Categories
News

UVA Board of Visitors supports zero-tolerance sexual assault policy

UVA’s Board of Visitors voted unanimously in a special meeting today to commit to a zero tolerance policy for sexual assault.

The meeting came six days after the publication of an explosive report by Rolling Stone detailing a reported 2012 gang rape at a fraternity and a culture of covering up sexual assaults on Grounds. The vote came after lengthy discussion of the story’s impact on the University community, which in the last week has seen protests, numerous statements from administrators, the temporary suspension of all fraternities and sororities, and commitments from advocates, students and school officials to change the culture around sexual assault.

“Part of the reason we got here is because we swept things under the rug,” said Board of Visitors member Helen Dragas, who shared her feelings about the story with C-VILLE in an e-mail interview this week. Dragas, who choked back tears when she initially took her turn to report to the rest of the board Tuesday, was the one who proposed the motion.

“Like so many of you, I have been heartbroken over the last few days,” she said. “I think it’s important to put into words the suffering that our victims, their families, go through.”

Earlier today, Attorney General Mark Herring announced the appointment of three attorneys with the firm O’Melveny & Myers would serve as a special counsel to the board—the promised investigatory outfit announced by Governor Terri McAuliffe last week.  The trio consists of Danielle Gray, Apalla Chopra and Walter Dellinger. Dellinger is a former acting Solicitor General of the United States who successfully argued a landmark Title IX case, Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The attorneys are tasked with investigating the reported 2012 rape and its handling by the University, scrutinizing its overall policy on sexual assault, and assisting the board in determining what “cultural and institutional” changes must be made to support survivors and encourage them to come forward.

“The University of Virginia community and all Virginians have been stunned by the horrific story Rolling Stone brought to light, as well as the apparent inadequacy of the University’s response to this and other past reports of sexual violence,” Herring said in a press release announcing the counsel’s appointment. “Charlottesville Police have been asked to handle any criminal investigations into this specific attack, but all other aspects of campus sexual violence, including how school officials handled this case, will be thoroughly and independently scrutinized. I have made it clear this will be an aggressive and consequential investigation and review. The safety of our students is too important to accept anything less than a full accounting of what happened and bold ideas to ensure that no student suffers the unimaginable trauma of sexual violence or the injustice of an inadequate institutional response.”

Categories
Arts

Musical heirs: New Boss is reborn through old connections

More than once, my father has mentioned a desire to trace our family tree. I only understand this practice in abstract terms though. The closest concrete example I know of such a family tree comes not from any genetic kinship but rather attempts by friends to detail the shared ancestry of musicians in local bands. If the trunk of this family tree is the Central Virginia music scene, the thickest branches are Charlottesville, Harrisonburg and Richmond. Bands of varying degrees of success form nodes off these branches. Countless musicians fill the space between these nodes, each interweaving, connecting and disconnecting over the years.

As a band, New Boss exemplifies this interconnectedness and boasts quite a pedigree through the collective experience of its musicians. Guitarist Thomas Dean puts it simply: “It was always the same scene, it just hadn’t worked out that we were in a band together specifically, but a lot of our bandmates were in bands together,” he said.

Including Dean, the band is Jordan Perry on guitar and vocals, Scott Ritchie on bass, Parker Smith on drums, Nick Rubin on keyboard and Chelsea Blakely on vocals and electric organ.

The current line-up has evolved from the band’s inception. In fact, even New Boss’ origin story showcases a complicated ancestry, tracing to a far-reaching node on the family tree: Order of the Dying Orchid (later known simply as Order).

Boasting countless members (including both Dean and Smith), Order was so influential in Charlottesville’s music culture that I won’t attempt to detail it here. Suffice it to say that New Boss began as a glint in Dean’s eye, a hope that he might be able to restart Order after a few years of dormancy. He enlisted Rob Dobson, formerly of The Fire Tapes, as well as Smith, Rubin and Ritchie. “It seemed like generally everyone would be more comfortable if we changed the name since it was a different thing,” said Dean. Thus, New Boss was born.

The band describes its sound as “tweeboogie,” a term coined by Rubin on an early tour in North Carolina. The lead singer at the time, Carolyn Zelikow, brought a certain precious sound to the songs while the rest of the band juxtaposed that with jammy rock ‘n’ roll. Zelikow has left the band, as has Dobson, with Perry now taking the lead on songwriting and vocals and the band is “still a lot of boogie, but a little less twee,” Smith said.

Perry joined the band after returning to Virginia from a two-year stint teaching guitar at a music school for refugees in the Palestinian city of Ramallah. “I was really excited because it had been a long time since I’d played in a band,” he said. Prior to his time abroad, Perry had played in countless bands and knew Dean, Smith and Ritchie.

In the new version of New Boss, Dean leads the creative process by building instrumental bones for a song, then Perry composes vocals to complete the track.

“I like the way people interpret music and I realize that sometimes songs aren’t just one way,” said Dean. “There’s one way that I’d probably choose to play them but I like seeing a group of people take and interpret the parts.” As a result, New Boss has a sound that continues to evolve but never fails to satisfy.

With an eye towards producing two cassette releases, New Boss is working to finish several recordings. One of the cassettes is slated to contain material from Zelikow’s time with the band as well as some of Perry’s material. The other cassette will feature the band’s new songs on one side, saving room on the flip side for new songs by Borrowed Beams of Light, another band whose lineage is intertwined with many local musicians. New Boss also has hopes for an upcoming tour and will be performing on Friday at the Southern along with another notable local act Dead Professional.

Originally comprised as a solo act by John Harouff, Dead Professional has recently grown. “I started out last year playing shows solo with looped drum beats and vocal effects,” said Harouff. “This past summer I started playing with a more traditional band.” This evolution allows Harouff the space to experiment with his sound and then expand on it. For the upcoming show, Taven Wilson will join Harouff on bass and vocals along with New Boss’ Parker Smith on drums.

Last summer Harouff released the Dead Professional single “Downtown at Sundown,” which features a catchy drumbeat backed by hand claps and guitar tracks that are at times structurally rhythmic, at times rambling. Drum machines and looped samples play a role in the recorded effort that clearly highlights Harouff’s talent as a songsmith who crafts evocative pop music that’s a bit bittersweet, a bit rock ‘n’ roll.

Dead Professional recently released its first official EP titled Hard, Hard, Hard and is planning a 2015 tour. For now, don’t miss the chance to see the band with New Boss at The Southern Café & Music Hall on November 28 with opening band White Laces.

Help us grow the local music family tree by posting at www.c-ville.com/arts.

Categories
News

Crimes and punishments: Universities, sexual assault, and why UVA is under investigation

This story is part of our ongoing coverage in the wake of the Rolling Stone story on rape at UVA. There’s more: A Q&A with Board of Visitors member Helen Dragas on her reaction to the story, responses from the Rolling Stone reporter and women she interviewed as well as two women who reported their own rapes while students, a look at an alumna’s success raising money for a victims’ defense fund, and information on victims coming forward from a Charlottesville prosecutor. 

Reaction to last week’s Rolling Stone piece that detailed allegations of the 2012 gang rape of a UVA student by fraternity brothers was swift and visceral. There was horror and confusion—why does the University attempt to resolve rape cases at all? Isn’t that the courts’ job? What happens when a student reports a rape to the University? And why hasn’t UVA ever kicked anybody out for rape if we know it happens all the time?

We’ve gathered explanations from sources who understand the good, the bad and the ugly when it comes to fighting sexual assault on college campuses. All of them were quoted in the Rolling Stone story. Here’s the in-depth policy discussion that didn’t make into that narrative.

“Why do universities adjudicate sexual assault at all? Rape is a serious crime, so why do schools treat it like an administrative issue?”

Short answer? They have to.

“Under current federal law, a college or university cannot say, ‘We are not going to have an institutional conduct process to address sexual assault,’” said S. Daniel Carter, director of the 32 National Campus Safety Initiative, which aims to develop practical safety guidelines for colleges. It’s a project of the Centreville-based VTV Family Outreach Foundation, a nonprofit founded in the wake of the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting to fund violence prevention in higher education. Carter was among those who pushed hard for the passage of the 2013 Campus Sexual Violence Elimination (SaVE) Act, an update to the 1990 Clery Act that introduced new demands on colleges when it comes to reporting and adjudicating sexual assault.

It’s worth noting, Carter said, that schools didn’t create sexual assault proceedings because the government told them to. Colleges and universities have long had internal adjudication for all manner of offenses, whether they’re crimes or not.

Then came Title IX of the education amendments of 1972, which says nobody can be denied access to a publicly funded education on the basis of gender. Along with the Clery Act, it helped establish some guarantees for those involved in adjudication processes, Carter said. Because sexual assault overwhelmingly affects women, it’s a gender-discrimination issue for colleges: If an institution receives federal funding, it has to have a system for internally addressing sexual assault claims.

That’s a good thing, said Carter.

“Sometimes, either due to the wishes of the victim or the decisions of a prosecutor, there may not be a criminal justice path,” he said. “That may often leave the college or university as the only venue to provide safety for the victim and others on campus.” Consider, too, he said, that the criminal justice system doesn’t necessarily have the power to keep an accused rapist off campus ahead of a trial—something a victim might feel she needs. A university can do that thanks to Title IX, Carter said.

“Why don’t schools at least report the details of every sexual assault complaint they get to law enforcement?”

“Mandatory reporting to law enforcement is fraught with significant challenges,” said Carter, and no school he knows of has or is considering such a policy.

“We’re talking about an adult victim who has had their autonomy violated, their decision-making ability stripped away from them,” he said of sexual assault survivors. Forcing them to report would be repeating that situation, he said, and the consensus among victims’ advocates is that it would only deter people from coming forward at all.

The Clery Act does require that institutions encourage and support victims if they choose to report to law enforcement—an option Carter said he and many other advocates are strongly in favor of. But it doesn’t require them to report, and the recently passed Campus SaVE Act explicitly says victims have a right not to report.

Not everybody thinks that’s wise.

“You are asking a young traumatized girl to make a decision, and you’re putting the option on the table of doing nothing, going to the police or mediation as if all three options weigh the same,” said Susan Russell, who has been an outspoken critic of UVA’s approach to handling sexual assault ever since her daughter Kathryn attempted to get the man she said raped her in 2004 expelled.

“Kathryn’s Law,” proposed in the Virginia legislature 2011, would have required local law enforcement to be notified of all reported rapes at schools in the Commonwealth. A watered-down version of the act passed without the reporting requirement, and Russell is pushing for new legislation to be considered again in 2015. The attack described in the Rolling Stone piece cried out for mandatory reporting, she said.

“When an administrator knows that a girl has been gang raped by seven people and gives her the option to do nothing, then that administrator is complicit with the crime,” said Russell.

“Where’s the accountability? If this mandated internal process works, why hasn’t anybody been expelled from UVA for rape?”

Good question.

UVA is one of 88 colleges and universities currently under investigation by the Department of Education (DOE) for specific complaints of possible Title IX violations related to their handling of sexual assault cases. Back in November 2012, well before the list of schools under scrutiny was announced in May 2014, C-VILLE reported that the University was under “compliance review” by the DOE’s Office of Civil Rights, something the Rolling Stone story points out is a deeper, broader investigation into systemic issues in the way a school handles sexual assault cases.

“Compliance reviews are not random audits of schools; they are selected based on various sources of information—including statistical data and prior complaints, information from students, parents, advocacy groups, the media and community organizations—and are initiated based on a considered and targeted decision that investigation is necessary in order to remedy possible violations of rights,” said Catherine Lhamon, assistant secretary for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Education, in an e-mail interview.

This is not UVA’s first showdown with the DOE over sexual assault policy. In November 2008, the department found UVA had violated the Clery Act when officials told two women who had brought unsuccessful complaints that they were forbidden from accessing their case records unless they swore to keep them confidential. The University wasn’t fined.

We know more about another complaint from a 2011 case that has been folded into DOE’s compliance review thanks to court records filed by a former student known only as Jane Doe. She claims UVA officials violated the school’s own policy in adjudicating her claim by allowing the accused student, whom she says drugged and raped her, to review evidence she never got to see, and by letting him directly question her. She also said that in her case, it’s clear the Sexual Misconduct Board used an evidence standard that was too strict: Since April 2011, the DOE has required that schools find in favor of an alleged victim if it’s “more likely than not” that an assault took place—something known as a preponderance standard—as opposed to the far more strict “clear and convincing” standard used in criminal courts. Jane Doe says the University said she was “credible,” but still didn’t find her assailant guilty of rape.

UVA’s response to these claims has been that it’s fully complying with the DOE investigation, and that it has updated its policies so that they’re in line with current standards.

So why no rape expulsions?

Fourth-year Catherine Valentine, a reporter for the student-run radio station WUVA, wanted to know exactly that when she sat down to interview Associate Dean Nicole Eramo in September. She was reporting on why the University handles honor offenses—lying, cheating and stealing, which are punishable only by expulsion—so differently from sexual assault complaints. The 21-minute interview, which Valentine posted uncut online after the Rolling Stone story was published, reveals a lot about the philosophy that guides UVA’s sexual assault policies. 

Eramo, who has chaired the University’s Sexual Misconduct Board since 2006, works closely with survivors who come to the administration wanting to report sexual assault. Regardless of whether they’re also pursuing a criminal investigation, those who come to the deans to report can ask for no school-led process, seek an informal resolution or opt for a formal trial in front of the Sexual Misconduct Board, which includes at least one student and at least two faculty members, Eramo explained in the interview.

Few people choose the last option. Out of the 38 students who came to her last year, Eramo told Valentine, only nine wanted any action, and only four of those wanted a formal trial.

“You would be very surprised the number of times I hear, ‘I don’t want to get him in trouble,’” said Eramo. Many people have no interest in seeing their rapist expelled, they just want validation and a road map to move forward, she said.

“They’re not looking for that type of sanction,” said Eramo. “They’re looking to be able to look into the eyes of that other person and say, ‘You’ve wronged me in some way,’ and they’re generally quite satisfied with the fact that the person has admitted that they’ve done something wrong.”

When Valentine pressed Eramo to explain why students who admit to sexual assault aren’t kicked out, things got testy.

“If a person is willing to come forward and admit [wrongdoing] when there’s absolutely no advantage to doing so, then that does deserve some consideration,” Eramo insisted.

She also offered an explanation for why the punishment of choice for those found guilty after a trial is suspension. It has to do with the preponderance standard, she claimed: The threshold for guilt is lower than it would be for a criminal conviction, so “there’s some mitigation there in terms of sanction and standard,” Eramo said. “I think what you’re seeing is if our board feels they’re only 51 percent certain that somebody committed an offense, they’re not willing to expel that person permanently.”

Ultimately, Eramo said, “we are trying to balance the rights of the individual who’s being accused and the rights of the complainant, and sometimes that’s very difficult.”

The DOE has yet to decide if UVA is handling that very difficult equation right. A department spokesman confirmed that the compliance review, now more than two years old, is ongoing. There’s no timetable for completion.

Categories
Magazines Village

The family that plays together: How to deal with a bunch of drama queens? Take them to the theater

It’s 8:45pm on a cold November night. The tech rehearsal has been going since 4pm, and I’ve been at the theater since 11am. My shoulders have inched gradually up to hover around my ears. The cast is running the finale with lights and sound, and in my capacity as assistant director, I’m sitting next to the director taking dictation of her notes. In pairs and small groups, the cast converges from various points to hit their final stage picture. All is going well until… My 6-year-old son doesn’t enter on cue, leaving a gap. We stop, and the director calls his name. The stage left Stage Manager calls back that she can’t find him. I’m half annoyed, half alarmed. After a pause, the stage right Stage Manager sticks her head out to say she’s found him sleeping on a bench backstage. She rouses him, we start the song again, and he finishes strong. The rehearsal is finally over. We give notes to the cast, and I wearily collect my things for the half-hour drive home. “My things” in this case include my son and my 9-year-old daughter, my husband, and four scripts, water bottles, pencils, coats, and bags of dinner remnants. We struggle to the car, load our gear, buckle up, and head out. I turn to my son, who hasn’t been to bed on time in six weeks.

Me: “Were you nodding off backstage, buddy?”

6-year-old: “I was just resting my eyes. I was still listening, though.”

9-year-old: “Pffft, yeah right. You missed your cue!”

6-year-old: “I DID NOT MISS MY CUE!”

9-year-old: “Did TOO.”

6-year-old: “Did NOT, I was AWAKE!”

And they’re off. The family that plays together, stays together—and bickers in the car all the way home from the theater. Crabby Husband and I snap for quiet, and I switch on the continuous Christmas music station, a guaranteed crowd pleaser this November. The play we’re working on is A Christmas Carol, and it helps us get in the mood. Among all the firsts on this work experience—my first full-length stage adaptation, my first directing experience, my first time working alongside the kids—the fact that it’s the first time we’ve all belted out “Faaaaallllll on your kneeeees!” along with Martina McBride is the one that surprises me most.

My husband and I are longtime theater enthusiasts raising two hammy children, so perhaps doing a family play was inevitable, but our experience last fall came together by accident. I had committed to adapting and assistant directing A Christmas Carol, and early on the director and I made the decision that I would also perform as the Ghost of Christmas Future, so we didn’t stick another actor with a non-speaking role. Then my daughter asked to audition, and did well. My husband read on a whim when he came to pick her up, and he was great, too. The director mercy-cast my son so he wouldn’t have to stay home with a sitter while the rest of his family did a show together during the holidays. Et voilà, family play!

I went into rehearsals with a lot of anxiety about involving the kids. The anticipation of months of rushed meals and late nights triggered my Fun Police alert system. I worried they were too young to take on the challenge, and I hoped all the hard work would feel worth it.

And as my opening anecdote suggests, we had some stressful times. Parenting is hard, parenting while working is hard, parenting people who are working hard is hard, and doing it all at once was… Well, hard. It was cool to have our kids get to know us as parents and people in a very different context, and also a little weird.

I found myself having conversations I never would have imagined, like this one, with my son backstage on opening night:

Me: “I need to do your makeup. Go get the eyeliner.”

Son: “I’ll have to steal it from Dad. He’s hogging it.”

My daughter also loved the makeup. As we got ready for dress rehearsal, my husband watched her shellack on layers of lipstick. After layer five, he suggested she might have on enough, and she snapped back, “Dad, I am actually allowed to wear makeup, and I am GOING TO ENJOY IT.”

As the show got going, we had fun opportunities for backstage bonding. I paged the curtain for 9-year-old’s first entrance as the Ghost of Christmas Past, and we became so familiar with the text of the preceding scene between Scrooge and Marley that we could do a fully silent lipsynced performance of it, complete with overwrought gestures and dramatic facial expressions.

Another ritual I loved was waiting for the curtain call with my 6-year-old. I wore a big, billowing cloak as the Ghost of Christmas Future, and my tired little guy would escape the chill backstage by creeping under it and resting his head against my stomach. To the outside observer, we would have looked like one head, one black pyramid of body, and four feet.

Our show closed on a matinee performance, and we spent several hours striking the set before going out to dinner with a family of friends from the cast. Bedtime was a tearful, over-tired affair, but finally we were tucking in covers and snapping off lights. I heard my daughter choke out a question to my husband clouded by the last of her tears: “Daddy? Is it always this hard?” And his gentle answer: “Only when you’re lucky.”

Categories
Magazines Village

Ahead of the game: Sixteen-year-old snowboarder Ward Saunders is already making his way

Earlier this year, then-15-year-old snowboarder and Charlottesville native Ward Saunders traveled to Copper Mountain, Colorado, to compete in the U.S.A. Snowboard Association’s national championships. Described by the event website as “the largest snowboard and free skiing event on earth,” the national championships invite top regional winter sport athletes from around the country to compete by age bracket for a shot at a spot in the U.S.A. snowboard team development camp, a training ground for future Olympic hopefuls.

Saunders excels at boardercross, an untimed elimination heat in which a group of four snowboarders race down a narrow, serpentine incline, around and over jumps, drops, and speed bump-like “rollers.”

“Each event has several races. On average I have three or four, but they can get up to seven or eight, and it’s exhausting,” Saunders said. “You take one run at the beginning, then they put you in brackets based on your time. You have to get top two to advance, and then you’re against the top two from another bracket. You’re racing for the top eight. ”

He placed first or second in his first five races on Copper Mountain, which gave him the edge to move on to the championship’s single heat consolation run—his last chance to make the top eight. Saunders described that final race as one of his best moments in his career on the slopes.

His invitation to the U.S.A. snowboard team camp followed. “The day after school ended, I flew out to Oregon to ride with the U.S. snowboard team at Mount Hood for 10 days,” he said. “That was really surreal. I was racing for fun against guys I’ve only seen on TV. I was able to ride the chairlift with Nick Baumgartner [a member of the 2014 Winter Olympic team], who I’ve looked up to since I’ve done boardercross.”

WardSaunders1
Ward Saunders

Now 16, Saunders began skiing when he was about 5 years old, but at age 8, he discovered the snowboard during a family trip to Telluride, Colorado.

Since then, he’s honed his snowboarding skills at Wintergreen Resort, which “was really small after going to a bunch of different mountains, but it was a great place to learn,” Saunders said. “At first it was just about balance and keeping the fundamentals of your board flat on the snow and learning how to stop.”

Saunders entered his first competition, a boardercross and skiercross event held at Wintergreen, at age 12. He eventually joined the resort’s snowboarding team, where he heard about Gould Academy, a small private prep school in the ski resort town of Bethel, Maine, that focuses on training its students to become better winter sport athletes.

“My family members have gone to boarding school, so that was an option for me,” Saunders said. “The ski program at Wintergreen was started by the ski coach at Gould, so we checked it out.”

Now he lives in Bethel, where the majority of students spend six days a week on the snow. Classes alternate in length throughout the year to maximize training time, and Saunders and his peers spend about four hours a day “riding around, carving drills, messing around in the terrain park, and going off jumps,” he said. The school offers competitive snowboarding and skiing, and students who don’t join the competition program can spend time alpine skiing, working ski patrol, or teaching local middle school students how to ski.

It’s a major change from Charlottesville. “Up here, it’s normal for kids to be skiing and snowboarding,” Saunders said. “I’m around kids who have the same interests I have and do the same sports that I do. We usually talk about professional snowboarders or which competitions we’re doing and how last year went.”

Since his time with the U.S. snowboard team, Saunders has been invited to train with more Olympic hopefuls at a U.S. gold conditioning camp in Utah. At school, he focuses specifically on boardercross, an idea encouraged during his time with Baumgartner. “Nick told me that he was 15 when he started snowboarding and that he worked his ass off to get where he is today. He realized strength and condition were a big factor to getting him there, so I thought about that and now I go to the gym much more.”

That routine includes weight lifting and high-intensity cardio with a coach five days a week, as well as agility training to improve balance and coordination. “You have to have a lot of intensity to compete with kids your age,” he said. “I had a huge growth spurt the summer between freshman and soph-
omore year. I came in a lot taller and had a good season. This year I’ll be travelling a lot, going out West five or six times. In the higher end competitions like in California and Canada, you have to get in the top 10 or top five a few times to be able to qualify.”

He hopes to achieve just that at Owl’s Head, a ski resort near Quebec, where he’ll compete for a spot at the U.S. Snowboarding Junior World Champi-
onships in China. “That’s like the best riders my age competing against riders from different countries,” he said.

Beyond the snow, Saunders has two long-term goals: to get into a college where he can compete during the winter and still go to class, and find a way to play baseball, too. “I played in the McIntire Little League in Charlottesville, then at Lane Babe Ruth, and now I’m playing center field at Gould,” he said. “Baseball and snowboarding don’t compare. Snowboarding is hurry up and wait, and baseball is a pretty slow sport. But,” he added, “it’s much more relaxing.”

Categories
Magazines Village

More than you can chew: Practical tips for parents of picky eaters

I was stewing—not something on the stovetop, but because of the article I was reading. The title, “Getting Your Kids to eat (or at Least Try) Everything,” promised so much. The content provided so little.

The author’s solution to getting kids to try new things was to do what he, a cook-book writer and cooking columnist, did. Yep, feed them the exotic foods you’re making while doing research for your paying job, and you’ll be just fine. Oh, and make sure you start the process the instant the tykes can gum down solids, or you’re out of luck.

A praiseworthy pursuit, but not practical. For most of us, getting kids to eat the food we enjoy is difficult. My 3- and nearly 5-year-old make it their nightly mission to overthrow me as family culinary director. They proclaim their right to “pick the dinner.” They claim they aren’t hungry. They refuse to eat. They even offer helpful prep suggestions—the other night when I told my oldest I was making pot roast, she suggested we turn it into “chicken pot roast pie.”

I admit this is my fault. While these days I feed the girls what my wife and I eat, in their younger years I fell prey to the ease of feeding them first and later making adult dinner.

But I can’t go back in time. I long ago started this pot roast, and now I’ve got to turn it into chicken pot roast pie.

I turned to UVA nutritionist and children’s health specialist Angie Hasemann for suggestions. How do I get my picky eaters to pick up forkfuls? Here are a few of her best tips.

Show, don’t tell. Hasemann said the most powerful thing you can do for your children’s diet is to be a role model. If they see you enjoying a big salad, they’re more likely to down a plate of romaine themselves. “Kids do an awful job of doing what we say, but they do a great job of doing what we do,” Hasemann said.

Avoid the power struggle. The dinner table is the wrong place to take a hard line. Instead of insisting your kids finish what’s on their plate, set baseline rules about trying new things and be consistent in how you enforce them. In the heat of the moment, make it seem like it’s not that big a deal; your kids will be more likely to feed off their meal than feed off your frustration.

Be persistent. There’s no magic number of times children should try a new food, but keep at it even if they don’t take to it like cheese to macaroni on first bite. “I tell kids those little bumps on their tongues are taste buds, and they change regularly,” Hasemann said. The way we experience food is subject to mood, time of day, and hunger level, so give your little guy or gal plenty of chances to decide once and for all parsnips are yucky.

Serve new foods first. “We eat fastest when we start a meal,” Hasemann said. If your kids sit down and quickly fill up on chicken nuggets, they’ll be less interested in their broccolini. Encourage them to start on their veggies, and if that fails, try coursing out your meals.

Involve kids in prep. Haseman said if you want your kids to try something new, have them help make it. They’ll be less likely to throw out the Y-word if they have some pride in the dish on the table.

Ditch the junk. A lot of kids think of “snacks” as being more fun than “meals,” because snack time means junk food time. Hasemann said some nutritionists advocate serving only foods you’d find at meals for snacks so there’s less of a perceived difference. Whatever you serve for snack, keep it small (snacks should be the size of one hand, meals should be equal to both hands together) so your kids come to the table hungry—the best state for trying new grub.

Have fun with it. Hasemann doesn’t talk to kids about calories and nutrition, she tells them what good foods can do for them. The old spinach-makes-Popeye-strong thing might be played out, but what kid wouldn’t want laser vision from carrots? “One parent told me she tells a story about how a green monster is coming to eat all her kids’ peas,” Hasemann said. “Then when she turns away, the kids eat their peas. It makes it fun and not stressful for anyone, and that’s great.”

Reward carefully. Rewards “shouldn’t cost money, and they shouldn’t be food,” Hasemann said. Choose a privilege-based reward for trying new vittles, like getting to sit at the head of the table, and never punish kids for passing.

If the Gibbs household is any indication, none of these tips are a quick fix, but we’ve improved. In the meantime, does anyone have a good recipe for chicken pot roast pie?

Categories
Magazines Village

Naming conventions: With your kid’s moniker, buck trends

I remember the moment my husband and I decided on a name for our first child. I wish I could tell you that the clouds parted and the sun shone on my belly as the universe accepted the name for its new inhabitant. Names are big deals, after all. The truth is, we were driving to Sam’s Club to buy toilet paper and tubs of hummus. I was doing a little jig in the front seat, trying to “hold it” as the baby karate chopped my bladder.

“I don’t think I care that people will think of the chipmunk,” I said, after stressing about the connotation for weeks.

“OK. I don’t either.”

“OK, so Simon?”

“Simon.”

That’s how our son was named.

I did all the pregnant woman stuff: prenatal yoga, walking clubs, and Facebook groups where I got to form opinions on things that I didn’t even know I could have an opinion about: What kind of sippy cup is best? Should my mesh crib bumper have ties or velcro?

I also learned that keeping baby’s name a “surprise” is what people do now. You don’t tell a living soul, then you announce the name, along with a photo of the newborn baby on Instagram, then you make sure you link it to your Facebook, too. I’m not making fun here. A quick scroll through my own social networking accounts would show you that I do just this. It is, after all, what the “cool” moms do these days.

A few other trends I noticed to which I adhered:

1) The baby must have a name that is unique, lest someone else in their kindergarten class have the same name.

2) Whatever you do, the name must not be on the list that pops up when you Google search “100 Most Popular Baby Names” (I named my second child “Owen” which is no doubt on the popular list, but it’s OK, because it’s a boy name and she’s a girl. I know you were worried. Phew, right?)

And some others, which I noticed after I had my own babies and therefore couldn’t get in on:

1) You can make up a name for your baby. Or you can make up a different spelling of a common name. Both are acceptable.

2) Your children can have themed names; all children’s names can start with the same letter or come from your favorite book, for example.

OK, I’m obviously being a bit dramatic here, people. In all seriousness, naming my kids was my favorite part of being pregnant. I loved picturing a sweet little face to go with the name. I loved doodling it on notepads and ordering products with their monogram on it. As with most things in life, my choice of names for my kids was met with some opposition and some acceptance. Most people get really annoyed that I named my daughter a predominantly male name. She rocks it, though. And I have a “boy” name, so I’m allowed, right?

Here’s what I’ve learned: Whatever name you choose for your kiddo, own it. Love it. You only get to do it once!

Categories
Magazines Village

Losing your parenting ego: Keeping the kids’ needs in mind

There’s an old saying: “A sweater is what you put on when your mother is cold.”

I’d like to add that it’s also what you put on when your mother fears judgment from fellow parents at the bus stop for possibly allowing her child to go slightly underdressed.

My own mother forced me to wear a coat until the spring equinox every year of my childhood regardless of the actual temperature. Back then it was still commonly believed that you could catch the flu from inappropriate attire, so I’ll cut my mom some slack. But that myth is no excuse for my own status as an occasional sweater pusher. I do it because, well, I’m always cold, but more importantly, I don’t want to spend the day worrying that my children might be cold—I just don’t have time for that! Also, and this is embarrassing to admit, but I really do care what other people think. If my daughter doesn’t wear a sweater, will “they” think I don’t care for her comfort? Will they label me a lazy parent? Will they assume I’m incapable of handling a second grader who whines every morning having to wear an outer layer?

Deep down I believe that if I’ve ensured my child’s warmth, packed all the right things in her lunchbox and checked that she did her homework correctly, then everyone, including me, will know I’m a good parent—that day anyway.

The parenting ego is a powerful thing, but as hard as it is to fight, it really has no place in child rearing, according to the experts. With research to back it up, they say that when parents focus, consciously or not, on meeting their own needs—whether that’s to keep up appearances, be proud, or just feel engaged and involved—they might not be satisfying their children’s needs to become self-sufficient, confident, resilient, capable adults. To do that, children must have age-appropriate autonomy and the freedom to make mistakes and take risks. When children have the physical and psychological ability to do something or make a decision, they should be allowed to do it from that point on—whether that’s tying their shoes, choosing their outerwear, riding their bikes to a friend’s house three streets over or giving up soccer.

Also, according to renowned social psychologist Carol Dweck, parents should praise children’s efforts, not their actual accomplishments, even if that means parents don’t get to put one of those “My Child Made the Honor Roll!” bumper stickers on their minivans. Dweck says praising or labeling children as “smart” or a “star” athlete may actually tamp down on their motivation to take on new challenges that could jeopardize their status.

All of this is easier said than done, of course, especially when you’re already 10 minutes late for work and forced to watch your child struggle to make bunny ears with her tennis shoe laces. For fellow parents who, like me, are valiantly battling their egos, but just need to celebrate little victories once in a while, here are a few suggested new bumper stickers for the family truckster:

“My child went sockless in 30-degree weather and the world didn’t end.

Also, she says she’ll wear socks tomorrow!”

“My child struck out all four times at bat at Little League and still showed up and tried his best the next time!”

“My teenager decided to drop all of her AP classes,

but at least now she doesn’t totally hate school anymore!”

Categories
Magazines Village

Life saver: The Wildlife Center of Virginia provides real-world education

Dahlia Lithwick didn’t hold out much hope for the injured baby bird her family found last spring.

“We put it in a box and were feeding it worms from our compost heap, trying to keep him alive as best we could,” she said. After a lengthy Facebook back-and-forth, it was decided that “Chirpy’s” best chance for survival entailed a trip to Waynesboro’s Wildlife Center of Virginia, where, said Amanda Nicholson, the center’s director of outreach, any kind of injured native wildlife critter is welcome.

“We treat a variety of wild animals here—hawks, owls, eagles, squirrels, opossums, turtles, snakes,” she said, but cautioned that if you find a large injured animal, such as a bear or bobcat, call the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.

As Lithwick discovered, when a “patient” is admitted to the center, it’s taken to a dark, quiet waiting room and given time to calm down. When the animal’s stress level is in check, one of the center’s veterinarians examines it.

Since its founding in 1982, the Wildlife Center has treated more than 65,000 wild animals, and the lessons learned from those cases have been shared with about 1.5 million children and adults through open houses and Critter Cams (wildlifecenter.org/critter-corner/critter-cam-landing). “On any given day, you may see a bear, eagle, owl, hawk or falcon,” she said. Questions about Critter Cam animals are answered in regular moderated discussions, and teachers can schedule interactive classroom Q&A sessions. The Wildlife Center also hosts off- and on-site educational programs.

According to Lithwick, her 11-year-old son left the center feeling heroic. He’d saved Chirpy’s life.

“It was such an educational thing for him to know that he had agency in the world, that there are things you can do, and if you ask for help, somebody who knows what to do will help you,” she said.

For more information about the Center, visit wildlifecenter.org.

Categories
Magazines Village

Exploring the great outdoors: A guide to survival for snowy winter days

As every parent knows, a bored child is a menace to herself and others. Lacking positive ways of focusing her attention, my toddler, for example, will use her own body in experiments designed to discover if there are any loopholes in the laws of gravity. Keeping children entertained during the winter months presents special challenges, especially when the weather obliges us to stay indoors. Granted, winters in Central Virginia are generally relatively mild, but relative warmth doesn’t necessarily make going outdoors more appealing: While 30 degrees and snow is a perfect opportunity to get outside with the kids, 40 degrees and rain is a miserable thing to try to manage with children (no matter what people from the greater Seattle area may say).

Last winter, I resolved to come up with a list of inside things to do out of the home. I expected slim pickings, but quickly discovered that Charlottesville has so many great, publicly available, free or low-cost things to do that even the most restless child could never get to them all in the course of a single childhood.

Starting with the free things, the Jefferson-Madison Regional Library (comprising eight library locations from downtown Charlottesville to Albemarle, Greene, Louisa, and Nelson counties), offers a truly impressive variety of free ongoing and one-time classes, events, and activities for kids ranging in age from infants to teens. Some of JMRL’s offerings are open to drop-in attendance, but most require prior registration (and many of those fill up quickly) so check for details about JMRL’s offerings on its website (jmrl.org/pr-kids.htm) or by picking up a program guide from any of the locations.

Of particular note are the storytime programs for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers, and book clubs for tweens and teens. My daughter was especially fond of “Mother Goose Time” at Gordon Avenue Library. Glynis Welte did a wonderful job making well-known children’s stories interactive by combining stories, songs, movement, and play time to keep the infants and toddlers fully engaged.

Other highlights from JMRL’s schedule include the monthly Family Movie Matinee, Lego Mania, a “Nutcracker Suite” meet and greet with the Charlottesville Ballet, occasional dance parties for 2- to 5-year-olds, various craft programs, and special programs when school is out (including snow day matinees!).

The Virginia Discovery Museum (vadm.org) sponsors “Kid-vention” (February 22), a free annual event designed to “celebrate science” through a variety of interactive displays. Admission to the VDM itself is $6 per person. The museum, catering to kids from ages 1 to 10, has a lot of exhibits, many of which my daughter found mesmerizing. The VDM is fun for parents, too. The only drawback is that it’s not open on Sundays.

The Charlottesville Department of Parks & Recreation also offers an incredible number and variety of activities for kids from ages 0 to 17—everything from aerobics to zumba. Most classes and activities require prior registration and charge a small fee (albeit higher for non-city residents). Check the Parks & Rec website for details (charlottesville.org/parksandrec).

For sheer physical activity for toddlers and preschoolers, there is the “Parent and Me Playgroup,” which is for kids up to age 5 and meets three times a week. My daughter loved the tumbling class we enrolled her in last winter (so much so that we took the same class twice), so I was pleased to discover that Parks & Rec offers tumbling classes for specific age groups through age 8. Parks & Rec has sessions in specific age groups (starting at age 2 or 3 and running through age 17) in basketball, soccer, swimming, tennis, skating, self-defense, and dance (including separate classes in ballet and zumba). Roller skating at Carver Recreation Center is free (!) on Fridays and Sundays.

For kids who prefer to get their ya yas out in less physical ways, the options include art classes available to kids as young as 1, photography classes (starting at age 7), crafts (starting at age 3), separate guitar and drumming classes (open to kids from age 10), yoga (starting at age 3), Spanish language classes (starting at age 6), and cooking classes (starting at age 9).

See stars at McCormick Observatory's free public night, on the first and third Friday of each month. Photo: Jack Looney
See stars at McCormick Observatory’s free public night, on the first and third Friday of each month. Photo: Jack Looney

Conducting an informal poll of local parents, I came up with even more suggestions for free or low-cost activities not covered by the library, Parks & Rec, or the Discovery Museum. A lot of parents recommend taking younger kids to the indoor play areas at Fashion Square Mall, C’ville Coffee, and Barnes & Noble. Older kids might be interested in “Public Night” at UVA’s McCormick Observatory. It’s free and happens on the first and third Friday nights of each month. Check the website for details (astro.virginia.edu/public_outreach/schedule.php). Finally, Bounce-N-Play (bouncenplayofcville.com) offers an incredible play area for everything from crawling to laser tag and a lounge area for parents. Cost of admission is $10 for each child over 2 years old, but free for adults.

With all the resources Charlottesville has, the problem isn’t finding something to do when the weather is bad—it’s choosing among all the great options.