (tradition), growth (reform), and corruption (power mongering) with historical tags that fit the facts (veracity), shared facts being the real basis of an academic village, fancy buildings notwithstanding.

Jefferson and White were both brilliant men with a similar history of miss-calculations and collisions with other people’s social agendas. All the more reason to follow the facts to bedrock. With the items I have focused on, I don’t think this article is there yet. A fine piece of research and writing nonetheless.

Clay Moldenhauer
Charlottesville

Flattery files

I am visiting for a few days in Charlottesville and by chance picked up the latest issue of C-VILLE.

Wanted Mr. Beard to know that I was thrilled with your writing of the article on the ex-Mrs.Kluge [“Wine in the time of poverty,” May 24]. I live in San Francisco and my interest in the subject was mild at best but the quality of your writing was quite exceptional.

I have had a long career in media and content and am nearly finished with my 1,000 page memoir so I believe I have a learned eye for excellent expression—which you have clearly demonstrated. In fact, as a long-time reader of Vanity Fair I think your article would fit in that publication quite comfortably.

J. William Grimes
San Francisco

CORRECTION

Due to a reporting error, last week’s feature story, “Wine in the time of poverty,” flubbed a quote from Ernest Hemingway—the work, context and precise wording. Hemingway wrote a scene in The Sun Also Rises in which one character asks another how he went bankrupt: “Gradually,” he replies, “then suddenly.” The article misattributed the quote to For Whom the Bell Tolls, incorrectly stated that it was in reference to the 1929 stock market crash, and altered it to “Slowly, and then all at once.” Also, in the same article, we failed to catch a misspelling of “ark” in a pull-quote.

Categories
Living

Alcohol rising

The alcohol in wine has been causing quite a buzz lately, and not just the kind that makes you want to hug everyone. One of the hottest issues in the industry these days is wine’s rising ABV (alcohol by volume). Certainly not a new trend, alcohol levels have been climbing for decades. However, some recent decisions by retailers and sommeliers to not stock wines over 14 percent ABV, along with a law passed in the UK mandating restaurants to publish all ABVs on their wine lists, are getting those who see ABV as merely a number all hot and bothered.

A wine’s alcohol comes from the ripeness of the grapes that made it. Riper grapes mean more sugar to be converted into alcohol during fermentation. Alcohol adds body and a perception of sweetness to wines, so when the ABV increases, these qualities are amplified. Sounds appealing, until every wine starts tasting like brandied plum pudding. But, there’s a palate out there for these fruit bombs pushing 16 percent ABV, and it belongs to the world’s most influential wine critic, Robert Parker, whose scores tend to go up as ABVs do. Producers caught on and began letting grapes over-ripen in order to make wines so high in alcohol that they should come with a designated driver. Parker’s allegiant followers buy by score, so even sun-challenged winemakers began producing walloping wines. And now, with what’s been termed “The Parker Effect,” many wines once known for elegant restraint (Burgundies) and quiet strength (Bordeaux) are becoming clumsy, characterless versions of themselves.

How much does this matter to wine drinkers who don’t know their ABVs from their ABCs? Considering the fact that higher alcohol wine gets you drunk faster, it should matter to anyone interested in getting home safely. Without the boring math, the difference between having two glasses of 12.5 percent wine and two glasses of 15.8 percent wine within an hour is 25 percent more alcohol—and the potential to go from within the legal limit to beyond it. Richmond-based wine importer Bartholomew Broadbent believes that consumers should be informed of a wine’s ABV before ordering it and hopes to see a law passed for American restaurants like the one passed in the UK.

“I check the ABV on a wine before the sommelier opens it and I turn it away, more often than not, if it is 15 percent or higher,” he says. “It would save time for them and aggravation for me if I knew the level before ordering it.” For him, it has nothing to do with balance. “A 7 percent wine can be just as balanced as a 16 percent one, but if I can safely have one extra glass of wine a night by buying a 12.5 percent wine versus a 14.5 percent wine, I will always prefer an evening spent with a lower alcohol wine.”

Should it be the restaurant’s duty to provide full disclosure, or simply be a case of buyer beware? Keswick Hall’s sommelier, Richard Hewitt, expects that people who order wine are aware of how it may influence them. “It seems a bit rude to publish ABVs—that would imply that people are not responsible or educated enough to know that alcohol levels vary.” At Keswick, ABVs are discussed in terms of food pairings, though, since a 15 percent Chardonnay isn’t going to match the chef’s hamachi crudo any better than a shot of Jameson would.

And how about those sommeliers and retailers who won’t let beefy wines past their velvet ropes? Rajat Parr, wine director for a San Francisco restaurant group, stirred up controversy when he banned any Pinot Noir or Chardonnay above 14 percent alcohol from his own restaurant. To Parr, it’s all about the balance in these Burgundian grapes, but his decision got him an online slap on the wrist from Parker, who suggested that “arbitrary cutoffs make no sense, and are nothing more than a form of wine fascism.” An interesting criticism from a man who’s made his living and ruined others’ by way of the arbitrary. Fortunately, some retailers, like Tastings of Charlottesville owner Bill Curtis, stay above it all. “I’ve spent my life goading people into exercising their own judgement when I sell wine and the ABV is clearly printed on every label.” And, for those of us who find the number inconsequential and just don’t care? Well, we can just ignore it and enjoy the buzz. 

Categories
Arts

Blowing up

 “Destroy Build Destroy”
Wednesday 8:30pm, Cartoon Network
Cartoon Network has been expanding outside the animated realm for several years, including with this live-action game show, now entering its fourth season. “Destroy Build Destroy” lives up to its name as two teams of teenagers blow up assorted objects using bazookas, rocket launchers and other explosives, use the leftover parts to build a new vehicle, compete to see who has the better creation, and then blow up the losing project. So it’s intended for boys, and grown-ass men who still act like boys. (Read: most of the adult male population.) Overseeing the wanton destruction is Andrew W.K., a musician you may remember from his incredibly stupid 2001 anthem “Party Hard.”

“Surviving D-Day”
Saturday 9-11pm, Discovery Channel
If Memorial Day made you wish you knew a bit more about the sacrifices our servicemen and women made for this country, this two-hour documentary on the 1944 battle for Omaha Beach is a good start. “Surviving D-Day” examines in minute detail the 12-hour siege, using war records, forensics, and testimony from veterans of the battle to recount some of the more mind-blowing details that helped save the day. We’re talking codes and maps hidden in watercolor paintings, exploding dummy paratroopers and the lifesaving effects of buckle-strap designs—fascinating stuff even for non–war buffs.

“Switched at Birth”
Monday 9pm, ABC Family
ABC Family has carved out a nice little niche for itself with teen-centric dramas, and while the execrable “Secret Life of the American Teenager” somehow stays on the airwaves, it has been joined by some decently-made guilty pleasures. “Switched at Birth” has potential to join those ranks. As the title implies, it tells the story of two families brought together after they discover that their teenaged daughters were swapped in the hospital as infants. While one of the girls grew up privileged in an upper-middle-class family, the other was raised by a struggling single mother, and also went deaf after contracting meningitis—a novel twist that could, if handled properly, lead to some thoughtful explorations of deaf culture. The cast includes Lea Thompson (Back to the Future) as the stuck-up rich mom, Constance Marie (“George Lopez”) as the single one, and recent “Celebrity Apprentice” runner-up Marlee Matlin.

Categories
Living

Just a band. With a choir. And horns.

 When I caught up with Parachute’s frontman and songwriter Will Anderson last year, he had just moved from Charlottesville to Nashville, and his band had wrapped up sessions in Los Angeles with the producer John Fields, known for his work with pop artists like the Goo Goo Dolls and Colbie Caillat. Anderson said then that he wanted the band’s new album, The Way It Was, which debuted in the 19th slot on the Billboard 200 last week, to sound like five guys playing together in a room—just a band, playing its songs.

Parachute’s tour in support of new album The Way It Was brings the group to the Jefferson Theater on June 4.

“I think we matched that,” says Anderson over the phone from his new home, Tennessee. “We were adamant about that with John, and he was totally into it. We made an album that sounds big and obviously well-recorded and well-produced. But it can be recreated live, which, for us, is a really important thing.”

The album’s lead single, “Something to Believe In,” is a spirited entry into The Way it Was. As the full-length record goes the way of the 8-track, with The Way It Was the band has hedged its bets on short and sweet. At a brief nine tracks and 40 minutes, it is custom-tailored to a market that prizes the single more than the album. Billboard reported in 2009 that the band’s first release, Losing Sleep, made its charts based on the strength of iTunes sales; for The Way It Was, says Anderson, “We had very specific goals in mind, but, honestly, [the new album] surpassed them. We were really, really excited about the numbers for the week and the response from the fans, and seeing the feedback was amazing.”

It makes you wonder when Parachute will outgrow the Jefferson Theater —where the group plays on June 4 with Schuyler Fisk and Harper Blynn—for the larger nTelos Wireless Pavilion. “Right now, we’re happy to sell out the Jefferson,” says Anderson. “It’s fun to see it sell out every time, and I’m sure within the next year we’ll move up to the Pavilion and really go for it, and really try to blow it out.”

Meanwhile, Anderson’s central task as a songwriter remains a relentless search for creative ways to apply “love” to “her”—sometimes expressed as “you.” The Way It Was fills in the blanks in some interesting ways. The album’s second single, “You and Me,” tells the story of a pair of outlaws up “against the world” and a vague attempt to “take the money and run.” The hints of violence are so out of step with the band’s middle-of-the-road sound and squeaky-clean image as to sound almost farcical. (“We did our crime and got away / stole the gold and made the day,” he sings.)

But adult contemporary doesn’t make any pretensions toward poetry, and more convincing than the band’s lyrical content is its knack for rich and rousing arrangements. The album’s first track “White Dress” opens with a barrage of percussive guitars that will remind listeners of the band’s more Maroon 5-indebted first album that explodes into a sugar-coated chorus. But on the new record the band’s bag of tricks has grown. Alex Hargrave’s hyperactive basslines recall Coldplay, while the soaring vocal arrangements channeled through Peter Gabriel, aided by drummer Johnny Stubblefield’s able imitations of U2’s Larry Mullen, achieve a driving pop transcendence—granted, with the occasional help of a gospel choir.

But parts of The Way It Was will strike local listeners for how much it draws on Charlottesville’s other very famous export, the Dave Matthews Band. You might mistake Kit French’s percussive baritone saxophone stabs on lead single “Something to Believe In” for those of the late LeRoi Moore, Matthews’ horn player. Ditto for the gospel choir, which riffs on latter-day Dave and is a surprising and welcome addition.

“It’s nine really good songs that I’m proud of,” says Anderson. “I’d show anybody to show them that this is what we can do.”

Categories
News

Six Degrees of Separation; Live Arts; Through June 12

When Paul first shows up at Flan and Ouisa Kittredge’s posh Central Park apartment, he says that he’s been stabbed, and that the only copy of his Harvard thesis has been stolen. But after Paul charms the couple by claiming to be the son of Sidney Poitier—who Paul claims is planning a live-action adaptation of Cats—the Kittredges forget their discomfort, and insist that this stranger, who seems to know the couple’s children, spend the night recovering in their home.

In Six Degrees of Separation, Kay Leigh Ferguson and Doug Schneider play Flan and Ouisa Kittredge, easy dupes for a charming young con man (Lance Lemon, pictured) claiming to be the son of the Sidney Poitier.

By morning, we get the inkling that Paul is not who he said he was. John Guare’s Six Degrees of Separation, which plays at Live Arts through June 12, examines the art of the swindle, which is itself a kind of acting. The story, based on the actual exploits of David Hampton, a con man who managed to infiltrate Guare’s clique of New York art elites, is not really about the mechanics of Paul’s hustle. It’s about being played for a fool.

Performance relies on a mutual agreement to misdirect and to be misdirected. For Paul, played well by a wispy Lance Lemon, the only mode seems to be misdirection. Even after his deception takes the life of a dupe, he doesn’t appear to be remorseful, doesn’t change. He’s not even a very good thief. But he gets under the skin of the Kittredges.

Through Paul, Kay Leigh Ferguson’s Ouisa seems to take a kind of quiet joy in experiencing victimhood. Ferguson gives Ouisa of subtle, matter-of-fact quality that downplays the character’s epiphanies and even her possible attraction to Paul. She plays the flake, only to find that she can stretch out her wings a bit, even be defiant. Unfortunately, the plotting gives Ouisa a somewhat ham-fisted closing; fortunately, Ferguson’s decision to remain on a lower key helps smooth the strangeness of the final scene.

Doug Schneider, known locally as a singer, is one of the best character actors in the area. His Flan lacks transcendence, but it’s hardly a distraction. (The on-stage nudity is, however.) Elsewhere, the bulk of the players are prescribed a scene or two at most, which is a glitch of the scripting. Nonetheless, these thinly-sketched characters are generally given a good go by the cast. I think of Edwina Herring, Alex Davis and Michael Goldstein, who should be given more than a dollop of stage time in future productions.

Six Degrees is fitting material for director Betsy Tucker, who is attracted to multi-layered scripts. (Her Beard of Avon, previously at Live Arts, was not as much about anti-Stratfordianism as it was about gender.) She hurdles the bumpy script with relish. I wondered what this story would have been like had it been penned by David Mamet or Sarah Ruhl or Caryl Churchill, playwrights with a clearer grasp on the notion that chaos and trickery can be redemptive. But even with an elusive and rocky script, Live Arts offers a solid, workhorse production full of compelling performances and ideas.