Categories
Arts Culture

Golden games

This year continues to be anything but typical, and yet the march to the 93rd annual Academy Awards ceremony, moved to April 25, feels familiar. While far fewer films played in theaters over the past 12 months, we still have many cinematic achievements to celebrate, and a must-see movie list is a welcome distraction from the doldrums of late winter.

This time around, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences selected eight films for best-picture consideration. In the 1930s and ’40s, eight to 12 films were nominated for what was then called the outstanding film of the year. The most nominations was in 1934 with 12 choices in a year that saw the release of It Happened One Night, Cleopatra, The Thin Man, and Imitation of Life. The possible nominees list was honed down to five in 1944, and it stayed that way for 65 years.

In 2009, the Oscars’ governing body increased the number of possible best-picture nominations from five to 10. That begs the question: Why aren’t 10 films nominated each year?

While sweeping historical films are always considered best picture Oscar fodder, this year the smaller personal dramas have a strong showing. Two of these, The Father and Nomadland, share a few similarities—a minimal number of speaking parts, and each film takes on aging in different ways.

The Father portrays a man coping with dementia, and both lead actor Anthony Hopkins and supporting actress Olivia Colman are nominated for their performances in the unsettling film. Frances McDormand is nominated for her starring role in Nomadland. In terms of setting and atmosphere, the films could not be more different. The Father is claustrophobic by design, and Nomadland is without walls, literally.

A third film with nominations for leading actress and best picture is Promising Young Woman. This one takes an unflinching look at misogyny and rape culture, but with a Lisa Frank color palette, and wit so sharp it could cut a man. It is a scathing disassembly of the good guy trope, and easily the most controversial film among the nominations. Director Emerald Fennell is also up for an award, making her and Nomadland director Chloé Zhao only the sixth and seventh women to be put forward as best director in the history of the Academy Awards.

Judas and the Black Messiah and The Trial of the Chicago 7 are historical dramas, and both stories, set in late 1960s Chicago, capture the palpable tension of the time. While Trial features an ensemble cast of men portraying the true events during the trial for anti-Vietnam War activists during the 1968 Democratic National Convention, Judas follows the betrayal of Black Panthers leader Fred Hampton.

Sound of Metal is a crushing film starring Riz Ahmed as a punk-metal drummer who suddenly loses his hearing. Incredible performances and immersive sound design help bring the audience closer to the drummer’s struggles. Supporting actor Paul Raci was also nominated, and is considered to be the odds-on favorite.

Though not intended as a palate cleanser, Minari sort of functions as one in this field. The charming film about a young Korean family in pursuit of the American dream is not without traumas—the family struggles with just about everything, but their perseverance and the film’s gorgeous cinematography combine to instill hope.

Perhaps the most classically “Oscar” film on this year’s list is David Fincher’s Mank. Not only does it star previous Oscar winner Gary Oldman, the movie itself is about the making of the Oscar-winning Citizen Kane. Oldman is Herman J. Mankiewicz, the screenwriter for Kane, who struggles with meeting his deadline, pleasing Orson Welles, and combatting alcoholism. It may be a self-indulgent exercise to make a movie about making a movie, but this is a brilliant film that gives us insight into the politics of Tinseltown and its players during the golden age of cinema.

The Academy Awards are, of course, self-indulgent, self-congratulatory, and navel-gazing. But, for better or worse, the awards determine who in Hollywood gets money, power, and attention for their next project. Art and film can nudge national and global cultural trends, putting award winners in a position to guide that conversation, and it’s in this role that the Academy Awards are not purely frivolous.

Categories
Arts Culture

Great loss

Capturing mental degeneration on screen is no easy task. Last year’s Relic did an excellent job of depicting the crushing effects of dementia on a family but, like so many films, it shied away from the interior life of the person suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. The Father takes a much closer look at both the patient and his family, and the result is a poignant, gut-punching film.

Rehashing the plot points of The Father would not only be a confusing and futile exercise, but it would do a disservice to the process of watching the film. Nothing in the movie is certain, even when naming which actor plays which character and where the film takes place. Everything should be viewed with a simmering layer of skepticism and distrust. Everything, that is, except the father himself, Anthony (Anthony Hopkins).

The Father, however, is not merely about a solitary man. His daughter, Anne (Olivia Colman), is Anthony’s primary caretaker—and she’s at her wits’ end. Her dad is still charming and can keep himself busy, but he also manages to scare away his nurse when he accuses her of stealing his watch. The watch was easily recovered, but it’s not the first time Anthony has harassed a caregiver to the point of resignation.

Though Anne is the first character on screen, and we see her do her best to stay strong during heartbreaking moments, the film’s genius comes from how the audience connects with Hopkins’ character.

Early in The Father, we notice that Anthony is not well. Beyond the argument over the missing watch and the mistreatment of his aide, he and Anne discuss plans for the future, and his struggle with memory loss is evident. He appears cogent and can remember his daughters, but details and placing them in either the present or the past is a challenge for him. He wavers between frail, friendly, and furious as he processes the near-constant barrage of contradictory information and mixed signals from his loved ones.

Brilliant editing and compassionate writing allow us to follow Anthony’s timeline: One moment he is making a cup of tea and then suddenly Anne returns to his flat with the groceries he has already put away. His son-in-law Paul (Rufus Sewell) is sitting in his living room, and the next thing Anthony knows, Anne is telling her dad she met someone and is moving away. It makes him question the solidity of his mind, but he continues to go with the flow. Tinkering with timelines, spatial awareness, and relationships puts us in Anthony’s shoes and gives us a glimpse into what it might feel like to begin to lose our grasp on reality.

Hopkins handles the role of the father with agonizing accuracy. He thinks on his feet to hide his confusion, and he sways from charming to hysterical without losing our empathy. His affection and stubbornness are endearing and concerning. Coleman is one of the best actresses working today, and pairing her with Hopkins is one of the best things about the movie.

Not many films rise to the task of telling such a difficult tale with as much poise as The Father. It is not easy to watch, though. It is emotionally draining, and its trajectory is tragically unavoidable, but it deserves our attention and admiration.