Categories
News

Pipeline parallels? Eminent domain: the movie

One of the least popular Supreme Court decisions this century would have to be Kelo v. New London, a case that resulted in 45 states, including Virginia, passing laws or, in the Old Dominion’s case, constitutional amendments to prevent the seizing of private property to benefit other private owners under the guise of economic development.

The story of Susette Kelo’s struggle to keep her home in New London, Connecticut, is documented in the film Little Pink House, starring Catherine Keener and Jeanne Tripplehorn.

Doug Hornig. Courtesy subject

Afton writer Doug Hornig sees a parallel with the controversial Atlantic Coast Pipeline and its use of eminent domain to cut a swath through private property.

“I think there’s a lot of interest,” says Hornig, who will screen Little Pink House June 28 at Regal Stonefield and follow the movie with a brief panel discussion.

In Kelo’s case, New London decided to scoop up her modest waterfront home, pitting Kelo and her blue-collar neighbors against Big Pharma. The theory was that if Pfizer redeveloped the seized properties, it would promote economic development and generate increased tax revenues, thus contributing to the public good. The Supreme Court backed that thinking with a 5-4 decision on June 23, 2005.

In actuality, Pfizer merged and moved, closing its New London facility and axing 1,000 jobs. Today the waterfront property is vacant, generating no tax revenue.

In 2012, Virginia passed a constitutional amendment that declared eminent domain for economic development was not a public use, and Delegate Rob Bell led the effort to enshrine property protection into the state constitution.

Courtney Balaker wrote and directed Little Pink House, and she says she and her husband, producer Ted Balaker, are using a hybrid distribution model. The film had a limited release in five cities April 20, and through the website Tugg, people who are interested in screening it can bring it to their local theater.

That’s what Hornig did. He made a request for a screening and Regal okayed it if he sold 90 tickets.

Hornig met that minimum and was upgraded to a larger theater, which he hopes to sell out before the screening. And he’ll have 25 minutes for a panel discussion that includes Jeff Redfern from the Institute for Justice, which represented Kelo; Chuck Lollar, a Virginia Beach attorney representing several of the people fighting the Atlantic Coast Pipeline; Richard Averitt, a Nelson County entrepreneur whose business is threatened by the ACP; and Joyce Burton, a Friends of Nelson board member.

Robert McNamera is an attorney with the Institute for Justice, and he says Kelo and the Atlantic Coast Pipeline are “really different” eminent domain cases, but “there’s always a parallel” when people’s property is being taken away “unlawfully.”

If anything, the pipeline condemnations are “crazier,” says McNamera, because before property owners can adjudicate the condemnations, they must first ask the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to reconsider its granting of certificates to Dominion Energy.     

Categories
News

City lawyer: Condemnation of Water Street Garage has begun

How many lawyers does it take to schedule a hearing? Well, if it has anything to do with the highly contentious battle between the city and Mark Brown’s Charlottesville Parking Center, that would be five attorneys in Charlottesville Circuit Court today to set a date for CPC’s petition for the appointment of an emergency receiver. During the hearing, the city’s lawyer from Richmond, Tom Wolf, told the judge the city had begun the condemnation process of the Water Street Parking Garage.

“We’re moving forward with the condemnation,” said Wolf outside the courthouse. That process involves getting an appraisal, making an offer and filing suit—not to be confused with the suit against CPC the city has already filed.

A June 22 hearing on the emergency receivership had been canceled, and CPC filed a motion claiming the city’s counsel falsely said that change of date was mutually agreeable to all parties. Judge Rick Moore said he was concerned with the representation that rescheduling was okay with everyone. “I don’t want that to happen,” he said.

Wolf blamed an assistant for the error.

The parking center’s attorney, Will Prince, said he was not required to give notice to all parties because of the emergency situation, with CPC’s management agreement to run the Water Street Garage expiring June 30. At that point, management of the garage reverts to the deadlocked Water Street Parking Garage Condominium Association, with its board evenly split between the city and CPC.

“It’s not an emergency,” said Wolf, who said the garage was an ongoing business and the city objected to appointing a stranger to run it.

“It’s not going anywhere,” observed Moore. He said that he wanted to hear from all parties to make an informed decision.

Ty Grisham represents the deadlocked condo association. “We’re in an untenable situation,” he said “It’s difficult for the association to have a position. We urge the court to consider all the concerns about timing.” He noted that the condo association board has to approve a management company. “Because of the stalemate, that’s not going to happen,” he said.

Prince said he had a problem with Wolf’s characterization of CPC “walking off the job,” and said the city had threatened to sue if CPC tried to close the garage. “CPC wants the garage to stay open,” he said.

Brown was not in court, but new CPC general manager Dave Norris was. Earlier today he called the city’s plan to take the parking garage “an egregious abuse of eminent domain power.”

For more on parking garage battle, read this week’s story, “Escalation Clause: City threatens eminent domain of Water Street Garage.”

cpc response to rescheduling 6-14-16

 

Categories
News

Escalation clause: City threatens eminent domain of Water Street Garage

In this week’s episode of Charlottesville v. Mark Brown over the Water Street Parking Garage, the city makes an offer to buy Brown’s shares of the garage. If he declines, it plans to initiate eminent domain proceedings, according to the city’s outside attorney.

“For months Mark Brown has been trying to bully the City into giving him control of the Water Street Parking Garage,” says Tom Wolf with LeClairRyan in Richmond in an e-mail. “He has even threatened to close down the garage, which he has no power or authority to do. Mr. Brown’s first lawsuit was meritless and this new one is a transparent attempt at further bullying. The City is not intimidated by Mr. Brown’s threats.”

Wolf calls the Water Street Garage “a public necessity,” confirmed by the recent public outcry demanding accessible, affordable parking in the city’s core. Downtown business owners have circulated petitions asking the city to not sell its spaces to Brown. 

On June 8, the city offered to buy spaces from Charlottesville Parking Center, which is owned by Brown, at the same price per space that CPC offered the city earlier this year. “According to CPC that price is above fair market value,” says Wolf. “If CPC refuses, the City will initiate the statutory procedure to make it possible to acquire CPC’s spaces through eminent domain.”

And that’s in a state that passed a constitutional amendment in 2012 prohibiting eminent domain for private enterprise, job creation, increased tax revenue or economic development.

Delegate Rob Bell wrote the constitutional amendment, and he says the key is that the use of a condemned property has to be public. He declines to weigh in on the city/Brown contretemps, but also notes that just compensation would have to be paid, including lost profits.

“The condemnor has the burden of proving it’s a public use,” he says. “Whether that’s a good use, the voters will decide. Ultimately it’s going to be settled by the court.”

“It’s unprecedented,” says CPC general manager and former mayor Dave Norris. “It’s a very extreme step that only escalates the current situation. Eminent domain is not designed to resolve a pricing dispute.”

The city’s move, says Norris, “creates a frightening precedent for any business wanting to do business downtown. If the city doesn’t see eye to eye on pricing or management, they’ll threaten to seize your property.”

While the two increasingly acrimonious sides had indicated they were going to attempt to settle their respective lawsuits, that conciliatory tone seemed to fall apart when council voted June 6 to make an offer to buy Brown’s spaces in the garage without his knowledge. Brown followed up the next day with a petition for an emergency receivership.

The petition cites the deadlock on the board of the Water Street Parking Garage Condominium Association, whose seats are evenly split between the city and Brown’s Charlottesville Parking Center. Because of a dispute over parking rates, the association has not approved a budget. CPC’s contract to manage the garage expires June 30, and a receiver is needed, says the petition, “to make necessary decisions related to the future operation” of the garage.

Those decisions include making a budget and approving rates. With the current deadlock, claims the petition, the condo association can’t negotiate with CPC to run the garage or hire a new managing agent. And CPC fears the deadlock will keep the association from maintaining appropriate insurance on the garage.

“A receiver is a fiduciary position like a trustee or guardian,” says legal expert David Heilberg. The receiver reports to the court about the assets and property for an entity, he says.

“Obviously Brown must feel like his hands are tied because the city won’t settle,” says Heilberg. “The receiver will sort it out until this is resolved. He’s saying, ‘I don’t want the responsibility of handling a disputed property.’”

And Brown wants $450-an-hour attorney Brian Jackson, a partner at white-shoe firm McGuireWoods, to be the receiver, with the help of $100-an-hour legal assistants.

“That’s pretty pricey,” says Heilberg.

But the city’s attorney, Wolf, is known to be pretty pricey himself. Wolf declines to reveal the rate he’s charging the city because, he says, he doesn’t want his other clients to know how steep a discount he’s offering.

“I agreed to a large discount in my hourly rate because my fees will be paid with taxpayer money and because I love litigating against bullies,” says Wolf.

He points out that all good trial lawyers with decades of experience are expensive and he knows for a fact there are many lawyers in Virginia whose normal hourly rate is significantly higher than his.

Brown declined to comment on the eminent domain threat. The emergency receivership petition was scheduled to be heard in court June 22. Another hearing on that scheduling will take place at 4:30pm today.

Says Heilberg, “It sounds like a mess.”

“The city has taken a situation that was messy and made it messier,” says Norris. “My sincere hope is that sanity prevails.”

Timeline of contention

August 12, 2014: Mark Brown buys Charlottesville Parking Center for $13.8 million.

October 15, 2015: CPC proposes new rates of $145 a month, $180 for reserved spaces and $2.50 an hour at the Water Street Garage.

October 28, 2015: The city counters with $125 and $140 for reserved spaces and an hourly rate of $2.

February 2, 2016: The city declines CPC’s offer to lease parking center spaces to the city, says it will consider a fair offer to sell its 629 spaces to CPC.

February 17: The city refuses CPC’s offer to pay $6,792 per space—nearly $4.3 million.

March 14: Brown sues the city, alleging he’s being forced to run the Water Street Garage at below market rate and below what the city-owned Market Street Garage charges.

March 28: Brown announces he’s hired former mayor Dave Norris to be general manager of Charlottesville Parking Center.

April 4: Chris Engel, Charlottesville director of economic development, sends a letter to Brown questioning Norris’ qualifications to run the parking garage.

April 6: Brown notifies the Water Street Parking Garage Condo Association that it’s in default of its agreement with CPC by not having a 2016 budget and gives the city 30 days to come up with one. Fears that the garage will close May 6 begin to foment.

April 28: Brown writes the city, urging them to work things out. brown letter to City Council 4-28-16

April 29: Charlottesville countersues CPC, claiming the city didn’t get its right of first refusal for Wells Fargo’s parking spaces that the bank sold to CPC. city counterclaim 4-29-16

May 25: Violet Crown hires PR firm Payne Ross, calls for petition urging city to hold onto its shares in the Water Street Garage.

June 6: City Council passes resolution authorizing the purchase of CPC’s spaces in the garage.

June 7: Brown petitions for an emergency receivership.

June 8: City offers to buy out CPC for the same price Brown offered to buy the city’s shares.

June 10: The lawyer representing Charlottesville says the city will use eminent domain if Brown doesn’t sell.

Updated 11:33pm June 15 with Dave Norris comments.

Categories
News

Signer fed up with ‘eyesore’ called the Landmark

City Council candidate Mike Signer stood before the skeletal Landmark Hotel, an unwelcome landmark on the Downtown Mall since 2009, and quoted the graffiti scrawled on its boarded up side: “We’re fed up.” And he promised to explore all legal actions for resolving the situation, including eminent domain.

Flanked by fellow Dem candidates Kathy Galvin and Wes Bellamy, Signer denounced the structure owned by Atlanta developer John Dewberry as an “eyesore,” and said, “The status quo is unacceptable. Having a derelict, dangerous and ugly abandoned building looming in the heart of our major commercial and civic area sector impacts our community’s quality of life and is an embarrassing symbol of inaction in the city.”

Dewberry did not return a call for comment. The Waynesboro-born former football star bought the Landmark for $6.25 million in 2012 after CNET founder Halsey Minor’s plans for a luxury hotel derailed. Dewberry said he would begin work on what will become the Hotel Dewberry when he finished the development of a Hurricane Floyd-damaged federal post office building he bought in downtown Charleston in 2008.  Work on that project began last November, according to the Post and Courier in Charleston.

Signer has run out of patience with Dewberry’s timetable, and says the developer “has already broken several deadlines and promises” and there has been “silence” on the Dewberry front. “That’s unacceptable,” said the candidate, who added that citizen complaints about the would-be hotel are a frequent refrain on the campaign trail.

He proposes a six-point project resolution framework to avoid such messes in the future and outlines its application to the Landmark. That would include working with Dewberry Capital, assessing the state of the exposed infrastructure and whether it’s even buildable at this point, exploring all practical and legal options, and within a year, executing a plan that either completes the hotel or uses the property for something else.

In the past, the city has accepted Dewberry’s timetable for completion of the mall property, contingent on finishing the Charleston hotel, a “vague” scenario, said Signer. “I think the consideration of legal action is part of the plan.” Even eminent domain? Said Signer, “That’s one of the tools I want to examine.”